
Iran and Ethiopia have a security deal – here's why they signed it
Ethiopia and Iran signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) on 6 May 2025. Under it, their national police agencies will cooperate on security and intelligence. This will include combating cross-border crime, sharing intelligence and building capacity. They will also share experiences and training.
For Iran, the MOU marks a significant step towards strengthening relations with a regional power that's strategically located in the Horn of Africa.
Tehran has been using its security apparatus and military capabilities to establish and expand political and economic ties with countries in Africa. This has included drone transfers to the Ethiopian government that helped it turned the tide of the Tigray war, a separatist struggle in the country's north that took place from 2020 to 2022.
Iran has also supplied the Sudanese army with surveillance and combat drones. These have been used against the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces in Sudan's ongoing civil war.
The agreement is important for Ethiopia for two reasons.
Firstly, it's likely to enable the Ethiopian government in Addis Ababa to combat ethnic militias more effectively. It faces increasing internal instability, including tensions with hostile factions of the separatist Tigray People's Liberation Front.
Secondly, the agreement comes after a meeting in Addis Ababa between the Ethiopian police chief, Demelash Gebremichael, and a delegation from Iran's regional rival, the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The exchange concentrated on investigating and extraditing cross-border criminals.
Addis Ababa's willingness to work with regional rivals in the Middle East shows its pragmatic approach to foreign relations. Ethiopia needs all the friends it can muster as an embattled and weakened state. Since the Tigray war, it has battled the rise of ethnic militias and confronted economic adversity. It is also facing renewed hostility with neighbouring Eritrea.
Since 2016, Ethiopia has been a gateway for Iran to gain a foothold in the Horn of Africa. That year, other countries in the region severed relations with Iran. This followed Tehran's disengagement from sub-Saharan Africa under Hassan Rouhani, who served as president from 2013 to 2021, and his prioritisation of a nuclear deal with the US.
The severing of ties was also a byproduct of geopolitical pressure exerted by Saudi Arabia and the UAE on countries in the region. The Middle Eastern states wanted to reduce, if not eliminate, Iran's presence in the Horn of Africa and Red Sea to limit its support for Houthi rebels in the ongoing Yemeni civil war.
Read more:
Ethiopia was the first country in sub-Saharan Africa to establish relations with Iran during the 1960s. It was also one of its top trading partners on the continent before and after the 1979 Iranian Revolution.
Strategically and ideologically, this special relationship was based on the pro-western and anti-communist stances of their monarchs: the Shah of Iran Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, who ruled from 1941 to 1979, and Emperor Haile Selassie, who was in power from 1930 to 1974.
After the revolution, Iran-Ethiopia relations revived under Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who served as Iranian president from 2005 to 2013. He pursued an active Africa policy to mitigate Iran's international isolation and circumvent US sanctions.
After Rouhani initially downgraded these relations, they were renewed during his second term. This followed US withdrawal from the nuclear deal.
Relations firmed when Ebrahim Raisi, who served as Iranian president from 2021 to 2024, delivered military drones and other aid to Addis Ababa during the Tigray war.
Ethiopia is facing increasing instability and uncertainty. The Tigray war has depleted the state's resources. There is an economic crisis caused by rising inflation and unemployment.
Addis Ababa continues to confront ethnic tensions. Hostile factions of the Tigray People's Liberation Front remain. It also faces tensions with the Amhara Fano militia, which initially fought alongside the government against Tigrayan forces. Forced disarmament policies and ongoing land disputes caused the militia to take up arms against the government.
Read more:
Ethiopian prime minister Abiy Ahmed also faces growing opposition and resistance from his own ethnic group, the majority Oromo, and their Oromo Liberation Army. The reason for their discontent is Abiy's imposition of centralised rule on their regional state within a federal system.
The security and intelligence cooperation with Iran could allow Addis Ababa to combat ethnic militias more effectively.
It would also enable Ethiopia to prepare for another possible war against neighbouring Eritrea.
Ethiopia and Eritrea normalised relations and fought together against Tigrayan forces. However, tensions between the two countries have been brewing again. These have been triggered by two factors. First, the conditions of the 2022 Pretoria peace agreement caused Eritrea to maintain forces inside Ethiopia. Second are the ambitions of Addis Ababa to acquire a Red Sea port in Somaliland, a breakaway region of Somalia. Eritrea has supported Somalia's opposition to the deal.
This isn't the first time that Ethiopia has tried working with two regional rivals – Iran and the UAE. The UAE is also among its top trading partners, along with Saudi Arabia.
