NZ Faces $9.4b Hit From Invasive Caulerpa, Analysis Shows
The invasive seaweed is gaining an increasing stronghold.
New Zealand's economy risks a $9.4 billion hit as the invasive seaweed caulerpa gains an increasing stronghold – with reports of it now spreading to the Bay of Islands tourist town of Russell.
That's the stark warning after new NZIER analysis showed caulerpa's spread will impact tourism and recreation, commercial fishing, aquaculture and ecosystems if more is not done to stop the spread.
The analysis is part of a New Zealand-first iwi, community and council consortium December business case to the government pushing for a co-ordinated, scaled up approach.
The heavyweight consortium wants up to $215 million – $43 million annually – for the first five years of a 30-year fight against caulerpa, which would be funded through taxpayer contributions, local rates and vessel levies.
But Biosecurity Minister Andrew Hoggard has challenged the $9.4 billion economic impact figure.
'The impacts of exotic caulerpa in New Zealand are still not fully understood and long-term studies are underway to understand this better.
'Given that we are still studying how caulerpa behaves and affects local marine ecology it would be extremely difficult to identify a cost with any certainty,' Hoggard said.
Hoggard would not comment on how much money the government would be putting towards caulerpa in the 22 May Budget.
'The government always faces difficult choices about what to fund and I cannot discuss Budget ahead of its release later this month,' Hoggard said.
Exotic caulerpa has been described by independent scientific experts as the country's most serious marine biosecurity invasion in a lifetime.
Northland-based Conquer Caulerpa Trust chair Verdon Kelliher said the situation was desperate and the government wasn't doing enough to remedy the issue.
'We're talking about major impacts,' Kelliher said.
'Without immediate, co-ordinated action, our fishing grounds, tourism industry and cultural heritage face unprecedented damage.'
The caulerpa threat area stretches 1500 kilometres of coastline from Cape Reinga to East Cape, including the 'golden triangle' economic powerhouse of Auckland, Waikato and Bay of Plenty, as well as Northland.
It has spread to more than 90 locations from the Bay of Islands to the Mercury Islands, off the upper Coromandel Peninsula.
Ex-Tropical Cyclone Tam washed more than 500 tonnes of caulerpa ashore in thick carpets in the Bay of Islands' Omākiwi Cove and adjacent Whiorau Bay over Easter.
Local volunteers rushed to remove it due to fears of it creating a growth explosion.
The consortium wants a strengthened government approach to caulerpa with a stronger marine biosecurity framework to co-ordinate a scaled-up fight.
Its business case, by consultants Martin Jenkins and based on the NZIER economic analysis, was developed over four months by Hauraki Gulf-based Pou Rāhui iwi (Ngāti Pāoa, Ngāti Hei, Ngāti Tamaterā and Ngā Tai ki Tāmaki) with financial and/or other input also including from marine scientists and Northland Regional Council, Auckland Council, Waikato Regional Council, Thames-Coromandel District Council, Hauraki District Council, DOC plus affected industries.
Hoggard met Pou Rāhui iwi and councils behind the business case in March.
He said the meeting had been 'very useful' and asked officials to consider the business case and provide advice to him 'in due course'.
Pou Rāhui iwi spokesperson Herearoha Skipper said the cost of the government not taking appropriate action outweighed the cost of doing so.
'The arrival of caulerpa represents an unprecedented threat to our marine environment,' Skipper said.
'We are deeply concerned about the lack of a comprehensive approach to fighting this seaweed species and its potentially devastating impact.'
NZIER modelling suggested that without proper intervention, $9.4 billion of the upper North Island's natural capital asset value could be lost over the next 30 years.
That includes an $8.8 billion recreational and tourism loss including recreational fishing – fish biomass has been halved in overseas caulerpa infestations.
Recreational boating would be impacted with significant movement restrictions, the report said.
There would be a $118 million loss for commercial fishing, $24 million for aquaculture and $489.4 million in ecosystem services degradation, NZIER said.
Roles and responsibilities in the caulerpa fight were not clear and regulatory barriers often prevented rapid responses. Traditional frameworks failed to adequately incorporate mātauranga Māori and invasive species funding had been reactive rather than proactive, the report said.
