Bank of England boss Andrew Bailey sounds alarm over jobs as it leaves interest rates on hold
Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey yesterday sounded the alarm over the darkening outlook for jobs as it left interest rates on hold – but opened the door to a cut in August.
He said there had been 'signs of softening in the labour market' as a Bank survey found that UK employers are slamming the brakes on pay rises as a result of Rachel Reeves' £25billion raid on employers' National Insurance.
Global events are also 'highly unpredictable' as conflict in the Middle East pushes up oil prices and US tariffs also take their toll.
The comments are the latest evidence undermining Government claims that it is turning the economy around.
Recent figures showed more than 100,000 UK jobs were lost in May with a quarter of a million axed since the Budget.
Growth in the first quarter of this year was followed by a downturn in April, when GDP slumped 0.3 per cent.
Employment growth is also 'near zero'. The Bank's monetary policy committee left interest rates at 4.25 per cent, citing the need for a 'gradual and careful' approach.
But three of the nine members voted for a cut, fuelling hopes of a rate slash in August.
Inflation is 3.4 per cent and expected to climb close to 4 per cent by the end of the year. The feedback from the Bank's survey was bleak.
Many firms are in 'wait-and-see' mode on tariffs while investment intentions are being held back by factors such as 'fragile demand, trade developments, Government tax and labour policies'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
an hour ago
- Glasgow Times
300 jobs at risk as firm moves Scottish Power contract to South Africa
The outsourcing firm Capita confirmed that all its staff working on their contract with Scottish Power in the UK have been placed at risk of redundancy, STV News has reported. Around 303 roles are at risk, with workers in home move, prepayment, and smart metering services, and domestic customer services among those affected. Scottish Power has its headquarters in Glasgow, with centres across Scotland and in England. The London-based firm has provided customer support for Scottish Power since signing a five-year deal in 2022 worth a reported £63 million. Five work packages will still be delivered over the next three years, but operations will transition to South Africa, a memo seen by STV News reportedly said. Meanwhile, work on two packages still to be delivered will also be transitioned to South Africa, but through another outsourcing firm. It has been reported that some staff will be let go in October, while others may be made redundant in February next year. The announcement was made to staff on Wednesday, along with at-risk letters issued on the same day. A minimum 45-day collective consultation period will begin on Thursday. Capita previously provided customer support services for Scottish Power between 2005 and 2016. A Capita spokesperson said: 'Changes to our delivery model unfortunately mean that all colleagues working on our Scottish Power contract in the UK have been placed at risk of redundancy. 'Our priority is to support impacted colleagues through this change, and includes looking at redeployment opportunities where possible.' Scottish Power has been approached for comment.
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Breakingviews - Uncle Sam's stablecoin passion has shaky rationale
LONDON, June 19 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Uncle Sam is going all-in on stablecoins. President Donald Trump backed, opens new tab the privately issued cryptocurrencies whose value is pegged to the U.S. dollar within days of his inauguration in January. Now Congress is poised to legislate, after the Senate this week approved the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins – or GENIUS - Act. The newly supportive regulatory environment has drawn a flood of interest from potential issuers, from major banks, opens new tab to retailers, opens new tab such as Walmart (WMT.N), opens new tab and (AMZN.O), opens new tab, according to media reports. Meanwhile stablecoin specialist Circle Internet, opens new tab(CRCL.N), opens new tab, which listed on the New York Stock Exchange this month, has a digital dollar surrogate, USDC, which already has coins worth over $60 billion in circulation, opens new tab. Commercial interest is nothing new. Tech-savvy American corporates have long recognised stablecoins as the one species of digital money with a compelling mainstream use. The first generation of cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin offered not just a way of digitally storing and transferring value, but the ability to denominate it in their own standard units. That model caught on with speculative traders but never made much headway in the world of digital payments. Stablecoins, by contrast, combine the novelty of global, real-time availability and programmability with the familiarity of national currency units. That makes them uninteresting as speculative bets – but well suited as methods for payment. A simple comparison shows how the two models serve different purposes. Bitcoin – the original and by far the largest own-standard cryptocurrency – has tokens in circulation worth $2.1 trillion. That's nearly 10 times the value of the two biggest stablecoins, USDT and USDC, combined. Yet when it comes to transactions, the leaderboard is reversed. Less than 3% of those bitcoins change hands in a 24-hour period, compared to nearly 40% of the two stablecoins. The payments business is a big target for disruption. Visa (V.N), opens new tab and Mastercard (MA.N), opens new tab – the two largest processors of fiat currency payments – reported combined revenue of $74 billion last year and enjoy net profit margins of around 50%. That's quite a market at which to take aim. Moreover, stablecoin issuers collect interest on the collateral backing their digital coins as well as harvesting transaction processing fees. That's how Circle made a cool $1.7 billion in revenue last year. It's not hard to see why potential stablecoin issuers have been lining up for years. Nevertheless early projects flopped, notably Facebook owner Meta Platforms' (META.O), opens new tab ill-fated 2017 Libra stablecoin, opens new tab. That's because regulators and central bankers have not been nearly so keen. Three potential gremlins have been uppermost in their minds. The first is what would happen if stablecoins are not backed by sufficient high-quality, liquid collateral to make them redeemable at par on demand. A plague of pseudo-U.S. dollars would then circulate at varying discounts to the real greenback. That would undermine the so-called 'singleness of money, opens new tab' and destroy the co-ordinating role of the U.S. dollar as a unit of account. The regulators' second bugbear is the black economy. They fret