Why NC Helene funding bill could be stalled in General Assembly
RALEIGH, N.C. (WNCN) — More than $450 million in Helene relief funding could be held up in the North Carolina General Assembly if Senators decide to incorporate it in the budget instead of passing it as a separate bill.
House members passed the $464 million relief measure as a standalone bill on Thursday, meaning it could just go on to the Senate, be passed, and then immediately head to the Governor's desk.
But top Senators may negotiate the funding as part of the overall budget instead.
Those negotiations can take weeks, meaning the funding could be stalled.
'However they decide to do it, we just need to get it done. We don't know what's going to happen with federal support and we just need to get those resources to the people of western North Carolina,' said Senator Natalie Murdock.
Top Representatives say they're hopeful negotiations on the budget will go smoothly with the Senate.
'As in the past, there will be a give or take on certain areas, areas that are priorities for each of the chambers, so you know in order to get anything done in here especially a budget with so much in it, you have to compromise on each side,' Representative Destin Hall said.
But some Senate Democrats are less optimistic and say the Helene funding shouldn't be caught in the crossfire.
'I think it should be a separate bill since it looks like the budget is more controversial than maybe any of us would've wanted it to be,' Senator Julie Mayfield said.
Lawmakers won't be back in Raleigh until the first week of June to start those negotiations.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump escalates war of words on Putin as Ukraine ceasefire deal stalls
President Trump and Russian officials are engaged in a war of words, a sign of escalating tensions between the two powers as Trump grows increasingly frustrated over the lack of progress toward a ceasefire in Ukraine. Trump has posted in recent days on social media that Russian President Vladimir Putin had gone 'absolutely CRAZY' and warned he was 'playing with fire' with continued strikes on Ukrainian cities. Moscow, meanwhile, has issued coy responses to Trump as it carries out deadly strikes against Kyiv, cautioning the U.S. president against 'emotional overload' and warning that the only bad outcome would be 'WWIII.' Lawmakers in both parties have used the shift in tone to urge Trump to take a tougher stance through sanctions on Russia, while experts argued it was still unclear whether the president would match his stronger rhetoric with action. 'We're going to find out whether he's tapping us along or not. And if he is, we'll respond a little bit differently. But it will take about a week and a half, two weeks,' Trump told reporters Wednesday when asked if he thought Putin wanted to end the war. 'They seem to want to do something, but until the document is signed, I can't tell you. Nobody can,' Trump added. 'I can say this — that I'm very disappointed at what happened a couple of nights now where people were killed in the middle of what you would call a negotiation.' Russian forces invaded Ukraine in February 2022 after amassing troops near the border for weeks. Tens of thousands of troops on both sides of the conflict have been killed in the more than three years since. Trump campaigned in 2024 on a pledge that he would end the war in Ukraine before even taking the oath of office. But he has found it more difficult than expected to strike a peace deal, and he has lashed out in recent months at both Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Trump aides have met separately with officials from both Russia and Ukraine, and Russian and Ukrainian officials spoke directly earlier this month for the first time since the war began. While Ukrainian leaders have said they would back a 30-day ceasefire, Russia has not shown a serious interest in any kind of pause in fighting. In recent days, Trump's ire has been directed mostly at Putin. Trump has in the past drawn intense scrutiny from Democrats for his friendly approach to the Russian leader and his desire for good relations with Moscow. But Trump's patience appeared to be wearing thin as Putin launched a barrage of strikes on Ukrainian cities in recent days while the U.S. pushed for a detente. The president claimed Tuesday that he was the reason 'lots of really bad things' had not happened to Russia. That came two days after Trump said Putin was 'needlessly killing a lot of people, and I'm not just talking about soldiers.' Some experts see Trump's newfound frustrations as a change in tone. 'I do think it's a shift, and one that may be designed to send a signal to Putin that Trump is not going to write him a blank check,' said Brett Bruen, a former diplomat who was director of global engagement in the Obama White House. 'Whether or not he'll accept something far short of what is smart remains an open question.' Bruen likened Trump's back-and-forth with Putin to his first-term dalliance with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, which shifted between bombastic rhetoric that raised the specter of conflict and two in-person summits that presented a chance at diplomacy but ultimately yielded limited results. Senators in both parties, perhaps sensing an opening with Trump's public frustration with Russia, have urged the president to take a firmer posture toward Moscow. Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) said Trump should take 'decisive action' against Putin like he has done in cutting off federal grants for Harvard University. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), a close Trump ally and a leading backer of a bill in the Senate that would impose additional sanctions on Russia, argued Tuesday that Putin has shown he is 'not willing' to end the war. Sen. Jack Reed (R.I.), the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, said in a statement Wednesday that the U.S. 'must join our allies in levying new sanctions on Russia to intensify the economic pressure.' Zelensky told reporters Tuesday that Trump indicated during a recent meeting in the Vatican that he supported additional sanctions on Russia. 'Our conversation was positive from the point of view that I perceive our conversation as a confirmation of the U.S. policy of imposing strong sanctions against Russia if Putin does not agree to a ceasefire,' Zelensky said. While lawmakers and foreign leaders waited to see if Trump's tough talk toward Putin would lead to action, the U.S. president has signaled he may feel the need to meet with the Russian leader face-to-face for there to be any clear progress. Trump shrugged off Putin's absence at negotiations between Russia and Ukraine in Turkey earlier this month, arguing there was no reason for Putin to attend if Trump himself would not be there. Trump has talked repeatedly about a potential in-person summit with Putin this summer, though the timing and location of any such meeting is still up in the air. Experts cautioned that it plays to Putin's advantage the longer the U.S. continues to bide its time. 'He's learning how difficult this kind of diplomacy with the Kremlin is,' Bruen said. 'I think he's significantly underestimated what is a pretty shrewd actor in the case of Putin.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Warren, Markey, Healey warn of Medicaid cuts
BOSTON (WWLP) – Massachusetts' top leadership on the state and federal levels came together to denounce Medicaid cuts and call for action. Following the passage of President Trump's so-called 'big, beautiful bill' in the U.S. House, which guts Medicaid funding, Governor Healey and Senators Warren and Markey had a message for Massachusetts residents: if these cuts go forward, people will die. Healey announces business regulation reductions Medicaid cuts would result in the loss of healthcare coverage for a quarter of a million Massachusetts residents, including one-third of all babies and their mothers, and two-thirds of seniors living in nursing homes. Senator Warren says this bill marks the largest transfer of wealth from poor Americans to rich Americans in history. 'These guys are actually out there making history by taking away from hardworking families, from people down on their luck, from seniors, from little babies,' Warren said. Governor Healey called on Bay Staters to speak out against this bill. 'People have got to understand what's going on so that they can get out and advocate, advocate to Congress, advocate to the Trump administration,' Healey said. Senator Ed Markey said members of Congress will also do their part in discouraging support for this bill by ensuring political consequences for the bill's supporters. 'We're not going to back down, and I think ultimately Republicans are going to see that they're going to proceed at their own political peril,' Markey said. The so-called 'big, beautiful bill' still needs to pass the Republican-led U.S. Senate, and it is not yet clear what, if any, changes will be made to the plan. WWLP-22News, an NBC affiliate, began broadcasting in March 1953 to provide local news, network, syndicated, and local programming to western Massachusetts. Watch the 22News Digital Edition weekdays at 4 p.m. on Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk emboldens GOP critics of Trump's big bill: From the Politics Desk
Welcome to the online version of From the Politics Desk, an evening newsletter that brings you the NBC News Politics team's latest reporting and analysis from the White House, Capitol Hill and the campaign trail. In today's edition, we explore how Elon Musk is adding fuel to the fire for Republican skeptics of President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' Plus, Andrea Mitchell dives into how Trump is fundamentally reshaping the the postwar alliance between the U.S. and Europe. Sign up to receive this newsletter in your inbox every weekday here. — Adam Wollner Elon Musk took some of the wind out of the sails of the 'big, beautiful bill' as it moves to the Senate next week after passing the House by the narrowest of margins. In an interview with CBS' 'Sunday Morning' that will air in full this Sunday, Musk said he was 'disappointed' that the massive domestic policy package would increase the deficit and said it 'undermines' the work of the Department of Government Efficiency. 'I think a bill can be big or it can be beautiful, I don't know if it can be both,' Musk said. It's not the first time Musk has broken with President Donald Trump on a major issue. (See his comments on tariffs last month). Nor is it the first time Musk has thrown a wrench into the middle of high-stakes legislating on Capitol Hill. (See his comments on a government funding bill late last year.) The criticism: Musk has suggested he's scaling back from his administration role to return his attention to the private sector. But his comments still served to embolden conservative critics of the multitrillion-dollar package, as the GOP faces a tight timeline and little margin for error for final passage. Rep. Warren Davison of Ohio, one of only two Republicans who voted against the bill in the House last week, said in response to Musk's interview on X: 'Hopefully, the Senate will succeed with the Big Beautiful Bill where the House missed the moment. Don't hope someone else will cut deficits someday, know it has been done this Congress.' Sens. Rand Paul of Kentucky, Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and Mike Lee of Utah reiterated their issues with the bill, which revolve around the deficit impact. The Congressional Budget Office has projected the legislation would add $2.3 trillion to the federal deficit over 10 years. 