Did federal workers cost Poilievre his job? Top union boss says it's more about Trump
"I think what people saw was too many similarities. People see the platform that was presented. They see past decision-making and they link it to what's happening down south in an extreme manner," said Sharon DeSousa, national president of the Public Service Alliance of Canada (PSAC), the largest federal public sector union.
She said Trump's "mass firings" of government workers caused Canadians to worry the same could happen here.
"They're worried about their livelihood. They're dependent on public services," she said.
After Trump was elected president a second time, he launched the Department of Government Efficiency with the help of billionaire Elon Musk, which gutted several U.S. government agencies and fired thousands of workers.
DeSousa said those events "changed the game" of the 2025 federal election.
Poilievre said on Friday that he lost the riding of Carleton — which he represented for more than two decades — because of an "aggressive" union campaign after he was honest about wanting to cut federal jobs.
"It's an Ottawa riding with a lot of federal public servants who disagreed with that approach," Poilievre said in an interview with CBC's The House. "They ran a very aggressive campaign, particularly the public sector unions did, to defeat me on that basis."
DeSousa said PSAC ran a campaign during the 2025 federal election called For You, Canada that focused on protecting public services and reached about four million people. The "very basic" campaign targeted MPs in a variety of ridings, she said.
"At the end of the day, the public sector unions don't have a vote. Individuals do," DeSousa said. "I feel like the stance that is being provided is very simplistic."
WATCH | Why Poilievre thinks he lost his riding:
Poilievre says committing to cut federal public service cost him his Ottawa seat
5 days ago
In an exclusive interview with CBC's The House, host Catherine Cullen asks Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre how he makes sense of losing the Ottawa-area seat he held for two decades. Poilievre says public sector unions 'ran a very aggressive campaign' to defeat him.
The union president also said Poilievre's track record in the House of Commons made him even less appealing to his constituents. DeSousa cited Poilievre's vote against developing a national framework to establish a school food program.
"I think it's also a disconnect with him and the members of that particular riding. Keep in mind, this is someone who's held that riding for 20 years and was re-elected seven times," she said.
In a statement to CBC News, the president of the Canadian Association of Professional Employees, Nathan Prier, said "Poilievre actively campaigned against the interests of both his constituents and all Canadians, and as a result, his ideas were rejected."
Prier also said Poilievre blaming public sector unions should be a warning to "anyone else who fell for his masquerading as a friend of unions, while he clearly attacks federal public sector unions over his electoral defeat."
Poilievre claims Liberals hid plans to cut public service
During his interview on The House, Poilievre argued he was honest with Canadians about his plans to cut the public service while the Liberals and Mark Carney hid their intentions to do the same.
"Some people might say, 'Well, it wasn't the best idea to run on a smaller federal public service when you're an Ottawa MP,' but I had an entire country to represent," Poilievre said. "I had to be honest with people."
Last week, Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne sent letters to cabinet ministers asking them to figure out "ambitious savings proposals" to handle public sector spending. The wording of the letter was confirmed by Champagne's director of communications.
WATCH | Poilievre's exclusive interview with Catherine Cullen:
FULL INTERVIEW | Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre speaks with CBC Radio's The House
5 days ago
In an exclusive interview, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre speaks with CBC Radio's The House host Catherine Cullen about the ongoing trade negotiations between Canada and the U.S., his bid to regain a seat in the House of Commons and what he thinks led to him losing his Ottawa riding.
DeSousa said she doesn't think the Liberals were hiding their plans because the Trudeau government had already begun the work to cut federal spending, including funding to departments and agencies.
Carney's election platform promised to cap spending growth at two per cent per year through 2028-29. He also said during the election campaign that he would cap but not cut the public service. DeSousa said she's hoping Carney will keep that commitment.
"The prime minister still has an opportunity to make good on his promise, and I think it's a little bit early to say that it was a blatant lie," DeSousa said.
