13 on trial in France over 'racist' stunt against Olympics singer
Thirteen people went on trial in France on Wednesday over a "racist" insult targeting Franco-Malian singer Aya Nakamura, who faced criticism from the far right and harassment over her performance at the Paris Olympics opening ceremony.
The defendants, linked to extreme-right group Les Natifs (the Natives), are on trial for a stunt in March 2024 -- after reports the superstar singer would perform at the Olympics -- when they unveiled a banner reading: "No way, Aya, this is Paris, not the Bamako market".
It was a reference to Mali's capital, where the 30-year-old singer was born, and her hit song "Djadja".
Nakamura's performance at the July 2024 opening ceremony sparked a political firestorm among far-right politicians and conservatives, a reaction French President Emmanuel Macron at the time described as "racist" and "shocking".
Les Natifs espouses the far-right, white-nationalist "Great Replacement" conspiracy theory, according to which white Europeans are being deliberately supplanted by non-white immigrants.
The 13 defendants, aged between 20 and 31, face charges of publicly inciting hatred or violence -- or complicity in such incitement -- on the grounds of ethnicity, nationality, race or religion.
Only three appeared in court, while the remaining 10 were represented by their lawyers. Nakamura was not present at the hearing.
The defendants, including the spokesman for Les Natifs, Stanislas T., refused to answer questions, reading a statement to justify their actions.
"What is at stake today is the issue of freedom of expression and the independence of the judicial system," said the 24-year-old spokesman, denying the group had insulted Nakamura or incited hatred.
According to the activist, the aim was to denounce "a political choice that deliberately sought to promote the dissolution of our ancestral culture".
Their lawyers, Mathieu Sassi and Pierre-Vincent Lambert, requested the acquittal of their clients, saying Nakamura had been targeted because of her "vulgarity".
Prosecutors requested sentences of up to four months of prison.
Nakamura responded to the group's stunt on social media at the time, writing: "You can be racist, but you're not deaf... and that's what really bothers you! I'm suddenly the number one topic of debate -- but what do I really owe you? Nothing."
Nakamura is the world's most listened-to Francophone singer, and her performance on one of Paris's fabled bridges, the Pont des Arts, was among the most-watched moments of the opening ceremony.
But when reports began circulating in early 2024 that the Mali-born, Paris-raised superstar was going to perform, far-right politicians and groups vehemently criticized the decision.
An appearance by Nakamura, who mixes French with Arabic and Malian slang, would "humiliate" the country, far-right leader Marine Le Pen suggested, taking aim at her supposed "vulgarity" and "the fact that she doesn't sing in French".
In March 2024, a dozen members of Les Natifs unfurled the banner targeting Nakamura along the River Seine. They posted a picture of the stunt on social media, and far-right outlets amplified the message.
Les Natifs, which has 10,000 followers on Instagram and 19,000 on X, has staged other provocative stunts.
In March, the group covered portraits of veiled women on display in a church in the northern Paris suburb of Saint-Denis with black sheets.
Two people including Stanislas T. were due to appear in court in connection with that case on Thursday.
In February, the activists plastered an Air Algerie office in Paris with posters encouraging people with Algerian roots to "re-migrate".
The goal for groups like Les Natifs is to "provoke massive reactions and shock public opinion so we have no choice but to talk about them", said Marion Jacquet-Vaillant, an expert on far-right movements in France.
Capucine C., 22, who until March 2025 was a "parliamentary assistant" to three far-right National Rally MPs, was among the accused appearing in court.
Nakamura's complaint is not the only one stemming from the opening ceremony to head to trial.
A French court in May found seven people guilty of bullying Thomas Jolly, the ceremony's artistic director, who is openly gay.
Five people are to stand trial in September over similar complaints from Barbara Butch, a French DJ and lesbian activist who starred in a controversial scene during the ceremony.