In 2016, Ethiopia was the only country in the Horn of Africa that didn't cut ties with Iran, though it was under pressure from the UAE and Saudi Arabia to do so. The decision was taken by Abiy's predecessor, Hailemariam Desalegn, whose term ran from 2012 to 2018.
During the Tigray war, Ethiopia received military drones and other assistance from Iran and the UAE, alongside Turkey.
The civil war in Sudan has presented an even more complicated story. Ethiopia has vacillated between engaging with the Rapid Support Forces and the Sudanese Armed Forces at different points in the conflict.
For its part, Iran has supported the Sudanese army. The UAE has backed the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces.
Ethiopia's efforts to strengthen its security ties with Iran and the UAE show a unique case of convergence between regional rivals that have otherwise remained on opposite sides of conflicts in countries like Yemen and Sudan.
This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Eric Lob, Florida International University
Read more:
In talking with Tehran, Trump is reversing course on Iran – could a new nuclear deal be next?
What is federalism? Why Ethiopia uses this system of government and why it's not perfect
In Yemen, Trump risks falling into an 'airpower trap' that has drawn past US presidents into costly wars
Eric Lob does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
New protests in S.F. begin as Newsom says Trump is sending more National Guard troops to L.A.
Outrage over immigration raids in Los Angeles sparked a second day of protests in San Francisco on Monday, as state and local leaders accused President Donald Trump of stoking fear and violence by deploying federal troops to Southern California. The demonstrations began late Monday afternoon on the steps of City Hall as Gov. Gavin Newsom said that Trump would deploy another 2,000 members of the California National Guard to Los Angeles, despite the first 2,000 troops being underprepared and underutilized. 'This isn't about public safety. It's about stroking a dangerous President's ego,' Newsom posted on social media. 'This is Reckless. Pointless. And Disrespectful to our troops.' At San Francisco City Hall, about 200 people gathered on the steps for a rally and press conference opposing Trump's immigration enforcement, including his enactment of a travel ban targeting citizens from mainly African and Middle Eastern countries. One person waved an upside-down American flag, while another held a Pride flag. Among the speakers were three members of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors — Bilal Mahmood, Jackie Fielder and Shamann Walton — who each strongly condemned Trump. Both Mahmood and Walton described the Trump administration as tyrannical, while Mahmood challenged Trump to come after him first before targeting his residents. 'Donald Trump, you are a coward,' Mahmood said. 'You are a wannabe king anchored in hatred.' Fielder accused Trump of "recklessly" escalating the protests in Los Angeles by deploying the California National Guard and later the Marines. 'It was the National Guard that incited violent protests by arresting peaceful protesters,' Fielder said. 'We have fought this before, and we have to fight it again.' The demonstration came on the heels of a chaotic altercation in downtown San Francisco on Sunday that resulted in the arrest of 148 adults and six juveniles. The civil unrest spurred Mayor Daniel Lurie and other city officials earlier Monday to urge protesters to demonstrate peacefully, while promising to hold those who commit vandalism or other crimes accountable. The rally at City Hall was expected to merge with a protest Monday evening at the 24th and Mission BART plaza. The protests first erupted over the weekend in Los Angeles after federal authorities conducted immigration raids in heavily Latino neighborhoods. Some protesters clashed with local law enforcement, while people vandalized buildings and set vehicles on fire. Local law enforcement deployed tear gas and flash-bang grenades on protesters. The Trump administration deployed National Guard troops, without the request of the governor, in an effort to quell the protests, but Newsom said local law enforcement did not need the help and that the federal government sent them to escalate tensions. The deployment led to Trump and Newsom trading barbs on Monday. Newsom said the state would sue the administration over the deployment, calling it a 'serious breach of state sovereignty.' Trump said on Monday that Newsom should be arrested, and the government began deploying hundreds of U.S. Marines to Los Angeles. On Sunday in San Francisco, protesters gathered near the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement office downtown. The demonstration soon turned into a chaotic standoff between protesters and police that injured two officers, police said. Of the more than 150 arrested, police cited and released all but one of them, a person suspected of aggravated assault. There was no immediate indication that federal officials also planned to send National Guard troops to San Francisco. San Francisco's mayor Lurie refrained from attacking Trump at a press conference Monday morning, while stressing the need for protesters to demonstrate peacefully. Lurie said he understood why people were protesting and criticized the 'tactics being used across the country to target immigrant communities.' 'Those tactics make members of our community less likely to work with law enforcement to report crimes and criminals,' Lurie said. 'They make people afraid to go to work or send their kids to school. That all makes our city less safe.' Lurie endorsed San Francisco's sanctuary law that limits cooperation between its police and federal immigration enforcement, saying the policy had made immigrant residents of the city more comfortable working with police when necessary. He also said 'everyone in this country has a right to make their voices heard peacefully.' 