Gardaí who disregard roads policing ‘letting colleagues down'
The Fine Gael leader was responding to comments by Garda Commissioner Drew Harris, about a report that found some gardaí showed a 'blatant disregard' for roads policing duties while they knew their actions were being reviewed.
Advertisement
It comes amid a focus on road safety in Ireland, with the Government introducing new speed laws and after the Garda Commissioner mandated that frontline gardaí dedicate 30 minutes of road policing duties per shift.
Simon Harris said he did not want to 'tar any one group with one brush', and said he has the utmost respect for gardaí.
'Indeed, it's not that long since we were at a funeral of a member of An Garda Siochana killed while on road traffic policing duties,' he said at Government Buildings.
'Having said that, I am concerned with what I've heard, and I'd like to be in a position to read it. So I think it's important that what the commissioner said he intends to do does happen, that he publishes the report so that we can actually see this and analyse it directly.
Advertisement
'Because any member of An Garda Síochána who is acting in the way that the commissioner outlined is seriously letting their colleagues down in the first instance, colleagues who work every day to keep us safe and would absolutely be undermining our road safety efforts in this country.
'There are far too many empty seats at far too many kitchen tables in Ireland. We've worked extremely hard as a country, I don't just mean as a government, as a country, to improve road safety over many years.
'That progress had stalled in recent years and indeed we'd seen a negative trend, and this is disappointing and concerning.
'But I think it's important that we have the opportunity to see the report, rather than to comment on a comment about the report.'
Advertisement
Asked if he was surprised that a member of government had not seen the report, considering the policing authority had seen the report in June, he said: 'I am somewhat, but I haven't had an opportunity to discuss this with colleagues in government yet, and I'd obviously like to discuss it in the first instance with the Minister of Justice.'
Sean Canney, a junior minister with responsibility for road safety, said the reported findings were 'shocking' and 'serious'.
'There's no point in us bringing in laws, reducing speed limits, doing all of this kind of thing, if we don't have a functional enforcement section within the gardaí,' he said on RTÉ Radio.
Mr Canney said his thoughts were with the families of the 95 people who had died on Irish roads so far this year.
Advertisement
He said he had not read the report from consultancy firm Crowe, which has carried out investigations on behalf of An Garda Síochána previously, but planned to meet Justice Minister Jim O'Callaghan and both the outgoing and incoming Garda commissioners.
'I'll be talking to the commissioners to express my deep concern with what is in this report,' he said.
He said the independent Crowe report was conducted while the reviewer was 'sitting in the car with a garda that wasn't doing his duty and didn't seem to have a problem with that'.
'So I think there is definitely a serious case to be answered here as quickly as possible.'
Advertisement
Mr Harris said he commissioned the examination after he received an anonymous report from a whistleblower.
The chairwoman of the Policing and Community Safety Authority, Elaine Byrne, said the report was 'shocking' and found some gardaí showed a 'blatant disregard' for road policing while they knew their actions were being reviewed.
'They were openly hostile to doing their job,' she said, in what she described as a 'wake-up call' for An Garda Síochána.