© 2025 AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Diplomat
6 hours ago
- The Diplomat
The Social Media Battle Between Thailand and Cambodia
Civil wars, insurgencies, religious and ideological movements, and social and political tensions exist in all 11 nations of Southeast Asia and among the many communities they contain. However, since the end of the Cold War, the region has largely avoided one particular type of conflict: interstate war. It is unsurprising then, that when airstrikes and artillery barrages erupted along the disputed border between Thailand and Cambodia in late July, it made global headlines. The scale and intensity of the fighting was markedly different from that of the skirmishes that took place during the last border dispute from 2008-2011. While many factors have been observed as the roots of the war, what has been less explored and analyzed is the pre-existing tensions that exist between each state's ordinary citizens, especially following the border skirmish in May, who have rallied to their respective governments as the dispute has intensified, particularly on social media. From TikTok to X, Thai and Cambodian netizens have been waging a different kind of war, one based on insults, nationalistic hyperbole, and historical and cultural nostalgia. This has created echo chambers where an imagined sense of one's perceived innocence and superiority over the other justifies hatred and war. At a time of fragile peace, this sort of collective mentality remains a constant threat to the safety and security of thousands on both sides of the border. A History of Territorial Disputes The recent conflict between Thailand and Cambodia is a manifestation of the complicated relationship between the two countries. In 2008, a dispute over Preah Vihear temple, an 11th Century Angkorian temple situated on the border between the two countries, resulted in a standoff between Thailand and Cambodia that escalated into military conflict. A French colonial map of the area placed the temple on the Cambodian side of the border, but Thailand believed that this deviated from the terms of border treaties signed between French Indochina and the Kingdom of Siam in 1904 and 1907, and claimed it had never officially accepted the map. Although the International Court of Justice ruled in Cambodia's favor in 1962, giving it ownership over Preah Vihear, disputes over this and other surrounding parcels of land. The most recent incidents erupted from a minor skirmish at the border, resulting in the death of a Cambodian soldier on May 28; both countries blame the other for initiating the clash. Tensions escalated further on July 23, when Thai soldiers triggered a landmine, injuring five, following a similar incident a week earlier. Accusations once again flared, and Thailand recalled its ambassador from Phnom Penh. Early the next morning, fighting broke out at Ta Moan Thom, another temple along the border, which was followed by four more days of large-scale exchanges of firepower and air strikes, which ultimately killed at least 43 people, including civilians, and displaced more than 300,000. On July 28, both countries agreed to 'an immediate and unconditional ceasefire.' However, about eight hours after the newly implemented ceasefire, 20 Cambodian soldiers were detained by Thai forces for crossing the border, only two of which have since been returned. Nationalism and Social Media Before the Five-Day War Social media has long acted as a battleground in the everyday lives of Thais and Cambodians, nationalist sentiments bashing one another being a common sight. A quick search on any social media platform showcases many examples of defamation and nationalist pride that have garnered much attention and hatred even before tensions poured into a war. Well before the war, Cambodian netizens had accused Thailand of the cultural theft of music, ancient temples, and food, as well as rewriting or faking history to erase 'Khmer glory' from the Thai education system. This has led some to refer to it as 'Copyland.' Comments from various social media platforms have labelled Thailand as a 'bully,' claiming that Cambodians living in Thailand are treated without respect, abused without protection in the workforce, and that their children are denied rights. Alongside the bashing of Thailand, a recent upsurge of a TikTok trend of users dressed in Cambodian uniforms dancing to the song 'Weapons,' by Cambodian Artists La Cima Cartel, All3rgy, and Hasha had obvious undertones of nationalism that propelled many Cambodians to rally around their government following the initial clash in May. Conversely, hostile discourse by Thais is not uncommon. 'Scambodia,' 'CampuChina,' 'Xi Jinping's playground,' and 'mini China,' are all derogatory nicknames that Thai social media users have given to Cambodia in the comment sections of various social media sites before the events of July 24. This phenomenon has created a foundation of mistrust on platforms that are less visible to outsiders yet extremely influential in an age of digital technology, creating the conditions for an explosion of online animosity after the conflict broke out. Continuing Tensions #Save Thailand, #ThailandOpenedFire, 'Angkor Wat will belong to Thailand,' 'Cambodia Attacking Hospital.' These are just a few of the many recent comments under a TikTok video of two Western travel-vloggers who shared their experiences having visited Cambodia weeks before the war began. There is no doubt that the preexisting adversity between the two states before the outbreak of the conflict blew into a massive social media battleground still active a week after the ceasefire. Many themes that dominated the social media tug-of-war before 24 July — moral superiority, cultural history, good governance, respectable royalty — became sharper and more pronounced afterwards. Recent social media posts include comparisons of royal family members, a favorite target of Cambodian users being Thailand's Prince Dipangkorn Rasmijoti who has been frequently contrasted against Cambodia's Princess Norodom Jenna, usually subjected to shameful emojis and captions. Thai netizens are no better, posting edits of their air force's military