New Zealand's first mainland exotic caulerpa infestation was identified in Omākiwi Cove in the eastern Bay of Islands in May 2023.
More than 1000ha – the equivalent of 1429 rugby fields – have been closed to boat anchoring since June 2023 to help stop its spread.
Sightings of caulerpa have now been reported outside this anchoring ban area including Russell's Kororarēka Bay, about 10 kilometres by boat from Omākiwi Cove.
It's also been reported at Long Beach (Oneroa) and Tāpeka Point.
'And it's highly likely that additional beaches are affected but remain unreported,' Kelliher said.
Hoggard said the caulerpa that had been shown globally to create dense monocultures were different species from those causing issues in New Zealand – where there was no clear evidence the marine pest was overgrowing seagrass.
Biosecurity New Zealand, mana whenua, regional councils, affected communities and other agencies had invested a huge amount of effort and money to tackle the situation, he said.
The government had put more than $20 million towards efforts to understand the pest, contain its spread and develop new technologies to remove it, Hoggard said.
World-leading technology was also helping to remove different types of caulerpa infestations including the development of a large-scale suction dredge in the Bay of Islands.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
2 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Israeli-made drones not ruled out by NZ Defence Force
Roboteam unmanned ground drone. Photo: Roboteam The NZ military has not ruled out buying drones from Israel during the Gaza conflict. Many countries are shopping for drones, and Israel has some of the most advanced and lethal in the world. In 2019, the NZ Defence Force bought bomb-clearing robots from Israeli firm Roboteam, well before drones went off as a warfighting essential. A few days ago, Roboteam talked about the Gaza war letting loose an "orchestra" of drones. "We connect the drones with the unmanned ground vehicles [UGVs], and then you get a new orchestra of UGVs talking with each other and shooting," [ it told Breaking Defense media]. This was a "huge change" from when weaponising drones was banned before the war, it said. The military here said government procurement rules did not allow bans on firms based on country of origin. "The NZDF will exclude a supplier from the tender process, if it has sufficient grounds to believe there is evidence of human-rights violations by the supplier or in the supplier's supply chain," it said. It had "no specific process" to assess that, but concerns might be raised during due diligence checks (listed below). "Accordingly, the NZDF would not exclude Roboteam based on the fact they are an Israeli-owned company, unless this was a central government direction (for example, if a supplier's country of origin is on a relevant sanctions list)." As drones rapidly become more crucial to warfare and more lethal, the questions around buying and using them increase in significance. However, the Defence Force admitted to RNZ it had neither a doctrine nor a strategy for drone development. "The New Zealand Defence Force (NZDF) does not have drone development strategies nor does it have doctrines around drone development," it said in response to an OIA. Asked what documents it had about drone rules of engagement in warfare, it provided nothing. It also lacked any centralised purchasing system for drones - individual units bought their own "as needs require", it said. It followed the government's "approach to drone regulation and development", but the force last briefed Defence Minister Judith Collins about drones 19 months ago. On Thursday, Collins unveiled plans to buy $2.7 billion of US maritime helicopters and large planes from Europe, as signalled in the Defence Capability Plan in April. Asked later if it would get some drones next up, she said: "Oh, absolutely." Asked if she would rule out buying them from Israel, given the Gaza war, Collins said: "You know, what I can really say, I hope we are buying from New Zealand." During the media conference, Collins stressed she wanted a more lethal defence force. Tauranga company Syos makes surveillance and cargo drones used in the Ukraine war, while other companies also make non-weaponised drones. Before October 2019, government procurement ruless contained no specific reference to human rights issues, the NZDF said. Budget 2025 provided unspecified funding for counter-drone systems. There are many such systems , including Israeli ones, that shoot drones using roboticised rifles, which can themselves be mounted on drones as an offensive weapon. The $12b defence capability plan envisages New Zealand buying many more air and sea drones by 2029. Defence's most recent purchase of four types of surveillance drones did not include any Israeli ones, it told RNZ. Asked how it applied the procurement rules for these, it said: "In accordance with the government procurement rules, the NZDF has not excluded Roboteam from tendering for any of its procurements on the basis of Roboteam's country of origin." It emphasised to RNZ Roboteam's civilian credentials. Defence Minister Judith Collins and Foreign Minister Winston Peters front a defence-spending media conference. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone "Roboteam is an entrepreneurial business run from Israel, which is built upon the company's core expertise in design of mobility systems and controls. Much of its business is involved in personal mobility solutions for disabled persons and medical applications," it said. Roboteam supplies many countries' militaries. RNZ contacted Roboteam for comment. On Thursday, Collins re-iterated New Zealand wanted to buy the same military systems as Australia to stay interoperable. A few days ago, the Australian government laid out plans to spend more than a billion dollars on drones and counterdrones in the next decade. It launched Project LAND 156, which had already granted more than $50m in contracts for counterdrones to local firms. The project adopted a "continuous modernisation model" critical to ensure investments today would be useful in future , it said. . Canberra stressed it would buy local, if it could, but in 2022, the Australian army bought Skylark drones from Israeli firm Elbit. An Elbit Skylark reconnaissance drone crashed in a street in Gaza city last weekend, before an assault by the Israel Defence Force on the city. The Jerusalem Post reported that Skylarks could help co-ordinate artillery fire . Last year, Australia [ did a controversial deal with Elbit] to buy turrets worth abouot a billion dollars. Reuters has reported on "many" Israeli firms getting "a boost from Israel's war needs". "Unfortunately, war is good for business and Israel has been a major partner," it quoted Boeing Israel growth and innovation head Ayal Somech on a panel at a conference . NZDF said due diligence could include, but was not limited to: Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
2 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Attempted spying conviction for soldier who was less Bond, more bumbling
Photo: ADELE RYCROFT At first glance, it reads like a Tom Clancy spy thriller. A disloyal, far-right soldier, an undercover officer posing as a foreign agent, and the passing on of secret army information, which could put the safety and defence of the country at risk But this time, it isn't fiction. It's real life, in New Zealand. For the first time, a serving soldier has been convicted of attempted espionage , sent to a military prison, and dismissed from service for attempting to spy on the Defence Force. At his long-awaited trial, in front of a court martial at Linton Military Camp, the man - whose name is currently suppressed - pleaded guilty to three charges of attempted espionage, dishonestly accessing a computer system, and possessing an objectionable publication. Newsroom journalist Marc Daalder broke the story six years ago, and attended the court case this week, and tells The Detail , that "this isn't James Bond, it's not the Hunt for Red October either ... what we have here is maybe more like a bumbling wannabe-spy". "As the judge put it in his sentencing decision, 'How could you be so naive as to think this is the way forward, this is the right thing to do?'" Daalder says that the soldier did have ties to far-right groups and "it's a serious, serious issue, but you don't want to overstate it either". So how and why did a Kiwi kid grow up to be a would-be spy? Daalder says the soldier had a troubled childhood; he was a loner and didn't make friends easily. "Even once he joined the NZDF, he was not particularly well-liked, and that's part of what drove him, he says, to these far-right groups." Daalder says in social media posts the soldier would boast that he "joined a Nazi organisation and [he said that] it's the best thing that ever happened to me, I used to be a loser, no job, no fitness or social skills. Now I'm working a decent job, have plenty of friends and a half-decent life, all thanks to the mentoring I got from older Nazis, and I have no regrets". Before the 15 March terror attacks, the soldier founded a far-right group, 'The Dominion Movement', which meant that after the attacks he was on the radar of police and was pulled in for questioning several times. In an affidavit presented at his court-martial hearing this week, the soldier said, "The investigators were incredibly aggressive towards me, often getting in my face and shouting. To me, their approach was actually violent." The soldier said he was terrified, and felt he had to leave New Zealand and get to another country where he thought he would be safe. "He frames himself as a victim of political persecution," Daalder says. The soldier then contacted a third party, indicating that he wanted to defect. "Following the New Zealand government learning of the contact with that third party, an undercover officer, posing as an agent of the foreign country, reached out to him and asked to meet ... and the soldier was asked to provide a letter, asking what he could provide that would assist that foreign country," Daalder tells The Detail . "From there, it's a mixture of spy thriller and maybe a bumbling spy version." Among the items the soldier provided were documents, including maps and aerial photographs of various defence force bases, along with passcodes, access codes, login details to its IT system, and telephone directories. He also passed on handwritten assessments of the vulnerabilities of the Linton Military Camp, where he was stationed. The soldier was eventually arrested at the Linton Military Camp in 2019, and put under open arrest, living in defence-subsidised housing and receiving full pay. He initially