She also described an issue with fear among Garda managers of carrying out poor performance management, which she said Mr Harris agreed was an issue.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
9 hours ago
- Times
Sally Rooney vows to use BBC royalties to support Palestine Action
Sally Rooney, the author of Normal People, will dedicate the proceeds of her book sales in Britain and the fees the BBC pays her to adapt her works to support Palestine Action. Rooney announced her plan in the Dublin-based Irish Times rather than a UK newspaper because, although she would 'happily publish' her support for Palestine Action in a British publication, 'that would now be illegal' since the group was added to the list of proscribed organisations in the Terrorism Act on July 5. She wrote: 'I feel obliged to state once more that — like the hundreds of protesters arrested last weekend — I too support Palestine Action. If this makes me a 'supporter of terror' under UK law, so be it. Paul Mescal and Daisy Edgar-Jones starred in the BBC's adaptation of Normal People ENDA BOWE/BBC/PA 'My books, at least for now, are still published in Britain, and are widely available in bookshops and even supermarkets. In recent years the UK's state broadcaster has also televised two fine adaptations of my novels, and therefore regularly pays me residual fees. I want to be clear that I intend to use these proceeds of my work, as well as my public platform generally, to go on supporting Palestine Action and direct action against genocide in whatever way I can. Rooney challenged the UK government to investigate the 'shady organisations' that promote her work, such as WH Smith and the BBC, over her comments. On Sunday Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, defended the ban of Palestine Action in an article for The Observer. She wrote that the group had claimed responsibility for — and promoted on its website — attacks that have led to those allegedly involved being charged with violent disorder, grievous bodily harm with intent, actual bodily harm, criminal damage and aggravated burglary. She also said that the group has an 'underground manual' that encourages the creation of cells, provides practical guidance on how to identify targets to attack and how to evade law enforcement. • I started protesting at 83 — Palestine Action is just my latest arrest Demonstrations in support of Palestine Action took place last weekend on Parliament Square ALAMY NATASHA QUARMBY/ALAMYLIVENEWS 'For a home secretary to ignore all those security assessments, advice and recommendations would be irresponsible', Cooper wrote. 'In a democracy, lawful protest is a fundamental right but violent criminality is not.' The civil liberties movement Defend Our Juries has written to Lord Hermer KC, the attorney-general, to complain that Cooper's article amounted to a contempt of court, arguing that her comments would prevent a fair trial of those accused of supporting Palestine Action. The Metropolitan Police said on Friday that a further 60 people would be prosecuted for showing support for the group.
Telegraph
10 hours ago
- Telegraph
Don't cave to Putin, Europe urges Trump
Sir Keir Starmer and other European leaders will urge Donald Trump not to submit to Vladimir Putin's demands for more Ukrainian concessions. In a show of unity in the wake of Russia's success at last week's Alaska summit, the group will fly to Washington on Monday and attempt to stiffen US resolve in the peace talks. Alongside Emmanuel Macron, the French president, and Friedrich Merz, the German chancellor, Sir Keir will seek to minimise the risk of Volodymyr Zelensky being humiliated in the Oval Office again – as happened when he last visited in February. The European delegation – which includes Giorgia Meloni, the Italian prime minister; Ursula von der Leyen, the European Commission president; and Mark Rutte, the Nato secretary-general – will also push back on Putin's demand for Mr Zelensky to surrender the whole of the Donbas region, which is made up of the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts in eastern Ukraine. But the Trump administration said a discussion about the future of the mineral-rich region was needed and insisted 'both sides' will need to make concessions. On Sunday, Mr Macron said the delegation's will was to ' present a united front between Europeans and Ukrainians ', warning Mr Trump: 'There is only one state that proposes a peace that would be a capitulation: Russia.' He added: 'If we are weak with Moscow, we are preparing for tomorrow's conflicts.' European leaders have not explicitly called for all of Donetsk to remain Ukrainian, instead saying it was up for Mr Zelensky to decide what to agree to on territory. Mr Zelensky pushed back on suggestions that he should be made to give up the entirety of the Donbas region, including land that Ukraine still holds. However, he opened the door to negotiations with Putin directly, saying any territorial changes should be discussed in a three-way meeting with the US. 'We need real negotiations which means they can start where the frontline is now,' Mr Zelensky said. 