Iran 'ready to hold talks' with US over nuclear programme, Pezeshkian says
Speaking to American journalist Tucker Carlson in an interview that aired on Monday, Mr Pezeshkian noted that while Iran was willing to return to allowing supervision of its programme, its nuclear infrastructure was 'severely damaged' by recent US strikes.
'We don't have any access to them,' he said. 'We have to wait for it and to see what happens and how much they have been damaged, so that we can go for the supervision.'
Iran and the US had been in the process of negotiating a new deal to put limits on Tehran's nuclear programme in exchange for sanctions relief. President Donald Trump withdrew from the original deal during his first term, but expressed his desire earlier this year to come to a new agreement.
The two sides had held several rounds of indirect talks in Muscat and Rome, with Oman as mediator, when Israel launched a 'pre-emptive' strike on Iran's nuclear infrastructure.
Mr Pezeshkian said the US team told Iran during the negotiations that 'as long as we don't give the permission to Israel, they are not going to attack you'.
'We were sitting at the negotiating table when it happened, and by doing this, they totally ruined and destroyed diplomacy,' he said, accusing Israel of attempting to drag the US into 'forever wars'.
'How are we going to trust the United States again? We re-enter the negotiations, then how can we know for sure that in the middle of the talks, the Israeli regime will not be given the permission again to attack?'
Still, the President said Iran was 'ready to hold talks over' the future of the nuclear programme.
'We have never been the party that has run away from verification. We stand ready to have these supervisions,' he said.'
Carlson pointed out that Mr Pezeshkian had approved a law suspending co-operation with the UN's nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency. The agency is responsible for monitoring Iran's nuclear programme amid concerns that it is trying to build a nuclear weapon – something Tehran has continuously denied.
Mr Pezeshkian said Iranians were 'pessimistic' about the activities of the IAEA following a report that he claims gave Israel the excuse to attack Iran's nuclear facilities.
'The IAEA failed to condemn these attacks or try to anyway to stop them. And this ran counter to the international law, and this resulted in a widespread lack of trust among the Iranians,' he said.
The US has condemned Iran's move to stop co-operating with the IAEA.
With regard to the US and future relations, Mr Pezeshkian emphasised the need for Washington to respect Iran's rights.
'I believe that the United States' President can very well guide the region and the world to peace and tranquillity, or, on the other hand, to lead it to forever wars,' he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
26 minutes ago
- The National
Lebanon to push ahead with disarming Hezbollah amid assurances Israel will pull troops out
Lebanon has received western guarantees for Israel to withdrawal from its territory and commit to a ceasefire, a Lebanese political source told The National. In exchange Lebanon is expected to enter a "new phase' in which its army becomes the sole legitimate holder of weapons in the country, while Hezbollah has also agreed to disarm, the source added. 'If the US and French guarantees move forward, I estimate we can move on to the next phase,' the source said. 'Our biggest priority is establishing a ceasefire and Israeli withdrawal – before anything else.' The source was speaking after a visit by US envoy Thomas Barrack, during which leaders in Beirut submitted a seven-page response to Washington's road map for Hezbollah's disarmament and Lebanon's integration into what the US views as a new era of regional stability under western influence. 'The overall meeting that happened between [Lebanese leaders] and Barrack was much preferable to our expectations,' the source said. He described Lebanon's response to the proposal as acceptance of 'a new opportunity and giving the Israelis an opportunity to [end the conflict]'. He confirmed the response to Washington included a "plan for the army to secure and facilitate the state's legal authority over all arms in the country". But despite the guarantees the source expressed some doubt, citing an escalation of Israeli attacks on Lebanese territory in the past week. Israel has continued to carry out strikes on Lebanon despite a ceasefire that ended 14 months of war with Hezbollah in November. The truce called for Hezbollah to begin disarming south of the Litani River in exchange for a full Israeli withdrawal from Lebanese territory. Officials in Beirut have criticised the ceasefire deal as one-sided, claiming it has failed to stop Israel attacking Lebanon. Israel still maintains a military occupation of five points along the border separating the two countries. While Hezbollah, a powerful political party and paramilitary force that suffered devastating losses in the war, has co-operated with Lebanese authorities south of the Litani, the US has increased pressure on the country's leaders to push for the group to lay down its weapons. Mr Barrack's visit, which promoted the US-backed road map, reflected what he has described as a 'carrot and stick' strategy, linking Hezbollah's disarmament to