Hegseth champions special operations as the force for today's threats
TAMPA, Fla. – The secretary of defense championed special operations forces as a key leader in the Pentagon's priorities of maintaining high standards and meeting threats with asymmetric tools.
'Special Operations have never been more important in our country,' Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said at the annual Global SOF Foundation Special Operations Force Week in Tampa.
Hegseth noted that over the past three years SOF-specific missions have risen by 200%. And over the past six months, SOF units have killed 500 enemy combatants and captured another 600 in operations throughout the globe, Hegseth said.
That increase was coupled with a 35% surge in deterrence support that has been requested of SOF units and Special Operations Command.
SOCOM must improve high-risk training oversight, report says
The head of that command, Gen. Bryan Fenton, echoed his boss' comments, stressing the asymmetrical nature of what the force does.
'We're the scalpel, but if the time comes we can bring the hammer,' Fenton said. 'We're tailor-made for this era ... where asymmetry matters more than it ever has.'
Those advantages will wither, however, without the right technology — part of the pitch for this conference connecting industry entities with special operations planners.
'We can't and we won't fight today's opponents at yesterday's pace,' Hegseth said.
That means rapid adaptation and evolving capabilities.
The defense secretary called rapid fielding, innovation and feedback critical for SOF success.
Fenton noted that adversaries such as Russia, China, Iran, North Korea and terrorist organizations are 'fusing' their efforts to work collaboratively.
The four-star said that with the increase in missions also comes more challenges as an ever-growing portion of the areas in which they operate are contested by adversary systems.
Fenton pointed to Sonic Spear, an exercise conducted in April that merged communications, virtual constructions and live training. The exercise tested SOCOM's ability to host and synchronize all the way from the seabed to low-Earth orbit.
Experts analyzed how SOCOM contributes to the joint force's ability to sense and strike targets across various spectrums.
'Sonic Spear 25 is our first go at this,' Lt. Gen. Francis Donovan, SOCOM vice commander, told Defense Scoop at a National Defense Industrial Association event in February. 'Let's push our autonomous investments, some other investments we're making. ... What do our forward forces need to be able to control ourselves, control our robots and then link in with the joint force?'
The aim now is to create an O-6 level multidomain special operation task force. The Army has created similar units known as Multi-Domain Task Forces, two for the Pacific theater and one designated for Europe.
Real world scenarios, meanwhile, are showing the need for change.
'If we've learned anything from our partners in Ukraine, you innovate in minutes, days and weeks, not years and decades,' Fenton said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘Lesser-known D-Day' strikes as Pentagon purges transgender patriots serving in the U.S. military
Friday marked a grim milestone for transgender service members across the armed forces: the deadline set by the Pentagon to either resign or face involuntary separation under a Trump administration policy that legal advocates say is discriminatory, unjustified, and a profound betrayal of those who serve. Keep up with the latest in + news and politics. Under a May 15 directive, military commanders were ordered to review medical records for any diagnosis, history, or symptoms 'consistent with gender dysphoria.' Those identified and not granted a rare, nearly unobtainable high-level waiver, which requires the denial of one's identity, are being kicked out from service. The result: a systemwide purge that LGBTQ+ advocates call discriminatory, degrading, and dangerous to military readiness. Related: Meet the transgender Army lieutenant who is challenging Donald Trump's military banRelated: This trans Air Force recruit wants to jump out of planes to save others. He's suing Trump to serveRelated: Transgender Army officer Erica Vandal was born into military service. Now, she's suing Trump to stay in 'There's nothing voluntary about forced separation,' said Jennifer Levi, senior director of transgender and queer rights at GLAD Law, which represents transgender plaintiffs suing the administration over the ban in Talbott v. United States. 'Honorable and committed transgender servicemembers are being coerced into choreographing their own dismissal under a presidential edict that maligns their character with falsehoods — characterizations the government itself admitted in court are untrue. These are decorated veterans who served for decades, and forcing them out simply for being transgender is a shameful betrayal of American values.' The policy took effect after the U.S. Supreme Court lifted an injunction in a separate case, Shilling v. United States, the lead lawsuit challenging the ban. Commander Emily Shilling, a Navy pilot, aerospace engineer, and the first out transgender aviator cleared for tactical jet operations, is the lead plaintiff in that case out of Washington state. Speaking at the Equality PAC Pride Gala just days before the implementation of forced separation, Shilling made her position clear. 