'The contact line is the best line for talking and the Europeans support this.' The Ukrainian president noted that the Russians were 'still unsuccessful' in Donetsk, where Ukraine holds 30 per cent of the land, and had failed to take the area in the 12 years that Putin had tried to seize control. The request for face-to-face talks with Putin, which Moscow has consistently rejected , appears to be part of a wider European strategy to show Russia as the obstacle to peace. In a joint press conference in Brussels on Sunday, Mr Zelensky and Ms Von der Leyen said Russia must stop attacking Ukraine before proper negotiations can progress, whether that is called a ceasefire or not. The message represented an attempt to counter Mr Trump's public declaration that all sides should end the focus on a temporary ceasefire and move straight to establishing a permanent peace deal. European leaders are wary of this position because it would allow Putin's forces to seize more Ukrainian land while talks were ongoing. However, senior figures in the Trump administration reinforced the president's desire for talks over territory on Sunday. Steve Witkoff, the US peace envoy who joined Mr Trump and Putin for talks in Alaska, told CNN: 'There is an important discussion to be had with regard to Donetsk and what would happen there.' Marco Rubio, who was also in Anchorage, told CBS News: 'To reach the end of this conflict, both sides are going to have to make concessions. That's just a fact.' The US secretary of state also backed away from previous US threats to sanction Putin if he failed to agree to a ceasefire, suggesting such a move would not keep him at the negotiating table. European leaders praised the Trump administration after the president promised security guarantees to a Western-backed peacekeeping force in Ukraine once the fighting has ended. Sir Keir and Mr Macron are leading a group of 30 nations dubbed the ' Coalition of the Willing ' offering to help protect Ukrainian freedom if a peace deal is struck. Under the plans, British military trainers and engineers would be sent into Ukraine alongside contributions from other nations after a ceasefire to rebuild the Ukrainian armed forces. European planes, including Royal Air Force fighter jets, would also police the skies to deter any invasion. Leaders have argued for months that the US would have to provide some form of security 'backstop' to make sure that in reality Russia would be deterred from attacking again. Some went public over the weekend thanking Mr Trump for supposedly offering 'Nato Article 5-like' guarantees in a call briefing them on the Putin summit. Article 5 is a clause that agrees an attack on one Nato member is considered an attack on all. Downing Street wants the White House to clarify what security guarantees it is offering, while Mr Macron said he would ask the US 'to what extent' it is ready to contribute. However, Sir Keir did not issue personal comments on Sunday, reflecting Downing Street's strategy of trying to influence Mr Trump behind closed doors rather than via megaphone diplomacy. Senior figures in Downing Street have expressed regret over what they consider to have been their failure to help Mr Zelensky prepare for February's ill-fated meeting with Mr Trump in Washington. Mr Zelensky arrived at the White House hoping to announce Ukraine had reached a minerals deal with the US. But his Oval Office meeting with Mr Trump descended into a shouting match after JD Vance, the vice-president, demanded that he show more gratitude after years of American support.
The Sun
10 hours ago
- The Sun
I had revenge sex after boyfriend bedded my pal – but he thinks what I did was WORSE and constantly brings it up
DEAR DEIDRE: AFTER my boyfriend slept with my friend, I had revenge sex with someone from work. I forgave my boyfriend but apparently what I did is still an issue. We're eight months on and he constantly brings up my cheating. Yet, somehow, his infidelity isn't as important. I'm 25 and he is 26. We've been together for almost two years. A while back we went through a bad patch, because I felt neglected and needed more affection from him, but he refused to change. Miserable, I decided to take a break to see if he would change his mind. It backfired because within a week he had sex with a friend of mine. I was heartbroken but he convinced me to give him another chance. It played on my mind and I couldn't forget what he'd done. We decided we needed some space from one another to work out what we wanted. I was so angry and admit I behaved recklessly. One night I went out after work and got drunk. Looking back I can see I was on a mission: I flirted outrageously and went home with one of my colleagues, my mind was full of revenge. I knew this guy liked me, he had made it obvious before. He's 30 and single but he was a let-down in bed. Afterwards I felt so guilty, I confessed to my boyfriend. Spotting the signs your partner is cheating Still, I was taken aback when he admitted he'd been getting to know another girl and she had given him oral sex. We agreed to forgive one another but my boyfriend is finding it difficult to forget. He always brings up what I did, even though I don't say anything about his behaviour. My sex drive is almost non-existent now. I wonder if it's because he won't accept we are as bad as