Oxfordshire farm pioneers mushrooms grown from coffee grounds
The farm consists of three units for preparation of the substrate and inoculation with mushroom spawn, incubation and fruiting.Once harvested, the spent substrate from the mushroom growing is converted to a a charcoal-like compost in the palace's walled garden. The compost is used to grow produce and the cycle begins again.
The farm is the latest stage in the Country Estate Carbon Demonstrator Project, Blenheim's collaboration with bioeconomy company Tumblebug. The project unlocks the value of Blenheim's organic waste, such as food, coffee and sheep wool.Roy Cox, managing director for estates at Blenheim Palace, said it was "incredible" to see mushrooms grown using its own organic waste."The mushroom harvest is the final piece of the puzzle, which completes this self-sustaining circular ecosystem," he said.It received a five-star food safety hygiene rating from West Oxfordshire District Council.
You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X, or Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Hotel tycoon reveals Heathrow runway expansion proposal
Hotel tycoon Surinder Arora has announced he is submitting a Heathrow expansion plan which rivals a proposal from the airport's billionaire's Arora Group said the "primary benefit" of the plan it submitted to the government was a shorter new runway which would avoid the costly and disruptive need to divert the M25 a 2,800-metre third runway instead of the full-length 3,500-metre runway planned by the airport would result in "reduced risk" and avoid "spiralling cost", the company airport declined to comment on the Arora Group's proposal. A shorter runway could have limits on its use, although Arora Group insisted it would be able to accommodate aircraft of all announcement means that for the first time, there will be two bids on the table to build a third runway at Heathrow. Arora Group said its plan, called Heathrow West, could have a new runway fully operational by 2035, while a new terminal would open in two phases, in 2036 and plan, developed with infrastructure company Bechtel, has a cost estimate of under £25 billion, not including the redevelopment of the airport's existing central said in 2018 it could complete its runway for £14 billion, but it is now expected to cost billions June, the government invited competing proposals for Heathrow's expansion and set a deadline of 31 Arora, who is one of the largest landowners at Heathrow, said: "After a decade working with our world-leading design and delivery team, I am very proud that the Arora Group can finally unveil to the UK government our Heathrow West proposal."The Arora Group has a proven track record of delivering on-time and on-budget projects including in and around Heathrow airport."We are delighted that the government has taken a common-sense approach to invite proposals from all interested parties for the very first time rather than granting exclusivity to the current airport operator, no matter its track record."Mr Arora has repeatedly accused the airport of wasting money. Carlton Brown, CEO of Heathrow West, said the new company would be able to dedicate time and focus to the expansion while working with stakeholders including airlines, communities and business."Ultimately, I want to see Heathrow help Britain become the best-connected nation in the world and facilitate the trade and inward investment our UK economy needs," he December 2024, French company Ardian completed a deal to become Heathrow's largest shareholder with a 23% stake, while Saudi Arabia's sovereign wealth fund purchased a 15% Rachel Reeves gave her backing for a third runway in a speech on growth in will submit its own expansion plan to the government on had planned to create a third runway by rerouting the M25 motorway between junctions 14 and 15 through a tunnel under the new runway. After receiving the proposals, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander will review the Airports National Policy Statement, which provides the basis for decision-making on any Development Consent Order is understood to be open to a discussion with airlines about building a shorter runway if it can deliver the same expanded, the number of flights at Heathrow Airport could go up to 720,000 - or nearly 2,000 a day on average. They are currently capped at 480,000 a told the BBC that it would eventually be able to serve up to 140 million passengers a year once a third runway is in operation. Paul McGuinness, chair of the No 3rd Runway Coalition, said they were concerned that thousands of people would have to be rehomed for the plans to move added: "There's a real danger that we'll end up with a hole in the ground and a debt pile for taxpayers to underwrite, because the government had foolishly encouraged Heathrow's profligate self-interest, as if blind to the lessons of HS2."In the past, the cost, the Covid pandemic and legal challenges have all got in the way of any development. A third runway was first proposed in 2009 by Gordon Brown's Labour government but was only finally given the go-ahead by the Supreme Court in 2020. 'Growth is important' The last bid sunk was partly by a legal challenge from five local councils and the Mayor of London. Several members of the current government - including Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer - voted against a Heathrow expansion when in Sir Keir told the BBC that the government has climate commitments, "but growth is really important too".Asked in January this year, when the government announced that it was in favour of a third runway, London's mayor Sir Sadiq Khan refused to rule out joining any future legal challenge to expansion.
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
Regulators warn firms over car finance compensation claims
Consumers caught up in the motor finance scandal risk losing up to 30 per cent of redress by signing up to paid services they do not need, regulators have warned. In an intervention ahead of a major Supreme Court ruling on Friday, the Solicitors Regulation Authority and Financial Conduct Authority, which have become increasingly concerned, have warned law firms and claims management companies over poor practices in commission claims. The FCA has already required 224 promotions to be amended or withdrawn over the past year and the SRA has 89 investigations into 73 law firms over potential breaches of its rules relating to high-volume claims. • Rachel Reeves may overrule Supreme Court over car finance scandal The prospect of the motor finance industry being forced to pay out tens of billions of pounds in compensation to borrowers has led claims firms to gear up for a bonanza and hit the share price of some London-listed lenders. The FCA will confirm within six weeks of Friday's Supreme Court judgment whether it will propose to introduce a redress scheme for motor finance customers. The judgment follows a review of a landmark ruling in October by the Court of Appeal, which concluded that any type of commission that was not properly disclosed to a borrower was unlawful. The regulators said they expect law firms and claims management companies to inform clients of any redress scheme, or where there is a 'realistic prospect' of one being introduced, which would allow customers to instead pursue a claim independently and free of charge. They must also alert them to charges if they do use a firm and must be clear on exit fees. The regulators are concerned about the 'volume and accuracy' of marketing materials, a failure to advise consumers about free alternatives, and 'inaccurate or misleading' information on the likelihood of success or payouts. Sheree Howard, executive director at the FCA, said: 'We've seen law firms and CMCs [claims management companies] advertising highly speculative figures, so we are warning them of our expectations when it comes to drumming up clients for motor finance commission claims … If we introduce a redress scheme for motor finance, we will aim to make it easy for people to take part.' Paul Philip, chief executive of the SRA, said: 'Where we find cases where firms are not acting in the best interest of their clients, we will investigate and take action.'
