MoD braced for £1billion compensation bill after 100k lives put at risk of Taliban death squads by Afghan leak scandal
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
DEFENCE chiefs are braced for a £1billion compensation bill over a data breach which revealed Afghans who supported UK forces.
Around 100,000 were put at risk of Taliban death squads when their names or loved ones' were revealed in 2022 — with the blunder then 'covered up' by a UK gagging order.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
7
Evacuation of Afghans in 2021 after the Taliban took control - ahead of the Conservative Government's 2023 secret airlift, codenamed Operation Rubific
Credit: Getty
7
The Taliban has stated it is actively hunting those revealed on the leaked list
Credit: AP
7
Around 100,000 Afghans were put at risk of Taliban death squads when their names or loved ones' were revealed in 2022
Thousands could sue the MoD after the leak was made public this week.
Almost 900 Afghans on the 'kill list' email leak are ready to sue — with lawyers saying thousands more are poised to join them.
Legal sources claimed victims whose lives were endangered could be entitled 'to five-figure payouts'.
Adnan Malik, at Manchester firm Barings Law, which is representing nearly 900, said: 'The victims have been exposed to not just financial harm, but the real threat of violence and death.
In some cases, these threats have been tragically carried out.
Monies claimed will vary substantially between claimants, we would expect sums upwards of five figures for each person affected.'
That could see the overall compensation bill pass £1billion.
The February 2022 leak was caused by a Special Forces soldier who accidentally shared a list of 18,714 people who had applied to flee to Britain in the wake of the 2021 Taliban takeover of Afghanistan.
The list included their last-known locations, how they served British forces, and in some instances who supported their claims — including MPs, Special Forces and spies.
The leak, which included details of a 'secret route' for some of those affected to come to the UK, was only discovered when excerpts were put on Facebook in August 2023.
Taliban warns thousands of Afghans secretly airlifted to UK 'we will HUNT you down'
The next month, the Tory government used a superinjunction to stop journalists reporting the breach. It was extended until being lifted by a High Court judge this Tuesday.
A defence source said yesterday: 'People on that list had fought with British forces in Afghanistan.
'They fought against the Taliban. First of all we let the Taliban take over, and then when these people came to us for help we put their lives in even more danger.'
The potential huge bill emerged as Nigel Farage claimed 'convicted sex offenders' are among the Afghans secretly airlifted into the UK.
The Reform UK leader said the rescue of almost 20,000 Afghans is a risk to women's safety — triggering a row with Labour and the Tories.
Defence Secretary John Healey insisted everyone had been checked 'carefully' for any criminal records. And he said if Mr Farage had any hard evidence, he should report it to police.
Shadow Chancellor Mel Stride also said Mr Farage should provide evidence for his claims.
PM Sir Keir Starmer said the previous Tory government had serious questions to answer over the leak.
Hunting people down
Sir Ben Wallace, Defence Secretary at the time, insisted there was not a cover-up and the gagging order was to protect at-risk Afghans, and he made 'no apology' for doing so.
Sir Ben also said he applied for a four-month injunction and did not know why it was converted into a superinjunction in September 2023, when Grant Shapps had taken over as Defence Secretary.
7
The list contained the details of 20,000 Afghans whose country had been taken over by the Taliban
Credit: Alamy
7
The leaked list also included the names of UK sponsors and MI6 spies who could have become targets of the Taliban in Afghanistan
Credit: Getty
Ex-Tory MP Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg said Mr Shapps had questions to answer. Mr Shapps has yet to comment.
Meanwhile, Zia Yusuf, head of Reform's Department of Government Efficiency, has launched a petition calling for an independent, judge-led inquiry.
He said: 'We want to know who made these decisions.'
Lawyers insisted the injunction was necessary to protect the lives of people who were named and at risk of Taliban reprisals.
It included hundreds of Afghan Special Forces who had served in units known as the Triples, alongside Britain's SAS and SBS.
The Triples conducted thousands of night raids against senior Taliban leaders and counter-narcotics operations.
Last night, Taliban sources claimed they have had the list for years — and had been hunting down those on it.
A Taliban official said: 'We got the list from the internet during the first days when it was leaked.
'A special unit has been launched to find them and make sure they do not work with Britain. We've been calling and visiting their family members to track them down.'
7
The potential huge bill emerged as Nigel Farage claimed 'convicted sex offenders' are among the Afghans secretly airlifted into the UK
Credit: PA
7
Defence Secretary John Healey insisted everyone had been checked 'carefully' for any criminal records
Credit: PA
In 2023, the Government launched a secret airlift, codenamed Operation Rubific, to smuggle around 4,500 people on the list to Britain.
