
Without immigration, I might well not be here
I was lying in theatre after an emergency caesarean section. There was hustle and bustle all around me from the medical team.
I was haemorrhaging badly. Things had taken a serious turn, and the doctors were preparing for the possibility of removing my womb to save my life.
An obstetrician was called. She rushed in, calm, focused and decisive. With extraordinary skill, she saved my womb. She saved my life. I went on to have two more children.
She was a migrant. In the moment, I didn't stop to ask where she was born or how long she'd been in the country, I was too busy being grateful that she was there. I wasn't thinking about borders or immigration status, I was thinking, 'Thank God for her'.
READ MORE: John Swinney condemns 'unacceptable' football fan violence across Scotland
That memory returns every time I hear anti-immigrant rhetoric, and it came roaring back last week when I listened to the Prime Minister deliver his speech on immigration. It was cold. Calculated. And laced with language that felt designed to sow fear. Keir Starmer spoke of 'chaos', 'experiments,' and 'shutting down the lab'. And I couldn't help but think: 'Does he even know who he's talking about?'
Migrants aren't just numbers in a spreadsheet or slogans on a lectern. They're the people who save lives. Who support our teachers. Who process our food. Who care for our loved ones.
And let's be honest, these new immigration policies aren't about economics, fairness, or control. It's pure populism. If the UK Government really cared about economic growth, it wouldn't be pulling up the drawbridge on working-age migrants.
In Scotland, we face a falling birth rate, an ageing population, and serious labour shortages in key sectors. Our fish processors, care homes, farms, and hospitals are crying out for workers.
When employers can't recruit, it's because there simply aren't enough people. So they turn to migrant labour. This is not because people are lazy or on benefits.
Throughout my constituency of Banffshire and Buchan Coast, I've spoken to seafood factory owners who have said plainly that without migrant workers, they'll have to shut their doors. These are businesses that feed the nation, export to the world and support entire communities. They offer hard, honest work.
Many migrants have been here for years, raising families, paying taxes, and keeping our coastal economy afloat. Now, under the UK Government's new rules, they are being told they're no longer welcome And it's not just our coast that's under pressure. Across Scotland, we're facing a demographic challenge.
According to the National Records of Scotland, our population is projected to start falling from 2040 unless we have continued inward migration. The number of people aged 75 and over is rising rapidly, while our working-age population is shrinking.
The Fraser of Allander Institute warned that without immigration, Scotland's workforce could decline by nearly 20% in the coming decades. That would be catastrophic for our economy and our services. We need people and we need policies that reflect that.
Let me also clear up a misunderstanding I keep seeing on social media. People talk about migrants 'coming over on boats', as if they're all the same – as if a factory worker in Peterhead, a student in Aberdeen, and someone desperately fleeing war or persecution are part of one big group. They're not.
When we talk about immigration to support the economy, like filling gaps in the care sector or in fish processing, we're talking about legal routes via visas, work permits, and sponsorship. That's entirely different from people coming here seeking asylum – which is a legal right under international law.
And yes, some of those people arrive by small boat, not because they're 'jumping the queue', but because there's no safe, official route open to them. Once here, they're not allowed to work. They're often housed in hotels, living on a few pounds a day and unable to contribute even though many desperately want to.
These are two completely different systems, but bad actors deliberately blur the lines to stoke fear. It's the same scapegoating tactic we've seen throughout history, and it always ends up hurting the wrong people.
When I see them being lumped together and blamed for everything from housing shortages to NHS waiting times, I feel furious, as a politician and as a human being. Because this scapegoating doesn't just distract from the real causes of our problems, it also dehumanises the people helping to solve them.
Let's take one example, the social care sector. Scotland has one of the highest vacancy rates for care jobs in the UK. We are literally unable to meet demand without workers from abroad. Yet now, the visa rules for these roles are being tightened. How is that sustainable?
Clinging to a Brexit-shaped fantasy that has already cost Scotland dearly will be devastating. Our fishing industry was promised the world and left with red tape and worker shortages. Now it's being dealt another blow by a government that sees value only in votes, not people.
This isn't about the UK being 'full'. It's about being failed – failed by a London-focused Westminster Government making policy for polling numbers.
Scotland deserves better. And one day soon, with independence, we'll build an immigration system that reflects who we are and what we need. To those who have chosen Scotland as their home, we thank you. You are not the problem. You are part of the solution.
