
Trump can shatter the abortion pill cartel
Anyone not looking through the rose-colored glasses handed out by the abortion lobby can see this lack of regulation for what it clearly is: a recipe for rampant abuse.
Several women have already come forward, sharing how their partner ordered the pill and drugged them, forcing abortions. Victims of sex trafficking have also come forward, recounting how they were forced to abort — often multiple times — by their captors, using the abortion pill.
Somehow, these women go largely ignored by policymakers and those with the power to prevent future abuse.
Abortion pill manufacturers and distributors have been allowed to form a cartel across and within the borders of the U.S. that has gone unchecked. Even those who pride themselves on giving women 'choice' should recognize there is no choice in such abuse. There is no consent in being forced to abort a wanted child. Abortion advocates' core pillar of 'autonomy' has been torn down to nothing more than rubble.
As a nation, we attack the foreign cartels threatening the American people in many ways. But can we identify and shatter the ones we have allowed to form within our own borders?
Since the Biden-era FDA used the COVID-19 pandemic as an excuse to remove the in-person dispensing requirement for the abortion drug mifepristone in 2021, abortion pill distributors have rapidly built their expansive cartel. Women and their abusers can access these cartel distributors online and are often required to fill out questionnaires that have no way to verify whether the alleged patient is actually the one behind the screen.
Some of the questionnaires tied to these tele services ask you to confidentially verify your name and other personal identifying information. They even ask if you are being forced to order the pills. But what use are any of these questions when the abuser can easily circumvent the system and identify as the victim?
In his first term, President Trump ordered one foreign abortion pill distributor to cease and desist illegal trafficking of abortion drugs not approved by the FDA into the U.S. Unfortunately, the administration did not follow through on its warning to the doctor in charge, and trafficking of the pill has only escalated.
This term, the Trump administration has the opportunity and ability to send the abortion pill cartel packing.
Most urgently, the Trump FDA can reinstate the in-person dispensing requirements for mifepristone. New data shows that by the end of 2024 one in four abortions were provided via 'telehealth,' demonstrating real and immediate impact reinstating REMS requirements would have.
This unilateral administrative action can put a swift end to the domestic and criminal mail-order distribution of abortion pills. Although it will not prevent foreign cartel partners from sending the drugs into the country or in-person dispensing at brick-and-mortar abortion businesses, it is a first step.
The Trump administration also needs to heighten scrutiny around mifepristone by working with the Department of Health and Human Services and the DEA to designate the drug as a controlled substance. Drugs with high potential for abuse and which may lead to psychological or physical damage are set to only be prescribed by certain licensed practitioners that hold DEA certifications — and mifepristone should not be an exception.
Abuse of the abortion pill is rampant. Recent studies have shed further light on the expanded physical and psychological adverse events women are experiencing by taking mifepristone. Women being forced into abortion via the deregulation of the abortion pill are even more likely to experience these dangerous outcomes.
The U.S. Code already creates heightened oversight and penalties for importation of controlled substances. If the Trump administration designates the abortion pill as a controlled substance, it will equip the Department of Justice to prosecute members of the cartel — both foreign and domestic — to the fullest extent of the law.
Trump must also work alongside the Republican Congress to uphold state laws that prevent abortion pill trafficking. States such as Louisiana and Texas have laws in place that prohibit the abortion pill from being sent women within their borders, but it has been an uphill battle to enforce them, with pro-abortion states enacting shield laws to prevent prosecution of cartel abortionists engaging in pill trafficking.
This term, Trump must hold true to abolish cartels — including the ones previous administrations have given free rein within our own borders. If Trump truly believes abortion to be a state issue, he should ensure that states have the power to protect their citizens. Women deserve to live without the paranoia that they might be the next victim of this dangerous cartel.
Gavin Oxley is a public relations consultant currently serving at Americans United for Life.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
27 minutes ago
- Axios
Bessent casts some shade over Musk's new political party
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Sunday he imagined that Elon Musk 's businesses' boards weren't so keen on the Tesla CEO's unveiling of his new "America Party." The big picture: The world's richest man — who before his explosive fallout with President Trump said he'd do a lot less political spending moving forward — became a GOP mega-donor last year. Now, the billionaire seems intent on carving a new political path. Irate over Trump's recently signed"big, beautiful bill," the former DOGE leader is turning his sights away from what he described as "the two-party (some would say uniparty) system" and plans to form his own party. Driving the news: Bessent, with whom Musk once had a heated spat in the White House, said on CNN's "State of the Union" Sunday that "the principles of DOGE were very popular" — but Musk was not. Musk's massive slashes through the federal government left a bruise on his reputation and his company. A March NBC News poll found that 46% of voters thought creating DOGE was a good idea, while 40% said it was bad — but when asked to broadly rate their feelings on DOGE, 47% had a negative view, compared to 41% who held a positive view. And 51% had a negative view of Musk himself. What he's saying:"I believe that the boards of directors at his various companies wanted him to come back and run those companies, which he is better at than anyone," Bessent told CNN's Dana Bash. He continued, "I imagine that those boards of directors did not like this announcement yesterday, and will be encouraging him to focus on his business activities, not his political activities." Catch up quick: Musk announced on Saturday that he would launch "the America Party," which he claimed would "give you back your freedom." Musk said in a response that the party would caucus independently and that "legislative discussions would be had with both parties." Yes, but: There are steps Musk must take to formally register a political party, and recent Federal Election Commission filings don't show that has yet happened. What we're watching: The day prior, he shared a poll to his followers asking whether he should create a new political party and suggested part of his strategy would be to "laser-focus on just 2 or 3 Senate seats and 8 to 10 House districts." Musk didn't specify what those specific races would be. He added, "Given the razor-thin legislative margins, that would be enough to serve as the deciding vote on contentious laws, ensuring that they serve the true will of the people." Billionaire Mark Cuban and Anthony Scaramucci, who briefly worked in for Trump during his first term, both appeared interested.