They are among 34,000 Afghans who have been offered new lives in Britain since the Taliban takeover. That number is expected to rise to 43,000 and the Government predicts the total cost will be £7billion.
An MoD spokesman yesterday insisted a £1billion compensation bill was 'pure speculation'.
He said: 'The Government inherited a deeply complex situation and since taking office, have taken appropriate action in line with the level of risk these individuals faced.
'We will do everything possible to defend against any compensation claims and any we do get, we will fight them hard.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
25 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Family of Brit tourists locked up in Iran for 'espionage' all 'living in solitary confinement'
Richard Ratcliffe, the husband of Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe, has spoken to the Mirror about the 'isolation' experienced by the families of Iranian hostages - as Lindsay and Craig Foreman's detention in the country continues Campaigner Richard Ratcliffe worked for years to secure the released of his wife, innocent hostage Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe, from Iran. Nazanin was falsely accused of espionage, propaganda, and plotting to topple the Iranian regime - and was imprisoned between 2016 and 2022 in Tehran's notorious Evin Prison. Richard likened the "isolating" experience of his wife's imprisonent on trumped-up charges, to the Mirror as being "like the whole family goes into solitary confinement." The campaigner has recently advised the family of Lindsay and Craig Foreman, a British couple who were detained in Iran on charges of espionage early in the year - something their children have categorically denied. 'Brit parents jailed in Iran fell into a common trap, there's only one way out' 'Our parents are stuck in jail abroad - their trip of lifetime turned into hell' Richard said, "It is such an isolating and terrifying experience at the beginning. It is like the whole family goes into solitary confinement," adding that when he advised the family, "The main thing I told them when we first met was that they needed to get it confirmed where they were, and that [Lindsay and Craig] were still alive." Two of the Foreman's sons, Joe and Kieran, spoke to the Mirror about their ordeal, and the huge emotional impact it had on their family, as they still do not have a clear picture of the conditions their parents are being held in, or contact with them. "You are fearful for how they are," said Joe to the Mirror describing the daily impact it had on the four siblings, explaining that it is "upsetting you can't just pick up the phone and speak to them," and adding that "everyday worried about their well being." Kieran said, "You don't have a second to think about your own problems – all you are worried about is their welfare, how they are." He added, that it can "Almost feel selfish for being upset about it all. It's a really weird situation where you feel helpless, you almost feel like you are falling down a pit and you can't get up." Richard explained that during his own family's ordeal, there were a couple of things that helped them all stay strong as they worked towards bringing Nazanin home. "The main thing that kept us going across the years was knowing we were not alone, finding all these people following our story and caring. "I always felt it was not our campaigning that got Nazanin home, it was all the people who listened and cared. That was what moved the politicians." He added, "So talking to other families in the same shoes helped me understand our own story better - to realise Iran's games weren't personal, and to better spot the UK's playbook for stalling. That made it gradually easier to navigate, to know the game we were a chess piece in. It takes us all time to accept." He also told the Mirror that the way the Foreman family had been treated before launching their public campaign was "depressing" and indicated the Foreign Office had learned few lessons from Nazanin's case, despite making "promises" to change their approach. "I found it really alarming that in the six months since Craig and Lindsay were taken hostage, the family had not met the Foreign Secretary or any Minister, or even the Ambassador - and that only changed when they decided to go public," Richard said. "It had been the same in Nazanin's case. So it was depressing to see none of the lessons from our had been learned, despite the Foreign Secretary's promises in the elections to transform consular protections." Lindsay and Craig are believed to be held in Kerman Prison, after being arrested at the start of the year, whilst embarking on a motorbike trip from Spain to Australia, and undertaking a project about what makes a good life as they went, connecting with strangers and learning about communities. In early June, the Foremans were due to be transferred to Evin Prison in Tehran - where Nazanin was imprisoned between 2017 and her eventual release in 2022. However, just weeks later, Is raeli strikes hit the infamous facility, and Lindsay and Craig's family had no idea if they were safe, or whether the planned transfer had even gone ahead. Through the Foreign Office, Iranian authorities have since said that the couple are in Kerman - but their four children spent weeks in an unbearable limbo, with no idea what was going on. Richard told the Mirror he found it "really shocking" that the UK government had not stayed on top of the couple's whereabouts during the conflict. "I was really shocked that the government had lost track of them in the middle of the Iran-Israel war, and had just closed the Embassy and not updated the family," the campaigner said. "When Evin prison got bombed, the only thing that mattered was proof of life. Not a vague assurance from the Iranian authorities, but a phone call to the family where they confirmed where they were, and a visit from an independent doctor to confirm they are ok. "It is quite astonishing that after six months, the government still has not secured that." The embassy in Tehran has since been reopened, and Hamish Falconer MP - Minister for the Middle East - has said, "We will continue to play our full role to ensure the safety of British nationals in Iran." Richard explained to the Mirror that when speaking with Lindsay and Craig's family as they campaign to secure the release of their "generous and fun" parents, he "told them that there is no road map - and what works for them will be their own path. "But they should remember that the government's interests were different from the family's, and that it would continually find ways to kettle the campaign, and stop their suffering getting in the way of other agendas. "They would get sympathy, but they would have to push hard for any action." Lindsay and Craig's children encourage anyone moved by their parents' story to write to their MP to help their campaign to secure the couple's release from Iran. The Foreign Office advises against all travel to Iran, and a spokesperson said to the Mirror in response to Richard's claims, "We are deeply concerned by reports that two British nationals have been charged with espionage in Iran. We continue to raise this case directly with the Iranian authorities. 'We are providing them with consular assistance and remain in close contact with their family members.'