gains during the clashes or the country's supposed help toward Cambodian refugees in 1979. Even against the backdrop of a nominal ceasefire, the generalization and abuse of issues as trivial and mundane as the two prime ministers' English accents during the ceasefire agreement have become weapons disrupting an atmosphere of stability on the internet. AI tools have been used extensively to serve up the same propaganda and slander, for instance, to reimagine a false, glorified conclusion to the conflict. In addition to amplifying the existing social media animosity, the outbreak of war has also led both sides to accuse each other of firing the first shot. This has been followed by a flood of tit-for-tat requests for justice and accountability, veiled in self-righteousness. On X, Cambodian op-eds from their national newspapers and captioned images still condemning the Thai military for 'a calculated act of intimidation against a peaceful neighbour' have been posted as recently as August 4, while pro-Thai posts have similarly pictured Cambodia as a false victim of a war it started. Nationalist social media posts continue to be uploaded ambitiously. Videos of both sides accusing each other of breaking the ceasefire have also surfaced well into the first week of August. The constant animosity on social media between politicians from both countries, including big names such as Thaksin Shinawatra and Hun Sen, only increased tensions, rallying nationalistic crowds, rallying nationalistic crowds, both to agree and add insults, under every post. A Mentality of Conflict Persists While social media banter and its influence on nationalistic and jingoistic rhetoric is not new, its effects have created a collective opposition to lasting peace between Thailand and Cambodia. As part of a reply on a TikTok video posted a few days ago — 'just protect and fight back' — connotes, the desire for conflict has not been quelled. While there have been calls for peace and stability in the region, such optimism is usually overshadowed by unresolved grievances and a confused need for netizens to fulfill their own definitions of justice, created in an echo chamber of like-minded people. Social media users on both sides continue to justify the violence as a necessary reaction to aggression from each other, rather than calling for the two nations to transcend their dispute in the interests of reconciliation and cooperation. On the ground, as the ceasefire remains fragile, both militaries are on high alert, and distrust between the two governments runs deep. 'It can erupt at any time,' one Thai politician commented, on the possibility of renewed conflict. Online, the social media war shows no signs of slowing down. It is important to recognize that one of the contributors to a lack of widespread opposition to the war from both sides has been the fact that social media had already laid the groundwork of distrust and antagonism. If cool-headed leaders on both sides are unable to rise above the online noise, the continuing tug-of-war on social media may pull the two nations into yet another series of border clashes.
The Mainichi
10 hours ago
- The Mainichi
Senegal president hopes for Japanese support for Africa's digital growth
DAKAR (Kyodo) -- The president of Senegal has expressed hope for Japanese support for boosting technological and digital development in Africa to help grow the continent's economy. In a recent interview ahead of the ninth Tokyo International Conference on African Development in Japan, Diomaye Faye said that he believes taking advantage of Japan's edge in the field will lead to providing "transformative solutions for African economies." The remarks by Faye, who became the youngest president in Senegal's history in April last year at the age of 44, come ahead of the start of the TICAD conference on Wednesday in Yokohama near Tokyo. Faye is hoping to tap into the region's large young population for the development of human resources. This year's TICAD conference will tackle issues such as empowerment of youth and women. Faye described the gathering as a "great opportunity to strengthen and diversify cooperation between Africa and Japan." While stressing the importance of TICAD as a forum for multilateral cooperation, he said he is concerned that "multilateralism is taking a significant step backward," in an apparent reference to U.S. President Donald Trump's "America First" foreign policy. Faye called on Japan, Africa and partners around the world "to strengthen this multilateralism" and make it "fairer." Faye won last year's presidential election as an opposition candidate, marking the third democratic regime change in the country after 2000 and 2012. In recent years, West Africa has experienced military coups, prompting the French military to withdraw from the area. Although Senegal has never experienced a coup since its independence from France in 1960, it has requested French troops to leave, ending their permanent deployment in July.
Yomiuri Shimbun
19 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Takeaways from Trump's Meeting with Zelenskyy and Europeans: Praise, Security Talks, More Meetings
WASHINGTON (AP) — During their second meeting in the Oval Office this year, President Donald Trump said the U.S. would be willing to support European efforts to police any peace deal in Ukraine, while its leader, Volodymyr Zelenskyy expressed his gratitude and wore dressier clothes. And Vice President JD Vance kept his mouth shut. As Trump hosted Zelenskyy and top European leaders to energize months of stalled U.S.