"We're in a transition period … the prime minister is well aware of the position of the federal public service, the unions and the workers."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
3 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Carney's policy shift on Palestinian statehood met with cautious hope, criticism by Canadians
Reem Sultan's uncle was killed in Gaza last December, her aunt died of malnutrition in January. Her cousin's family of six, including children, perished when their home was bombed in May. Another cousin who went to retrieve and bury their bodies died in an air strike, killed while grieving the dead. In all, the resident of London, Ont., has lost 15 close relatives in the Middle East conflict, but a tally of extended family members reaches closer to 100. So while Ms. Sultan welcomes the news that Canada intends to recognize the state of Palestine, she says more is needed than just words. 'It is a significant step in aligning Canada with other countries in the world,' said Ms. Sultan, a pharmacist, in an interview on Thursday. 'But at the same time, it's very important to emphasize that what is needed right now is to ensure that we end the genocide in Gaza, and for the government to take immediate action to save lives of Palestinians. What good is statehood if it's built on the graves of an entire population?' What does Canada's recognition of a Palestinian state mean in practice? Canada's plan to recognize Palestinian statehood prompts swift, divided reaction Prime Minister Mark Carney's announcement Wednesday that Canada intends to recognize a Palestinian state at the United Nations General Assembly in September has been met with both cautious hope and urgent demands from Canadians with deep ties to the region. Seen by many as an overdue recognition of Palestinian rights, the move has also been criticized as a symbolic gesture with little meaning without change on the ground. Others take issue with the timing. Former justice minister Irwin Cotler, a noted human-rights advocate and Canada's first Envoy on Preserving Holocaust Remembrance and Combating Antisemitism, supports Mr. Carney's intention to recognize an independent and democratic Palestinian state. However, he said it should have followed the mandated requirements under international law rather than trusting in good faith that the necessary conditions can be met. The Montevideo Convention, signed in 1933, sets out widely accepted criteria for statehood: a permanent population, a defined territory, a functioning government and the ability to engage in foreign relations. Mr. Carney had said that Canada's 'intention is predicated' on the Palestinian Authority's commitment to essential reforms, including that president Mahmoud Abbas hold general elections in 2026 in which Hamas would be unable to take part. 'I have been a supporter of 'Two states for two peoples' for more than 55 years now, not as an idle or lazy slogan, but one which presupposes a mutual acknowledgment of each other's legitimacy, and right to live in peace and security; and two democratic, rights-protecting states side-by-side,' Mr. Cotler wrote in an e-mail to The Globe and Mail. 'What we don't need is another authoritarian or terrorist-supporting state in the Middle East.' Izzeldin Abuelaish, a Palestinian doctor who is now a professor of medicine and public health at the University of Toronto, said Canada's move is a step in the right direction but that more action is required. He cited as an example the need for Canada to stop sending arms to Israel. Dr. Abuelaish said more than 70 of his family members have been killed in the conflict with Israel, and he wonders whether his relatives in northern Gaza will witness Canada's recognition of Palestinian statehood this fall. 'Are they going to be alive in September, to enjoy it, to celebrate it, to give them hope, to inspire them to keep moving forward?' Dr. Abuelaish said. 'It's an urgent situation. This war crime of starving the people, depriving them from the essential needs, needs to stop.' Montreal resident Stuart Lubarsky lost five family members when Hamas attacked Israel on Oct. 7. 'We've been wanting a two-state solution since the existence of Israel, so I have no problem with the recognition of Palestine as an independent state,' he said. 'It's just this is not the right time, in my opinion – not under these circumstances.' Mr. Lubarsky said he wouldn't agree with Canada's position until the hostages that were taken by Hamas are returned. Ben Losman, a core organizer with Toronto Jewish Families, a group dedicated to ending both anti-Palestinian racism and antisemitism in the Toronto District School Board, said the recognition is an overdue and necessary step. 'Growing up in a Jewish community, the idea that we would prevent genocide from ever taking place ever again was something that was very much a part of my Jewish education, Jewish identity,' he said. 