GE2025: WP retains strongholds in Aljunied and Hougang despite national swing to PAP
The WP's Aljunied GRC candidates (from left) Kenneth Tiong, Fadli Fawzi, Pritam Singh, Gerald Giam and Sylvia Lim on May 4. ST PHOTO: MARK CHEONG
GE2025: WP retains strongholds in Aljunied and Hougang despite national swing to PAP
Follow our live coverage here.
SINGAPORE – The WP retained its traditional strongholds of Aljunied GRC and Hougang SMC with little drama, returning its core leaders secretary-general Pritam Singh and chair Sylvia Lim to Parliament.
Despite a national swing towards the ruling party, the WP five-member team in Aljunied GRC maintained its hold over its PAP challengers to take the constituency with 59.68 per cent of the votes, to the PAP's 40.32 per cent.
This is in line with its previous showing during the Covid-19 polls in 2020, when it won the five seats with 59.93 per cent of the votes.
WP candidate Dennis Tan, 54, was also re-elected for his second consecutive term in WP's storied home base, Hougang SMC – a seat the party has held since 1991.
He was the rare opposition MP to buck the national trend and improve his winning margin. His 62.17 per cent is a 1 percentage point increase from his 2020 victory of 61.19 per cent.
His rival, PAP newcomer Marshall Lim, 38, secured 37.83 per cent of the vote.
The elected Aljunied GRC MPs are Leader of the Opposition Mr Singh, 48; Ms Lim, 60; Mr Gerald Giam, 47; Mr Fadli Fawzi, 44 – who had contested Marine Parade GRC in 2020 – and newcomer Kenneth Tiong, 36.
The losing PAP slate was led by second-time Aljunied GRC candidate Chan Hui Yuh, 48, and included four PAP new faces. They are Mr Faisal Abdul Aziz, 37; Mr Adrian Ang, 42; Mr Jagathishwaran Rajo; 37, and Mr Daniel Liu, 40.
Mr Singh thanked supporters at Serangoon Stadium, saying: 'Your support has been so important in the mission of achieving and working towards a more balanced Parliament. That work also continues.
'As the team committed to you, we serve everyone equally. I look forward to working with you to make Aljunied our best home yet.'
Speaking to The Straits Times after the sample count for Aljunied GRC was announced at 10pm, the PAP's Mr Liu said at Bedok Stadium that he was proud of his team.
He said: 'The five of us have never been parliamentarians. It's a big accomplishment for us.'
PAP team lead Ms Chan said in her concession speech: 'This past campaign has been amazing – blood, sweat and tears from all of us. It was not easy, but we persevered. We went with our eyes open, and we did our best with no regrets.'
The WP had wrenched Aljunied GRC from the PAP in 2011, making history by becoming the first opposition party to win a GRC since the system was introduced in 1988.
During hustings, it focused its campaign mostly on party-wide, national issues.
A constant refrain was the need for a more balanced political system with credible opposition, with it having proven its mettle in both parliamentary and municipal issues.
Mr Singh's conviction earlier in 2025 over lying to a parliamentary committee under oath went largely unmentioned, except by the PAP's Ms Chan at her team's final rally on May 1. Mr Singh has said he would be appealing against the verdict.
With the PAP moving Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong to Punggol GRC, WP's Ms Lim also sought to use the party's 2011 victory over the PAP team in Aljunied GRC as a precedent for how losing PAP ministers need not be exaggerated.
Then, the PAP team included two ministers, George Yeo and Lim Hwee Hua.
Ms Lim had said: 'Since the PAP lost, has Singapore been weakened? Life goes on and guess what? One of the Workers' Party's unknowns is now the Leader of the Opposition.'
Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong and Senior Minister Teo Chee Hean accompanied the PAP Aljunied GRC slate on its walkabouts, though overturning WP's hold on the constituency ultimately proved too much of an ask.
Members of the PAP Aljunied GRC team had brushed aside questions of it being without an anchor minister and being a 'suicide squad'.
They argued this allowed them more time to walk the ground, and they were focused on serving residents.
As for Hougang SMC, the WP has frequently cited it as one of the finest examples of voters' resistance to PAP's former policy of upgrading opposition wards last, proving that voters cannot be bought.
The party also produced Hougang The Documentary, released in November 2024, which charted how former WP chief Low Thia Khiang – who spoke fluent Teochew – convinced voters to take a chance on the WP.