that because stablecoins are effectively 'bearer securities', like physical banknotes, they are subject to know-your-customer and anti-money laundering rules only when their users seek to convert them into traditional bank deposits. In the meantime, they can be used to make payments anonymously just like physical cash. Finally, there is the risk that stablecoins erode the effectiveness of monetary policy. Physical greenbacks may be hard to track, but they are still issued by the U.S. Federal Reserve. A stablecoin issued by Amazon or Walmart might settle a macroeconomically significant volume of transactions between its customers and suppliers without ever formally touching the dollar. That could scramble the Fed's attempts to manage inflation by constraining liquidity. Yet none of these objections are new. Prudential risks are already a concern for money market funds and traditional banks. The anonymity of transactions is a feature of physical banknotes. The dilution of monetary policy is a familiar gripe of central bankers in emerging markets, where foreign currencies such as the dollar or euro often circulate alongside the national unit. What spooks regulators in the developed world is less the novelty of the risks than the frightening scale, scope, and speed which digitisation allows. That implies work-arounds can probably be found, especially if a unified clearing and settlement protocol connecting stablecoins to the traditional financial system, such as the ubyx, opens new tab concept announced this week, are adopted. Until this year, the caution of the regulators trumped the commercial interests of potential stablecoin issuers. What has helped to unblock the GENIUS Act is that the U.S. government believes it has spotted a fiscal benefit. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent set out, opens new tab his reasoning immediately after the Senate approved the act. 'A thriving stablecoin ecosystem will drive demand from the private sector for U.S. Treasuries, which back stablecoins,' he wrote: 'This newfound demand could lower government borrowing costs and help rein in the national debt.' What's more, he argued, stablecoins could 'onramp millions of new users – across the globe – to the dollar-based digital asset economy', effectively opening up a new frontier of overseas funding for the U.S. budget deficit. Bessent cited projections that the stablecoin market could top $3.7 trillion by 2030. That's certainly not small change. It would be more than sufficient to soak up the $3 trillion that nonpartisan experts reckon, opens new tab Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act will add to the national debt over the next 10 years. Unfortunately, things are not so simple. The Treasury already effectively enjoys free foreign financing via overseas demand for U.S. dollar banknotes. The Fed estimates, opens new tab that over $1 trillion of them currently circulate abroad. If dollar-backed stablecoins simply replace demand for physical notes, there will be no net fiscal benefit. Another niggle is that while purchases of stablecoins may help finance the national debt, the tokens could facilitate more payments that fly under the radar of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). In 2022, the IRS estimated, opens new tab that nearly 12% of U.S. taxes go missing due to underreporting, implying a shortfall of around $600 billion in the most recent fiscal year. A surge in stablecoin usage could easily make that worse. Given the compelling commercial case and the likelihood that regulatory risks can be managed, it is ironic that the potential fiscal dividend that has finally convinced the U.S. government to bank on stablecoins is the shakiest rationale for embracing them. Follow @felixmwmartin, opens new tab on X
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Breakingviews - China may win more than EU from auto tariff truce
LONDON/HONG KONG, June 19 (Reuters Breakingviews) - A détente in the electric vehicle tariff war may suit China more than Europe. Brussels and Beijing are haggling over a way for Chinese manufacturers to sell battery rides tariff-free, but at a minimum price. Embracing such a system would be a risky move. Europe's electric-vehicle tariffs are barely a year old. Brussels added extra levies of up to 35% to offset the competitive advantages that made-in-China vehicles get from government subsidies or cheap labour. Now, the People's Republic is pushing an alternative: rather than duties levied on imports, carmakers would commit to not sell below a certain price, a model used before with solar panels. Such a system could have benefits. Chinese manufacturers would not have to absorb the burden of levies through discounted prices. Europe, meanwhile, would be able to mollify Beijing and so avoid tit-for-tat tariffs on cognac and other exports, but still stop it dumping cars on the cheap. The latter is a potential mortal threat to Renault ( opens new tab or Volkswagen ( opens new tab. Last year, the Middle Kingdom exported, opens new tab some 1.25 million electric vehicles, more than half of the total production in Europe, as per International Energy Agency data. Look beneath the hood, however, and there are issues. Europe would probably want to find a level that reflects the extent of subsidies enjoyed by each carmaker, as it did with tariffs. A single tariff, likely China's preferred option, would be less precise. Either way, establishing a minimum floor for a complex vehicle with many moving parts would be challenging. It could also quickly become obsolete. Renault and Volkswagen are launching cheaper EV models to compete with China, and changes in battery technology will lower costs. A floor could reduce the incentive to innovate. Enforcement looks a bigger headache. Tariffs have the virtue of simplicity. Yet car prices are fluid: dealers offer discounts, and incentives such as cheap loans. And China's carmakers are already masters at bundling products to make their wares more attractive at home. BYD ( opens new tab, ( opens new tab includes its 'God's Eye' assisted driving software for all vehicles priced above 100,000 yuan (less than $10,000). Carmakers at April's Shanghai auto show touted perks such as multiple screens and built-in kitchenettes. Nio ( opens new tab owners have access to the brand's clubhouses. As such, European carmakers may still be undercut by Chinese rivals, incentivising production in China. True, Europe could impose minimum import quotas, as it did with Japan in the 1980s. Or it could set the price floor high but still impose tariffs below that level. But overall, minimum pricing may be the cost Europe must bear to maintain relations with Beijing and secure access to rare earths – meaning China would most likely be the winner. Follow @Unmack1, opens new tab on X and Katrina Hamlin on Bluesky, opens new tab and Linkedin, opens new tab