'But let me also be clear: We will not tolerate violence and destructive behavior, and we will never tolerate violence directed at law enforcement or city workers,' Lurie said. 'Our public servants are there to protect the right to protest and the right to be safe. Violent behavior towards them is unacceptable.' District Attorney Brooke Jenkins said she sympathized with immigrant residents who are afraid to go about their daily lives because of the raids being conducted by the Trump administration. She expressed support for peaceful protest but said 'we draw the line when people violate the law.' Jenkins vowed to prosecute 'those who are committing vandalism, violence and other acts that are criminal' but said it would take time for her office to sort through videos and other evidence gathered by police on Sunday. Law enforcement leaders are bracing for a potential influx of arrests in the coming days if unrest persists in San Francisco. The sheriff's office prepared its intake and release facility to handle mass arrests 'should the need arise,' Undersheriff Katherine Johnson told reporters. Sheriff's officials can open additional jail units if needed, she said.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
AP PHOTOS: Trump's new travel ban takes effect, and some protest
President Donald Trump's ban on travel to the United States took effect Monday. Demonstrators outside Los Angeles International Airport held signs protesting the ban affecting citizens from 12 mainly African and Middle Eastern countries. At Miami International Airport, passengers moved steadily through an area for international arrivals. Tensions are escalating over the Trump administration's campaign of immigration enforcement. The new ban applies to citizens of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. It also imposes heightened restrictions on people from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela who are outside the U.S. and don't hold a valid visa. ___ This is a photo gallery curated by AP photo editors.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
All Ivy League schools are supporting Harvard lawsuit — except these 2
As Harvard University fights in federal court against the Trump administration's nearly $3 billion in funding cuts or freezes, over two dozen universities are supporting the Cambridge institution in new court filings. However, Columbia University and Cornell University are notably the only Ivy League institutions that are absent from the document, known as an amicus brief. The court filing points to how the funding cuts to Harvard would 'negatively impact the entire research ecosystem,' in addition to the 'Nation's universities, to the public welfare and to America's position in the world,' according to the filing. The filing initially had 18 institutions and six requested to join on Monday. Spokespeople at both institutions didn't respond immediately to requests for comment. Read more: 'We are not just fighting for Harvard': For alums, this year feels different The institutions that have signed on to the court document include: American University Georgetown University Stanford university University of Delaware University of Denver University of Maryland, Baltimore Boston University Brown University California Institute of Technology Colorado State University Dartmouth College Johns Hopkins University Massachusetts Institute of Technology Michigan State University Oregon State University Princeton University Rice University Rutgers University Tufts University University of Maryland, College Park University of Oregon University of Pennsylvania University of Pittsburgh Yale University While Columbia hasn't signed on in support of Harvard's lawsuit, an alumni group called Columbia Alumni for Academic Freedom has offered support in a separate amicus brief. The group was organized in March 2025 in response to the Trump administration's actions toward both Columbia and Harvard. The group said members are 'united in the conviction that nothing about recent campus events — ones that reflect real fissures in our world and nation — remotely justifies, nor is the true reason for, the sweeping, indiscriminate and punitive actions recently visited upon Columbia and Harvard by the Trump Administration." Columbia has been in a similar fight to Harvard with the Trump administration. Most recently, the U.S. Department of Education threatened Columbia's accreditation due to its response to campus antisemitism. It was the first institution to be offered an ultimatum — either abide by a list of requirements laid out for them or jeopardize its 'continued financial relationship with the United States government.' Columbia later agreed to implement a list of policy changes, including overhauling its rules for protests and conducting an immediate review of its Middle Eastern studies department. After Harvard University was also issued an ultimatum — with billions of dollars of funding on the line — Harvard pushed back against the administration. The university has multiple lawsuits against the federal government right now. Quickly following in Harvard's footsteps, Columbia pledged not to make any agreement with the federal government that would 'relinquish our independence and autonomy,' according to a message from the university's president. Columbia is also being investigated by the U.S. Department of Education for failing to protect Jewish students from antisemitic discrimination and harassment. Six Massachusetts institutions are also part of the investigation. Cornell, the other institution that did not sign onto the legal document in support of Harvard, had $1 billion in funding frozen in April. Embassies directed to resume processing Harvard University student visas Over 12,000 Harvard alums lend weight to court battle with Trump in new filing 'We are not just fighting for Harvard': For alums, this year feels different What a monk, a librarian and a dentist have to do with Harvard's fight with Trump Judge blocks Trump admin from banning Harvard international students from entering US Read the original article on MassLive.