Delay to EU's 2040 climate goals ‘a mistake', Ribera answers Macron
It would be a mistake for the European Commission to follow French President Emmanuel Macron's advice and slam the brakes on its proposals for 2040 climate targets, the Commission's Executive Vice-President Teresa Ribera told Euronews' Europe Today show on Friday morning.
Ribera, responsible for the EU's green transition portfolio, is slated to present the 2040 targets after next Wednesday's meeting of the college of commissioners.
The French president raised his opposition to the EU executive's tabling of the proposal next week in an unusual intervention at the leaders' level during the EU Council summit in Brussels on Thursday.
After the summit he told reporters that the EU should take more time to come to an agreement on the new targets because "we want to make this climate ambition compatible with European competitiveness".
"I believe in the possibility of a Europe that reconciles an ambitious climate agenda with respect for the commitments of the Paris Agreement and that preserves its competitiveness. All that requires is technological neutrality, the ability to invest and consistency in trade policy,' Macron said.
Targets are essential to economic and social welfare, says Ribera
"The 2040 targets can't be a technical debate that takes just a few weeks. It has to be a democratic debate at 27 (member states). And I say this because I love Europe. And I say it because, in two years' time, I'll no longer be in charge of my country. But I would be unwise to leave my successor a situation that had been debated outside the framework of the 27," he added.
'I think it could be a mistake,' Ribera told Europe Today, asked by presenter Meabh McMahon whether she was prepared to accede to Macron and delay the proposal.
'This year is the 10th anniversary of the Paris agreement, and we want to identify how we can keep on going in something we that we think is quite essential for the economic and social welfare of Europeans and worldwide,' Ribera said.
'We have already identified that we want to be a fully decarbonised economy by 2050, we have targets for 2030, we need some clear orientation around 2040, and the reduction of 90% is a clear goal,' the Spanish commissioner said.
'Then how we can combine the different pieces, the eventual flexibilities is the thing to be discussed, but we are working hard and we will table our proposal in the coming days.'
The EU is committed to net-zero by 2050, after bringing its carbon emissions to 55% below 1990 levels by the end of this decade. The missing element is the 2040 target, which the EU executive was originally supposed to table last year, but which has been subject to delay.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
39 minutes ago
- Euronews
Why did Fico veto the new EU sanctions on Russia? Money is key
A new veto has landed in Brussels. Robert Fico, Slovakia's prime minister, confirmed on Thursday that he would continue to vote down the next package of sanctions that the European Union wants to impose on Russia in response to the full-scale invasion of Ukraine. With sanctions subject to unanimity rules, Fico's decision makes it impossible to approve the proposal, which is considered ready to go after diplomats spent the last day polishing the technical details in anticipation of a formal endorsement. Interestingly, Fico's opposition has nothing to do with the sanctions themselves. It relates to an entirely different matter: the so-called REPowerEU roadmap. The roadmap envisions a phase-out of all imports of Russian fossil fuels, including pipeline gas and liquefied natural gas (LNG), by the end of 2027. The European Commission unveiled the roadmap in May and presented the draft legislation in June, based on gradual bans on short-term and long-term gas contracts. "Russia has repeatedly attempted to blackmail us by weaponising its energy supplies," said Ursula von der Leyen, the Commission president. "We have taken clear steps to turn off the tap and end the era of Russian fossil fuels in Europe for good." As a landlocked country with entrenched ties to Russian fuels, Slovakia immediately – and vociferously – protested the phase-out, warning it would raise prices and endanger competitiveness. Hungary, which is in a similar situation, joined the resistance. A hot point of contention has been the Commission's strategy to frame the proposal as trade and energy policy, meaning it will only need a qualified majority to pass through. Until now, the executive had chosen sanctions, a foreign policy tool, as the go-to option to remove imports of Russian fuels, such as coal and oil. Hungary and Slovakia were exempted from the permanent ban on Russian crude oil. As sanctions on gas remain elusive due to long-standing disagreements among capitals, the Commission took matters into its own hands and envisioned a creative workaround to ensure the prohibition on Russian gas eventually sees the light of day. The trick infuriated Slovakia, which resorted to vetoing the 18th package of sanctions as a last-ditch effort to extract the concessions that it would otherwise not get. The colour of money Fico confirmed his veto after holding a bilateral meeting with von der Leyen on the sidelines of an EU summit in Brussels. In the days leading up to the summit, officials in the Commission had sounded optimistic that a compromise of sorts would be reached and the 18th package of sanctions would sail away before the end of the month. But then, the Slovak put his foot down. In a video message posted on his Facebook account in the middle of the summit, Fico aired an extensive list of grievances and reservations regarding the phase-out, indicating he was open to a deal with von der Leyen but at a higher-than-expected price. "It's unfortunate that we are heading down this road, as this is clearly an ideological proposal," he said. "This will harm us, unless an agreement is reached with the European Commission that would compensate us for all the damage this proposal might cause." The leader name-checked five issues that he wants to address and, ideally, resolve: "Therefore, this issue must be resolved first," Fico said at the end of the video. "Let's define the solution, and only then can we discuss further sanctions packages. If our proposal to postpone the vote is not accommodated, the Slovak ambassador will receive a clear instruction to veto the adoption of the 18th sanctions package." Fico noted he would engage in "constructive negotiations", with a "special mission" led by the Commission scheduled to travel to Slovakia next week. It is far from clear how von der Leyen's team would manage to accommodate his needs, which appear to be worth billions in euros. The bloc's multi-annual budget is strained and has limited space to cope with unforeseen circumstances or, in this case, demands. The proposed phase-out does not feature a dedicated envelope of EU funds. Von der Leyen did not address the thorny subject in her press conference at the end of the summit, and the Commission did not immediately reply to a request for comment. Officials had previously insisted the phase-out would not produce a steep rise in consumer prices because the bloc's transition away from Russian fuels is already well underway, with greater diversification from Norway, the US, Algeria, Qatar, Azerbaijan and the UK, as well as faster deployment of homegrown green energy. "We can, indeed, make sure that this transition will happen in a way that it does not lead to an increase in prices and certainly not to a situation of supply issues for these countries," Dan Jørgensen, the European Commissioner for Energy, said in June. Jørgensen also stressed that the bans foreseen under the phase-out would be solid enough to declare force majeure – that is, events or circumstances that go beyond the control of the signatories – and protect clients against eye-popping damages. "We've deliberately formulated this legislation and used the legal basis which makes it a prohibition and thereby a force majeure situation for the companies in question," he said. "That means they are not legally liable. It's not them that's breaking up a contract." The reasoning has not entirely convinced experts, who argue traditional foreign-policy sanctions are the most bulletproof method to defy lawsuits in court.
