
Ex-Defence Secretary Ben Wallace says he's NOT sorry for injunction blocking reporting of airlifts of 18,500 Afghans to Britain after data leak blunder
The Tory former defence secretary said his 'first priority was to protect all those that might be at risk' from retribution by the Taliban after a huge military data leak.
Sir Ben said he 'made no apology' for ordering officials to apply for the injunction in August 2023 - although he stressed it was envisaged as lasting for four months and he did not know why it was later upgraded to a super-injunction.
Meanwhile, current Defence Secretary John Healey said the Labour government waited a year to drop the draconian measure because it needed to 'get on top of the risks'.
After 23 months of being gagged, the Daily Mail has revealed how the projected £7billion cost was signed off while taxpayers and MPs were kept in the dark.
But the revelation sparked another secrecy row last night as Mr Healey's emergency explanation to Parliament appeared at odds with facts heard at secret High Court hearings over the last two years.
The covert airlift of thousands of Afghans – codenamed Operation Rubific – was launched after the UK military catastrophically lost a database of details of those who had applied for sanctuary in the UK to flee the murderous Taliban.
It put 100,000 'at risk of death', in the Government's own words. It also exposed British officials whose details were on the list.
After the Mail was the first newspaper in the world to discover the data breach, in August 2023, the Ministry of Defence mounted a cover-up and successfully hushed up our exclusive.
They obtained a super-injunction and ever since then, cloaked by the unprecedented news blackout, ministers have been clandestinely running one of the biggest peacetime evacuation missions in modern British history to rescue people the UK had imperilled – smuggling thousands out of Afghanistan and flying them to Britain at vast cost, with taxpayers being neither asked nor informed.
Every few weeks, unmarked government charter planes are landing at airports including Stansted and RAF Brize Norton packed with hundreds of Afghans, who are processed before being whisked off to a new life.
So far 18,500 Afghans whose data was breached have been flown to Britain or are on their way in taxpayer-funded jets. A total of 23,900 are earmarked for arrival.
They are living in MoD homes or hotels until permanent accommodation is found. More than 70,000 others will be left behind in Afghanistan and will have to fend for themselves after the Government yesterday shut the scheme.
Incredibly, hundreds of the Afghans rescued by the Government are now poised to sue the UK for leaking their data in the first place – potentially adding a further £1 billion in compensation to the colossal costs of the rescue and rehousing mission.
Last October, ministers signed off the £7 billion project which 'will mean relocating 25,000 Afghans [and] extend the scheme for another five years at a cost of c.£7bn', the secret court hearings were told. The £7billion figure was used repeatedly throughout the case.
Yesterday, however, as the injunction was lifted, Mr Healey told the Commons the costs were actually only £400 million to £850 million, not £7 billion, while claiming the numbers rescued because of the data breach would hit 6,900.
The Afghan migrants have been landing at Stansted around once a fortnight and are bussed from a private hanger
An MoD official last night said there was a distinction between Afghans coming because their data was leaked and those on the list coming here anyway via other relocation schemes.
Speaking on BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Sir Ben said: 'When we applied in August 2023, when I was secretary of state, we didn't apply for superinjunction. We applied for a four-month injunction, a normal injunction.'
He said he was not in court in September 2023 when the injunction was converted into a superinjunction, so does not know why it was converted.
He defended his initial application, adding: 'But nevertheless, I think the point here is I took a decision that the most important priority was to protect those people who could have been or were exposed by this data leak in Afghanistan, living amongst the Taliban who had no regard for their safety, or indeed potentially could torture them or murder them.
'That was my priority.'
Writing in the Telegraph, Sir Ben said that when he was informed of the 'error' he was 'determined that the first priority was to protect all those that might be at risk'.
'I make no apology for applying to the court for an injunction at the time. It was not, as some are childishly trying to claim, a cover-up,' he said.
'I took the view that if this leak was reported at the time, the existence of the list would put in peril those we needed to help out.
'Some may disagree but imagine if the Taliban had been alerted to the existence of this list. I would dread to think what would have happened.'