'The case was originally Shilling v. Trump, and now it's Shilling v. United States. I want to make it very clear: I am not against the United States. I serve because I love this country — even when the courts get it wrong,' she said. Related: Federal judge dismantles Trump's trans military ban in explosive hearing 'This ban does not make us stronger,' Shilling continued. 'It tells service members that their identity matters more than their performance, their sacrifice, or even their oath.' The Pentagon's order has triggered a wave of quiet exits — and agonizing decisions. Some troops are retiring early to preserve benefits. Others are being separated involuntarily under codes usually reserved for misconduct. Major Erica Vandal, a plaintiff in Talbott v. United States, is among those now being forced out. She is a West Point graduate, a Bronze Star recipient, and a veteran of Afghanistan who served with distinction for 14 years. 'The military has invested millions of dollars in training thousands of transgender servicemembers,' said Shannon Minter, legal director at the National Center for Lesbian Rights, which also represents Talbott plaintiffs. 'Major Vandal and others are now being forced out through a humiliating process typically reserved for misconduct that will leave a stain on their records. This mistreatment… is needlessly cruel and a shocking betrayal of our commitment to all those who serve.' Related: Federal judge roasts Trump DOJ attorney over 'frankly ridiculous' claims in transgender military ban case Second Lieutenant Nicolas Talbott, the lead plaintiff, has told The Advocate that he had no intention of resigning. 'I do not have any plans to pursue voluntary separation,' he said in May. Navy Commander Blake Dremann, a submarine logistics officer and one of the first out transgender service members, marked the day with a somber reflection online. 'Today will be a lesser-known D-Day for many transgender service members,' he wrote in a lengthy post on the social media platform Threads. 'They must 'choose' to leave voluntarily or ride out involuntary separation. I have requested my regular retirement… It feels like giving up. It feels like I will be judged for it.' Dremann, who was set to deploy for the 12th time, called the ban's deployability rationale 'made up' and listed what he called the '7 Truths' of transgender service: they are in every branch and specialty; they lead, deploy, and train others; they are welcomed and trusted by their units; and they have families and communities who support them. 'We LOVE what we do AND we are damn good at it,' he wrote. 'If merit is what matters, my gender shouldn't.' Waivers under the policy must be approved by a Senate-confirmed official—a process that many legal advocates describe as opaque and functionally unattainable since it requires the military member not to express their gender identity. The Pentagon has cut transgender troops off from SkillBridge, a civilian career prep program, and reinstated its ban on gender-affirming care. While legal challenges persist, lawmakers are highlighting the policy's immediate harm. On Thursday, Sen. Tammy Duckworth of Illinois — a decorated Iraq War veteran and double amputee — led 22 Senate Democrats in a last-minute plea to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, urging him not to carry out what they called a 'foolhardy,' 'cruel,' and 'politically motivated' expulsion. Related: Combat vet Tammy Duckworth leads Democrats' final plea to stop Pentagon purge as trans military ban begins In a scathing letter obtained by The Advocate, Duckworth wrote that the policy 'punishes those who have volunteered to serve' and warned that it would 'harm our armed services' operational readiness and lethality.' The letter condemned the Pentagon's order to assign separation codes to transgender troops that suggest they pose a threat to national security. 'Using this discharge code is not only cruel,' it read. 'It's stupid.' For Dremann, who says he would continue serving if allowed, the impact is personal, but the fight is larger than one career. 'Our lives as service members are an example to many that need to see it to believe they can be us,' he wrote. Talbott, a reservist, said he has until July 7 to decide whether to fight separation or accept what the government calls 'voluntary' exit. 'I'm definitely feeling the weight of what this means for my thousands of fellow trans service members who are active duty and had to make their impossible decision by today,' Talbott told The Advocate on Friday. 'We are all burdened with the uncertainty of what's to come and major concerns about the widespread ramifications of the sudden dismissal of thousands of troops. I continue to find strength in the knowledge that this fight is not over, and I am confident that we will prevail in the end.' Another plaintiff, 24-year-old Air Force recruit Clayton McCallister, graduated from basic training at Lackland Air Force Base in Texas on Thursday after 7.5 weeks of grueling instruction. Despite graduating with the highest physical training scores in his dorm and receiving praise from superiors and peers alike, McCallister was told he would not be allowed to continue to technical school. 'Everybody that I worked with and worked for wants me to be in the Air Force—point blank,' McCallister said in a phone interview Friday. 'They said I was one of the best trainees they've had come through there. As far as my wingmen, they're mad about it just as much as I am.' Although McCallister technically remains on active duty, he has begun the process of separation, doing so under protest. 'It's not what I want,' he said. 