'Like so many people, I've been horrified to find that the perpetrators of genocide are the Israeli government.' Mr. Losman said Canada's recognition 'must be paired with an immediate comprehensive, two-way arms embargo and efforts to establish the free flow of aid immediately throughout Gaza.' Karen Golden, a Toronto-based lawyer and Israeli citizen who worked for years in Jerusalem, met Bashar Alshawwa at an environmental conference last year, shortly after the Gaza native arrived in Canada from Ramallah. The pair soon became friends, sharing many family dinners with their partners and children. As their connection grew deeper, they often found themselves asking why such partnerships between Jewish and Palestinian communities remain so rare. They believe Canada's announcement is a step toward peaceful co-existence. 'I'm hopeful and optimistic that it reduces the polarization and divisions we've been seeing in Canada,' Mr. Alshawwa said Thursday. 'This recognition is a reflection of this country's commitment for justice as part of its core identity. It's stating that Canada won't keep allowing for such atrocities happening around the clock in Palestine.' Ms. Golden and Mr. Alshawwa have been advocating in Canada as part of Standing Together, an anti-war organization in Israel that has called for a ceasefire and protested human-rights abuses in the troubled region. Ms. Golden said she is disappointed by the swift condemnation from major Jewish groups of Canada's decision this week. 'By conflating anti-war sentiments with antisemitism, they're denying – without any empathy – that Palestinians are equal humans deserving of equal rights as Jewish people,' she said.
Toronto Sun
33 minutes ago
- Toronto Sun
EDITORIAL: Mark Carney tossed grenade into trade talks
Announcing Canada's support for an independent Palestinian state in opposition to U.S. President Donald Trump's position defies logic Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney speaks during a press conference after a Cabinet meeting to discuss both trade negotiations with the US and the situation in the Middle East, at the National Press Theatre in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada on July 30, 2025. Photo by Dave Chan / AFP via Getty Images Why Prime Minister Mark Carney announced Canada's support for an independent Palestinian state in opposition to U.S. President Donald Trump's position – two days before the Aug. 1 deadline for negotiating a tariff and trade deal with Canada – is inexplicable. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Initially, Trump said on social media that Canada's actions would make it very difficult to reach an agreement on trade by the deadline, although he later said in response to questioning in the Oval Office that it wasn't a deal breaker. Regardless, it was an unnecessary distraction from the trade negotiations with Trump, who signed an executive order Thursday raising U.S. tariffs on imported goods from Canada not compliant with the 2020 Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement to 35% from 25%. The White House also announced a 40% tariff on any goods shipped to another country to avoid the tariffs. As for the current state of the negotiations, Trump revealed that before the new tariffs were announced when he said, 'We haven't spoken to Canada today. He's (Carney) called and … we'll see.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Read More Meanwhile Mexico, which didn't impose retaliatory tariffs on the U.S. – in fact, Canada and China were the only two countries to do so – received a 90-day reprieve from any new tariffs while negotiations continue. None of this evokes confidence in Carney's ability to achieve a deal on trade with the U.S., which was why Canadians elected him. To be clear, while we disagree with Carney's intention to recognize an independent Palestinian state – particularly as he heads a minority government with Parliament in recess and thus with no debate in the House of Commons – we do not question his authority to make that decision. RECOMMENDED VIDEO We are a sovereign nation with the right to declare our own foreign policies, regardless of the views of the American president. But why Carney announced it just before a deadline on efforts to arrive at a deal on trade with Trump, affecting the livelihoods of millions of Canadians, defies logic. As for what comes next in these negotiations, who knows, given Trump's habit of changing his mind and reversing course on his decisions within days and sometimes mere hours after making them. But there was no need for Carney to add fuel to the fire. Toronto & GTA Canada Toronto Blue Jays MLB World
Winnipeg Free Press
33 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
‘The fallout is going to be real'