South Wales Guardian
29 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Shapps: ‘We saved lives with gagging order on Afghan data leak'
The former defence secretary said lifting the superinjunction, which was imposed while he was in post, may have endangered those whose personal information was released 'in error' in February 2022. The details of more than 100 Britons, including those working as spies and in special forces, were included in the massive data breach that resulted in thousands of Afghans being secretly relocated to the UK. Defence sources have said information relating to personnel was included in the spreadsheet after they had endorsed Afghans who had applied to be brought to the country. Sir Grant had remained silent on the role he played in the aftermath as several Tory ex-ministers sought to distance themselves from the handling of the breach in recent days. But speaking to BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Friday, the ex-MP for Welwyn Hatfield said his focus had been on 'sorting out the mess and saving lives'. An injunction over the breach was sought by Sir Grant's predecessor Sir Ben Wallace, and a wider-ranging superinjunction, which prohibits disclosure not just of the information but of the order itself, was granted when Sir Grant was in office. 'The judge himself decided it should be a superinjunction,' he said. 'It is the case that I thought that once the superinjunction was in place, it should remain as a superinjunction.' This was to err 'on the side of extreme caution', he said, adding: 'I'd much rather now be in this interview explaining why a superinjunction was required, than being in this interview explaining why I failed to act and people were murdered.' The former minister said: 'I would do the same thing all over again. I would walk over hot coals to save those lives.' Asked whether he supported calls from the Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) for the publication of an intelligence assessment which formed the basis of the superinjunction, he said: 'Yes, I would.' He added he knew the committee 'won't like' the fact the incident had been kept secret but 'it was just so sensitive that if anything had got out at all, it would put those lives at risk'. Despite having kept the order in place during his tenure as defence secretary, which lasted just under a year, Sir Grant said he was 'surprised' it had remained for 'so long'. He added: 'I don't think it should have carried on as long as it had. I'm surprised that it has. Those questions are for others. 'But I came in, the problem was there, I dealt with it, and as a result I think that we saved lives.' Meanwhile, the chairman of the ISC said the previous government had ignored the usual process whereby the committee is able to see the information to ensure there was scrutiny and 'go down the legal route'. Lord Beamish told BBC Radio Scotland: 'I think there are serious constitutional issues here.' He said the most concerning element of the breach was that 'other states who want to do us harm' could use it not just to target individuals, but 'as a way of seeing other operations' being carried out by the security services. The initial breach saw a dataset of 18,714 people who applied for the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (Arap) scheme released by an official who emailed a file outside authorised government systems. The Ministry of Defence (MoD) became aware of the blunder only when excerpts from the dataset were posted anonymously on a Facebook group in August 2023, and a superinjunction was granted at the High Court in efforts to prevent the Taliban from finding out about the leak. The leak also led to the creation of the secret Afghanistan Response Route, which is understood to have cost about £400 million so far, with a projected final cost of about £850 million. A total of about 6,900 people are expected to be relocated by the end of the scheme. The official responsible for the email error was moved to a new role but not sacked. The superinjunction was in place for almost two years, covering Labour and Conservative governments, before it was lifted on Tuesday. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch has apologised on behalf of the Conservatives for the leak, telling LBC: 'On behalf of the government and on behalf of the British people, yes, because somebody made a terrible mistake and names were put out there… and we are sorry for that.' Former immigration minister Robert Jenrick said he and former home secretary Suella Braverman had 'strongly opposed' plans for the Afghan Response Route in 'internal meetings'. But former armed forces minister James Heappey, himself an ex-Army officer who served in Afghanistan, said ministerial colleagues offered no 'fierce opposition' to the relocation scheme. Mr Heappey also said claims he had backed a 'new entitlement' for people affected by the breach but not eligible for other schemes were 'untrue'. Ms Braverman has said there is 'much more that needs to be said about the conduct of the MoD, both ministers and officials'. Former veterans minister Johnny Mercer claimed he had 'receipts' regarding the previous government's actions in relation to Kabul, and has described the handling of the breach as 'farcical'. Sir Ben has said he makes 'no apology' for applying for the initial injunction because the decision was motivated by the need to protect people in Afghanistan whose safety was at risk.