'But with the uncertainty of the involuntary separation process, especially in a training environment, my wife and I just want some stability in this. With the end result likely being the same, I told them I want whatever is fastest to get the whole process over with.' He added that he's not eager to set his dreams and hard work aside, but that having been forced to decide his future, he's putting his family first and going with certainty, for now. McCallister, who trained for a career in special warfare and was preparing to enter pararescue—a highly selective field involving combat and medical rescue, said the decision to force out trans troops despite their qualifications sends a dangerous and demoralizing message. 'When I first came to training, I thought I had to prove that trans people could serve,' he said. 'But as I got deeper into it, I realized: we've already proven that, over and over. Thousands of trans service members have already done that.' McCallister said fellow trainees told him he had changed their minds about the ban. One airman who initially supported it told McCallister he now stands firmly against it after serving beside him. 'I may not have won the war,' McCallister said. 'But I won some battles here at BMT. I changed some opinions.' Now in legal limbo, McCallister is awaiting paperwork, medical evaluations, and the official processing of his discharge. He said the timeline is unclear, and his family remains in flux. 'We're just trying to find some stability again,' he said. 'It's stressful. But people here saw me for who I am. That means something.'
The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
Democrats unveil air safety bill after deadly crash
The Big Story Seven Democratic lawmakers unveiled legislation Thursday outlining updated air safety regulations after a deadly passenger plane collided with an Army helicopter in January. © Photo Credit The proposed bill would require the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to do safety reviews after commercial airline accidents while requiring companies to use advanced aircraft-tracking technology known as ADS-B. Democratic Sens. Maria Cantwell (Wash.), Tammy Duckworth (Ill.), Amy Klobuchar (Minn.), Raphael Warnock (Ga.), Tim Kaine (Va.), Mark Warner (Va.) and Ed Markey (Mass.) introduced the Safe Operation of Shared Airspace Act of 2025 'to strengthen aviation safety at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (DCA), airports across the nation, and the Federal Aviation Administration,' according to a press release. Both President Trump and Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy have called for major reform for airlines after several deadly plane crashes at the beginning of the year. Complications continued in early May, as two commercial passenger jets landing at National Airport last week needed to shift course because of an Army helicopter taking a 'scenic route' near the airport. Duffy, in part, said incidents occurred due to a dwindling air traffic control staff, outdated communication technology and a lack of clear guidance on military flights. However, lawmakers say Thursday's legislation will help close the gap in aviation regulations. 'The DCA tragedy claimed 67 lives and exposed critical gaps in aviation safety oversight—over 15,000 near-misses should have been a glaring warning sign,' Cantwell said in the release. 'This legislation closes dangerous loopholes that allowed aircraft to operate without essential safety technology, mandates modern surveillance systems that enhance pilot awareness of nearby aircraft, and ensures the FAA finally acts on the data instead of ignoring it.' Read the full report at Welcome to The Hill's Defense & National Security newsletter, I'm Ellen Mitchell — your guide to the latest developments at the Pentagon, on Capitol Hill and beyond. Did someone forward you this newsletter? Subscribe here. Essential Reads How policy will affect defense and national security now and in the future: Hegseth could be 'on the hook' for hundreds of millions on Qatari jet, says Raskin The top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee has warned Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth that he could be 'on the hook' for hundreds of millions of dollars for having accepted a luxury jet from the Qatari government. In a letter sent Wednesday, Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) argued that Hegseth's formal acceptance of the Boeing 747 jetliner last month — a move made so the Air Force can upgrade its security measures … Pentagon watchdog investigates if staffers were asked to delete Hegseth's Signal messages WASHINGTON (AP) — The Pentagon's watchdog is looking into whether any of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's aides were asked to delete Signal messages that may have shared sensitive military information with a reporter, according to two people familiar with the investigation and documents reviewed by The Associated Press. The inspector general's request focuses on how information about the March 15 airstrikes … Bannon: Musk should be 'deported from the country immediately' MAGA insider and former White House adviser Steve Bannon called on President Trump to investigate Elon Musk's immigration status and deport the South African tech billionaire after the bitter implosion of the president's relationship with Musk on Thursday. 'They should initiate a formal investigation of his immigration status because I am of the strong belief that he is an illegal alien, and he should be deported … US sanctions four International Criminal Court judges The U.S. on Thursday said it is sanctioning four International Criminal Court (ICC) judges via a part of a prior executive order President Trump issued in February. The four judges that the U.S. said it is sanctioning are Reine Alapini-Gansou, Luz del Carmen Ibáñez Carranza, Solomy Balungi Bossa and Beti Hohler, according to a fact sheet from State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce's office. 