the end of Israeli military operations and US funding for Lebanon's post-war reconstruction. Lebanon's political leadership has expressed broad agreement that the state should hold exclusive military authority. However, senior figures have urged the US to adopt a softer approach, citing the difficulty of making a case for Hezbollah's full disarmament as Israeli attacks continue. One western diplomat in Lebanon described the US proposal as 'an extension of the ceasefire, driven by a medium and long-term vision for what's needed to restore stability". "It's not about setting deadlines; it's a parallel-track approach. As progress is made on one front, reciprocal actions are taken on the other." Washington has made clear that Lebanon-Israel relations are not its priority following the region's shift towards western influence, the diplomat told The National. 'If the Lebanese choose not to engage, so be it. The reality is that Lebanon is not a US priority when it comes to normalisation. The real focus is Syria.' Lebanon has been beholden to foreign influence since its inception. Hezbollah's losses, along with an about-turn in Syria's 13-year civil war that brought an Islamist government to power, have created a willingness to align with US interests. At the same time, Iran's influence in the region diminished. This has allowed Lebanon, caught between the US and its allies on one side, and Iran and its allies on the other, to move on from years of state paralysis. All sources who spoke to The National requested anonymity due to the 'highly sensitive' nature of the negotiations. In an interview with Lebanese channel LBCI, Mr Barrack denied that Washington was imposing hard deadlines on the state to ensure Hezbollah disarms. 'There's no threats, there's no dictates," he said. "Look around you. The region is changing. Everything is changing. If you don't want to change, if the people don't want to change, just tell us and we'll not interfere. 'If Lebanon wants to just keep kicking this can down the road, they can keep kicking the can down the road but we're not going to be here in May having this discussion.' A pro-US Lebanese politician echoed the urgency of the situation. 'No one is going to wait forever for the Lebanese,' he said. 'You've seen the tactical shift happening in the Middle East. Alliances are shifting rapidly. No one wants to see Lebanon fall behind.'
The National
37 minutes ago
- The National
Lebanon to move forward on disarming non-state groups under western guarantee Israel will abide by ceasefire
Lebanon has received western guarantees for Israel to withdrawal from its territory and commit to a ceasefire, a Lebanese political source told The National. In exchange Lebanon is expected to enter a "new phase' in which its army becomes the sole legitimate holder of weapons in the country, while Hezbollah has also agreed to disarm, the source added. 'If the US and French guarantees move forward, I estimate we can move on to the next phase,' the source said. 'Our biggest priority is establishing a ceasefire and Israeli withdrawal – before anything else.' The source was speaking after a visit by US envoy Thomas Barrack, during which leaders in Beirut submitted a seven-page response to Washington's road map for Hezbollah's disarmament and Lebanon's integration into what the US views as a new era of regional stability under western influence. 'The overall meeting that happened between [Lebanese leaders] and Barrack was much preferable to our expectations,' the source said. He described Lebanon's response to the proposal as acceptance of 'a new opportunity and giving the Israelis an opportunity to [end the conflict]'. He confirmed the response to Washington included a "plan for the army to secure and facilitate the state's legal authority over all arms in the country". But despite the guarantees the source expressed some doubt, citing an escalation of Israeli attacks on Lebanese territory in the past week. Israel has continued to carry out strikes on Lebanon despite a ceasefire that ended 14 months of war with Hezbollah in November. The truce called for Hezbollah to begin disarming south of the Litani River in exchange for a full Israeli withdrawal from Lebanese territory. Officials in Beirut have criticised the ceasefire deal as one-sided, claiming it has failed to stop Israel attacking Lebanon. Israel still maintains a military occupation of five points along the border separating the two countries. While Hezbollah, a powerful political party and paramilitary force that suffered devastating losses in the war, has co-operated with Lebanese authorities south of the Litani, the US has increased pressure on the country's leaders to push for the group to lay down its weapons. Mr Barrack's visit, which promoted the US-backed road map, reflected what he has described as a 'carrot and stick' strategy, linking Hezbollah's disarmament to the end of Israeli military operations and US funding for Lebanon's post-war reconstruction. Lebanon's political leadership has expressed broad agreement that the state should hold exclusive military authority. However, senior figures have urged the US to adopt a softer approach, citing the difficulty of making a case for Hezbollah's full disarmament as Israeli attacks continue. One western diplomat in Lebanon described the US proposal as 'an extension of the ceasefire, driven by a medium and long-term vision for what's needed to restore stability". "It's not about setting deadlines; it's a parallel-track approach. As progress is made on one front, reciprocal actions are taken on the other." Washington has made clear that Lebanon-Israel relations are not its priority following the region's shift towards western influence, the diplomat told The National. 