Challenged why the reporting restrictions were not lifted earlier, Mr Healey told Sky News: 'Because we came into government a year ago and we had to sort out a situation which we'd not had access to dealing with before.
'So that meant getting on top of the risks, the intelligence assessments, the policy complexities, the court papers and the range of Afghan relocation schemes the previous government had put in place.
'And it also meant taking decisions that no one takes lightly because lives may be at stake.
'And in the end, we were able to do this because I commissioned an independent review, which I published yesterday as well from Paul Rimmer that took a fresh look at the circumstances in Afghanistan now, four years on from the Taliban taking control, and the important thing it said was that it is highly unlikely that being a name on this dataset that was lost three-and-a-half years ago increases the risk of being targeted.'
As politicians try to quell a wave of anger, it can revealed:
Mr Justice Chamberlain, the judge who heard the case, queried the billions being spent saying: 'I'm starting to doubt myself... am I going bonkers?' And he questioned the MoD's demand for secrecy by saying: 'This is a resettlement programme for immigrants to the UK';
Amid a housing crisis, one in ten of the new arrivals is expected to 'enter the homelessness system';
An incredible 20 per cent of all MoD property has been given over to housing Afghans;
Ministers were privately warned areas with Afghan arrivals were 'hotspots' for last summer's riots;
The MoD warned of 'the risk of public disorder' after the super-injunction was lifted.
Adnan Malik from Barings Law, a Manchester firm that already has 1,000 clients ready to sue the Government, said: 'Since the super-injunction was lifted, we have heard conflicting information from the UK Government which goes against facts which were previously heard in court.
'We urge the Ministry of Defence to be clear and transparent with the public about the extent of this fiasco.'
Last night there was also a political storm brewing as the chairman of the Commons defence committee, Labour MP Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi, said he was 'minded to recommend' an investigation, telling the Commons the 'whole data breach situation is a mess and is wholly unacceptable'.
Yesterday Mr Justice Chamberlain ruled: 'There is no tenable basis for the continuation of the super-injunction.'
But the Mail and other media were hit with a second injunction brought by the MoD – this time to ban sensitive details from the database itself from being published.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
14 minutes ago
- The Independent
Labour split as Sadiq Khan threatens to take government to court over Heathrow expansion
Sir Sadiq Khan has threatened legal action against the government over its controversial plans to allow a third runway at Heathrow. The London mayor doubled down on his opposition to the plans, warning that it will have a 'severe impact' in terms of noise and air pollution and leave Britain's climate targets in jeopardy. Sir Sadiq said he will ' carefully scrutinise ' Heathrow 's expansion plans and the impact they will have on Londoners. And, raising the prospect he could sue Sir Keir Starmer 's government, the London mayor said: 'I'll be keeping all options on the table in how we respond.' He added: 'I remain opposed to a new runway at Heathrow Airport because of the severe impact it will have in terms of noise, air pollution and meeting our climate change targets. I remain unconvinced that you can have a new runway at Heathrow, delivering hundreds of thousands of additional flights every year, without a hugely detrimental impact on our environment.' Sir Sadiq also warned of a 'huge knock-on effect' on London's transport infrastructure if a third runway goes ahead, warning that plans would need to be implemented to manage the impact. Rachel Reeves has already said a challenge to the expansion plans, part of her and Sir Keir's push to get the economy growing, would fail. The defiant chancellor said she has 'huge respect' for Sir Sadiq, who is one of the most influential figures in the Labour Party, but she said she disagrees with the London mayor and is confident the third runway will go ahead. Sir Sadiq's fresh opposition to the runway plans came as transport secretary Heidi Alexander welcomed Heathrow's proposals for its development. Ms Alexander said: 'I am pleased to have received the initial Heathrow expansion proposals - a significant step towards unlocking growth, creating jobs, and delivering vital national infrastructure.' She said the government will consider the proposals over the summer before a final decision on whether to give it the go-ahead. After months of flatlining growth since Labour came to power, Ms Reeves in January unveiled the plans for a third runway at Heathrow to boost the economy. She said pro-growth measures must trump other priorities such as the green agenda. But the plans have also sparked opposition from Andy Burnham, another senior Labour mayor. The Greater Manchester mayor has warned the third runway will concentrate economic growth in London. Energy secretary Ed Miliband has long opposed a third runway, while Sir Keir himself has previously voted against the airport's expansion. Britain's second-busiest airport, London Gatwick, has also been given a conditional go-ahead for its expansion plans as part of the government's push for growth. It intends to increase traffic on what is already Europe's busiest runway, and reconfigure the standby runway for routine use by departing aircraft.


