logo
Trump wants to fight democrats on crime. They're treading cautiously

Trump wants to fight democrats on crime. They're treading cautiously

With his efforts to take control of law enforcement in Washington, D.C., last week, President Donald Trump has pushed the issue of crime back to the foreground of American politics. In doing so, he's invited a fight with Democrats, who are treading cautiously as they seek to forcefully oppose the federal incursion into the nation's capital, something no president has ever attempted, without getting caught up in a debate over public safety on Trump's terms.
Trump and his Republican allies wielded the sharp increase in violent crime in urban areas during the pandemic as a campaign cudgel, winning control of the House in the 2022 midterms. Trump expanded his winning coalition two years later, in part with promises to prevent the rest of America from becoming like the cities he called "unlivable, unsanitary nightmares," deriding the data that showed improvement across the country. While his tactics in Washington are extraordinary, the effort is an actualization of one of his most tried-and-true political arguments: Democrats -- often Black Democrats -- have let lawlessness run rampant in the cities and states they were elected to run. At a moment when Trump's approval ratings even among his supporters are declining, he appears to be laying the groundwork for Republicans to once again weaponize the issue in the midterm elections.
Trump has sent National Guard troops to patrol the streets, turned federal law enforcement officers into beat cops and sought to put the local police department fully under his administration's control. And the president has suggested he wants to bring his brand of law and order to Chicago; Baltimore; Oakland, California; and New York, all liberal cities in blue states, while avoiding any mention of high-crime cities in red states, such as Memphis, Tennessee, or St. Louis.
Among Democrats, there is widespread agreement that Trump is stoking fear for political gain and exaggerating statistics to justify a power grab. But there is also recognition that the party must acknowledge that concerns about public safety continue to resonate not just with Trump's supporters, but with their own. "We as Democrats should be careful not to cede the issue of public safety to Donald Trump and Republicans," Rep. Ritchie Torres, who represents the Bronx borough of New York City, said in an interview. "We should own the issue of public safety, because it matters to voters." For his part, Trump made clear last week he sees his moves as a political slam-dunk. "I think crime is maybe 100 to nothing, so I think we may get very well some Democratic support," Trump said Wednesday. Trump made inroads across blue states including New York, New Jersey and California in 2024, alarming Democrats who worried that his messages about crime, immigration and quality of life had appealed to their voters, too. That year, a survey by Pew Research Center found that nearly 6 in 10 adults, including almost half of Democrats, wanted the reduction of crime to be a top priority for American leaders -- a figure that had grown since 2021. The differing approaches the party has taken to Trump over his crackdown in Washington were on display in neighboring Maryland, where a group of lawmakers, including five members of Congress, raised grave concerns for democracy. They framed the president's assertion of federal oversight of the Metropolitan Police Department and his use of the National Guard to patrol the streets as a "soft launch of authoritarianism." By contrast, Gov. Wes Moore, a Democrat, called the takeover a distraction, echoing party leaders including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York. "I see this as performative and nothing more," Moore said in an interview, "because if he wanted to have a serious conversation about violent crime, he should have to pay attention to the work we're doing in the state of Maryland to be able to address the issue." Moore accused Trump of ignoring the fact that the homicide rate in Baltimore is the lowest it has been in 50 years. "That doesn't fit his narrative," Moore said. "This is just a series of ignorant tropes that he continues to lay out." Some Democrats, though, warn that reality is not as important as perception -- something that Trump has long been adept at shaping with his will and his echo chamber. They recall Democrats' ineffective efforts during last year's presidential election to promote statistics showing that the economy was improving -- while Trump and his allies hammered away at the pain people felt over persistently high prices. He won the support of voters with deep economic concerns. "D.C. presents the easiest opportunity for him to make crime an issue when it's not, and politics is perception," said Mike Morey, a Democratic strategist who advised former Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney in the 2022 race he lost to Rep. Mike Lawler, a Republican, largely over the issue of crime. That contest was waged in New York City suburbs where crime was relatively low, but Lawler and his allies repeatedly attacked Maloney using headlines from the city's pandemic crime spike. Public safety is an issue in this fall's contest for mayor of New York City, while Republicans are signaling their intent to raise the matter during next year's race for governor of New York. "We have to be careful not to lean too heavily on statistics, because people form their judgments about public safety based on their own lived experience," Torres said. There are signs that the party is better prepared to ward off Trump's attacks on crime than it was in 2020 and 2022. "What Democrats need to do is keep calling out the lack of reason to do this other than to distract and to assert more power," said Rep. Dan Goldman of New York, who called Trump's actions "authoritarian fascism." Some Democrats have seized the opportunity to talk about their own credentials on public safety in places where violent crime has fallen on their watch, while being careful to acknowledge that a falling crime rate doesn't mean there isn't a problem. "No mayor in the country, myself included, is saying that we solved this issue of violent crime," said Brandon Scott, the mayor of Baltimore, adding that "we have to keep going until we make our cities even safer." In Washington, Mayor Muriel Bowser, a Democrat, appears well aware that Washington's historically low rate of violent crime hasn't prompted a significant change in people's perception of the issue. (A Washington Post-Schar School poll conducted last year found that 65% of Washingtonians rated crime as an "extremely serious" or a "very serious" problem in the District, up from 56% in 2023, when the crime rate was actually higher.) She initially responded to Trump's takeover last week with a cautious and conciliatory tone. Even as she called it "unsettling and unprecedented," she acknowledged that some residents wanted to see more done to reduce crime. Her tone grew more defiant after the Trump administration sought to tighten its grip over the city police.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Europeans Panicking': Big Declaration From Russia On Trump-Zelensky DC Meeting
'Europeans Panicking': Big Declaration From Russia On Trump-Zelensky DC Meeting