Let's reject this anti-immigration populist nonsense and be reasonable and pragmatic. Keir Starmer, not in our name.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Mainstreaming of far-right ideas in UK politics shows why John Swinney was right to raise alarm
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Received wisdom at Westminster has it that the far-right has never made it into UK politics. Coupled with that theory is then the debate by the same commentators around what constitutes the 'far-right'. However using the measurement of policies pursued, which is, after all, the very essence of a political movement or party, the far-right has most certainly arrived in UK politics. UK parties, across the political spectrum, now embrace the hardest of hard Brexit, unthinkable even in the aftermath of the referendum in June 2016, and a policy that has done untold damage to the economy and our rights. We also had a government that promoted the sending of asylum seekers to Rwanda and MPs who openly campaign on leaving the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which has underpinned our rights since the end of the Second World War. Were the UK to leave, it would be joining Russia and Belarus in doing so, hardly polite company. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Brexit, leaving the ECHR, and the Rwanda scheme are or were mainstream policy proposals in the UK yet they are policies that far-right parties elsewhere in Europe would baulk at. Even the hardest of hard-right parties in other parts of Europe such as the National Rally in France, the Vlaams Belaang in Belgium or Alternative fur Deutschland in Germany have abandoned plans to leave the EU, given the UK's Brexit debacle. John Swinney's stances on the EU, Donald Trump and migration, among others, have won plaudits (Picture: Jeff J Mitchell) | Getty Images An attack on justice Yet despite these policy failures, the mainstreaming of the far-right has become all too common in our politics along with their tactics. Over the past few days alone, Conservative Shadow Justice Secretary, Robert Jenrick, attacked the Labour Attorney General for doing his job and defending his clients. His remarks were described by former Conservative Attorney General Dominic Grieve 'as a direct attack on our principles of justice'. As we saw in this week's Hamilton by-election, we in Scotland are certainly not immune. Nigel Farage's attack on Anas Sarwar, which he doubled down on when challenged by the press, should act as a warning to us all. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Such remarks are unacceptable and whereas I may have legitimate policy differences with the Scottish Labour leader, they should have no place in our political discourse. For all the heat of the campaign in the run-up to what was a hard-fought by-election, it was good to see SNP and Labour leaders call out these disgraceful comments. Zia Yusuf's resignation as chair of Reform on Thursday and his concerns around Reform in the Commons should also act as a warning. Calling out bigotry That is why the First Minister was right to bring together colleagues from across the political spectrum in a summit seeking to 'lock out' Reform from Holyrood earlier this year. John Swinney is right to call out their policies and the 'bigotry' that they represent and to call out Farage as 'an accomplice of the Russian agenda'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Fair play to the politicians and representatives of civil society who put any political differences aside and joined the First Minister. That meeting was criticised at the time by the Conservatives and a range of commentators. Given Reform's tactics and language over the course of the by-election campaign, we have seen just how badly needed that stance was and remains. Labour will be pleased with Thursday's win, and I congratulate them on it, however, no party can afford to be complacent about Reform. One of the lessons from Hamilton must be that the key to taking on the far-right is to challenge them on their ideas. Nigel Farage's track record is not a particularly good one. He has been a driving force campaigning to leave the EU for decades. That was a decision that has exacerbated the cost-of-living crisis, removed rights from UK citizens, damaged business, especially small-to-medium enterprises (SMEs) and ultimately made us all poorer. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad He backed Donald Trump whose presidency has destabilised the world, seen tariffs introduced that have damaged the global economy, and undermined efforts to support Ukraine against Russian aggression. 'Island of Strangers' The Reform policy platform is weak. For their opponents, that should provide ample targets. Yet, in the Westminster bubble their policies are given far too much credibility. There is an omertà around discussing the glaring failure of the Brexit experiment and the less said about Keir Starmer's 'Island of Strangers' speech on migration frankly the better. John Swinney would be the first to admit that the Scottish Government haven't got everything right. However, on the big calls around our relationship with the EU, the impact of Donald Trump's presidency, migration, child poverty and the rights we should enjoy as citizens, the SNP leader has maintained credibility for his stances, winning plaudits at Westminster and further afield. Politics is about ideas and Reform's are simply not good ones. The Conservatives and Reform are increasingly aligning on a range of policies and a pact or even merger is not out of the question. This is to be expected, given that Reform draws its politicians and many voters from the Conservatives. They have, in turn, turned their backs on One Nation conservatism, and instead the party is dominated by the Johnson/Truss populist wing, which is not so different from Farage and Reform. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad This week's by-election and the preceding campaign must act as a wake-up call. During the run-up to the Holyrood elections, there is an opportunity for all parties to set out their vision for Scotland. On the one hand, there is an inclusive, outward-looking and internationalist vision represented by John Swinney, on the other is Reform's inward and exclusive offering. I know which one I'm backing.


Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Why Reform UK were the biggest winners despite coming third in Hamilton by-election
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... All parties celebrate a victory, but Labour's joy at their Hamilton by-election win had an extra edge that perhaps suggested they had privately feared John Swinney's claim that the seat was a contest between the SNP and Reform would turn out to be true. However, for all their delight at proving him decisively wrong, a more sober assessment of this unexpected win paints a far less rosy picture for Labour than it might at first suggest. Labour's Davy Russell may have beaten SNP candidate Katy Loudon – although only by some 600 votes – but the story of this by-election was the 7,088 people who backed Reform UK's Ross Lambie. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The highly respected pollster, Professor John Curtice, told The Scotsman that the result was "way below" what Labour needs if it is to win next year's Holyrood election. "I think the honest truth is that neither Labour nor the SNP can be really particularly happy with this result,' he said. He has also argued the idea that Nigel Farage's party could never 'make the political weather' in Scotland is no longer credible following the Hamilton result. Nigel Farage's Reform UK party is the coming force in Scottish politics (Picture: Lia Toby) | Getty Images Public discontent The parties that have traditionally dominated Scottish politics have been presented with a wake-up call about the challenge presented by Reform. They now need to do some serious thinking about why Farage and co have become quite so popular, so quickly. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The most obvious answer is widespread discontent about the economy and public services, particularly the NHS's long waiting lists, and the impression given by the Conservatives and SNP in government that little can be done. Labour's first year in government at Westminster has not done much to suggest that they have found an answer. Given the extent of the problems, some voters may be still giving them the benefit of the doubt, although that will not last much longer. In such a situation, a protest or 'plague on all your houses' vote is understandable. Democratic governments must deliver for their people or they will eventually find themselves out of power.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
What can Reform do to shift the idea it is the ‘Nigel Party'?