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
European countries issue travel warnings for banned Budapest Pride
Following the news that the government-banned Budapest Pride march is still to take place, several European countries have issued travel warnings for their citizens planning to attend the event in the Hungarian capital on Saturday. The government of Prime Minister Viktor Orbán earlier prohibited the event, citing child protection as the reason. However, the organisers have not backed down and now expect tens of thousands of people from across the continent to attend the event in the Hungarian capital. Many European countries have warned their citizens that they may face fines and additional risks if they attend the Budapest Pride event. The UK government website noted that the event remains illegal under Hungarian law, stating that participants could be identified using facial recognition technology and fined. "With policing arrangements for an illegal Pride march unclear and counter demonstrations planned, there is a heightened risk to participants' safety," the statement says. Hungarian authorities said earlier that anyone participating could face a fine of up to €500. The Dutch Foreign Ministry also warned travellers of the possibility of being fined. Belgium also issued a warning, highlighting that the demonstration was prohibited and anyone joining could face fines. "It remains unclear under what circumstances the Pride March will take place," the statement said, adding that participation in a demonstration is the responsibility of each individual. "We advise any participants to exercise the necessary vigilance and to keep up to date with the current situation through the media and social media of the embassy in Budapest. 'Everyone should decide what they want' The Belgian government has issued a further warning to its citizens about potential counter-demonstrations. The far-right Our Homeland party has called for its supporters to occupy bridges in central Budapest to prevent the Pride event from taking place. Furthermore, the party has already been issued a police permit to gather and use the same route that the Pride is supposed to march along. The announced far-right gathering has raised concerns over possible violence, according to authorities. "In particular, in the interest of their safety, any participants are advised to keep their distance from possible counter-demonstrations and, in the event of disturbances, to follow the guidelines of the local police," the statement of the Belgian foreign ministry said. France also issued a statement informing people that Hungary had banned the march, and participants would be monitored by smart cameras and face fines of €500. Orbán hinted that police would not disperse the crowd, but participants would face legal consequences. "We are adults, and I think everyone should decide what they want, keep to the rules, or if they don't, they should face the legal consequences," Orbán said. At least 70 MEPs from various political groups, along with European Commissioner for Equality Hadja Lhabib, will participate in the Pride event. On Thursday, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen called on Orbán to lift the ban on the Pride march.
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Ombudswoman asks EU institutions for more transparency amid complaints
The new European Ombudswoman has called on EU institutions to take a more proactive approach to improving transparency, following a rise in complaints about the issue. Teresa Anjinho, who began her mandate in February at the body responsible for holding the bloc's institutions and agencies to account, told Euronews that change was needed. "More can be done, especially at the European Commission, because there are successive delays in the delivery of documents," Anjinho said. "Access to information, which is often delayed, is then denied." According to the Ombudswoman's latest annual report, the bloc's lack of transparency is the biggest concern for EU citizens. "You can see that we had one of the biggest increases in complaints in the area of transparency. 42.2% of complaints are in the area of transparency, essentially access to documents," Anjinho explained. Anjinho stressed that she stood with citizens in her role as the head of the Ombudswoman's Office. "We are not mere administrative watchdogs. We are and must be a guardian of European citizenship and the citizen's right to participate," she said. Anjinho also noted that "the Ombudswoman's Office is an independent institution that acts as a bridge between citizens and the institutions; we are in the middle and what we serve is good European administration". "Any institution, be it (European) Parliament, the Commission or the Council, if it understands this, will always realise that it has an ally in the Ombudswoman's Office in terms of good administration. The fact that we criticise does not have to harm institutional relations," she added. Under her predecessor, the Ombudswoman's Office was involved in complaints against European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen regarding messages at the heart of the so-called "Pfizergate" scandal, linked to the purchase of vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic. Anjinho is now launching her own inquiry into the issue of "revolving doors". It will examine whether former public officials who transition into lobbying or private sector roles may benefit from their previous positions, potentially creating a conflict of interest between public service and private gain.