Time of India

time26 minutes ago

  • Time of India

'Europeans Panicking': Big Declaration From Russia On Trump-Zelensky DC Meeting

/ Aug 19, 2025, 07:54PM IST As Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelensky prepare for their high-stakes Oval Office showdown, Moscow-based veteran journalist Fred Weir joins TOI to decode how this could play out. Why are Europeans 'panicking'? What does Russia really want from this deal? And is Ukraine staring at only two grim options - collapse on the battlefield or cede territory at the table? Weir, who has reported from Moscow for decades, gives us the Russian perspective on Trump's flip from 'ceasefire first' to 'peace deal now,' Putin's long-term war goals, and why many in Moscow believe Ukraine is a lost cause. Watch this sharp, no-nonsense conversation for a glimpse of how the Kremlin, Russian media, and ordinary Russians are reading the Trump–Zelensky–Putin triangle.

Trump announced $50 mn bounty for his arrest. Now, Maduro responds with 4.5 mn militia and armed peasants
Trump announced $50 mn bounty for his arrest. Now, Maduro responds with 4.5 mn militia and armed peasants

First Post

time26 minutes ago

  • First Post

Trump announced $50 mn bounty for his arrest. Now, Maduro responds with 4.5 mn militia and armed peasants

Venezuelan President Maduro has ordered nationwide militia activation after the US doubled bounty for his arrest and intensified anti-drug operations in the Caribbean Venezuela's President Nicolas Maduro speaks as he presents a proposal to reform the constitution in a session of the National Assembly in Caracas, Venezuela on February 15, 2025. Reuters File Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro has announced that he will deploy 4.5 million members of the country's civilian militia, citing what he called renewed threats from the United States. The move comes after Washington increased the bounty for Maduro's arrest and launched new anti-drug operations in the Caribbean — actions Caracas has condemned as hostile and provocative. 'This week, I will activate a special plan with more than 4.5 million militiamen to ensure coverage of the entire national territory - militias that are prepared, activated and armed,' Maduro announced on state television. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The militia, originally established by former President Hugo Chávez, is officially reported to number around five million members, although independent estimates suggest the actual figure is significantly lower, reported Times of India. Venezuela's total population stands at approximately 30 million. In a televised address, President Maduro condemned what he described as 'the renewal of extravagant, bizarre, and outlandish threats' from the US, following a series of moves by Washington that have further strained bilateral relations. Earlier this month, President Trump's administration doubled the reward for Maduro's capture to $50 million. The Venezuelan leader faces drug trafficking charges in the United States, where officials accuse him of heading the so-called Cartel de los Sole_s_, a criminal network allegedly responsible for large-scale cocaine smuggling. In addition to increasing the bounty, the Trump administration imposed fresh sanctions on both the cartel and the Venezuelan government. The US military has also reportedly deployed several naval vessels to the southern Caribbean as part of its broader anti-narcotics campaign in the region. 'We are also deployed throughout the Caribbean… in our sea, our property, Venezuelan territory,' Times of India quoted Interior Minister Diosdado Cabello as saying. Although he did not explicitly mention the recent actions by the United States, President Maduro expressed gratitude to Venezuela's international allies for standing with the country against what he described as a 'rotten refrain' of ongoing threats. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Maduro also called for the expansion of worker and peasant militias across all sectors of the economy, urging broader participation in what he framed as a national defence effort. 'Rifles and missiles for the peasant force! To defend the territory, sovereignty, and peace of Venezuela,' declared Maduro. With inputs from agencies