each other. DEIDRE SAYS: As you now know, two wrongs do not make a right. I understand your anger with your boyfriend but, as you discovered, revenge didn't give you the satisfaction you were seeking. Every time something goes wrong in your relationship, you both run away from the issues. But unless you can dig in, talk about how you feel and start to open up, it won't be possible to create trust. You both will continue to question the other, think the worst of them and – in time – no doubt stray again. You need to be positive about the future and the pleasures you can share but if nothing changes you should think about calling it a day. My support pack Cheating – Can You Get Over It? will help. I'VE LOST WIFE TO THE GYM DEAR DEIDRE: MY wife wants to move out, leaving me and the kids. I put it down to her gym obsession – or one of her workout buddies has turned her head. She joined a gym three years ago, now she's addicted. She's constantly posting on social media about how far she's run or how many bench presses she's done. Is anyone interested? Even our two teenage kids are fed-up. It's as if we don't exist – she'll meet friends from the gym on Tuesdays and Friday nights and now it's spilling into our weekends. We had a row about me feeling second-best but she said she can't give up the gym and we'd be better off with her living elsewhere. I'm a 45-year-old man, she's 40. There's a guy who always goes out with her. He's 43 and equally obsessed with fitness. She says they're friends. But why this sudden urgency for her to get her own place? DEIDRE SAYS: She's checked out – but you can fight to keep her invested, for the sake of all of you. Keep calm and hold a mirror up to her obsession. Explain the children are missing her presence and so are you. She may be feeling a crisis at reaching 40 but she's paying a high price. Be honest – if you've neglected your relationship too, tell her that you're going to wipe the slate clean and look at it through fresh eyes. Counselling will help. See or call 020 7380 1975. SEXY PHONE PICS ENRAGED LOVER DEAR DEIDRE: SOME revealing pictures and messages sent to me by an old friend have flipped out my girlfriend, after she went into my phone and saw them. I am 27 and my girlfriend is 24. We have been together for two years and I absolutely adore her. We met online but I am the first proper boyfriend she has had and the only guy she has fallen in love with. I have no intention of ever cheating on her but do have a bit of a reputation for being flirty. I bumped into my old friend in a coffee shop in town. I have known her since we were both 16. She looked amazing and it was good to see her. My friend and I had never got together but I'd always fancied her so when I discovered she had always liked me it was a huge ego boost. That day we sat and chatted and she admitted she had always had a crush on me. I didn't really know what to say so just laughed it off. But a few days later she messaged me and we began chatting. At first it was just day-to-day stuff but then the messages became flirtier. I now realise a little bit of flirting can run away with you and soon become out of control. My girlfriend has accused me of cheating, which I guess it was. I am now wondering whether I will ever be able to have a relationship without harming it. I can't eat or sleep worrying about the damage I have caused to my relationship. DEIDRE SAYS: Flirting may seem harmless but some see it as micro-cheating. Your girlfriend clearly feels you have betrayed her. She needs to know that you are there for her, because your attention has certainly been elsewhere. Ask yourself how you would feel if she was exchanging revealing pictures and messages with another guy. Talk to her about her boundaries, and what constitutes cheating in her eyes, and see if you can agree limits. Talking this through will bring you closer. Flirting can be driven by low self-worth. My support pack Raising Self-esteem explains more about the underlying causes. BOYFRIEND DUMPED ME FOR ARMY DEAR DEIDRE: I AM heartbroken because my boyfriend is joining the Army and no longer wants to be in a relationship with me. I have begged him to reconsider but he is adamant that he has made up his mind. I have even said I will move to wherever he is going to be based, so we can be closer, but he is not listening. He doesn't want to know. I am 19 and my boyfriend is 20. We have been together for almost a year. We discussed marriage and kids, even though he never made as much effort as I did during our time together. I have been saving for our wedding for over a year and he told me he was putting money aside to buy me an engagement ring. I know he has always wanted a career in the Army and there is nothing wrong with him being ambitious. What I can't understand is why he is being so cruel by completely cutting me out of his life. I am devastated. DEIDRE SAYS: I am sorry he has dealt with this in such a hurtful way. He is young, and clearly wants to see more of life and broaden his horizons before he settles down. Even though it is devastating for you, it is better that you find out now rather than later down the line. My support pack Mend Your Broken Heart will help you to learn from this and move on.