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Advocates of a two-state solution realise time to act is now
It may prove to be a momentous week in Middle East diplomacy, and not just because Keir Starmer – after much hesitation – made his historic pledge on Tuesday that the UK would recognise a Palestinian state at the UN general assembly in September if Israel did not agree to meet certain conditions. The day was momentous because in New York, Brussels, Jerusalem and even Berlin the battle lines are becoming clearer between the moderate and extremist visions for the future of Gaza and the West Bank once the war finally ends. Advocates of a two-state solution, including a radically reformed Palestinian Authority governing without Hamas, have finally realised the time to act is now, or else risk their vision being buried by Benjamin Netanyahu and his far-right minister of finance, Bezalel Smotrich, under the benign watch of Donald Trump. The choice is between coexistence and forced displacement of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians. Britain's policy that it could hold back playing the 'recognition card' until the point of maximum impact in the peace process was based on a belief that the UK still held sway in the Middle East, but also rested on an outdated interpretation of the future trajectory of Israeli politics. The reality is that Israel in the wake of 7 October has moved further and further away from notions of a two-state solution. On Tuesday, Smotrich said the re-establishment of Israeli settlements in Gaza was no longer 'wishful thinking, but part of what had become a realistic work plan. Gaza is an inseparable part of Land of Israel,' he said. It comes amid reports that Netanyahu will give Hamas a few days to agree to a ceasefire on his terms and if not he will begin annexing parts of the Gaza Strip. Smotrich also said of the West Bank: 'Israel is making a revolution there by implementing de facto sovereignty, regulating construction making declarations changing the DNA of the entire system and paving roads.' Formal sovereignty over the West Bank will be completed in the government's term, he predicted. In this context it became absolutely critical that proponents of a two-state solution galvanise even if to make a last stand to keep the concept from being destroyed by Israeli bulldozers. In the words of the French foreign minister, Jean-Noël Barrot, the two-state solution was 'in mortal danger. On both sides the proponents of rejection seem to be winning.' A postponed conference in New York held this week provided the chance to turn the tide. Barrot argued: 'After 22 months of fruitless attempts, it is illusory to hope a lasting ceasefire can be obtained without outlining a shared vision for the postwar period in Gaza, without charting a political horizon, an alternative to a permanent state of war.' Before the conference the French president, Emmanuel Macron, presented a letter from the Palestinian Authority president, Mahmoud Abbas, in which he made a series of concessions. Among other commitments, the PA committed to hold presidential elections within a year throughout the occupied territories, including East Jerusalem. The aim was to achieve generational renewal – and the resignation of 89-year-old Abbas. Speaking to the New York conference, the Palestinian prime minister, Mohammad Mustafa, reiterated that Hamas must stand aside. But the conference, co-chaired by France and Saudi Arabia, did not just focus on reform of the PA and the marginalisation of Hamas, it set out in a seven-page document – the New York declaration – containing a path to a two-state solution, one in which Israel's security can be assured without further occupation, repression and annexation, the grim dystopian vision offered by Netanyahu. The declaration merges previous Arab and European postwar plans for Gaza. It proposes: 'Following the ceasefire, a transitional administrative committee must be immediately established to operate in Gaza under the umbrella of the Palestinian Authority. The declaration supports the deployment of a temporary international stabilisation mission, mandated by the UN security council, and welcomes 'the readiness expressed by some member states to contribute troops'. It emphasised Gaza was an integral part of the Palestinian State and must be unified with the West Bank. Hamas must end its rule in Gaza and hand over its weapons to the Palestinian Authority with international engagement. It also holds out the aspiration that the ending of the Israel-Palestinian conflict will lead to a wider regional settlement, even if the Gulf states currently balk at offering normalisation with Israel. In this wider context, the internal British debate about the conditionality attached to the British pledge to recognise a Palestine state looks somewhat marginal. From the left, Starmer faces criticism for not offering recognition as a principled assertion of the Palestinians' right to self-determination. His offer certainly lacked the high-flown rhetoric about statehood embedded in the French offer, and it seems misplaced to cast the offer as a punishment against Israel. Moreover, by refusing to act jointly with Macron last week, Starmer's decision appeared to be a retreat in the face of an internal rebellion, rather than showing leadership. Nevertheless the UK decision was greeted warmly in New York when announced by the UK foreign secretary, David Lammy. The conditionality, the last vestige of the UK hang-up about using recognition as an influential card, also helps to clarify that Israel faces an essential choice between conflict and coexistence. Since Israel has immediately rejected Starmer's terms, UK recognition now looks an inevitability in September. There are growing signs in Brussels and Berlin too that patience with Netanyahu's methods has run out, even if they cannot agree on a form of punishment. In the US the latest Gallup poll shows only 8% of Democrats support Israel's strategy. It is now the task of diplomats to harness the momentum created in New York, and the worldwide abhorrence at Israel's war in Gaza, to persuade Donald Trump to think more strategically about a Palestinian peace. It may yet prove impossible, but at least the groundwork has now been laid.
