
How Pakistani Scientist's Nuclear Black Market Fuelled Iran's Nuclear Ambitions
At the center of this shadowy nuclear web was Abdul Qadeer Khan – Pakistani metallurgist who, decades ago, stole blueprints from Europe and built Pakistan's atomic bomb. What few could imagine then was that Khan would go on to export that know-how in secret, creating the world's most dangerous underground market for nuclear technology – one that would arm Iran with more than just ambition.
Khan began his nuclear journey in the laboratories of Europe in the early 1970s, working for Urenco Group – a Dutch-German-British nuclear consortium. It was there that he accessed and copied sensitive centrifuge designs. By 1975, he returned to Pakistan with a suitcase full of secrets.
His role in developing Pakistan's uranium enrichment programme at Kahuta earned him celebrity status at home. But while the world celebrated non-proliferation treaties, he quietly flipped the script.
In the 1980s and 1990s, he built a secret pipeline that bypassed governments and treaties. Operating through shell companies, friendly states and willing middlemen, Khan's network smuggled critical nuclear equipment, blueprints and even bomb designs to multiple countries. Iran was one among them.
The most consequential sale came in 1987. Iranian officials met intermediaries of Khan's network in Dubai and secured an initial package: centrifuge blueprints, assembly manuals and a roadmap to enrichment. These were based on the P1 and P2 centrifuges – the same models Pakistan used to develop its bomb.
In the 1990s, entire sets of components – bellows, rotors, vacuum pumps and high-speed motors – made their way to Iran. Much of the hardware was built in Malaysian factories under Khan's supervision and then disguised and routed through Dubai to avoid detection.
By the early 2000s, Iran had a pilot enrichment facility running. The world watched, stunned, as Tehran's capabilities grew faster than intelligence agencies had predicted. But the acceleration was not magic – it was the Khan blueprint at work.
Khan's operation was not run out of basements or back alleys. It looked like legitimate business. Precision parts came from Europe and Southeast Asia. Firms like Scomi Precision Engineering in Malaysia manufactured rotors and pipes under the radar. Dubai-based logistics firms repackaged them for discreet delivery to Iran.
One of the biggest exposes came in 2003, when U.S. and British forces intercepted a ship bound for Libya. Onboard were centrifuge parts matching Khan's designs. That led to Libya giving up its nuclear program and to the unraveling of the entire network.
Investigations by the IAEA and Western intelligence revealed that Khan had sold similar materials to North Korea and Iran. Technical documents recovered from Iranian facilities bore unmistakable Pakistani signatures – even Chinese-style bomb schematics that Khan had allegedly passed along.
What Did Iran Really Get?
Centrifuge designs: Detailed plans for P1 and P2 centrifuges – blueprints, machining tolerances and assembly procedures. Manufactured parts: From rotors to vacuum systems, thousands of components were delivered over years. Weaponisation docs: Perhaps the most alarming were documents on how to build an implosion-style nuclear weapon. These were not basic concepts, they included measurements, trigger designs and engineering drawings.
Technical support: Though no direct evidence exists of Pakistani scientists physically working in Iran, declassified files suggest consistent technical communication and support through intermediaries.
The Lasting Impact
Even today, Iran's centrifuge models – IR-1 and IR-2 – closely mirror Khan's P1s and P2s. While Iran insists its programme is peaceful, the technological DNA traces directly back to Khan's black-market empire.
In 2022, Israeli intelligence leaked documents suggesting that Iran's 'AMAD Plan', an alleged nuclear weapons programme halted in 2003, used Khan-provided blueprints to model bomb designs.
The war now raging between Israel and Iran has reignited fears that Tehran's decades-long accumulation of nuclear knowledge may still carry a weapons-grade potential. And while Iran denies any intent to build a bomb, its ability to do so was never entirely homegrown.
It was bought, smuggled and built – piece by piece – in the shadows of Abdul Qadeer Khan's legacy.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India.com
25 minutes ago
- India.com
Why is the address of PMO changing after 78 years? What is the 'big' reason behind leaving South Block?
New Delhi: A big change is going to happen in Delhi's power corridor. After about 78 years, the Prime Minister's Office (PMO) will now shift from South Block to the newly built Executive Enclave. Government sources said that the new office will start functioning from next month. Why is the PMO shifting? Old buildings like South Block and North Block were built during the British rule before independence. There is a shortage of space in them, and there is also a lack of modern facilities. As India is becoming a big economic power, it was felt that new and better buildings are needed for administrative work. This is the reason why a new Executive Enclave has been constructed a few hundred meters away from South Block. Not only PMO, but there will also be Cabinet Secretariat, National Security Council Secretariat and conferencing facility. The special thing is that this place is also close to the Prime Minister's residence. What are the problems with the old office? Recently, while inaugurating Kartavya Bhawan-3, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had said that since independence, the administrative machinery had been running from the same buildings that were built by the British. Basic facilities like space, light and ventilation were also not properly available in these offices. He gave the example that an important unit like the Home Ministry continued to work from just one building for almost 100 years, while there were not enough resources available. The new offices will overcome this deficiency and match the image of modern India. The new PMO can get a new name It is assumed that the new PMO can be given a new name which reflects the spirit of service. At the beginning of his third term, the Prime Minister had said that 'PMO should not be of Modi, but of the public. This is an office that serves the people.' That is why the idea of 'People's PMO' can also move forward with the new office. What will happen to South Block and North Block? Now the question arises as to what will happen to historical buildings like South Block and North Block. The government has planned to convert them into a huge public museum, which will be named 'Yuge Yugin Bharat Sangrahalaya'. For this, an agreement has also been signed between the National Museum of India and France Museum Development. The government says that this museum will showcase the cultural heritage of India and will work to connect people with our glorious past, bright present and golden future.