faced 17 charges, including espionage. This week, he pleaded guilty to attempted espionage, accessing a computer for a dishonest purpose, and knowingly possessing an objectionable publication, and was sentenced to two years in military detention - the longest possible sentence of detention available under the law. Otago University law lecturer Sean Whittaker, who moved to New Zealand from Scotland a year ago, told The Detail he was "very surprised" by the spying conviction. "New Zealand has a reputation of being a safe place to live, to work, and not being vulnerable to such action - either by external forces or by people within the country itself. "I think that it's important to mention that the limited number of instances of espionage being detected and prosecuted is not indicative of the lack of quality of New Zealand's security intelligence services. "Ultimately, I think they are doing a good job; they have detected espionage in this particular instance, and I think that's overall because New Zealand isn't exceptionally vulnerable to espionage," he says. But does New Zealand really have anything worth spying on or information worth selling to foreign countries? "Despite New Zealand's small size, it is a decent-sized player in the international community ... we do have things that are worth [spying on], as it were, things that are valuable, both intrinsic to us and to the global system as well." Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here . You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook
RNZ News
2 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Officials warn of damage to diplomatic relations in secret climate change memo
Climate Change Minister Simon Watts. Photo: RNZ / Nate McKinnon Officials warned the government that reneging on climate commitments could have a domino effect and give bigger countries, like China, an excuse to do less. The advice was mistakenly released under the Official Information Act by the Ministry for the Environment (MFE). MFE and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFAT) have sought to retrospectively redact the information. The sensitive information was contained in a briefing paper released under the OIA in April. The paper warned that if the government decided not to meet New Zealand's first target under the Paris Agreement, it could impact a "delicate" hard-won global agreement and risk "undermining confidence in the solidarity of our climate effort" and harming "a number of our priority relationships". New Zealand's is a member of the Five Eyes Intelligence Alliance which includes Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States. The advice said the United States, United Kingdom, Canada and Australia as well as Europe would view "backing off from Paris Agreement commitments extremely negatively". The United States has since pulled out of the Paris Agreement. The memo urged ministers to show their commitment by sealing climate cooperation deals with other countries last year - before a crucial deadline to show progress under the Paris Agreement. Officials said sealing these deals to pay for emissions-cutting projects overseas - which are needed to achieve around two thirds of New Zealand's 2030 target - was a critical step for reassuring other nations this country was committed to meeting its obligations. The government did not take this step, and still has not. So far it has declined to make a decision either way, despite the urging of its own advisers. However after RNZ put questions to Climate Change Minister Simon Watts in July, officials asked RNZ to delete the material so they could replace it with a more fully redacted version. The advice also contained legally privileged material which RNZ has decided not to use. The advice also said Pacific Island countries would share similar concerns to New Zealand's larger "priority" partner countries about the implications for the durability of the Paris Agreement, "which is seen as a critical, if fragile, safeguard against an existential threat". It said a loss of confidence in New Zealand's commitment to climate action would likely diminish its influence in the region at a time of "increased strategic competition." "It is extremely likely that an individual country rejecting its commitments would be viewed through a lens of outsized impacts," it said. The warning was part of a package prepared by environment officials and MFAT in March 2024 outlining why the government should not lower its 2030 climate target - and why it should take "concrete steps" to seal international deals. Sixteen months later, the government has not reduced its target - and still says it is committed to meeting it - but it also hasn't taken the steps officials said it should take to reassure other nations that New Zealand planned to deliver. Paying money to other countries to fund decarbonisation projects (for example electrifying diesel buses or shuttering coal plants in Asia or the Pacific) was explicitly baked into New Zealand's target when it was set. Doing much of the work overseas was deemed cheaper and less disruptive than making faster, deeper cuts here, at least until the farming, electricity, manufacturing and transport sectors in New Zealand had had more time to deliver bigger emissions savings, which was expected to happen after 2030. Without overseas help, this country will fall more