US revokes thousands of student visas in 2025 over alleged crimes: The new legal grey zone for ‘outsiders' in America
US revokes thousands of student visas in 2025 over alleged crimes: The new legal grey zone for ‘outsiders' in America

Time of India

time39 minutes ago

  • Time of India

US revokes thousands of student visas in 2025 over alleged crimes: The new legal grey zone for ‘outsiders' in America

In 2025, the Trump administration revoked over 6,000 student visas—a number that has sparked concern not only in immigration policy circles but also across global academic communities. Approximately 4,000 of these were attributed to alleged 'criminal activity,' while an additional 200 to 300 were reportedly linked to accusations of 'support for terrorism.' But behind the headlines lies a less visible, more troubling shift: A transformation in how legality, suspicion, and dissent are being redefined for international students in the United States. From conviction to classification Visa revocation was once a legal consequence, the result of a specific breach—overstay, unauthorised work, or a confirmed criminal conviction. Today, it is increasingly a preemptive administrative action, where the burden of proof has quietly given way to the weight of perception. With agencies now authorised to scan vast law enforcement databases like the FBI's National Crime Information Center (NCIC), students can be flagged for infractions ranging from dismissed charges to decades-old traffic violations. The legal threshold is no longer conviction—it is presence in a dataset. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play this game for 3 minutes, if you own a mouse Undo This signals a deeper shift: From an immigration system that adjudicates to one that categorises. And students—especially from countries like India, China, and Iran—find themselves at the receiving end of a policy architecture that conflates irregularity with risk. Redefining 'law' at the Consular Desk At the EducationUSA fair in Hyderabad, US Consul General Laura Williams reiterated Washington's 'zero tolerance' stance on law-breaking. But in the current environment, the definition of law-breaking itself has grown elastic. Social media posts, prior affiliations, and online expressions that challenge US foreign policy are increasingly being treated as indicators of ideological unreliability. Students are learning that the pathway to a US degree is not just academic but behavioural—and policed long before they ever set foot on campus. Visa applicants are now expected to keep their social media profiles public. AI systems under the 'Catch and Revoke' initiative scan these for signs of activism or dissent. Students who once engaged freely in political discourse must now self-censor—not out of guilt, but out of precaution. For many, silence is not compliance but survival. Academic merit, conditional belonging Indian students, among the most populous international cohorts in the US, have historically been prized for their academic excellence and economic contribution. Yet, 2025 has made it increasingly clear that merit alone is insufficient. A spotless academic record may be outweighed by a misconstrued tweet. A research grant may be eclipsed by a protest photo from years ago. The lesson is uncomfortable but unmistakable: For international students, presence in the U.S. is not a right secured by achievement—it is a conditional belonging, contingent on alignment with a shifting set of political expectations. Institutional ambivalence Universities, while publicly affirming their commitment to diversity and academic freedom, operate within a compliance-heavy environment. Many have quietly adapted to the new climate. Course content is adjusted. Invitations to controversial speakers are rescinded. Campus groups are advised to tone down their activism. In such settings, critical inquiry competes not with ignorance, but with risk management. This recalibration may be practical—but it is also revealing. A university, once a sanctuary for dissent and pluralism, is slowly being reshaped into a space where dissent must be rehearsed cautiously, if at all. Beyond policy: A shift in first principles The real story is not just that 6,000 visas were revoked. It is that revocation itself has shifted from being a tool of last resort to a symbol of the government's expanding discretionary power. The rule of law has not disappeared, but it is being supplemented—sometimes replaced—by a more informal regime of reputational risk and political readability. For international students, especially those from democracies with vibrant political cultures, the dissonance is sharp. The US remains a global hub of innovation and higher learning. But the cost of accessing it is no longer measured only in dollars or grades. It is increasingly measured in restraint, in silence, and in the willingness to accept ambiguity as part of the contract. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store