Hans India
25 minutes ago
- Hans India
German Chancellor to travel to Washington for talks on Ukraine
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz will travel to Washington on Monday, joining Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and other European leaders for talks with US President Donald Trump, the German government announced on Sunday. According to a statement, the visit is for an "exchange of information" with Trump following his meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in the US state of Alaska on Friday, Xinhua News Agency reported. After the Alaska summit, Zelensky announced that he would meet Trump in Washington on Monday. Merz is expected to discuss the current state of peace efforts, the statement said, adding that security guarantees, territorial issues, and continued support for Ukraine will be addressed. Earlier on Saturday, Trump held a telephonic meeting with the European leaders and Ukraine's Zelensky to brief them on his discussions with the Russian President in Alaska. Following the meeting, Presidents Trump and Putin said that they made progress in three hours of talks on Friday, moving closer to finding an end to the Ukraine War, but did not announce an immediate ceasefire. Meanwhile, the US President took to his social media platform Truth Social on Saturday, calling the meeting with Putin in Alaska a successful one. 'A great and very successful day in Alaska! The meeting with President Vladimir Putin of Russia went very well, as did a late-night phone call with President Zelenskyy of Ukraine, and various European Leaders, including the highly respected Secretary General of NATO. It was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up," Trump posted. "President Zelensky will be coming to DC, the Oval Office, on Monday afternoon. If all works out, we will then schedule a meeting with President Putin. Potentially, millions of people's lives will be saved. Thank you for your attention to this matter!" the post added. European leaders including French President Emmanuel Macron, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, German Chancellor Merz, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Finnish President Alexander Stubb, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk, Portuguese President Antonio Costa, President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen welcomed President Trump's efforts to 'stop the killing in Ukraine, end Russia's war of aggression', and achieve just and lasting peace. 'As President Trump said, 'there's no deal until there's a deal'. As envisioned by President Trump, the next step must now be further talks, including President Zelensky, whom he will meet soon. We are also ready to work with President Trump and President Zelensky towards a trilateral summit with European support," read a joint statement issued by the European leaders after Saturday's phone call.

The Hindu
25 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Syrian President says unifying country 'should not be with blood'
Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa [Muhammad al-Jolani] has said the battle to unify his country after years of civil war "should not be with blood", rejecting any partition and accusing Israel of meddling in the south. His remarks, released by state TV on Sunday (August 17, 2025), came as hundreds demonstrated in south Syria's Sweida province, denouncing sectarian violence last month and calling for the right to self-determination for the Druze-majority province. "We still have another battle ahead of us to unify Syria, and it should not be with blood and military force... it should be through some kind of understanding because Syria is tired of war," Mr. Sharaa said during a dialogue session involving notables from the northwest province of Idlib and other senior officials. "I do not see Syria as at risk of division. Some people desire a process of dividing Syria and trying to establish cantons... this matter is impossible," he said according to a recording of the meeting, distributed overnight by state media. "Some parties seek to gain power through regional power, Israel or others. This is also extremely difficult and cannot be implemented," he said. At the protest in Sweida, some demonstrators waved the Israeli flag and called for self-determination for the region. A week of bloodshed in Sweida began on July 13 with clashes between Druze fighters and Sunni Bedouin, but rapidly escalated, drawing in government forces, with Israel also carrying out strikes. Syrian authorities have said their forces intervened to stop the clashes, but witnesses, Druze factions and the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights have accused them of siding with the Bedouin and committing abuses against the Druze, including summary executions. Mr. Sharaa said that Sweida "witnessed many violations from all sides... some members of the security forces and army in Syria also carried out some violations". The state is required "to hold all perpetrators of violations to account", whatever their affiliation, he added. "Israel is intervening directly in Sweida, seeking to implement policies aimed at weakening the state in general or finding excuses to interfere in ongoing policies in the southern region," Mr. Sharaa said. Israel, which has its own Druze community, has said it has acted to defend the minority group as well as enforce its demands for the demilitarisation of southern Syria. Syria's new authorities are also in talks with a semi-autonomous Kurdish administration that runs swathes of the country's north and northeast and has called for decentralisation, which Damascus has rejected. Implementation of a March 10 deal on integrating the Kurds' semi-autonomous civil and military institutions into the state has been held up by differences between the parties. "We are now discussing the mechanisms for implementation" of the deal, Mr. Sharaa said.