'If the Lebanese choose not to engage, so be it. The reality is that Lebanon is not a US priority when it comes to normalisation. The real focus is Syria.' Lebanon has been beholden to foreign influence since its inception. Hezbollah's losses, along with an about-turn in Syria's 13-year civil war that brought an Islamist government to power, have created a willingness to align with US interests. At the same time, Iran's influence in the region diminished. This has allowed Lebanon, caught between the US and its allies on one side, and Iran and its allies on the other, to move on from years of state paralysis. All sources who spoke to The National requested anonymity due to the 'highly sensitive' nature of the negotiations. In an interview with Lebanese channel LBCI, Mr Barrack denied that Washington was imposing hard deadlines on the state to ensure Hezbollah disarms. 'There's no threats, there's no dictates," he said. "Look around you. The region is changing. Everything is changing. If you don't want to change, if the people don't want to change, just tell us and we'll not interfere. 'If Lebanon wants to just keep kicking this can down the road, they can keep kicking the can down the road but we're not going to be here in May having this discussion.' A pro-US Lebanese politician echoed the urgency of the situation. 'No one is going to wait forever for the Lebanese,' he said. 'You've seen the tactical shift happening in the Middle East. Alliances are shifting rapidly. No one wants to see Lebanon fall behind.'
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Gaza crisis demands a return to political reality
As efforts to reach a ceasefire in the Gaza war continue, the latest pronouncement from Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz that the country's military work on a proposal to 'concentrate' thousands of the enclave's remaining Palestinians in a so-called humanitarian city serves only to shine more light on the daily death and destruction taking place in Palestine. At a time when Palestinians in Gaza are being killed at aid distribution points or bombed from the air, the idea that forcibly displacing them and cornering them could lead to an improvement in their lives is a disturbing one. This plan is just the latest in a series of mendacious and unrealistic proposals for Gaza that waste time and diplomatic energy that could be better spent producing genuine solutions. In fact, a similarly incongruous proposal came from Mr Katz in January last year. Presented to 27 EU foreign ministers during a meeting in Brussels to discuss the war, Mr Katz showed the European representatives videos of an artificial island to be built off the Gazan coast. The EU's High Commissioner for Foreign Affairs, Josep Borrell, later told a news briefing that 'the minister could have made better use of his time and focus on the security of his country, bearing in mind the high number of deaths in Gaza'. The stakes for Palestine, the Middle East and the Israeli public are much too high for further timewasting or disruptive proposals that are clearly unworkable and unacceptable. In Gaza itself, amid the suffering of the Palestinian civilians there, some 50 Israeli hostages are still being held after being kidnapped during the brutal Hamas -led attacks of October 7, 2023. The idea that the military responsible for tens of thousands of civilian deaths can be trusted to guard any kind of humanitarian operation is unworkable Sadly, however, more speculative contributions are coming to light; experts have been alarmed by reports that an American official, quoted anonymously in US news outlet The Hill, said that the Middle East's borders are 'illusory', dismissing the sovereignty of a number of nation states. It is time to come back to political reality. The overwhelming majority of the international community agree on the need to end the war in Gaza, to get humanitarian aid to its suffering inhabitants, to stop the creeping Israeli annexation of the West Bank and to move from merely 'managing' the Palestinian-Israeli conflict to bringing it to a negotiated end. The possibility of peace in the region – that includes all the countries of the Middle East – cannot be met without a path to Palestinian statehood, with peace and security for Palestinians and Israelis. Reconvening the high-level UN conference on the two-state solution that was postponed by the Iran-Israel war would be a good place to start. No-one should object to good-faith proposals or fresh thinking about how to resolve this conflict's many related aspects, such as reaching a ceasefire, releasing Palestinians held in Israeli detention, rebuilding Gaza and encouraging consensus among Palestinian factions so they can eventually deliver good governance for their people. But proposals such as an Israeli-run 'humanitarian city' amid the ashes of Gaza do not offer real solutions nor serve regional peace.