The WP's Mr Tan was mostly content to allow his party's leadership and newer candidates to take the limelight during hustings, but said during WP's May 1 rally that Hougang must remain a beacon of democracy in Singapore.
Mr Michael Lai, 75, who was among those celebrating the WP's victory at Serangoon Stadium, said he had hoped for a lower vote share for the ruling PAP.
The director of an engineering company said the WP MPs had fulfilled their duties well.
He said: 'They've argued against the GST (goods and services tax) and COE (certicate of entitlement) increase in Parliament. The estate is also clean and well maintained.'
Businessman Joel Tan, 34, said he took issue with Mr Lim's comments about himself being a fighter and that Hougang did not belong to the WP.
Said Mr Tan: 'I didn't really like his attitude when he spoke about Hougang. It's a stronghold, so I expected 68 per cent for the WP.'
There were 144,298 voters in Aljunied GRC and 29,464 voters in Hougang SMC in 2025.
Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
9 hours ago
- Straits Times
Trump pressures Fed's Powell to cut rates by ‘a full point'
Jerome Powell, chairman of the US Federal Reserve, speaks during the Federal Reserve IF 75TH Anniversary Conference in Washington, DC on June 2. PHOTO: BLOOMBERG – President Donald Trump urged the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates by a full percentage point, intensifying his pressure campaign against Chair Jerome Powell. ''Too Late' at the Fed is a disaster!' Mr Trump posted June 6 on social media, using a derisive nickname for Mr Powell. 'Despite him, our country is doing great. Go for a full point, rocket fuel!' While the size of Mr Trump's rate-cut demand – a full percentage point – was unusual, his call for the central bank to lower rates is not new. The president, who first nominated Mr Powell to the job in 2017, has regularly complained that the Fed chief has been too reluctant to cut borrowing costs. Mr Trump pushed Mr Powell to lower rates in a White House meeting last month. Mr Trump said later June 6 that he has considered successors for Mr Powell, whose term as chair ends in May 2026. 'It's coming out very soon,' he told reporters on Air Force One, without naming any potential candidates. 'I have a pretty good idea who,' Mr Trump added. After Mr Trump was specifically asked about Kevin Warsh, a former Fed governor considered among the potential successors to Mr Powell, he responded: 'He's very highly thought of.' Fed officials are scheduled to meet June 17-18 in Washington and are widely expected to leave their benchmark rate unchanged, as they have done all year. Many policymakers have said they want to wait for more clarity over how Mr Trump's policies on trade, immigration and taxation will affect the economy before they alter rates. It would be highly unusual for the Fed to lower its benchmark rate by a full percentage point at one meeting outside of a severe economic downturn or financial crisis. Officials last cut rates by a full point in March 2020, when the US economy was cratering as the Covid-19 pandemic prompted widespread shutdowns and layoffs, triggering a deep recession. The Fed targets 2 per cent inflation over time, and adjusts interest rates with the goal of maintaining both stable prices and maximum employment – the two responsibilities assigned to it by Congress. Lowering rates too quickly could stoke inflationary pressures, while holding them at high levels for too long could restrain the economy more than desired. Mr Trump posted his call on social media after new data showed US job growth moderated in May, but was still better than expected, and the unemployment rate held at a low 4.2 per cent. In a separate statement, the White House touted the 'booming economy,' including job gains, increasing wages and tame inflation. Fed policymakers in recent weeks have described the labour market as on stable footing, which they've said provides further cause for them to keep borrowing costs steady for now – especially with inflation still above their target. Mr Trump, in a subsequent message, accused Mr Powell of 'costing our country a fortune' by keeping rates at their current level, saying they have increased borrowing costs for the federal government that should be 'much lower'. BLOOMBERG Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
a day ago
- Straits Times
Hear Me Out: Has the swing against elitism gone too far?
