Sexual violence in conflicts worldwide increased by 25% last year, UN says
Secretary-General Antonio Guterres' annual report said more than 4,600 people survived sexual violence in 2024, with armed groups carrying out the majority of the abuse but some by government forces. He stressed that the U.N.-verified figures don't reflect the global scale and prevalence of these crimes.
The report's blacklist names 63 government and non-government parties in a dozen countries suspected of committing or being responsible for rape and other forms of sexual violence in conflict, including Hamas militants, whose attack in Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, sparked the war in Gaza.
Over 70% of those listed have appeared on the report's blacklist annex for five years or more without creating steps to prevent the violence, the U.N. chief said.
U.N. warns Israel and Russia about allegations
For the first time, the report includes two parties that have been notified the U.N. has 'credible information' that could put them on next year's blacklist if they don't take preventive actions: Israel's military and security forces over allegations of sexual abuse of Palestinians primarily in prisons and detention, and Russian forces and affiliated armed groups against Ukrainian prisoners of war.
Israeli U.N. Ambassador Danny Danon, who circulated a letter Tuesday from Guterres about the country's forces being put on notice, said the allegations 'are steeped in biased publications.'
'The U.N. must focus on the shocking war crimes and sexual violence of Hamas and the release of all hostages,' he said.
Russia's U.N. mission said it had no comment on the secretary-general's warning.
The 34-page report said 'conflict-related sexual violence' refers to rape, sexual slavery, forced prostitution, forced pregnancy, forced abortion, forced sterilization, forced marriage and other forms of sexual violence. The majority of victims are women and girls.
'In 2024, proliferating and escalating conflicts were marked by widespread conflict-related sexual violence, amid record levels of displacement and increased militarization,' Guterres said. 'Sexual violence continued to be used as a tactic of war, torture, terrorism and political repression, while multiple and overlapping political, security and humanitarian crises deepened.'
The toll of sexual violence in conflict
The U.N. says women and girls were attacked in their homes, on roads and while trying to earn a living, with victims ranging in age from 1 to 75. Reports of summary executions of victims after rape persisted in Congo and Myanmar, it said.
In an increasing number of places, the report said armed groups 'used sexual violence as a tactic to gain and consolidate control over territory and lucrative natural resources.'
Women and girls perceived to be associated with rival armed groups were targeted with sexual violence in the Central African Republic, Congo and Haiti, it said.
In detention facilities, the report said sexual violence was perpetrated 'including as a form of torture,' reportedly in Israel and the Palestinian territories, Libya, Myanmar, Sudan, Syria, Ukraine and Yemen.
'Most of the reported incidents against men and boys occurred in detention, consistent with previous years, and included rape, threats of rape and the electrocution and beating of genitals,' the report said.
U.N. report details where abuse is occurring
The U.N. peacekeeping mission in the Central African Republic documented cases of rape, gang rape, forced marriage and sexual slavery affecting 215 women, 191 girls and seven men.
In mineral-rich eastern Congo, the peacekeeping mission documented nearly 800 cases last year including including rape, gang rape, sexual slavery and forced marriage, 'often accompanied by extreme physical violence,' the report said. The number of cases involving the M23 rebel group, now controlling the main city Goma, rose from 43 in 2022 to 152 in 2024, it said.
