Phil Miller, Founder P. Miller Music, is Now Offering Creative & Musical Direction for Festivals and Live Events
Phil Miller is a Live Music Production Strategist, Corporate Creative Director, Music Education & Licensing Expert.
BENSALEM, PA, UNITED STATES, May 14, 2025 / EINPresswire.com / -- P. Miller Music, founded by seasoned creative and music director Phil Miller, has announced the expansion of its services to include a broader range of creative and musical direction for festivals, live productions, and corporate events. Phil Miller, the founder of P. Miller Music, is widely recognized for several successful projects, such as Off-Broadway shows for C-Line Productions, including After The Cross and Jesus Is Coming To Dinner, as well as 'Christmas in the Capital City' alongside former Trenton Mayor Eric Jackson.
With a professional history of providing production consultation for the Soul Train Cruise (2020–present), the Ultimate Disco Cruise (2020–present), and the Saturday Night Dance Fever Concert Series with Deney Terrio (2019–present), Miller's latest endeavors involve upcoming shows with prominent artists Freddie Jackson and Regina Belle, performances scheduled with Keke Wyatt, Karyn White, and Me'lisa Morgan later this year, and a highly anticipated appearance on the Soul Train Cruise in November.
By leveraging his extensive background in live show arrangement, production consultation, corporate entertainment consultation, and creative & musical direction, Miller positions himself as a go-to resource for festival organizers, event planners, and corporate clients seeking exceptional stage productions that blend professionalism, precise time management, and budget-friendly solutions.
As the driving force behind P. Miller Music, 'Phil Miller' embraces a unique philosophy that brings original recorded elements to life on stage, showcasing an attention to detail that resonates powerfully with both performers and fans. In an effort to build further brand awareness and online visibility, Miller is actively posting articles and thought leadership pieces on LinkedIn while also strengthening his presence on other digital platforms.
By doing so, he aims to increase his search engine rankings for key phrases such as 'Creative Director for Festivals' and 'Music Director for Live Events,' ensuring that prospective partners, industry peers, and music fans can easily discover his full suite of services and accomplishments.
Phil Miller's corporate consulting background offers a competitive edge, enabling him to thrive in diverse performance environments—whether they involve concert stages or corporate settings—while maintaining a steadfast commitment to delivering memorable, high-quality productions.
Prospective clients and media outlets interested in creative direction, musical direction, or production consultancy services for festivals, live events, or corporate productions can reach out to Phil Miller from P. Miller Music for inquiries and collaborations.
For inquiries or to make a booking, contact Phil Miller at [email protected], [email protected] or call 609.491.0864.
To learn more about P. Miller Music, visit: https://www.pmillermusic.com
Book the musical and creative services of Phil Miller at: https://calendly.com/pmillermusic
For more information on Phil Miller, please follow him on social media: https://linktr.ee/PMiller2410Productions
Phil Miller
P. Miller Music
+1 609-491-0864
email us here
Legal Disclaimer:
EIN Presswire provides this news content 'as is' without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author above.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
a day ago
- Forbes
‘Quordle' Hints And Answers For Sunday, June 15
Here's some help with today's Quordle, including hints and the answers. Before today's Quordle hints and answers, here's where you can find the ones for Saturday's game: Hey, folks! Hints and the answers for today's Quordle words are just ahead. For any newcomers joining us, here's how to play Quordle: Just start typing in words. You have four five-letter words to guess and nine attempts to find them all. The catch is that you play all four words simultaneously. If you get a letter in the right place for any of the four words, it will light up in green. If a word contains a letter from one of your guesses but it's in the wrong place, it will appear in yellow. You could always check out the practice games before taking on the daily puzzle. Here are some hints for today's Quordle game, followed by the answers: FEATURED | Frase ByForbes™ Unscramble The Anagram To Reveal The Phrase Pinpoint By Linkedin Guess The Category Queens By Linkedin Crown Each Region Crossclimb By Linkedin Unlock A Trivia Ladder Spoiler alert! Don't scroll any further down the page until you're ready to find out today's Quordle answers. This is your final warning! Today's words are... That's all there is to it for today's Quordle clues and answers. Be sure to check my blog for hints and the solution for Monday's game if you need them. See you then! If you'd like to chat about Quordle and New York Times word games such as Wordle, Connections and Strands (and to hang out with a bunch of lovely people), join us over at Discord! Also, subscribe to my newsletter, Pastimes!