An art installation at the Padang. Vocal naysayers recently accused the Government's SG Culture Pass initiative of being the very thing it counteracted: elitism. PHOTO: ST FILE Hear Me Out: Has the swing against elitism gone too far? SINGAPORE – At a time when most people understand that the personal is political, individual views have become a battleground of virtue – equality, good; hierarchy, bad. Elitism? The worst possible kind of social evil. Yet, take a step back from this instinctive repulsion and there might be benefits to muddying the waters. Elitism, the belief that an elite group, however defined, should be entitled to the reins of power has been the norm throughout much of history. Whether it is the clergy, kings with their divine right, the Confucian scholar or today's fintech bros, there have been groups in each time period that societies tend to value and reward. It was only with increasing democratisation, and a growing disenfranchisement at the chasm between the top and the rest, that elitism has become a byword for undeserved privilege and gross injustice. This brief trip back in time is not to rehabilitate elitism, but to show that the current period against it – or at least one that pays lip service to not believing in an elite class – may be an aberrant one. In the West, this has been taken to extremes, manifesting in a debilitating disregard fo r e xperts and fatal results during the Covid-19 pandemic against the advice of doctors to vaccinate. In Singapore, it is the elite schools that are targeted, in the idealistic slogan that every school is a good school. Though, for perplexing reasons, this scepticism has not yet been extended to the natural reverence the majority of Singaporeans harbour for lawyers and doctors. Their expertise is assumed to be universally applicable – a mentality that has narrowed parents and students' conception of what success looks like. In any case, the ills of elitism have been thoroughly aired, including the type of entitled, discompassionate divas that it ends up producing. The very consensus of who deserves to be elite has also fractured. I wonder, though, if this enmity has led to some unexpected side effects. This is a train of thought sparked by recent reactions to the Government's SG Culture Pass initiative set out during the Budget statement in 2025. Self-sabotage Under the scheme, $100 would be given t o Si ngaporeans aged 18 and above for the consumption of the local arts, redeemable from September. One would expect rejoicing, but there was uproar from a group of vocal naysayers. They accused the credits of being the very thing it counteracted: elitism. Why? Because the money could be better spent on support for groceries. This, I thought, was a case of anti-elitism as self-sabotage. Central to this worldview was that the arts is an elitist activity patronised only by the rich and the hyper-educated aesthete, when one type of activity for the elite and one for the others is exactly the sort of segregation and self-limiting mentality that perpetuates divides. There was no sense that this $100 in credits was a way of making the perceived barrier more permeable. To put it in context, the Government also announced $800 in CDC vouchers. This was bread for all, and roses too. Yet another potentially problematic by-product is that the word 'elite' has since been tainted by association. No one dares lay claim to the word 'elite', or acknowledge that someone else may be elite in his or her field. The rare exemption is perhaps in sports, where athletes accept the cut-throat nature of their competition, and where non-athletes are so tangibly outside their league that there is no point in pretending otherwise. This is not in itself a problem – elite is after all just a word – though I find no easy replacement term that can immediately convey excellence to the same degree. But it incidentally comes at a time when there is a general reluctance to impose any kind of objective standard, supplemented by that compassionate but useless invention: the consolation prize. This applies to things: Is no one taste now better than another? As well as people, where so many takes on social media are considered equally valid, measured just by virality. It is the kind of ChatGPT mentality where how often something is repeated or the number of clicks on a website can influence results, with no regard to its truth value. The war against elitism may have come at the expense of standards and good sense. Reclaiming elite This impulse to drag discourse to the same level – usually downwards – has the right intentions, timely given that, for so long, highly selective elitist standards have been imposed as objective metrics. To right the ship so discourse is levelled upwards though, perhaps elite can be thought of as separate from elitism, rehabilitated without the corresponding concentration of resources and power. This should be expanded so that who is elite becomes not just about education but also because of other qualities – role models people can aspire to in different contexts. What constitutes an elite has always been reliant on man-made barometers, negotiated by the community. There should be no shame in aspiring to be elite. Anti-elitism should not mean an absence of the elite, but that all who put their heart and minds to it should have a fair shot at claiming its pedigree, or getting closer to it. It is a lifelong dusting off of mediocrity, and it begins with first recognising what is good. Hear Me Out is a new series where young journalists (over)share on topics ranging from navigating friendships to self-loathing, and the occasional intrusive thought. Check out the Headstart chatbot for answers to your questions on careers and work trends.
