What to expect from Alan Jackson in Karen Read's second trial
The prosecution in Read's second trial rested on Thursday, handing the case over to the defense team made up of Jackson, David Yannetti, Bob Alessi and Elizabeth Little.
Who is Alan Jackson?
Jackson is a criminal defense attorney from the law firm Werksman Jackson & Quinn. A biography on the firm's website describes Jackson as "one of the country's most sought-after criminal defense attorneys."
According to the firm, Jackson has tried more than 85 cases to a jury verdict, and has a 96% success rate.
Jackson was the lead prosecutor for the Los Angeles Count District Attorney's office during the case against music producer Phil Spector, who was convicted of killing actress Lana Clarkson.
"His client list reads like a who's who of Hollywood celebrities, NBA stars, billionaire CEOs, and foreign dignitaries—all turning to him for 'must-win' cases," Jackson's biography reads.
Karen Read's lawyer Alan Jackson
Prosecutors accuse Read of hitting and killing her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O'Keefe, with her SUV after a night of drinking and leaving him to die in the snow. When Read was first arrested, her only attorney was Yannetti.
In the recently released HBO documentary "A Body in the Snow: The Trial of Karen Read," Yannetti, Read and Jackson discussed how the defense team expanded. Yannetti said it became clear the case was going to require a lot of work.
Read said in the documentary that she called the Harvard Law School Criminal Justice Institute. A professor told her to look into actor Kevin Spacey's case on Nantucket, where he was accused of groping an 18-year-old.
Jackson represented Spacey, and the felony charge of indecent assault and battery was eventually dropped. Read said she looked into the case, and that was how she learned about Jackson's work.
"I got an email and the subject line of the email with something along the lines of 'Murder of a Boston Cop.' I took one look at the autopsy photos of John O'Keefe, and I saw his arm, and I said, 'Are you kidding me? He was hit by a car?'" Jackson recounted in the documentary. Read's attorneys have argued that injuries to O'Keefe's arm were caused by a dog during the alleged fight.
With Jackson added to Read's defense team, the case began to garner national attention.
Karen Read and attorney Alan Jackson look at the empty jury box while listening to Judge Cannone during Read's murder trial in Norfolk Superior Court in Dedham, Mass., Wednesday, May 21, 2025.
Greg Derr/The Patriot Ledger via AP, Pool
What to expect from Alan Jackson
WBZ-TV legal analyst Katherine Loftus noted that compared to Read's first trial, Jackson took a bit of a back seat during the prosecution's case in the retrial.
Alessi, not Jackson, cross-examined several key witnesses. That included the medical examiner and several forensic experts.
Loftus said she believes that will change during the defense's case, which Read told reporters will take 1.5 to 2 weeks compared to just two days the first time.
"I think [Alan Jackson] is probably going to take the majority of the defense case," Loftus said. "They really have two potential ways they can go. We might know right off the bat as soon as we see who the first witness is whether they are going to go with what they did trial No. 1, which was this framing, third party, point the fingers. Or if they're really going to focus on the police, Michael Proctor, conflict of interest, substandard, you can't find her guilty."
Karen Read trial
Jackson and Read's legal team have not been allowed to speak publicly about the case since March 7. That's when Cannone approved a gag order in the case, applying to all attorneys from both sides.
As a result, Read has served as a de facto spokesperson throughout her second trial. Regularly when court ends for the day, Read speaks to reporters while leaving Norfolk Superior Court in Dedham with her legal team.
Inside the courtroom, Jackson has had several fiery exchanges with witnesses.
In Read's first trial, Jackson had contentious exchanges with Brian Albert, Brian Higgins, Colin Albert, and Jennifer McCabe. Read's defense has argued these are some of the people at the center of an alleged attempt to frame Read for O'Keefe's death.
Jackson has also clashed with Judge Beverly Cannone on several occasions since joining the case. During a March 2025 hearing ahead of Read's second trial, Cannone accused Jackson of making "repeated misrepresentations to the court."