The Hill
35 minutes ago
- The Hill
Hasset on healthcare coverage cuts: ‘Best way to get insurance is to get a job'
National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett said the best way for people to get health insurance is to get a job while discussing the massive tax cut legislation, which dramatically upends health care, signed into law by President Trump. During an appearance on CBS News's 'Face The Nation,' Hasset was asked about Americans' concerns that about 12 million Americans could lose Medicaid coverage, according to a report by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). However, Hasset said that the CBO made a similar claim when the Trump administration aimed to add work requirement waivers to Obamacare in 2017, stating that the number of insured people increased instead. 'The bottom line is, the best way to get insurance is to get a job,' he said. 'And we've got a 'big, beautiful bill' that's going to create a lot of job creation and a lot of insurance, and the CBO is just not accounting for that.' The bill enacts the country's first-ever requirement for adults under the age of 65 — including low-income parents of children older than 14 — to prove they work, volunteer or attend school at least 80 hours per month. 'The idea that that's going to cause a massive hemorrhaging in availability of insurance doesn't make a lot of sense to us,' he said. Hassett also claimed that 5 million of those who are losing insurance have other insurance, which he says the CBO did not take into account 'They're people who have two types of insurance,' he added. 'And so therefore, if they lose one, they're still insured.' Hassett insisted that no one will lose their insurance. 'It's sound budgetary politics. And I think that nobody's going to lose their insurance,' he said.


New York Post
41 minutes ago
- New York Post
Bessent teases new Aug. 1 deadline for tariffs, says Fed chair can't cut rates like Trump wants
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent revealed that the Trump administration is now eyeing Aug. 1 as the date to slap the 'Liberation Day' tariffs against countries that fail to cut lightning deals with the US. Back in April, Trump had given countries a 90-day extension before slapping those tariffs in place, meaning Tuesday, July 8. However, Bessent explained that Trump will warn countries of the forthcoming tariffs instead of imposing them outright. 'I'm not going to give away the playbook, because we're going to be very busy over the next 72 hours,' Bessent told CNN's 'State of the Union' on Sunday. Advertisement 'President Trump's going to be sending letters to some of our trading partners, saying that if you don't move things along, then on Aug. 1, you will boomerang back to your April 2 tariff level.' Trump had previewed his plans to blast out letters to trading partners, but didn't mention the Aug. 1 deadline. On April 2, which he dubbed 'Liberation Day,' Trump unveiled customized tariff rates against virtually every country on the planet — including a 10% baseline rate on almost all imports. 3 Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent explained that the Trump administration is giving time before imposing the 'Liberation Day' tariffs. CNN Advertisement 3 President Trump unfurled customized tariff rates against virtually every country back in April. Getty Images The 'Liberation Day' were later paused, though the 10% levy went into effect. 'I think we're going to see a lot of deals very quickly, and we're going to send out probably a hundred letters to small countries where we don't have very much trade, and most of those are already at the baseline 10%,' Bessent added. So far, Trump has announced various tariff deals with the United Kingdom and Vietnam. The president's team has also reached something of a tariff truce with China while negotiations play out. Advertisement Bessent contended that the Aug. 1 date is 'not a new deadline,' and he has previously described a focus on securing deals with 18 of America's top major trading partners. 'We are saying this is when it's happening. If you want to speed things up, have at it. If you want to go back to the old rate, that's your choice,' he added. 'We are close to several deals. As always, there's a lot of foot-dragging on the other side, and so I would expect to see several big announcements over the next couple of days,' he said. In addition to handling Trump's push to revamp US exports and reduce the trade deficit, Bessent has been in the headlines over speculation that the president may tap him to succeed Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell at the central bank. Advertisement 3 Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell has been adamant that politics shouldn't influence monetary policy. Getty Images Bessent has not ruled that out. Powell's tenure as chair at the Fed ends in May 2026. Trump had first appointed him in 2018. One of Trump's chief grievances with Powell has been the Fed's decision not to lower its benchmark interest rate target — making the $9 trillion in US debt that is expected to come due over the next year that much more expensive to finance. The rate also increases borrowing costs for homebuyers and businesses. Powell has defended the Fed's decision and argued that the central bank is taking a wait-and-see approach to gauge the inflationary impacts of Trump's tariffs. Historically, the Fed has sought to insulate itself from political influence over monetary policy. Bessent said that if he was chair of the Fed, he wouldn't necessarily be able to lower rates overnight. 'I think that the Fed chair does not cut interest rates. It is a committee, so it's up to the Open Market Committee and the voting members to cut rates,' Bessent said when asked if he would cut rates as Fed boss. 'The President is probably the most economically sophisticated president we've had in 100 years, maybe ever,' the Treasury secretary added when asked about Trump's complaints about the Fed.