Are We Ready to Accept Our Alternative History?
The poem begins with this beautiful verse:
"I focus my eyes in doubt to ask them:
Has Beirut left me so that I return?
Where do I begin? There are heaps my lips,
Brimming with chaos... that cannot be sequenced."
Two entire generations of Lebanese citizens have no memories of this Beirut that Lamia loved with a passion decades ago. Two generations who physically escaped the monstrous war that devoured tens of thousands, but who remain culturally and psychologically scarred to this day.
Memory, along with truth and innocence, was among the first casualties of this war. And today, the truth lies in shame as Lebanese people from all walks of life complain, trade suspicions and accusations, and find comfort in blaming all these sins on the politicians of the past.
There is no doubt that politicians bear much of the blame for the calamities that have unfolded in Lebanon since 1975. Nonetheless those same politicians, in one way or another, were also victims, or rather products, of a culture shaped by deals bigger than them and their small country located in a region that has long been - and remains - among the most volatile in the world.
In Lebanon, contradictory identities and allegiances are evident even in casual conversations and turns of phrase. Conceptions of nationalism, extremism, consensus, sovereignty, and coexistence remain contested, with interpretations diverging in accordance with the values and conditions of the community one was raised in.
I would argue that this state of affairs is by no means unique to Lebanon, although it is most apparent there because Lebanon has never been subjected to the kind of "totalitarian rule" seen for decades in neighboring countries. Totalitarian regimes became accustomed to suppressing diversity and silencing dissent with iron and fire and in the dark dungeons of intelligence services!
I recall, for instance, that when former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad criticized the "sectarianism" of Lebanese society, fools applauded him and the wise were left stunned because they knew that a volcanic eruption had been awaiting him.
The sectarianism of the Lebanese was "visible" because of their excessive indulgence in freedom, which went so far as to engender chaos. Meanwhile, millions of their Arab brothers, especially in Syria, knew that every breath they took was being accounted for so much so that they came to lose trust in even their closest relatives.
That all belongs in the past, which must be remembered if we are to avoid repeating it. In theory, this is a valid claim. However, the present and future have not been guaranteed...
Most Arab countries have young populations. Our people are still new to managing differences, dealing with diversity, and navigating responsible and mature democracy. However, if we examine what the "social media revolution" has done (and the challenges that artificial intelligence could present) we might find that, even in the most advanced countries with long-established democracies, things are not necessarily going much better. The rules of the game have changed entirely.
We are not the only ones who have to contend with the attacks of bots and trolls that spread disinformation, twist concepts, fuel the fires of fanaticism and racism, and poison the relationship among the communities of our society, using anonymous accounts, propaganda tools, and dangerous campaigns run by intelligence agencies.
In the United States, Britain, the Netherlands, Germany, and elsewhere, the past decade has made the dangerous role that social media can play in spreading lies, fabrications, slander, incitement, and character assassination, strengthening extremist and racist political parties.
In Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and several other Arab countries, unrestrained (there is no effective legislation) social media websites have effectively become tools of sedition and civil war.
Yet even so, it seems that our journey has just begun! Artificial intelligence could present even more insidious and terrifying threats, not only in terms of shaping the present and manipulating the future, but also in rewriting the past.
In its January 28, 2024 issue, The New York Times published an investigative piece under the striking headline: "AI Is Coming for The Past Too!"
On March 12, American website "The Hill" reported that the American Edge Project had released a report warning that China could manage to rewrite history through artificial intelligence in order to dominate the world. Former US Congress members Loretta Sanchez and Greg Walden introduce the article with a warning: "Imagine waking up to a world where entire chapters of history have quietly disappeared and key facts about important news are simply nowhere to be found..."
"Fortunately for those of us living in the United States, such a scenario remains a catastrophic nightmare - but for hundreds of millions living under authoritarian regimes, it is a daily reality," they then add.
The authors go on to unpack the study's findings. China is currently seeking to harness artificial intelligence to rewrite history, erasing its human rights violations and any criticism of the Chinese Communist Party.
Elsewhere, an April 10 Australian report explains that AI-generated images by "Facebook/AAP" can blend reality and fiction. That is, it can be used to rewrite history and manipulate images of everything from the Nazi Holocaust to the September 11 attacks and the events in Gaza and Ukraine.
Now, can we imagine what this means for us in the Levant? Can we wrap our heads around what Israel, a technologically and cybernetically advanced state, could do to "rewrite" our history and tailor this history to its narrative, as it is already doing? It knows far more about us than we know about ourselves or it.