Labour breathed a huge sigh of relief after a surprise victory in the Scottish parliament by-election in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse. Senior Scottish Labour figures had feared coming second or even third behind Reform UK; for once, it wasn't expectation management. Labour insiders admit privately the tight three-horse race confirms that Reform UK is on the map in Scotland, previously hostile territory for Nigel Farage. 'Something is up when you knock on doors in Scotland and get Reform talking points thrown at you,' one minister told me. Reform's advance will make Labour's task of ousting the SNP in next May's Scottish parliament elections much harder. After Keir Starmer's landslide last year, when Labour won 37 of Scotland's 57 seats, the party had high hopes of ending SNP rule north of the border after 19 years. But an unpopular government at Westminster has dragged Labour down; it has lost one in six of its 2024 Scottish voters to Farage's party. Reform is also on course to do well in next May's elections to the Welsh parliament, where Labour has called the shots since devolution in 1998. Although Reform had hoped to come at least second in Hamilton, it can still claim momentum in Scotland. A much bigger setback for Farage than its third place was the resignation of Zia Yusuf as party chair. After Reform's sweeping gains in last month's local elections in England and the Runcorn parliamentary by-election, Farage said: 'We would not have done […] what we did without him.' Now, Farage is dismissing Yusuf's claim to be responsible for Reform's meteoric rise. Tough game, politics. The energetic, telegenic Yusuf had made a good start in professionalising Reform – something Farage spectacularly failed to do as leader of Ukip and the Brexit Party. As a Muslim, Yusuf gave Reform cover against allegations of racism, but received nasty abuse on social media from some Reform supporters. Yusuf had plans to attract Muslim voters and that is why he was angered by Reform MP Sarah Pochin's call for a ban on the burqa. However, there were wider reasons for his departure. He felt sidelined after being put in charge of the Elon Musk-style Doge unit in councils run by Reform. The 38-year-old multi-millionaire entrepreneur didn't suffer fools gladly, and his abrasive style upset some at Reform's Millbank Tower headquarters (Labour's base when it won its 1997 landslide). He was blamed by critics for escalating the feud with former Reform MP Rupert Lowe. They complained that Yusuf was not a team player – a bit rich when that label applies to Farage in spades. The departure is a reminder of Farage's achilles heel: he falls out with senior figures in every party or campaign he is involved in. The loss of Yusuf will make it harder to make the Doge exercise work. This matters because the party needs to make its claim credible that vast savings can be made from cutting waste to be a contender for power. Crucially, Farage cannot be a one-man band – the 'Nigel Party', as it's dubbed at Westminster. He gives the impression of wanting to be the only tall poppy, but will need a cabinet-in-waiting to convince voters his party could run the country. However, other parties should not get carried away with Farage's woes. Voters are less bothered about Reform infighting than the Westminster village. Conservative claims that Reform is imploding are wishful thinking, and their humiliating fourth place in Hamilton illustrates their dire position. Reform remains a real threat to Keir Starmer's hopes of a second term. Labour is banking on turning the next election into a presidential contest between Starmer and Farage. Labour insiders call it a 'nosepeg' strategy: they hope left-of-centre voters who have given up on Labour after its poor first year will hold their nose and back Starmer to keep Farage out rather than defect to the Liberal Democrats, Greens or independents. Labour plans a parallel move in Scotland: 'Vote Farage, get SNP.' As my colleague John Rentoul noted, Labour should attack Farage for his 'fantasy economics' rather than being a 'privately-educated stockbroker'. Polling by More in Common shows that voters believe Starmer had a more privileged upbringing than Farage, and believe the Reform leader speaks more for the working class than the prime minister. Starmer allies insist the lesson has been learnt. Starmer's welcome moves to tackle child poverty and his U-turn on the winter fuel allowance suggest he realises he must also make a positive appeal to left-of-centre voters and not merely ape Reform with tough language on immigration, which such voters don't like. But he will need to go further, with an economic reset including tax rises, to pay for his new social justice commitments and avoid the impression that Wednesday's spending review will mean 'austerity 2.0'. Labour's approach has dangers: in attacking Farage head-on, some Labour MPs worry, the party risks amplifying his message and building him up further. There are no easy roads to a second Labour term.