The judge met with Read and her attorneys privately during the hearing. Cannone decided not to revoke Jackson's credential to practice in Massachusetts, which he is required to have because he is an out-of-state lawyer.
After that hearing, WBZ-TV's Kristina Rex asked Read outside court how she felt about her attorneys staying on the case.
"Amazing. Amazing," Read said. "There's no other attorneys I'd rather have than my attorneys."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
22 minutes ago
- Washington Post
China summons Nvidia over backdoor security concerns with AI chips
China's cyberspace regulator said Thursday that it had summoned representatives of U.S. tech giant Nvidia to explain alleged security vulnerability risks involving its highly sought-after H20 artificial intelligence chips. This comes barely two weeks after the Trump administration suddenly reversed its ban and allowed the Silicon Valley company to resume exports of the chips to China, part of broader de-escalation ahead of trade talks.
New York Times
22 minutes ago
- New York Times
China Summons Nvidia Over ‘Backdoor Security' Risks of A.I. Chips
China's internet regulator, the Cyberspace Administration of China, announced on Thursday that it had summoned Nvidia to explain security risks associated with one of its artificial intelligence chips developed for the Chinese market. The regulator said it had requested that Nvidia explain 'backdoor security risks associated with its H20 computing chips sold to China and submit relevant supporting documentation,' citing information it said had been revealed by 'U.S. artificial intelligence experts' that the company's chips could be shut down remotely or used to track a user's location. The H20 has been at the center of the increasingly heated contest between the United States and China for primacy over artificial intelligence. Earlier this month, Nvidia's chief executive, Jensen Huang, persuaded the Trump administration to lift an earlier ban on sales of the chip to China, in a remarkable reversal of a yearslong effort by officials in Washington to slow Beijing's technological and military progress. Mr. Huang met in recent weeks with senior officials in both Washington and Beijing, where he repeated his argument that American technology companies must do business in China to stay competitive. Former top officials in the administration of President Joseph R. Biden Jr. have warned that allowing Nvidia to sell the chips in China could set Chinese companies up to gain an irreversible dominance over artificial intelligence. The H20 is not Nvidia's most powerful chip, but it is coveted by Chinese companies for use in artificial intelligence systems. The reversal comes at a crucial time when Chinese A.I. companies are working to improve their technology and catch up to American rivals. China accounted for $17 billion of Nvidia's revenue during its last fiscal year, according to the advisory firm Bernstein Research, and Mr. Huang has previously said that the company expected to sell billions of dollars of chips in China this year. In Beijing earlier this month, Mr. Huang declined to estimate exactly how many H20 chips would now be sold in China. Nvidia did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Siyi Zhao contributed research from Beijing.
New York Times
22 minutes ago
- New York Times
The Philanthropy Fighting Trump's Budget Cuts Without Blaming Trump
Every year, the New York City philanthropy Robin Hood tries to outdo itself with a party so good that New York's rich and famous will be moved to open their wallets and collectively give tens of millions of dollars to combat poverty in the city. The charity pulled in nearly $69 million last year at its annual gala, which is billed as one of the largest one-night fund-raisers on the planet. This year, the stakes were dramatically higher. Enormous federal budget cuts to social service programs threatened to plunge hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers into poverty, and Robin Hood's leaders hoped to persuade partygoers to dig deeper than ever in response to the emergency. At the same time, they knew they had to avoid making an overtly political pitch — blaming President Trump or the Republicans in Congress — or risk alienating their conservative donors and wealthiest benefactors, virtually all of whom would benefit from the tax cuts that were also included in the president's signature budget-cutting bill. It was a high-wire act that has eluded many other institutions in the Trump era. For Robin Hood, according to interviews with 20 board members and supporters, grantees and staff members, the moment was a critical test in a moment of entrenched polarization. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