Are we not, we who know so little about ourselves (to say nothing about other citizens) easy prey? What protects us from being chewed up and discarded without even noticing?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
New Zealand's PM says Israel's Netanyahu has ‘lost the plot'
New Zealand's Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said on Wednesday that Israel's leader Benjamin Netanyahu had 'lost the plot' as the country weighs up whether to recognize a Palestinian state. Luxon told reporters that the lack of humanitarian assistance, the forceful displacement of people and the annexation of Gaza were utterly appalling and that Netanyahu had gone way too far. 'I think he has lost the plot,' added Luxon, who heads the center-right coalition government. 'What we are seeing overnight, the attack on Gaza City, is utterly, utterly unacceptable.' Luxon said earlier this week New Zealand was considering whether to recognize a Palestinian state. Close ally Australia on Monday joined Canada, the UK and France in announcing it would do so at a UN conference in September. The humanitarian crisis in Gaza has reached 'unimaginable levels,' Britain, Canada, Australia and several of their European allies said on Tuesday, calling on Israel to allow unrestricted aid into the war-torn Palestinian enclave. Israel has denied responsibility for hunger spreading in Gaza, accusing Hamas militants of stealing aid shipments, which Hamas denies. Ahead of Wednesday's parliamentary session, a small number of protesters gathered outside the country's parliament buildings, beating pots and pans. Local media organization Stuff reported protesters chanted 'MPs grow a spine, recognize Palestine.' On Tuesday, Greens parliamentarian Chloe Swarbrick was removed from parliament's debating chamber after she refused to apologize for a comment insinuating government politicians were spineless for not supporting a bill to 'sanction Israel for its war crimes.' Swarbrick was ordered to leave the debating chamber for a second day on Wednesday after she again refused to apologize. When she refused to leave, the government voted to suspend her. 'Sixty-eight members of this House were accused of being spineless,' House speaker Gerry Brownlee said. 'There has never been a time where personal insults like that delivered inside a speech were accepted by this House and I'm not going to start accepting it.' As Swarbrick left, she called out 'free Palestine.'


Arab News
an hour ago
- Arab News
New Zealand prime minister says Israel's Netanyahu has ‘lost the plot'
New Zealand's Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said on Wednesday that Israel's leader Benjamin Netanyahu had 'lost the plot' as the country weighs up whether to recognize a Palestinian state. Luxon told reporters that the lack of humanitarian assistance, the forceful displacement of people and the annexation of Gaza were utterly appalling and that Netanyahu had gone way too far. 'I think he has lost the plot,' added Luxon, who heads the center-right coalition government. 'What we are seeing overnight, the attack on Gaza City, is utterly, utterly unacceptable.' Luxon said earlier this week New Zealand was considering whether to recognize a Palestinian state. Close ally Australia on Monday joined Canada, the UK and France in announcing it would do so at a UN conference in September. The humanitarian crisis in Gaza has reached 'unimaginable levels,' Britain, Canada, Australia and several of their European allies said on Tuesday, calling on Israel to allow unrestricted aid into the war-torn Palestinian enclave. Israel has denied responsibility for hunger spreading in Gaza, accusing Hamas militants of stealing aid shipments, which Hamas denies. Ahead of Wednesday's parliamentary session, a small number of protesters gathered outside the country's parliament buildings, beating pots and pans. Local media organization Stuff reported protesters chanted 'MPs grow a spine, recognize Palestine.' On Tuesday, Greens parliamentarian Chloe Swarbrick was removed from parliament's debating chamber after she refused to apologize for a comment insinuating government politicians were spineless for not supporting a bill to 'sanction Israel for its war crimes.' Swarbrick was ordered to leave the debating chamber for a second day on Wednesday after she again refused to apologize. When she refused to leave, the government voted to suspend her. 'Sixty-eight members of this House were accused of being spineless,' House speaker Gerry Brownlee said. 'There has never been a time where personal insults like that delivered inside a speech were accepted by this House and I'm not going to start accepting it.' As Swarbrick left, she called out 'free Palestine.'

Al Arabiya
2 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
European leaders to hold online talks with Trump on Ukraine ahead of Putin summit
European leaders will hold online talks with US President Donald Trump on Wednesday, hoping to convince him to respect Ukraine's interests when he discusses the war with Russia's Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has invited Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy as well as the French, British and other European leaders and the heads of the EU and NATO to an afternoon video conference. They are then expected to talk to Trump and Vice President JD Vance in a second round of the conference call. The Trump-Putin meeting on Friday -- their first since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine over three years ago -- is so far planned to go ahead without Zelenskyy. This has fueled fears Kyiv could be forced into painful concessions, including over land. EU leaders stressed on Tuesday 'the inherent right of Ukraine to choose its own destiny,' adding that 'international borders must not be changed by force.' Zelenskyy, speaking to reporters Tuesday, ruled out withdrawing troops from the Donbas region which Moscow claims. Merz's office said the conference call would discuss 'further options to exert pressure on Russia' and 'preparation of possible peace negotiations and related issues of territorial claims and security.' The talks would include leaders from 'Finland, France, the UK, Italy, Poland, Ukraine, the heads of the European Commission and Council, the secretary general of NATO, as well as the US president and his deputy,' Berlin said on Monday. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, French President Emmanuel Macron and Merz are then also set to hold a round of talks of the so-called Coalition of the Willing of Ukraine's military backers. 'Difficult' battles Trump on Monday played down the possibility of a breakthrough in Alaska but said he expected 'constructive conversations' with Putin. 'This is really a feel-out meeting a little bit,' Trump said at the White House, but he also added that eventually 'there'll be some swapping, there'll be some changes in land.' Russia, as a prerequisite to a peace settlement, has demanded Kyiv pull its forces out of several regions claimed by Moscow, commit to being a neutral state, shun US and EU military support and be excluded from joining NATO. Ukraine has said it would never recognize Russian control over its sovereign territory, though it acknowledged that getting land captured by Russia back would have to come through diplomacy, not on the battlefield. Ukraine said Tuesday it was engaged in 'difficult' battles with Russian forces after Moscow had made rapid advances in a narrow but important section of the front line in the country's east. Zelenskyy said on social media that 'we see that the Russian army is not preparing to end the war. On the contrary, they are making movements that indicate preparations for new offensive operations.'