Forbes
2 days ago
- Forbes
NYT ‘Connections' Hints And Answers For Saturday, June 14
Connections hints and answers are here. Looking for Friday's NYT Connections hints, clues and answers instead? You can find them here: It's a rather tough day for our Connections weekend slot, which has at least two categories that are probably going to get you in some amount of trouble. Let's go through some clues and answers to help you along the way. Connections is the second-most popular NYT Games puzzle game outside of the main crossword itself, and an extremely fun, free offering that will get your brain moving every day. Play it right here. The goal is to take a group of 16 words and find links between four pairs of four of them. They could be specific categories of terms, or they could be little world puzzles where words may come before or after them you need to figure out. And they get more complicated from there. There is only one set of right answers for this, and you only get a certain number of tries so you can't just spam around until you find something. There are difficulty tiers coded by color, which will usually go from yellow, blue/green to purple as difficulty increases, so know that going in and when you start linking them together. FEATURED | Frase ByForbes™ Unscramble The Anagram To Reveal The Phrase Pinpoint By Linkedin Guess The Category Queens By Linkedin Crown Each Region Crossclimb By Linkedin Unlock A Trivia Ladder You pick the four words you think are linked and either you will get a solve and a lit up row that shows you how you were connected. If you're close, it will tell you that you're one away. Again, four mistakes you lose, but if you want to know the answers without failing, either come here, or delete your web cookies and try again. If you want to play more puzzles, you can get an NYT Games subscription to access the full archives of all past puzzles. So, onto the hints and answers: These are the hints that are laid out on the puzzle board itself, but after that, we will get into spoiler territory with some hints and eventually the answers. The hints for the Connections groups today are: Alright, the full spoilers follow here as we get into what the groups are today: The full-on answers are below for each group, finally inserting the four words in each category. Spoilers follow if you do not want to get this far. The Connections answers are: Connections I thought that Yellow Group was pretty easy this time, though maybe I spend too much time online where my For You pages are full of people calling Sabrina Carpenter or Taylor Swift or what have you one of these things, and then other people arguing that they are not one of those things. It's a bit exhausting. Blue Group was not bad between Hooch and Toto, I caught on pretty quick. I mean Hooch is either booze, which no other clues match, or the dog. I did not know what dog Blue was until I figured out oh, Blue's Clues, of course. Green Group got me. I have not seen a classic 'mom' tattoo anywhere but on TV or in movies, and I thought this was some sort of Valentine's/Mother's Day thing. Close, but not quite. Here's the combination: Mom A lot of other ones I found did not have any arrows, however. Purple group? Tough. It's one of those things in hindsight that makes sense, but in the moment, it's hard to group them even if you know it's some sort of 'blank' clue. I didn't know there was such a thing as a Border Terrier as I thought there were only Border Collies. My mistake. Which ones stumped you today? Follow me on Twitter, YouTube, Bluesky and Instagram. Pick up my sci-fi novels the Herokiller series and The Earthborn Trilogy.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
The Assault on Good-for-You TV: C-SPAN and PBS Teeter as Trump Attacks
When money flowed more freely in television, public-service programming was seen as a means of giving back. From educational TV and supporting public broadcasting to cable operators providing C-SPAN, spaces existed where ratings weren't the yardstick — instead, this was TV intended to be good for you. On Thursday, Congress took a major step toward undermining all of that, as the House narrowly approved a rescission bill that would claw back $1.1 billion in funding to the Corp. for Public Broadcasting, which helps support PBS stations, in addition to cuts to other programs. The bill passed by the slimmest of margins, 214 to 212, with a few GOP legislators switching their votes to get it through. The funding was part of a larger $9.4 billion allocation that lawmakers had already approved for foreign aid and public broadcasting. Senate still has to weigh in on the matter, and has five weeks to decide. With PBS and NPR besieged by the political right, with C-SPAN's funding via cable and satellite fees strafed by cord cutting, higher-minded alternatives have been hit by hard times. The whole point of PBS and National Public Radio was that they would be unfettered by commercial demands, allowing them to offer programming — from children's programming like Mr. Rogers and 'Sesame Street,' devoid of toy commercials, to lower-key news, documentaries and public affairs — that didn't have to justify its existence on a balance sheet. Ditto for C-SPAN, which cable operators carried for a small licensing fee simply because of the perceived value in allowing subscribers to see what their elected representatives were doing and saying, unfiltered and unedited. Public broadcasting has found itself swept up in the Trump administration's war against the media, with the perception that any unflattering reporting about the president — whether from PBS' 'NewsHour' or 'Frontline' or NPR's 'All Things Considered' — reveals 'invidious' bias and a liberal agenda, to use