WASPI women clear 'significant hurdle' in bid for court review over pensions
The Women Against State Pension Inequality (WASPI) campaign group have announced a significant step forward in their fight for a High Court challenge. WASPI is pushing for a judicial review to compel the UK Government to rethink its decision to dismiss a compensation package for women impacted by the way changes to the State Pension age were communicated.
On Friday, the campaigners revealed they've been informed their case is arguable, paving the way for a court hearing. A prior report from the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) suggested that compensation between £1,000 and £2,950 could be suitable for each affected individual.
However, in December 2024, the UK Government stated that while it accepted the Ombudsman's finding of maladministration and apologised for the delay in contacting women born in the 1950s, a blanket compensation scheme, potentially costing taxpayers up to £10.5 billion, cannot be justified.
In February, WASPI campaigners put forth arguments for a legal case challenging the decision not to compensate women, reports the Daily Record.
The campaigners' lawyers argue that the UK Government's reasons for deciding that people should not receive any remedy violate legal principles. WASPI also anticipates a hearing to consider its application for a costs capping order, ensuring campaigners wouldn't be burdened with unknown costs to cover legal fees if they lose.
Nevertheless, the organisation has warned it may need to withdraw its legal challenge if it lacks this monetary safety net and is appealing for more donations to support the fight. WASPI's chairwoman Angela Madden hailed the go-ahead in their legal battle as a "landmark moment in our campaign".
Speaking out, she remarked: "We are grateful for the funds raised so far and understand the country's purse strings are tight, but the Government cannot be allowed to brush this injustice aside."
Declining to give a detailed opinion due to ongoing proceedings, a spokesperson for the Department for Work and Pensions stated to PA news agency: "We do not comment on live litigation. We have apologised for there being a 28-month delay in writing to 1950s-born women."
They continued to outline the department's stance: "However, we do not agree with the Ombudsman's approach to injustice or remedy and that is why we have decided not to pay compensation."
This week, WASPI has been proactive by introducing a fresh interactive tool that reveals the level of MP support across the country for a compensation scheme aimed at helping around 3.6 million women impacted by the shift in their state pension age.
Recent data uncovers that 179 MPs have openly criticised the UK Government's refusal to compensate the WASPI women in the past few months. Of these, WASPI points out that 56 Labour MPs have vocally condemned Number 10 for failing to address this injustice, with a considerable number more believed to be silently supportive, including several high-profile ministers.
The map reveals a near-unanimous backing from smaller parties, with a robust coalition of Liberal Democrat, Reform UK, SNP, Green, Plaid Cymru and DUP MPs rallying behind the call to compensate WASPI women. Minor parties are almost entirely in agreement, with a formidable alliance of Liberal Democrat, Reform UK, SNP, Green, Plaid Cymru and DUP MPs endorsing the plea for WASPI women's compensation.
Approximately a dozen Tory MPs have also recently reiterated their support for compensation. These revelations coincide with the launch of WASPI's revamped website, which now includes resources to help supporters pen letters to their MPs and join the campaign for a modest annual fee of £15.
Among the most fervent advocates for WASPI women are members of the State Pension Inequality for Women APPG, led by Labour MP Rebecca Long-Bailey. This cross-party group of MPs, one of the largest in Parliament, comprises representatives from all major political parties who have pledged to persist in their quest for justice.
However, according to WASPI campaigners, 134 MPs who previously supported calls for compensation have not reaffirmed their stance following the Labour Government's announcement in December.
The data does not account for serving government ministers or whips, at least 80 of whom have previously expressed their support for the campaign. The stances of all MPs on compensation can be found on WASPI's interactive 'state of the nation' map, along with new campaign resources, here.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
9 hours ago
- Daily Record
State Pension uprating will not be paid to nearly half a million older people
Around 453,000 older people will not get new State Pension payments during the 2026/27 financial year. The latest figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) indicate that the annual State Pension uprating is on track to be determined by earnings growth, which is currently at 5 per cent (excluding bonuses) while the latest Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation rate is at 3.6 per cent. Under the Triple Lock, State Pensions increase each year in-line with whichever is the highest of average annual earnings growth from May to July, CPI in the year to September or 2.5 per cent. However, while millions of pensioners across Great Britain - including over one million living in Scotland - can look forward to the payment rise in April next year, nearly half a million people over State Pension age will not be due the increase. An estimated 453,000 pensioners are living in a country which does not have a reciprocal agreement with the UK Government resulting in them not receiving the annual State Pension uprating. This is despite having paid the necessary amount of National Insurance Contributions to receive the state Pension. Despite fierce campaigning by the 'End Frozen Pensions' campaign - which includes an online petition signed by thousands of supporters, a visit to Parliament by 100-year-old Second World War veteran Anne Puckridge, and persistent pleas to the UK Government to review the policy - many expats are receiving a significantly smaller State Pension than those resident in Scotland, England, Wales or Northern Ireland. Campaigners had hoped the appointment of former Governor of the Bank of England, Mark Carney, as Canadian prime minister, would open a dialogue with the UK Government about the issue which affects over 100,000 expats resident in Canada. The State Pension is frozen at the point of emigration for people mostly living in Commonwealth countries such as Canada and Australia. Retirees living in the USA or EU countries are eligible for the same considerations related to their State Pension had they remained in the UK. Many of the affected pensioners (49%) are receiving £65 per week or less with an estimated 86 per cent of all expats not being told their State Pension would be frozen. Campaigners say that some pensioners are receiving as little as £20.00 a week. You can find out more information about the End Frozen Pensions Campaign on their website. The New and Basic State Pension increased by 4.7 per cent in April, which means someone on the full New State Pension currently receives £230.25 per week, or £921 every four-week pay period. Those on the full Basic State Pension receive £176.45 each week, or £705.80 every four-week pay period. State Pension uprating predictions for 2026/27 The Triple Lock is currently on track to be determined by the earnings growth element - currently at 5 per cent (excluding bonuses) and 4.6 per cent (including bonuses). However, this figure may go up or down and isn't the final metric that will determine the level of uprating. The earnings growth figure that will be included in the Triple Lock guarantee will be published by the ONS on September 16. The CPI figure that will be used is due to be published in mid-October. The annual State Pension uprating won't be confirmed until the Autumn Budget, but pensioners - and those due to retire next year - can start to plan their finances by following the Triple Lock measurements. That being said, a 5 per cent increase on the current State Pension would see people receive the following amounts. Full New State Pension Weekly: £241.75 Four-weekly pay period: £967 Annual amount: £12,571 Full Basic State Pension Weekly: £185.25 Four-weekly pay period: £741 Annual amount: £9,633 The annual uprating won't be confirmed until the Autumn Budget, but pensioners - and those due to retire next year - can start to plan their finances by following the Triple Lock measurements.
