Algeria Seeks 7-Year Prison Term for Historian Over Anti-Amazigh Comments
According to Algerian media, the prosecutor at the Dar El Beida tribunal near Algiers also requested a fine of 700,000 dinars (approximately €4,600) for Belghit. The verdict will be announced on July 3, as confirmed by defense attorney Toufik Hichour on Facebook.
Belghit was placed in detention on May 3 after an interview with UAE-based Sky News Arabia went viral on social media. During the interview, the university professor claimed 'the Amazigh language is an ideological project of Franco-Zionist creation' and declared 'there is no Amazigh culture.'
These statements provoked widespread indignation in Algeria, where the Tamazight language was recognized as official in 2016, and 'Yennayer,' the Amazigh New Year, became a national holiday in 2017.
The historian faces serious charges including 'crime against national unity,' 'attacking symbols of the nation and republic,' and 'spreading hate speech and discrimination.' His comments were deemed particularly inflammatory given Algeria's constitutional recognition of Amazigh identity alongside Islam and Arabism.
Simmering tensions
The controversy quickly escalated into a diplomatic incident between Algeria and the UAE. Algeria's state television broadcast a scathing critique of the Emirates on May 2, accusing them of spreading 'a new form of venom, indecency and insults against Algerians' and having 'crossed all red lines.'
The five-minute tirade used particularly harsh language, repeatedly referring to the UAE as an 'artificial statelet' and its leaders as 'dwarves.' The broadcast warned that 'media incitement affecting Algerian identity will not pass without moral and popular accountability' and threatened to 'return the insult a hundredfold.'
This is not the first diplomatic confrontation between the two countries. Tensions boiled over last year when Algeria accused Abu Dhabi of collaborating with Morocco and Israel to destabilize the Sahel region and undermine Algerian interests in Western Sahara.
Algerian President Abdelmadjid Tebboune previously authorized Louisa Hanoune, leader of the Workers' Party, to publicly accuse the UAE of attempting to infiltrate Algeria's institutions and 'pushing for war in the region' to benefit Israel.
Hanoune claimed the Emirates were 'collecting money to arm Morocco' and using investments in Algeria as cover for alleged conspiracies. She suggested nationalizing Emirati-owned companies in Algeria, including the National Company of Tobacco and Matches, to reduce the UAE's economic presence in the country.
Although Amazigh activists denounced the comments as hateful, some have criticized the Algerian government's response as an attempt to deflect internal tensions by focusing on external enemies. One Kabyle activist noted on social media: 'It's not Sky News Arabia denying our history, it's the Algerian state giving voice to those who falsify our origins.'
The case draws parallels to that of Franco-Algerian writer Boualem Sansal, who was sentenced to five years in prison in March for stating in a French media outlet that Algeria had inherited territories from Morocco during French colonization. Tags: Algeriaalgeria and uae
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Morocco World
13 hours ago
- Morocco World
Algeria's Gas Gambit: Desperate Bid to Sway US on Sahara Dispute
Marrakech – Algeria is frantically courting American energy giants in a transparent attempt to influence US policy on Morocco's Western Sahara. According to Bloomberg, Algeria is nearing deals with Exxon Mobil Corp and Chevron Corp to tap its gas reserves, including shale, for the first time. 'The technical aspects have more or less been agreed upon, but the commercial alignment is still under negotiation and will soon be finalized,' Samir Bekhti, chairman of energy regulator Alnaft, told Bloomberg. Algeria is clearly betting big on shale as it attempts to shore up state revenue in a country where hydrocarbons account for more than three-quarters of exports. This energy push comes as Algerian President Abdelmadjid Tebboune received delegations from both Chevron and Exxon Mobil last June. These meetings revealed Algeria's calculated strategy to leverage oil and gas to attract strategic investments while simultaneously building indirect influence channels within Washington decision-making circles, above all to ward off any attempt by Congress to designate the Polisario as a terrorist organization. For the same reasons, Algerian political analyst Oualid Kebir even suggested that the military regime was ready to sell shale gas from the Eastern Sahara to Israel, not out of goodwill but to block any serious attempt within the UN to close the Western Sahara file – laying bare Algeria's toxic cocktail of hypocrisy, desperation, and utter moral bankruptcy. Algeria's frantic moves show it is feeling the heat, as US President Donald Trump's administration has made clear his intention to close the Sahara file once and for all. According to a June report by Instituto Coordenadas, Washington is preparing unprecedented pressure on Algiers – from demanding Polisario disarmament and dismantling the Tindouf camps to raising the threat of sanctions – measures designed to force Algeria into accepting Morocco's Autonomy Plan as the only realistic