In Sudan, where civil war is raging, the report said groups providing services to victims of sexual violence recorded 221 rape cases against 147 girls and 74 boys, 'with 16% of survivors under five years of age, including four one-year-olds.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Putin demands Zelensky surrenders Donestsk region as condition for ending war in Ukraine
The Russian leader told Donald Trump that he would be prepared to stop fighting on the rest of the frontline if Ukraine gave in to the demand and address 'root causes of the conflict'. The concessions were discussed at the highly-anticipated summit of the two leaders in Alaska on Friday, which ended with no peace deal despite nearly three hours of talks. Sources very close to the meeting told The Independent the dramatic move appears to have been endorsed by Mr Trump as a means to bring an end to the war. They said that Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky would want to 'clarify this on Monday' when he meets with Mr Trump on Monday in Washington DC. Mr Putin's condition for Ukrainian troops to withdraw from Donetsk and Luhansk, which make up the Donbas region, follow circulated reports on the demand ahead of Friday's summit. The Russian president also said he would freeze the frontline in the southern regions of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, where his forces occupy large territory. However, Putin made clear he would not fall back on core demands to 'resolve root causes of the conflict', that includes Ukraine becoming a neutral state and abandoning Nato aspirations. The Donetsk region has been centre of much of recent fighting, with Russian troops making a sudden thrust near the eastern town of Dobrophillya in the days before the summit. While Russia controls almost all of Luhansk, it holds about 70 per cent of Donetsk. Last week, Mr Zelensky insisted he would reject any proposal to withdraw from the industrial Donbas region, claiming it would 'open a bridgehead' for Russian offensive. All eyes will now turn to his meeting with Mr Trump on Monday. After Friday's summit, the US president said a permanent peace deal was now the best way to end the war, appearing to abandon aims at the summit for a ceasefire agreement. He also told Fox News in an interview that he would advise Mr Zelensky to make a deal. 'Yeah. Look, Russia is a very big power, and they're not,' he said when asked what he would say. Speaking ahead of Monday's meeting, Mr Zelensky said: 'I plan to discuss all the details regarding the end of the killings, the end of the war with President Trump in Washington on Monday. Grateful for the invitation.' On Saturday, Mr Putin, who also plans to visit Washington to meet Mr Trump, said Friday's meeting was 'timely' and 'useful'. The US and Russia are now 'closer to making appropriate decisions', Putin added. Meanwhile, European leaders have been putting piling pressure on Mr Trump not to cave to Putin's demands. They also support Mr Zelensky in his demand for security guarantees as part of a peace deal, to deter Russia from invading again in the future. Sir Keir Starmer and leaders from Italy, France and Germany were also on the call with Mr Zelensky spoke and the US president after Friday's summit. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni said the security guarantees - inspired by the transatlantic NATO alliance's Article 5 - had been the most interesting development at the summit. Speaking at the press conference after the summit, Mr Putin, who has hitherto opposed involving foreign ground forces, said he agreed with Trump that Ukraine's security must be "ensured". On Sunday afternoon, the coalition of the willing, a group of countries that have pledged to protect Ukraine, including the UK, will meet, with French president Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and Sir Keir expected to lead it. In a statement on Saturday, Sir Keir said: 'President Trump's efforts have brought us closer than ever before to ending Russia's illegal war in Ukraine. His leadership in pursuit of an end to the killing should be commended. 'While progress has been made, the next step must be further talks involving President Zelenskyy'.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Trump's astonishing gamble may pay off spectacularly
After speaking with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and European leaders overnight, Donald Trump changed the dial on what at first seemed like a lacklustre summit. The American president announced that he would be pursuing a peace settlement instead of a ceasefire in Ukraine. Trump justified this shift by highlighting the potential fragility of a Ukraine ceasefire deal. Historical evidence shows that Trump's concerns are well-placed. While the February 2015 Minsk II Accords halted Russian territorial expansion in eastern Ukraine, ceasefire violations by Putin's brutal regime were rampant. By March 2016, the US department of defence estimated that 430 Ukrainian soldiers died after Minsk II's signing and warned that Russia was 'pouring heavy weapons' into Donbas. Despite the inherent logic in Trump's push for a grand bargain solution to the Ukraine War, the devil is ultimately in the details. After Trump's meeting with Putin, there are concerns that he might see the legitimisation of Russia's annexation of nearly one-quarter of Ukraine as the fastest route to further imperialism. This worst-case scenario would tempt Russia to rearm and encourage further aggression against Ukraine, Moldova or the Baltic States. There are reasons to believe that these concerns are overly