Reuters
10 hours ago
- Reuters
Britain cancels extra border checks for animals ahead of UK-EU deal
LONDON, Aug 18 (Reuters) - Britain is suspending the previously planned introduction of extra border checks on live animal imports from the European Union to ease trade ahead of the implementation of a deal agreed in May to reduce friction, the UK government said on Monday. Extra border checks on some animal and plant goods imported from Ireland will also be suspended. May's sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) deal, part of a wider reset in UK-EU relations, will reduce paperwork and remove routine border checks on plant and animal products moving between the UK and EU, while maintaining high food standards. However, the deal is yet to be implemented as details are still being negotiated. In the meantime, British traders must continue to comply with the terms of the UK's Border Target Operating Model (BTOM) that protect the country's biosecurity, including existing checks. The suspension of the introduction of additional border checks follows the announcement in June that checks on EU fruit and vegetable imports had been scrapped. A spokesperson for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs could not give a timeline for implementation of the SPS deal. When Britain left the EU's single market in 2021, the EU immediately enforced its rules, leading to port delays and prompting some British exporters to stop selling to the bloc. Britain was much slower implementing its post-Brexit border arrangements, and after repeated delays and confusion it started to set new rules in phases from January last year.
The National
a day ago
- The National
Rachel Reeves failed to raise Grangemouth with refinery owner
In a response to an FOI submitted by the SNP, UK Government officials admitted that the Chancellor met with the Grangemouth chief in the same month Scotland's only oil refinery stopped processing crude oil but she did not raise the imminent closure. The UK Government response stated: 'We have identified that a meeting did take place in April 2025 at which the Chancellor and Sir Jim Ratcliffe were present. We can also confirm that the threatened closure of the Grangemouth refinery was not discussed at that meeting". Owner Petroineos announced last year the refinery would be turning into an import terminal, leaving Scotland without its own refinery and posing one of the first major tests of both the UK and Scottish governments in their push for a just transition away from oil and gas. READ MORE: Almost 2000 pubs across the UK stop selling BrewDog beer Repeated attempts to halt the closure ultimately failed, with the loss of around 100 jobs, though plans for future use of the site have been put in motion as both governments seek external investment. The Labour Government went on to ensure the future of the Prax oil refinery in England in June. Given the readily nationalised Scunthorpe Steel, the £100bn spend on English nuclear power plants and the saved refinery in Lincolnshire, the SNP have said this secret meeting 'tells Scots all they need to know about Westminster and where Scotland lies in its priorities.' SNP energy spokesperson, Graham Leadbitter MP said: 'This is a damning revelation. Scots will be disgusted to learn that just days before the Grangemouth doors slammed shut Rachel Reeves held a meeting with the owner, Sir Jim Ratcliffe [below], yet didn't even bother to mention the refinery in her meeting. 'The UK Government only conceded the information after significant pressure which speaks volumes about how desperate they were to keep this under wraps. That's because the truth is that never mind being an afterthought, the fact the Labour Government didn't even think it worthwhile to bring up such a critical issue to Scottish jobs shows Scotland doesn't even register as a thought at all. 'A steel plant in Scunthorpe was nationalised, a refinery in Lincolnshire was bailed out and £100bn is found for English nuclear power plants, yet when it came to a Scottish refinery the UK Labour Government didn't lift a finger to keep it in operation – that tells Scots all they need to know about Westminster and where Scotland lies in its priorities. 'It is this disregard for Scottish industry that leaves a growing number of Scots to wonder just how long we stay tied to this so-called Union of Equals because only with Independence can we prioritise Scottish jobs, Scottish growth and Scotland's people.' READ MORE: For Women Scotland launches legal action against Scottish ministers on gender policy The SNP also accused the UK Government of trying "to evade giving detail of the meeting," with the original request submitted in June. "Your request to extend the deadline until 11th of September 2025 would exceed this by a substantial margin, reaching a potential maximum of 64 working days from the date the initial request was received," the SNP Westminster team stated. They added: "Please be advised that I will now be raising this with the Information Commissioner".
