Switzerland Offers 'Immunity' To Putin If Chosen To Host Russia-Ukraine Peace Summit
The proposed peace summit would bring together Russian President Vladimir Putin, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, and US President Donald Trump.
Switzerland has officially expressed its interest in hosting the proposed trilateral meeting as part of the ongoing Russia-Ukraine peace talks. On Tuesday, Swiss Foreign Minister Ignazio Cassis released a statement confirming the country's willingness to serve as the summit's venue, while also guaranteeing 'immunity" to Russian President Vladimir Putin from the International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrant, reported Reuters.
The proposed peace summit would bring together Vladimir Putin, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, and US President Donald Trump. Although the date and location have not yet been finalised, multiple venues across Europe are being considered. According to reports, the US Secret Service is currently assessing security arrangements in Budapest, Hungary, making it one of the top contenders. However, Switzerland has now formally offered to host the meeting in Geneva.
'We have always signalled our willingness, but it naturally depends on the will of the major powers," said Cassis. The Swiss government has also addressed the legal implications surrounding President Putin's visit. The ICC issued arrest warrants against him in March 2023 over alleged war crimes committed during the ongoing conflict. Geneva has proposed to grant Putin immunity if he enters Swiss territory for the purpose of attending peace talks.
Budapest remains another potential venue. Hungary, having withdrawn from the ICC earlier this year, also offers a safe legal environment for Putin to attend the summit without fear of arrest. It is still unclear which location will ultimately be selected for the high-stakes meeting.
French President Emmanuel Macron has publicly endorsed Geneva as the venue, citing Switzerland's long-standing reputation as a neutral host for diplomatic negotiations. Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani also supported the idea, stating that Geneva 'could be the right venue."
As locations continue to be discussed, the Kremlin has not yet formally confirmed Putin's willingness to meet with Zelenskyy. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov stated on Tuesday, 'Any contacts involving top officials must be prepared with the utmost care."
However, according to several European Union representatives who were present at Monday's meeting at the White House, President Putin has agreed in principle to meet Zelenskyy within the next two weeks. While the exact date and venue remain undecided, the officials confirmed that Putin has accepted the proposal for a trilateral summit.
view comments
First Published:
August 20, 2025, 01:55 IST
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Loading comments...
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
22 minutes ago
- NDTV
Fact Check: Trump Says He Has Ended 7 Wars. The Reality Isn't So Clear Cut
President Donald Trump has projected himself as a peacemaker since returning to the White House in January, touting his efforts to end global conflicts. In meetings with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and other European leaders Monday, Trump repeated that he has been instrumental in stopping multiple wars but didn't specify which. "I've done six wars, I've ended six wars, Trump said in the Oval Office with Zelenskyy. He later added: "If you look at the six deals I settled this year, they were all at war. I didn't do any ceasefires." He raised that figure Tuesday, telling "Fox & Friends" that "we ended seven wars." But although Trump helped mediate relations among many of these nations, experts say his impact isn't as clear cut as he claims. Here's a closer look at the conflicts: Trump is credited with ending the 12-day war. Israel launched attacks on the heart of Iran's nuclear program and military leadership in June, saying it wanted to stop Iran from building a nuclear weapon — which Tehran has denied it was trying to do. Trump negotiated a ceasefire between Israel and Iran just after directing American warplanes to strike Iran's Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz nuclear sites. He publicly harangued both countries into maintaining the ceasefire. Evelyn Farkas, executive director of Arizona State University's McCain Institute, said Trump should get credit for ending the war. "There's always a chance it could flare up again if Iran restarts its nuclear weapons program, but nonetheless, they were engaged in a hot war with one another," she said. "And it didn't have any real end in sight before President Trump got involved and gave them an ultimatum." Lawrence Haas, a senior fellow for U.S. foreign policy at the American Foreign Policy Council who is an expert on Israel-Iran tensions, agreed the U.S. was instrumental in securing the ceasefire. But he characterized it as a "temporary respite" from the ongoing "day-to-day cold war" between the two foes that often involves flare-ups. This could be described as tensions at best, and peace efforts — which don't directly involve the U.S. — have stalled. The Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam on the Blue Nile River has caused friction between Ethiopia, Egypt and Sudan since the power-generating project was announced more than a decade ago. In July, Ethiopia declared the project complete, with an inauguration set for September. Egypt and Sudan oppose the dam. Although the vast majority of the water that flows down the Nile originates in Ethiopia, Egyptian agriculture relies on the river almost entirely. Sudan, meanwhile, fears