endgame. Furthermore, the ultimate blow looms: if the Polisario is designated a terrorist organization, Algeria would stand unmasked before the world as a state sponsor of terrorism – a pariah stripped of credibility, dragged into isolation, and branded by its own failed obsession with Morocco. Gas blackmail is not a Sahara policy For decades, the Algerian regime has persisted in the same exhausted maneuver – weaponizing its gas reserves, financing and sheltering the Polisario separatists who exist only in the vacuum of Tindouf, and attempting to manipulate global capitals. Algeria desperately wants the world to believe that the Western Sahara dispute remains an unresolved colonial chapter, when in fact the tide of history and diplomacy has already moved decisively in favor of Morocco's sovereignty with its Autonomy Plan. Yet this regime refuses to accept reality, clinging to Cold War dogmas and feeding off the illusion that blackmailing neighbors or threatening energy partners can somehow reverse a US recognition that has been in place since 2020, never withdrawn, and consistently reaffirmed through successive administrations. The Western Sahara file has moved decisively away from 1970s slogans and toward 21st-century realism, while Algeria's doctrine remains stubbornly stuck in the Cold War era. Algiers has run the same play for years: weaponize gas, bankroll the Polisario, and hope the world blinks. It hasn't worked. What Algiers calls foreign policy is in fact nothing more than tantrum-driven brinkmanship – a brittle and transactional game. Entire pipelines have been shut down, not because of economic necessity but out of the pathological desire to punish Morocco and any country that dares to align with Rabat's proposal. This was precisely the case in 2022, when Spain publicly backed Morocco's Autonomy Plan and Algeria immediately froze a twenty-year friendship treaty, strangled trade ties, and rattled the energy saber. Threats to halt gas, followed by punitive economic measures, were less a strategy than a tantrum – broadcasting to European capitals that Algeria's foreign policy is transactional, brittle, and ultimately unreliable. Algeria once again proved that its diplomacy is built on vengeance rather than vision, on sabotage rather than strategy. Analysts ask: What kind of state deliberately destroys integration projects that could bring regional prosperity, merely to indulge its hatred of Morocco? Self-destruction disguised as principle The Maghreb-Europe pipeline closure in 2021 perfectly exemplified this self-harming obsession. Algiers cut a vital artery that had carried Algerian gas to Europe via Morocco since the 1990s – a decades-old infrastructure that symbolized regional interdependence. Yet, the regime in Algiers willingly severed it – not to advance peace, not to gain leverage for real negotiation, but simply to strike at Rabat. This self-destructive decision punished neighbors, spooked markets, and signaled that Algeria will gladly torch regional integration to score a point against Rabat, even at the cost of destabilizing markets, losing revenue, and damaging its own standing. According to observers, this is not leadership; it is self-destruction recast as principle – a policy posture that prioritizes starving itself and destabilizing its neighborhood over confronting the strategic futility of its Sahara gamble. Meanwhile, the so-called Sahrawi 'state-in-waiting' that Algeria sustains is nothing but a dependency structure built in the sands of Tindouf. The Polisario leadership enjoys privileges while the camps remain locked in poverty, an arrangement that has lasted almost five decades and produces nothing but grievance politics and propaganda. This machine forbids transparency and thrives only on indefinite stalemate, because the moment accountability is introduced, the entire facade collapses. Colonization by proxy in Tindouf Commentators view this not as decolonization but as colonization by proxy – a deliberate policy of freezing human lives to keep alive a failed narrative that the rest of the world has moved beyond. The serious diplomatic failures of Algeria's approach were brutally put into light by Rachid Nekkaz, former presidential candidate, who recently criticized Foreign Minister Ahmed Attaf's performance as 'a complete failure on all levels.' Nekkaz pointed out that Attaf, who 'was unemployed for 19 years before being appointed as head of Algerian diplomacy,' has failed to 'stop Morocco's diplomatic successes regarding the Sahara.' Algeria's reliance on energy blackmail is doubly shortsighted; gas leverage is finite, and time is not on Algiers' side. Europe, shaken by Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022, has already diversified its supply – securing US LNG, Gulf producers, and new routes that dilute Algerian influence. Every time Algiers reaches for the gas weapon, it diminishes its credibility and accelerates its own irrelevance. In long-term energy markets, only reliability is rewarded, not tantrums; trust, not threats. Even where Algeria has expanded ties, notably with Italy, its volumes and dependability are now judged against a crowded field, and weaponizing energy may buy headlines but ultimately erodes the only currency that matters in strategic partnerships: trust. At the heart of this