'We do not take this step lightly. … On Our Radar Upcoming things we're watching on our beat: In Other News Branch out with a different read from The Hill: DHS orders officers to focus on overstayed visas The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has ordered the staff of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) to focus on overstayed visas, according to a Wednesday press release from USCIS. Over the weekend, an attack … On Tap Monday Events in and around the defense world: What We're Reading News we've flagged from other outlets: Trending Today Two key stories on The Hill right now: Supreme Court hands DOGE big wins in Social Security, records cases The Supreme Court on Friday handed the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) two major victories in its expanding legal battle over drastic efforts … Read more 5 winners from the Trump-Musk breakup The vicious blowup between President Trump and Elon Musk has shaken up the power dynamics in Washington, D.C. As Musk burns his bridges to the White … Read more Opinions in The Hill Op-eds related to defense & national security submitted to The Hill: You're all caught up. See you next week!
Politico
3 hours ago
- Politico
Trump executive order takes steps to protect domestic hackers from blowback
The Trump administration announced Friday it is amending 'problematic elements' of two landmark cybersecurity executive orders — though the extent of the changes in many cases appears modest. The modifications are part of a new executive order signed Friday by President Donald Trump. The full text of the EO was released Friday afternoon, and the Trump administration first outlined details of the order in a White House fact sheet. The fact sheet says the new order takes aim at two previous EOs focused on cybersecurity — one signed by former President Joe Biden in January just before leaving office, and one by former President Barack Obama in 2015. The order outlines a potentially weighty change: the new EO would change the Obama-era order — which allows for sanctions on individuals behind cyberattacks on U.S. critical infrastructure — by limiting it 'only to foreign malicious actors' and clarifying 'that sanctions do not apply to election-related activities.' While the fact sheet on the EO points to limiting sanctions against those interfering in U.S. elections, the text does not mention this, clarifying that only 'foreign persons' can be targeted by sanctions for attacking critical infrastructure. It is unclear if foreign hackers engaging in efforts to undermine U.S. elections, such as Russia, could therefore be exempt from possible U.S. sanctions. Spokespersons for both the White House and the National Security Council did not immediately respond to requests for further comment on the executive order. One key element of the Biden executive order was creating a pathway for the federal government to issue more digital identity documents for public benefits, such as mobile driver's licenses. It also outlined various measures to help the state and federal governments put these processes into effect. The new order revoked this portion of the Biden document, with the fact sheet describing this effort as a 'mandate for U.S. government-issued digital IDs for illegal aliens that would have facilitated entitlement fraud and other abuse.' Some cybersecurity experts on Friday criticized the order as undermining the nation's cybersecurity. 'The fixation on revoking digital ID mandates is prioritizing questionable immigration benefits over proven cybersecurity benefits,' said Mark Montgomery, senior director of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies' Center on Cyber and Technology Innovation. The order includes several less controversial directives on artificial intelligence, quantum computing and secure software development. It directs the Pentagon, Homeland Security Department and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence to work with the White House on developing standards for tracking, mitigating, and responding to vulnerabilities in AI systems. It also directs the NSA and the OMB to issue new encryption requirements that federal agencies must meet by 2030, in preparation for the arrival of more quantum computers. The order puts a heavier burden on the Commerce Department and its National Institute of Standards and Technology than on other agencies in terms of requirements to oversee. NIST has been among the federal agencies to face workforce cuts in recent months. It directs NIST to establish a consortium with industry to develop guidance on the implementation of the agency's secure software development practices; to update its guidance on how to update and deploy fixes for security bugs; and produce a 'preliminary update' to its secure software development framework. Montgomery, the FDD expert, said that NIST will face 'challenges' in overseeing the new order due to the budget cuts. The fact sheet also says the new EO will 'refocus' government efforts on AI and cybersecurity toward 'identifying and managing vulnerabilities, rather than censorship.' It is unclear what censorship the language is referring to, though Republicans have criticized federal efforts to combat disinformation online related to election security.