flooding and wants to protect its own power-generating dams. During his first term, Trump tried to broker a deal between Ethiopia and Egypt but couldn't get them to agree. He suspended aid to Ethiopia over the dispute. In July, he posted on Truth Social that he helped the "fight over the massive dam (and) there is peace at least for now." However, the disagreement persists, and negotiations between Egypt, Ethiopia and Sudan have stalled. "It would be a gross overstatement to say that these countries are at war," said Haas. "I mean, they're just not." The April killing of tourists in Jammu and Kashmir pushed India and Pakistan closer to war than they had been in years, but a ceasefire was reached. Trump has claimed that the U.S. brokered the ceasefire, which he said came about in part because he offered trade concessions. Pakistan thanked Trump, recommending him for the Nobel Peace Prize. But India has denied Trump's claims, saying there was no conversation between the U.S. and India on trade in regards to the ceasefire. Although India has downplayed the Trump administration's role in the ceasefire, Haas and Farkas believe the U.S. deserves some credit for helping stop the fighting. "I think that President Trump played a constructive role from all accounts, but it may not have been decisive. And again, I'm not sure whether you would define that as a full-blown war," Farkas said. The White House lists the conflict between these countries as one Trump resolved, but there has been no threat of a war between the two neighbors during Trump's second term, nor any significant contribution from Trump this year to improve their relations. Kosovo is a former Serbian province that declared independence in 2008. Tensions have persisted ever since, but never to the point of war, mostly because NATO-led peacekeepers have been deployed in Kosovo, which has been recognized by more than 100 countries. During his first term, Trump negotiated a wide-ranging deal between Serbia and Kosovo, but much of what was agreed on was never carried out. Trump has played a key role in peace efforts between the African neighbors, but he's hardly alone and the conflict is far from over. Eastern Congo, rich in minerals, has been battered by fighting with more than 100 armed groups. The most potent is the M23 rebel group backed by neighboring Rwanda, which claims it is protecting its territorial interests and that some of those who participated in the 1994 Rwandan genocide fled to Congo and are working with the Congolese army. The Trump administration's efforts paid off in June, when the Congolese and Rwandan foreign ministers signed a peace deal at the White House. The M23, however, wasn't directly involved in the U.S.-facilitated negotiations and said it couldn't abide by the terms of an agreement that didn't involve it. The final step to peace was meant to be a separate Qatar-facilitated deal between Congo and M23 that would bring about a permanent ceasefire. But with the fighting still raging, Monday's deadline for the Qatar-led deal was missed and there have been no public signs of major talks between Congo and M23 on the final terms. Trump this month hosted the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan at the White House, where they signed a deal aimed at ending a decades-long conflict between the two nations. Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan called the signed document a "significant milestone," and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev hailed Trump for performing "a miracle." The two countries signed agreements intended to reopen key transportation routes and reaffirm Armenia's and Azerbaijan's commitment to signing a peace treaty. The treaty's text was initialed by the countries' foreign ministers at that meeting, which indicates preliminary approval. But the two countries have yet to sign and ratify the deal. Armenia and Azerbaijan have been locked in a bitter conflict over territory since the early 1990s, when ethnic Armenian forces took control of the Karabakh province, known internationally as Nagorno-Karabakh, and nearby territories. In 2020, Azerbaijan's military recaptured broad swaths of territory. Russia brokered a truce and deployed about 2,000 peacekeepers to the region. In September 2023, Azerbaijani forces launched a lightning blitz to retake remaining portions. The two countries have worked toward normalizing ties and signing a peace treaty ever since. Officials from Thailand and Cambodia credit Trump with pushing the Asian neighbors to agree to a ceasefire in this summer's brief border conflict. Cambodia and Thailand have clashed in the past over their shared border. The latest fighting began in July after a land mine explosion along the border wounded five Thai soldiers. Tensions had been growing since May, when a Cambodian soldier was killed in a confrontation that created a diplomatic rift and roiled Thai politics. Both countries agreed in late July to an unconditional ceasefire during a meeting in Malaysia. Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim pressed for the pact, but there was little headway until Trump intervened. Trump said on social media that he warned the Thai and Cambodian leaders that the U.S. would not move forward with trade agreements if the hostilities continued. Both countries faced economic difficulties and neither had reached tariff deals with the U.S., though most of their Southeast Asian neighbors had. According to Ken Lohatepanont, a political analyst and University of Michigan doctoral candidate, "President Trump's decision to condition a successful conclusion to these talks on a ceasefire likely played a significant role in ensuring that both sides came to the negotiating table when they did."
Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
Putin & Zelensky To Come Face-To-Face In Moscow? European Leaders Tell Trump Its A Bad Idea
New details have surfaced about a phone call between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. According to AFP, Putin suggested Moscow as a venue for a possible summit with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Sources said Zelensky rejected the proposal, while European leaders in Washington reportedly warned Trump against the idea. Both the White House and Kremlin confirmed the 40-minute call as Trump hosted Ukraine and EU leaders at the White House.#Trump #Putin #Zelensky #Moscow #UkraineWar #WhiteHouse #PeaceTalks #EU #Kremlin #Washington
Mint
22 minutes ago
- Mint
India and China cautiously mend ties as tariffs cloud economic outlook
In a visit to India this week, China's top diplomat said the two Asian nations should deepen cooperation amid international threats to free trade, a sign that President Trump's trade war could accelerate a thaw in the frosty relationship between Beijing and New Delhi. Both countries have faced hefty tariff threats from Trump over their trade policies, with India singled out in recent weeks for its large-scale purchases of Russian oil. In remarks in New Delhi on Monday at a meeting with his Indian counterpart, Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi made a veiled reference to the U.S. by noting that New Delhi and Beijing should find ways to coexist against a backdrop of 'unilateral bullying." China and India 'should view each other as partners and opportunities rather than adversaries or threats," said Wang on Monday, according to a statement from China's Foreign Ministry, In his opening remarks, Jaishankar said the nations are seeking to move ahead after a 'difficult period in our relationship." 'Differences must not become disputes, nor competition conflict," he said. India has said it would resume issuing tourist visas to Chinese nationals. Wang's schedule included a meeting with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Tuesday. At the end of the month, Modi is expected to make his first visit to China in seven years for a meeting of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, a security group that also includes Russia. The nuclear-armed neighbors are edging closer to resuming normal bilateral relations after facing their worst tensions in decades following the 2020 border clash that killed 20 Indian troops and four Chinese soldiers, analysts said. Both sides in recent years have amassed tens of thousands of troops at their disputed border, while round after round of high-level military talks failed to defuse tensions. A breakthrough came last October, when the two countries hammered out a patrolling agreement at the border, paving the way for talks between Modi and Chinese leader Xi Jinping in Russia. In recent months, China has allowed Indian pilgrims to visit holy sites in Tibet, while India has said it would resume issuing tourist visas to Chinese nationals. Analysts said the slow but steady improvement in China-India relations could gain momentum from the trade war kicked off by Trump. The countries recognize they may need to lean on other trade relationships to fend off heavy damage on their economies, analysts said. In recent weeks, Trump slapped a 25% tariff on Indian imports and has threatened to double it before the end of the month. That 50% tariff would roughly match the duties that the U.S. levies on many Chinese goods. 'Mr. Trump and his actions may have given it a greater sense of urgency than before," said Harsh Pant, head of strategic studies at the Observer Research Foundation, a New Delhi think tank. 'The Chinese seem to be playing to this idea of 'Look, we are the more reliable partner.'" The India-China trade relationship, at close to $130 billion, is roughly the same size as U.S.-India trade. But India buys far more from China than it does from the U.S. India's growing manufacturing prowess in electronics, for example, remains heavily dependent on Chinese parts, and some in India see more economic collaboration with China as necessary to propel India's manufacturing sector. Beyond trade, Trump's actions have cast a question mark over the direction of the U.S.-India relationship, described rosily by both countries over the past decade as a robust partnership that had shed the prickliness of the past. A strong relationship was natural, political experts argued, given shared concerns over China's growing economic and military heft. India remains deeply invested in the U.S. partnership, an Indian official said, and hopes to work out trade differences. The official noted that the China-India meetings occurring this month have long been in the works. Talks between China and India over how to avoid conflict at the border continued on Tuesday with a meeting between Wang and India's national security adviser Ajit Doval. Both officials applauded the upward trajectory of China-India relations. 'Borders have been quiet, there has been peace and tranquility, our bilateral relations have been more substantial," Doval said during opening remarks. But the two countries face fundamental strategic differences that are unlikely to be resolved. Border disputes could still flare up, as both countries have built permanent infrastructure along it in recent years to prepare for a possible future conflict. India hosts the Dalai Lama, the Tibetan Buddhist leader in exile who is seen as a separatist by Beijing for his advocacy for greater autonomy for the Tibetan region, which is controlled by China. China, meanwhile, is the strongest ally of rival Pakistan, which deployed Chinese jets in the most recent conflict against India. 'There are inherent tensions in this relationship," Pant said. 'But where the focus will be in the relationship going forward is, can they build a relationship now based on the positives?"