Manitoba exports may become more expensive for American customers, but the proposed change is being met with skepticism. Since 2016, exporters could ship parcels valued at US$800 or less into the United States tax-free. That's changing, according to an executive order U.S. President Donald Trump signed Wednesday. He's suspending the global exemption — called the de minimis exemption — starting Aug. 29. ADRIAN WYLD / THE CANADIAN PRESS FILES Since 2016, exporters could ship parcels valued at US$800 or less into the United States tax-free. That's changing, according to an executive order U.S. President Donald Trump signed Wednesday. He's suspending the global exemption — called the de minimis exemption — starting Aug. 29. New charges will vary. If a good is sent through the postal service, it'll be hit by a tariff rate from its country of origin. In other cases, the fee could range from US$80 to US$200, depending on the tariff rate at the package's country of origin. This option has a six-month time line. Canada is among the countries negotiating new trade pacts with the United States. Freshly signed deals with the U.S., including those by the European Union and Japan, have come with 15 per cent tariffs. 'The fallout is going to be real,' said Tyler Slobogian, a senior policy analyst with the Canadian Federation of Independent Business. Roughly 16 per cent of the CFIB's 4,500 Manitoba members export to the United States. Most ship using the de minimis exemption. Losing the immunity will likely result in companies changing their export models or dropping American sales, Slobogian forecast. Already, 31 per cent of Manitoba CFIB members have shifted to domestic suppliers within Canada amid U.S. trade uncertainty. Another 31 per cent are considering doing the same, per CFIB polling. Meantime, 14 per cent have moved their export markets outside of the United States. On Thursday night, Trump announced 35 per cent tariffs (up from 25 per cent) on Canadian goods not covered by the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement on trade, with the new number going into effect today. 'It's just another degree of uncertainty,' Matt Poirier, Retail Council of Canada vice-president of federal government relations, said of the de minimis change. 'Who knows if this order will see the light of day by the end of August?' He was echoed by Riley Slater, a K9 Storm employee. The Winnipeg company ships collars and leashes, among other things, to U.S. clientele under the exemption. 'Everything is kind of fluid,' Slater said. 'Things that are said today (are) not necessarily how it's going to be once trade deals are all worked out and finalized.' K9 Storm's wares comply with CUSMA and are not subject to current tariffs. It's unclear how the de minimis exemption's repeal might affect exports. A majority of Manitoba exports are CUSMA compliant, customs brokers have noted. The Retail Council of Canada has championed Canada's low de minimis rates, which is generally set at $20. 'Companies based outside of Canada (shouldn't) have a selling advantage into Canada,' Poirier said. 'The U.S. has the right to do that for themselves, too, obviously, but the way they're yo-yo-ing back and forth on this … that's going to impact their consumers.' Alan Dewar, executive vice-president of GHY International, expressed his surprise in a 2016 LinkedIn post following a change in the U.S. de minimis exemption from US$200 to US$800. Dewar labelled foreign businesses among the 'winners' in the 2016 policy change. Direct-to-consumer shipments from international businesses, like Chinese-based Shein and Temu, have since increased. Dewar expects Trump's executive order on the issue will affect all Manitoba companies who export south of the border. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. 'Everybody ships something that is probably worth less than $800,' he said Thursday. Once companies need declarations to ship their lower-value packages, brokerages like GHY will get busier, Dewar predicted. A combined cost of duties and intermediaries — like brokers — will raise the price of goods entering the U.S., he added. The Trump administration slashed the de minimis exemption on Chinese and Hong Kong imports in May. It initially set a tariff rate of 120 per cent on incoming goods from China, but later lowered the fee to 54 per cent. Manitoba businesses reliant on Chinese parts, and identifying their products' country of origin as China, have lost the de minimis exemption on applicable goods. Gabrielle PichéReporter Gabrielle Piché reports on business for the Free Press. She interned at the Free Press and worked for its sister outlet, Canstar Community News, before entering the business beat in 2021. Read more about Gabrielle. Every piece of reporting Gabrielle produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates. Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