than a year's worth of emissions short of its promise, according to latest estimates. But since the 2023 election, ministers have repeatedly baulked at committing to paying for overseas carbon deals, saying spending billions offshore is not realistic, and that they still have time before 2030 - and even hinting that they might find 80 million tonnes of additional emissions savings here at home. Officials have repeatedly told ministers that overseas deals are the only realistic way to meet the target. Advisers have calculated that meeting the target here at home would take the equivalent of fully electrifying all road transport, eliminating all industrial energy emissions, and eliminating half of all agricultural emissions, all in the next four years. That would cause unnecessary "social and economic" pain, according to the Climate Change Commission. In the documents, officials warned that countries whose cooperation was important to New Zealand "would view backing off from Paris Agreement commitments extremely negatively - undermining confidence in the solidarity of our climate effort with theirs and triggering concerns this would 'push the domino' that gave cover to others." They told the government taking concrete action last year to close deals with other countries would "mitigate the risks" of damaging important relationships. Switzerland, Sweden, Singapore and other countries have already signed deals with the likes of Kenya, Peru, Nepal and Ghana to secure what's been called the "low hanging fruit" of climate action, including paying for energy efficiency upgrades to buildings, electric buses, ebikes and renewable energy. Paying for poorer countries to cut emissions is cheaper than it would cost to achieve the same climate benefits in a wealthier country. Some climate lobby groups say taking the cheaper route is cheating - however government advisors say it is now New Zealand's only choice, short of reneging. The sensitive advice said announcing concrete steps to buy carbon savings last year would help the New Zealand government to prove its commitment before the first deadline for all countries under the Paris Agreement to publish their Biennial Transparency Reports. The transparency reports are the Paris Agreement's main mechanism for countries to keep each other honest on their progress. "It is important that New Zealand retains a clear narrative that it will uphold its legal obligations under the Paris Agreement, including pursuing measures with the aim of achieving the NDC," the government was told. "This will provide partners more reassurance if this narrative is supported by a robust plan to optimise domestic mitigation and take concrete steps toward purchasing a steady stream of offshore emissions reductions. Early decisions to stand up purchasing arrangements will enable this progress to be demonstrated to key partners through the 2024 Biennial Transparency Report (BTR) and other channels," the advice said. "Domestic mitigation" refers to steps inside New Zealand to cut emissions and meet the country's emissions budgets, which the government does through its Emissions Reduction Plans. The Emission Reduction Plans have been set at a level that would meet around a third of the total 2030 target, with the other two thirds were expected to come from overseas, at a cost likely to end up in the low billions. As of August 2025 the government had not announced any purchases. That's despite MFE presenting Watts with six options for meeting New Zealand's commitments. The details of those options were redacted from the documents. In an interview on July 25, Watts confirmed that Cabinet had not made any decisions, either to buy help from offshore or rule it out. "Our position on offshore mitigation remains consistent with what I've said previously, which is at this point Cabinet hasn't made any decisions on entering into any arrangements, however the government has made decisions since being in office in a number of countries to put in place mechanisms to enable that to occur, if the decision is made to do that," he said. Last year the government announced memorandums of understanding with countries such as the Philippines, to "explore" potential future carbon trading under the Paris Agreement. "Our focus remains that we are focussed on domestic emissions reduction opportunities... we are still making good progress to close that gap, it is a significant challenge but we are closing that gap, as I've noted with some of the technology that's come through even in the last six months," Watts said. Asked if he accepted there was no path to closing an 80 million tonne gap by 2030 domestically, Watts said: "I'm not going to make any statements on where we are going to be five years from now, what we are focussed on is what we can do with the tools that are available. There are new tools and innovations coming on month by month that allow us to close that gap." Asked again if he was saying there was a prospect of meeting the 2030 target inside New Zealand, Watts said the government was "focussed and committed to its climate targets" and spoke about steps to meet the domestic emissions budgets. "The government remains committed to the plan we have published and our domestic budgets," he said. "I have optimism around our ability to get to those positions in the future." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