Straits Times
a day ago
- Straits Times
Jacinda Ardern thinks world leaders need more kindness
Jacinda Ardern at Harvard University's campus in Cambridge, Massachusetts, on May 31. After she resigned as prime minister of New Zealand, she got married, temporarily relocated to the United States and now has three fellowships at Harvard. PHOTO: LAUREN O'NEIL/NYTIMES CAMBRIDGE, Massachusetts – It is easy to forget that Jacinda Ardern is a former prime minister of New Zealand. Standing in line at a cafe in Cambridge, Massachusetts, wearing a suit by New Zealand designer Juliette Hogan, with sneakers and gold hoops, she flashes a disarming smile and says to call her 'just Jacinda'. As she orders a cappuccino, the cashier wonders why she looks so familiar. Was she, by any chance, that person on TV? 'Toni Collette?' they ask, referring to an Australian actress. Ardern, without security detail, waves off the misidentification and does not set the record straight. The cafe is a 10-minute walk from Harvard University, where Ardern, who resigned as prime minister in 2023, now holds three fellowships. In the aftermath of her voluntary resignation, she married her long-time partner Clarke Gayford and temporarily moved her family to Massachusetts. The day before we met, students and faculty had gathered for their commencement and remnants of the ceremony are everywhere: tents, stacks of foldable chairs lying in yards and students milling around with cardboard boxes . The ceremony capped a school year in which the institution has been entangled in a legal stand-off with United States President Donald Trump's administration over allegations of anti-Semitism, with federal funding and the visas of international students enrolled at the university in jeopardy. It is in that tense environment that Ardern, who during her time in power was frequently referred to as the 'anti-Trump', is publishing her memoir, A Different Kind Of Power. The book, which was released on June 3 , makes the case that leading with empathy and kindness might be the solution for a range of global crises – an argument that has also been the subject of one of her fellowships at Harvard Kennedy School. Whether such a book will resonate in a highly charged moment is an open question. Ardern said she has been relishing the relative anonymity of life in the US. A step back has allowed her to spend more time with her six-year-old daughter, who, she said, has a 'greater awareness now' of the fact that her mother was prime minister, yet 'doesn't dwell on it'. But the book and a global tour are part of what appears to be a re-emergence into public life, which also includes a documentary about her, called Prime Minister, that will be released later in June . In the book, Ardern, 44, gets into the granular details of what it was like to lead a country through multiple crises, including a live-streamed terrorist attack in Christchurch, a major volcanic eruption and the Covid-19 pandemic. This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity. We are sitting so close to Harvard, which has been at the centre of heated debates, and now you are releasing a book about kindness and empathy in leadership. How does this all fit together? I started writing it after I left office – in early to mid-2023. Though there was a lot of difficulty in the world, now feels vastly different from then. So it's not lost on me, the environment it's going into. But I would have written the same book regardless. Because, even then, ideas of empathy, compassion and kindness in leadership were treated as if there was a naivete there, and probably even more so now, and I just push back on that. How do you push back? First, I think there's a disconnect. People make an assumption that because we have a particular type of leadership on display at the moment, that must be what voters are seeking. And I don't think that's true. There are very real issues that need to be addressed that I summarise as deep financial insecurity and uncertainty in the face of a very changeable world. Politicians can come into that space either with a message of fear and blame or they can take on the very difficult issue of finding genuine solutions. I think it would be wrong to say people don't want to see kindness and compassion in their politics, and that they don't want to see politics done differently. It's not naive. In the book, you say you worried that your compassion could be seen as a weakness and, by extension, that weakness could be seen as female. I decided early on that I was just only ever going to be myself. And in New Zealand, if you're not yourself, they can sniff out inauthenticity – there's so much proximity to politicians and leaders that you need to be yourself. So that was the environment. But did it come easy? Not necessarily, because I remember moments when I thought, I cannot let my emotions be on display. And there were certain times when it just wouldn't have been appropriate because it wasn't about me; it was about the situation, the victims, the circumstance. But I decided that sometimes, you're just going to have a human response and that's okay. In fact, maybe it builds trust, because people can see then that you're human. Do you think people now expect this style from female leaders? I get asked a lot whether these traits are gendered. I've worked with a number of politicians, and I see empathetic leadership in men and women. In fact, I like to think of it within the frame of what we teach our kids. If you ask a room of parents, 'What are the values that you think are really important for your kids?', you'll hear the same things. People want their kids to share, they want them to be generous, they want them to be kind and empathetic, they want them to be brave, courageous. Those values that we teach our kids, we then see somehow as weaknesses in leaders? I was struck by the push and pull you describe in the book between what parts of yourself to share with the public and what parts to hide away. In hindsight, when I look back on those moments, it's very clear to me that, if you are, for instance, only the second woman in the world to give birth while in office, you feel a burden of responsibility to still demonstrate that it's possible. And so I did hold back anything that might allow someone to question that I could be both a mother and a prime minister. But the thing that conflicted with that was also my desire to make sure that it didn't look like I was doing everything on my own. You know, the Wonder Woman fram e. NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