failure lies a poisonous mindset: Algeria treats the Sahara not as an issue to be solved but as a theater to bleed Morocco, a tool to box in Rabat diplomatically, and a national myth to justify repression at home. It repeats the same sterile slogans of 'referendum or nothing,' ignoring that the UN process itself has moved on, that major capitals from Washington to Madrid to Paris have embraced Morocco's Autonomy Plan as the only serious solution. No amount of gas-fuelled pressure can reverse that trajectory. Washington's 2020 proclamation recognizing Moroccan sovereignty remains firmly in force, and US diplomacy has stayed fixed on Rabat's Autonomy Plan as the realistic path forward. Morocco, for its part, has done the slow, unglamorous but necessary work: devolving powers, investing in the southern provinces, and building a coalition of states that see autonomy as both ethical and executable. This is not a temporary mood swing; analysis suggests it has proven durable through subsequent administrations and UN cycles – especially as Trump himself reaffirmed this stance as recently as late July in a letter addressed to King Mohammed VI on the occasion of the 26th Throne Day. The naked truth is this: what Algeria sustains is not a foreign policy but a failing project propped up by energy bullying – a hollow strategy that confuses volume (of gas, of rhetoric) for vision, noise for influence, and mortgages the lives of so-called 'Sahrawis' to keep alive a grievance industry, Sahrawis whom the military regime does not even allow a census for. In the process, it even undermines its own economic interests just to preserve the fantasy of striking at Morocco. History is moving, the Sahara file is moving, Washington has locked in its recognition, and Europe increasingly treats autonomy as the only executable outcome. Yet Algiers continues to act as if time stopped in 1976, dragging its people into isolation, wasting billions on separatism, and reducing itself to little more than a supplier with a flag – a state that could have been a regional power but has chosen instead to be a regional saboteur. Tags: algeria and the USAlgeria and Western SaharaWestern sahara
Ya Biladi
3 days ago
- Ya Biladi
Meknes newborn finally registered under the name Massinissa after initial refusal
In Meknes, a family's choice to name their newborn son Massinissa, after the historic Amazigh king, sparked administrative hurdles this week. A civil registry officer at the 8th district office in the Marjane 2 neighborhood refused to register the name, despite clear legal and judicial rulings granting parents the freedom to choose names, and official instructions requiring officers to register them or refer disputes to the High Commission within 24 hours, the family's lawyer, Sabri Lhou, denounced in a post on Facebook. Lhou said the officer «placed obstacles in the way, creating unnecessary difficulties to block my client's legal right to register his son under the name Massinissa, and demanded another name be chosen». The dispute ended after the intervention of the Governor of Meknes Province. In a follow-up post on August 12, the lawyer said the governor upheld the law and «restored the prestige, status, and authority of the name Massinissa». The father was contacted by the Marjane 2 office and informed that the earlier refusal had been overturned. The incident brings the issue of civil registry officers refusing Amazigh names back into the spotlight. In the past, many parents have seen their Amazigh name choices rejected, but the Moroccan government had made its position clear on the matter. In 2023, Morocco's High Commission of the Civil Registry reaffirmed that Moroccans are free to choose Arabic, Amazigh, Hassani, or Hebrew names, provided they respect morality and public order. Since then, and under decree No. 2.22.04 implementing Law 36.21, civil registry officers must accept all declared names, even if they raise concerns, and refer them to a higher committee for a decision. This committee must provide a justification, with results communicated digitally to both the officer and the applicant.
Ya Biladi
4 days ago
- Ya Biladi
French court overturns expulsion order, grants residence permit to Moroccan graduate
The administrative court of Cergy-Pontoise, northwest of Paris, has overturned the decision to deny a residence permit to Zahra*, a Moroccan national who recently graduated in France, where she has been living since 2018. Samy Djemaoun, a Paris-based lawyer representing the young woman, told Yabiladi that the court also annulled the order to leave French territory (OQTF) and the re-entry ban (IRTF) previously imposed on his client. The prefect has now been instructed to issue her a residence permit. The case began several weeks ago, when Zahra* discovered the measures against her only upon returning from a vacation in Morocco. Having earned her MBA in business management, she had hoped to start her career in the country where she has built her adult life. At Roissy–Charles de Gaulle Airport, a routine border police check took an unexpected turn when an officer emerged from an office and asked her to follow him. Held at the airport, she was informed that she was subject to an OQTF and a staggering 40-year re-entry ban, a situation her lawyer described as unprecedented in his career.