FCC chairman Brendan Carr's favorite word. Conservatives have long argued that public broadcasting represents an unnecessary expense given the abundance of choices available to most consumers. But in its latest incarnation, 'Defund PBS' overtly translates into being less about fiscal responsibility than leveraging the government's underwriting role to silence otherwise-independent media voices by labeling them progressive propaganda. On the left, the response was unambiguous. The Writers Guild of America East (WGAE) condemned the House vote as 'a radical right-wing ideology that aims to destroy a non-partisan public service despite all evidence of its wide benefits.' The group quickly turned its attention to pleading with the Senate, which holds a GOP majority but has exhibited a bit more restraint than the House in prosecuting the MAGA agenda. The CEO of PBS, Paula Kerger, remained silent in the wake of Thursday's vote, but she has been lobbying intensively to save PBS, warning that Trump's push to defund public broadcasters would spell the end for a number of local stations, and the service they provide to their communities. In a recent interview with Katie Couric, Kerger contemplated the end of public funding for the network, which only relies on the government for a portion of its funds. 'I think we'll figure out a way, through digital, to make sure there is some PBS content,' she said. 'But there won't be anyone in the community creating local content. There won't be a place for people to come together.' Kerger was referring to the fact that the campaign against PBS and NPR disproportionally harms smaller and more rural communities that voted for Trump (even if many listeners and viewers didn't), which lack the same menu of local-media options as major markets. In a sense, Sesame Workshop — the entity behind 'Sesame Street' — has provided an unlikely poster child for the financial pressures on public TV, having undergone layoffs before losing its streaming deal with Warner Bros. Discovery's Max. Netflix has since stepped into the breach, joining with PBS Kids in providing access Elmo and his pals. As for C-SPAN, its challenges stem primarily from evolving technology, which has dramatically undercut the financial model upon which the network was founded in 1979. With viewers shifting to streaming and dropping cable and satellite subscriptions, the number of homes receiving C-SPAN has sharply dropped to a little over 50 million, meaning the nonprofit enterprise — which costs operators just $7.25 a month, a fraction of what they pay for channels like Fox News and CNN — is running at a significant deficit. One proposed solution would be for entities with streaming subscribers, like YouTube or Hulu's live-TV package, to carry C-SPAN. Indeed, YouTube's 8 to 10 million subscribers alone would provide enough income to offset most of the shortfall in its roughly $60 million annual operating expenses. Thus far, however, those companies have balked, prompting a rare bipartisan push in the Senate on C-SPAN's behalf, with Republican Chuck Grassley and Democrat Amy Klobuchar among those joining in a resolution calling upon streaming services to carry the network. 'For tens of millions of Americans who have cut the cord and get their content from streaming services, they should not be cut off from the civic content made available by C-SPAN,' the senators stated. It's a welcome development for C-SPAN CEO Sam Feist, who joined the network a little over a year ago from CNN. Feist noted that 'cord cutting' doesn't accurately characterize what's transpired — since old cable subscribers have generally moved to new delivery systems — meaning the case for carrying the network remains as simple as the public-service ideal that inspired its launch. 'We're the only network that provides what we provide, which is this unfiltered view of American government,' Feist told TheWrap, adding in regard to the streamers, 'It is good for the country for their customers to have access to our product.' The campaign regarding C-SPAN carriage has seemingly gained some momentum over the last year, with former Federal Communications Commission chairman Tom Wheeler and the Washington Post's Karen Tumulty among those joining the aforementioned senators in taking up the cause. Wheeler called YouTube's decision not to carry C-SPAN 'baffling and anti-democratic,' writing in The Hill that the company is depriving viewers of 'an unfiltered window into the goings-on in Congress, the White House and other parts of the government.' As Sen. Ron Wyden told Tumulty, carrying the network would only cost YouTube about $6 million a year — 'crumbs,' he suggested, for a streamer that rakes in billions in ad revenue. YouTube has stated that its subscribers 'have not shown sufficient interest in adding C-SPAN to the YouTube TV lineup to justify the increased cost' to their monthly bills, although as Wyden noted, that would amount to a relative pittance of 87 cents a year per household. The two situations aren't completely analogous, especially with the fate of PBS and NPR having become embroiled in politics, as opposed to corporate stubbornness. More fundamentally, though, both situations speak to the question of civic responsibility, and whether the government and private interests acknowledge such obligations. Because even if C-SPAN and PBS reach smaller audiences in a fragmented world, certain things are worth keeping around not because everybody watches them, but rather for what they offer, symbolically as well as tangibly, thanks to the staid sobriety they provide by being available to the people that do. The post The Assault on Good-for-You TV: C-SPAN and PBS Teeter as Trump Attacks appeared first on TheWrap.