-led efforts to halt Russia's 3 1/2-year-old war, the tone and style of the sit-down was far different than when Ukraine's president was hounded out of the White House in February. Following the talks, Trump called and spoke at length to Russian President Vladimir Putin who got the red carpet treatment at a summit with Trump last Friday in Alaska, to discuss the extraordinary gathering of allies. Trump said he would now work to arrange a meeting between Zelenskyy and Putin. Here are key takeaways: Trump says the US could back security guarantees for Ukraine A central question for peace talks is how to prevent further Russian aggression in the future. Trump has ruled out allowing Ukraine to join NATO, which would extend the military alliance's protection to the besieged country. He did, however, express support for security guarantees for Ukraine — though details remain vague. European countries 'want to give protection and they feel very strongly about it and we'll help them out with that,' Trump said. That pleased Zelenskyy, who said the U.S. was offering 'such (a) strong signal.' With Europeans looking to set up a force that could backstop any peace agreement in Ukraine, Trump suggested that Putin would be open to accepting security guarantees. His special envoy, Steve Witkoff, said Sunday that Moscow was open to accepting NATO-style protections for Ukraine. European leaders applauded that notion, and the larger meaning it would carry. 'When we speak about security guarantees, we speak about the whole security of the European continent,' French President Emmanuel Macron said. Macron said talks to determine what the U.S. is willing to provide will start as soon as Tuesday. European leaders praise Trump but say tough work is still ahead The Europeans came to show a united front on Ukraine, and many used public comments to heap praise on Trump. That was striking given tensions over Trump's threats to impose steep tariffs and other issues. Ahead of their meeting, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte called Trump 'dear Donald' and said of fighting in Ukraine: 'If we play this well, we could end it.' In an interview later with Fox News Channel, Rutte called Trump 'amazing' and said potential swaps of Ukrainian territory weren't discussed. 'First, we need full clarity on security guidelines,' Rutte said. Though Ukraine might not have NATO membership, he noted, there would be discussions for security guarantees similar to those extended to members of the alliance. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said after the meeting that there was 'real progress' and a 'real sense of unity.' Before the leaders spoke privately at the White House, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said all the parties were working together on 'a just and lasting peace.' Offering a more measured tone was German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who said 'the path is open now' to halting the fighting but next steps are 'more complicated.' 'Let's try to put pressure on Russia,' Merz said, adding that he would like to see a ceasefire come together. Trump was noncommittal, saying, 'If we can do the ceasefire, great,' but suggested it was far from a dealbreaker. He dropped his push for a ceasefire after Friday's summit, aligning with Putin's position that negotiations should focus on a long-term peace settlement instead. The good feelings extended to Zelenskyy and Trump. After Ukraine's leader praised the 'very good conversation' with Trump, the U.S. president responded, 'Great remarks. I appreciated it.' Speaking to reporters Monday night, Merz said the Russian demand that Ukraine give up unconquered parts of its eastern Donbas region to end the fighting would be equivalent to the U.S. giving up Florida. More formal attire — and a far different reception — for Zelensky The meeting with Trump in the Oval Office on Monday was dramatically different than six months ago, when Trump and Vance harangued Zelenskyy for not being thankful enough for U.S. military support. Trump even seemed to relish a reporter from a conservative outlet asking then why Zelenskyy wasn't wearing a suit at the White House. Ukraine's leader came prepared this time, wearing a black shirt and blazer. The same reporter told Zelenskyy, 'You look fabulous,' and Trump responded, 'I said the same thing.' Then Trump said to Zelenskyy: 'That's the one that attacked you last time.' The Ukrainian president said he remembered, then playfully needled his questioner. 'You are in the same suit,' Zelenskyy said as laughter rippled through the room. 'I changed. You did not.' Ukraine's president usually appears in a trademark hoodie or T-shirt — a show of solidarity with Ukrainian forces on the front lines. Zelenskyy also expressed gratitude to the U.S. and European allies for supporting his country, and repeatedly thanked first lady Melania Trump for sending a letter to Putin about stopping the killing of children during the war. In the Oval Office, Vance gave no public comments. Next steps in the negotiations turn back to Putin Trump, who bragged on numerous occasions during the campaign that he could settle Russia's war in Ukraine in a day, said repeatedly Monday that it was far more complicated than he ever thought it would be. But he also suggested — likely implausibly — that the fighting that has raged for years could wind down quickly. 'A week or two weeks, we'll know whether we're going to solve this, or if this horrible fighting is going to continue,' said Trump, even suggesting the issues yet to be hammered out weren't 'overly complex.' Still, much remains unresolved, including red lines that are incompatible — like whether Ukraine will cede any land to Russia, the future of Ukraine's army and whether the country will ultimately have lasting and meaningful security guarantees. Trump said he had begun arrangements for a face-to-face meeting between Putin and Zelenskyy. But Russian foreign affairs adviser Yuri Ushakov said only that Putin and Trump had a 40-minute phone call and 'spoke in favor' of continuing direct talks between the sides, Russian state news agency Tass reported. Outside the White House, Zelenskyy said no date had been set for such a meeting but that the U.S. suggested it be as soon as possible. 'But for that, agreement of all sides is needed,' he said. He added that the question of territory 'is a matter that we will leave between me and Putin.' Though many European leaders oppose forgoing a possible ceasefire on the road to seeking lasting peace, they have supported a meeting by Trump, Zelenskyy and Putin in the meantime. Macron suggested that another summit could feature the three presidents and also top European leaders. 'The idea of trilateral meeting is very important, because this is the only way to fix it,' the French president said.