Leader Live
29 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Shapps: ‘We saved lives with gagging order on Afghan data leak'
The former defence secretary said lifting the superinjunction, which was imposed while he was in post, may have endangered those whose personal information was released 'in error' in February 2022. The details of more than 100 Britons, including those working as spies and in special forces, were included in the massive data breach that resulted in thousands of Afghans being secretly relocated to the UK. Defence sources have said information relating to personnel was included in the spreadsheet after they had endorsed Afghans who had applied to be brought to the country. Sir Grant had remained silent on the role he played in the aftermath as several Tory ex-ministers sought to distance themselves from the handling of the breach in recent days. But speaking to BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Friday, the ex-MP for Welwyn Hatfield said his focus had been on 'sorting out the mess and saving lives'. An injunction over the breach was sought by Sir Grant's predecessor Sir Ben Wallace, and a wider-ranging superinjunction, which prohibits disclosure not just of the information but of the order itself, was granted when Sir Grant was in office. 'The judge himself decided it should be a superinjunction,' he said. 'It is the case that I thought that once the superinjunction was in place, it should remain as a superinjunction.' This was to err 'on the side of extreme caution', he said, adding: 'I'd much rather now be in this interview explaining why a superinjunction was required, than being in this interview explaining why I failed to act and people were murdered.' The former minister said: 'I would do the same thing all over again. I would walk over hot coals to save those lives.' Asked whether he supported calls from the Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) for the publication of an intelligence assessment which formed the basis of the superinjunction, he said: 'Yes, I would.' He added he knew the committee 'won't like' the fact the incident had been kept secret but 'it was just so sensitive that if anything had got out at all, it would put those lives at risk'. Despite having kept the order in place during his tenure as defence secretary, which lasted just under a year, Sir Grant said he was 'surprised' it had remained for 'so long'. He added: 'I don't think it should have carried on as long as it had. I'm surprised that it has. Those questions are for others. 'But I came in, the problem was there, I dealt with it, and as a result I think that we saved lives.' Meanwhile, the chairman of the ISC said the previous government had ignored the usual process whereby the committee is able to see the information to ensure there was scrutiny and 'go down the legal route'. Lord Beamish told BBC Radio Scotland: 'I think there are serious constitutional issues here.' He said the most concerning element of the breach was that 'other states who want to do us harm' could use it not just to target individuals, but 'as a way of seeing other operations' being carried out by the security services. The initial breach saw a dataset of 18,714 people who applied for the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (Arap) scheme released by an official who emailed a file outside authorised government systems. The Ministry of Defence (MoD) became aware of the blunder only when excerpts from the dataset were posted anonymously on a Facebook group in August 2023, and a superinjunction was granted at the High Court in efforts to prevent the Taliban from finding out about the leak. The leak also led to the creation of the secret Afghanistan Response Route, which is understood to have cost about £400 million so far, with a projected final cost of about £850 million. A total of about 6,900 people are expected to be relocated by the end of the scheme. The official responsible for the email error was moved to a new role but not sacked. The superinjunction was in place for almost two years, covering Labour and Conservative governments, before it was lifted on Tuesday. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch has apologised on behalf of the Conservatives for the leak, telling LBC: 'On behalf of the government and on behalf of the British people, yes, because somebody made a terrible mistake and names were put out there… and we are sorry for that.' Former immigration minister Robert Jenrick said he and former home secretary Suella Braverman had 'strongly opposed' plans for the Afghan Response Route in 'internal meetings'. But former armed forces minister James Heappey, himself an ex-Army officer who served in Afghanistan, said ministerial colleagues offered no 'fierce opposition' to the relocation scheme. Mr Heappey also said claims he had backed a 'new entitlement' for people affected by the breach but not eligible for other schemes were 'untrue'. Ms Braverman has said there is 'much more that needs to be said about the conduct of the MoD, both ministers and officials'. Former veterans minister Johnny Mercer claimed he had 'receipts' regarding the previous government's actions in relation to Kabul, and has described the handling of the breach as 'farcical'. Sir Ben has said he makes 'no apology' for applying for the initial injunction because the decision was motivated by the need to protect people in Afghanistan whose safety was at risk.