The Sun
14 minutes ago
- The Sun
Fury as number of foreign sex offenders & violent criminals jailed in England and Wales hits record high
THE NUMBER of foreign sex and violent offenders locked up in England and Wales has soared to record highs, damning new data reveals. Official figures show 1,731 foreign-national sex offenders were in prison in June - up nearly 10 per cent in a year and almost three times the rate of British offenders. 2 Violent foreign inmates hit 3,250 - the highest since records began - with an 8.8 per cent annual rise, nearly double the 4.8 per cent for UK nationals. Shadow Justice Secretary Robert Jenrick said: 'Instead of releasing criminals early to free up prison space, the Government must deport every single one of these foreign offenders. "They need to be kicked out of the country immediately. Starmer must suspend visas and aid until countries take back their nationals.' Albanians remain the largest foreign nationality in UK prisons, with 1,193 behind bars - many for drug offences. Poles Romanians and Irish make up the next biggest groups, followed by Lithuanians and Jamaicans. Foreign nationals now account for more than one in 10 sex offenders and violent criminals in custody, and one in five drug offenders. The new figures, published by the Ministry of Justice, follow months of pressure for greater transparency on the nationality of offenders. Some of the protests at asylum hotels have been sparked by alleged sex attacks by migrants. The Sun also recently revealed that four in ten people charged over sex attacks in London in the last seven years were foreign nationals. Police figures showed these migrants were behind 2,809 of the 7,798 alleged crimes recorded in the capital since 2018 - despite making up less than a quarter of the city's population. Manchester Police Raids smash down doors in early morning raids on postal drug dealers 2


The Sun
14 minutes ago
- The Sun
Britain must follow New Zealand and ditch war on oil and gas, demand top Tories and Reform UK
BRITAIN must follow New Zealand's lead and ditch the war on oil and gas, top Tories and Reform UK demanded last night. Kiwi ministers have this week torn up their 2018 drilling ban - imposed by ex-PM Jacinda Ardern - blaming it for soaring energy bills and growing blackout risks. 3 3 Climate and energy minister Simon Watts told Parliament: "In times where renewable production decreases, it is clear that we need contingency options to ensure that Kiwis are not left footing a bigger bill, and to ensure that we have sufficient supply.' The move has reignited calls in the UK to scrap Labour's own plans to block new North Sea licenses - with warnings it will cost jobs, raise taxes and wreck energy security. It comes as official figures revealed UK gas imports surged by 20 per cent between January and March 0 just as North Sea output plunged by 6.9 per cent. The fall marks the first signs that Labour's ban on new drilling is beginning to bite - forcing Britain to rely more heavily on foreign gas from Norway, Qatar and the US, often with higher emissions and higher costs. Shadow Energy Secretary Claire Coutinho said: " Ed Miliband should learn from New Zealand. His plans to shut down the North Sea are economic insanity. "All it will mean is that we pay to import gas from abroad with higher emissions when it could have been drilled in Britain." Reform UK's Net Zero is a mega destroyer of jobs and industries. "Red Ed Miliband should take the hint but sadly his tin ear is full of eco zealots." New Zealand's U-turn comes days after US President Donald Trump has called for a "drill, baby, drill" approach to North Sea oil saying it's a 'treasure chest' for the UK. Leaked docs exposing true cost of Net Zero 'proves what we all knew all along', MPs blast 3