'This bill isn't a done deal yet,' Lee said. 'The Senate version will be more aggressive.' Republicans can only afford three defections in the Senate, and any changes they make there would have to go back through the House before the bill can go to Trump's desk, which they are aiming to do by July 4. The defense: Trump's allies quickly rushed to defend the package, which is a product of delicate negotiations among Republicans with a thin House majority. White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller and House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., took to X to say that their efforts to shrink the size of government would extend beyond the 'big, beautiful bill.' They said they would seek to cut spending through a rescission package — a clawback of money that Congress has already appropriated — and through the regular budget process for the 2026 fiscal year. 'The House is eager and ready to act on DOGE's findings so we can deliver even more cuts to big government that President Trump wants and the American people demand,' Johnson said. What Trump is saying: Asked about Musk's criticism, Trump said he was 'not happy about certain aspects' of the bill, but 'thrilled by other aspects of it.' Read more → Town hall heat: GOP Reps. Mike Flood of Nebraska and Ashley Hinson of Iowa faced intense questioning and jeers at town halls this week over their support for the 'big, beautiful bill.' Has the Trump administration decided America's closest European allies should be treated as adversaries? Setting aside President Donald Trump's long-standing aversion to NATO and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth calling the Europeans 'pathetic' in a now-infamous Signal chat, now the State Department is sending diplomats to Ireland and France to chide their governments for allegedly censoring free speech by right-wing political parties and movements. Secretary of State Marco Rubio went on social media to criticize Germany for labeling a far-right opposition party 'extremist.' And Vice President JD Vance caused a furor at the Munich Security Conference by attacking his hosts for 'a retreat of Europe from some of its most fundamental values — values shared with the United States of America.' Vance's criticism, immediately rejected by some Republicans in attendance, was widely written off as an outlier. Now it has become policy. An even more inflammatory statement just published on the State Department's official Substack is expanding on Vance's critique and declaring U.S. support for the nascent right-wing movements across Europe. In a separate but related statement, Rubio announced visa restrictions against foreign nationals who try to censor Americans or foreign officials who demand that U.S. tech platforms moderate global content that reaches into the United States. Leaders of the European Union, the world's largest trading bloc, are also reeling from Trump's recent suggestion that the U.S. would impose a 50% tariff on E.U. exports — a proposal he put on hold after a sharp rebuke from the markets pending the conclusion of trade negotiations in July. But with plans underway for the annual NATO summit in June, European leaders are also bracing for the latest Trump salvo over their lagging defense commitments, coupled with a potential declaration that he will not sustain U.S. military support for Ukraine once the current pipeline of Biden-approved weapons runs out. As Europe scrambles to replace what it anticipates will be the U.S. abandonment of Ukraine, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer is leading the charge to rally European contributions — although they cannot duplicate American air defenses or intelligence. And Starmer is rushing to try to repair his country's post-Brexit breach with the E.U. in expectation of an economic stalemate over tariffs with the White House. Meanwhile, the entire bloc looks toward Beijing as an alternative trading partner. What isn't clear is how the Trump administration's criticism of Europe and tariff fights advance either U.S. security or economic interests. But this appears to be only the beginning of the administration's reimagining of a postwar alliance that rebuilt a devastated Europe and created the greatest, most sustained economic boom in American history. 📝 Pardon politics: Trump said he would look into possibly pardoning the men convicted in a scheme to kidnap Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer. Read more → 📝 Pardon politics, cont.: Trump's recent string of pardons highlight the Justice Department's pullback from public corruption cases. Read more → ➡️ Russia-Ukraine latest: Trump suggested he'll make a decision in the next two weeks on how he will deal with Russia's handling of peace talks with Ukraine. Read more → 📈 Deportation data: The Trump administration has dramatically stepped up its pace of deportations, according to Immigration and Customs Enforcement data obtained by NBC News, but is still lagging behind its target. Read more → 🚫 New directive: The Trump administration has stopped scheduling new interviews for international students seeking visas to study in the U.S. as the State Department prepares for expanded social media screening of applicants. Read more → Follow live politics updates → That's all From the Politics Desk for now. Today's newsletter was compiled by Adam Wollner. If you have feedback — likes or dislikes — email us at politicsnewsletter@ And if you're a fan, please share with everyone and anyone. They can sign up here. This article was originally published on