pessimistic. Tragically, any end to the war would almost certainly require Ukraine to make some territorial this is a bitter pill for Ukraine to swallow, frustrations could be tempered by Trump offering the besieged nation ironclad security guarantees. Even though Trump launched a tirade against Zelensky when he mentioned the need for security guarantees at the Oval Office in February, he has apparently come around to the necessity of these assurances. Trump has offered Ukraine Article 5 Nato-style security guarantees in the event of a peace deal. Ukraine would still be nominally a neutral country and not become a full Nato member; yet it will have most of the protections that are afforded to countries within the alliance bloc. This proposal could gain traction within the US foreign policy community and rare bipartisan support. Based on my past engagements with American experts familiar with the Biden administration's thinking on a peace settlement, a plan consisting of territorial concessions and Nato-style security guarantees was under consideration back then. The main disagreement pertains to the legal status of the Russian-annexed regions. Biden's team was firmer about the need to avoid official recognition of these territories and inclined to support Ukraine's claims to their future reintegration. Trump's team, meanwhile, is more willing to torpedo the principle of Westphalian sovereignty and recognize the regions as Russian to stem Putin's aggression. If the US settles on this formula, Europe and Ukraine are unlikely to mount a fierce resistance campaign against it. Its chances of success hinge on its implementation, and there are two issues that need to be resolved for it to be effectively adopted. The first challenge pertains to settling Ukraine's new de facto borders. These involve extremely difficult decisions for Zelensky. In exchange for abandoning Donbas, Ukraine will almost certainly want a land swap deal that guarantees control over the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant and the occupied half of Kherson. It is unclear whether Putin will accede to these demands, as Russia has officially annexed these areas, but a compromise is possible as they have less resonance to Russian ultra-nationalists than Donbas. Regardless of whether a land swap deal transpires, Ukraine will be forced to tragically dismantle its civilian institutions in Donetsk and potentially integrate hundreds of thousands of internally displaced persons. It will also have to respond in a measured fashion to Putin's imposition of Russian culture on all remaining Donbas residents and the subjugation of more Ukrainians to the totalitarian nature of Russian occupation. Once these challenges are achieved, Ukraine will need to ensure that its new borders are defensible. The 1994 Budapest Memorandum security guarantees unravelled due to a lack of will amongst signatories and denialism about the evil threat of Russian neo-imperialism. While these sources of complacency are much less striking now, there are still reasons for concern. The varying paces of arms deliveries to Ukraine and heated debates about escalation risks suggest that Nato does not have a united post-war plan. Therefore, it will be incumbent on Ukraine's strongest supporters within the alliance to quickly provide security assistance and steer as many of their more reluctant counterparts to follow suit. Britain's pledge to deploy ground troops to Ukraine within a week of a ceasefire and use Royal Air Force jets to patrol Ukraine's skies provides a positive example for its like-minded Nato allies. The US's active participation in the post-war peacekeeping coalition is critical. While Americans are evenly divided on the acceptability of peacekeeper deployments and military retaliations against Russia if peacekeepers are attacked, Trump must transcend politics for the cogency of the Nato alliance. Aside from the deployment of peacekeepers and integration of Ukraine into Nato's military technology supply chains, post-war reconstruction investments are a further guarantor of peace. If Ukraine's economy can attract large-scale capital infusions from both Western powers and Russia-friendly Global South stakeholders, such as the Gulf monarchies and China, the costs of further Russian aggression would rise precipitously. Putin's appalling wars have been driven by his false confidence in easy victories and a belief in Russian impunity. These assumptions need to be unequivocally put to rest. The Alaska summit failed to live up to its billing as a stepping stone for peace in Ukraine right now. Despite this, Trump's newest proposals suggest that it might just be around the corner.
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Newshour Trump touts progress towards peace deal
Donald Trump has said he, along with the presidents of Russia and Ukraine, have determined that a peace agreement was preferable to a ceasefire in the conflict between the two warring nations. The announcement comes after Mr Trump's high-profile summit in Alaska with Russia's leader Vladimir Putin ended without an agreement. We'll hear a Ukrainian response to the sight of President Putin being given a red carpet welcome in Alaska and get reaction fom the foreign minister of the Czech Republic. Also in the programme: Violent clashes erupt in Serbia's capital after demonstrations by pro-government and anti-corruption groups; and we mark 80 years since the publication of George Orwell's Animal Farm. (Photo shows Donald Trump at a press conference with Russian president Vladimir Putin in Anchorage, Alaska,on 15th August 2025. Jeenah Moon/Reuters)
