
Court dismisses ex-AG special officer's appeal in lawsuit against Rewcastle-Brown
14 Jul 2025 03:48pm
The suit is related to three articles published in Sarawak Report, including one titled "How AG's Office Connived to Prevent a Second Post-mortem on Kevin Morais - Exclusive Expose".
PUTRAJAYA - The Court of Appeal today dismissed the appeal by former Attorney-General (AG) Tan Sri Mohamed Apandi Ali's special officer, Mabel Sheela Mutthiah, against the High Court's decision to dismiss her legal suit against Sarawak Report editor Clare Rewcastle-Brown.
The suit is related to three articles published in Sarawak Report, including one titled "How AG's Office Connived to Prevent a Second Post-mortem on Kevin Morais - Exclusive Expose".
A three-member bench chaired by Court of Appeal Judge Datuk Azizah Nawawi, in a unanimous decision, said that they were bound by this court's (another Court of Appeal) ruling that the plaintiff (Mabel) must provide a Malay-language translation of the impugned defamatory article.
"In this case, there was no Bahasa Melayu translation of the impugned defamatory article, and that was clearly a non-compliance with Order 92. We find there is no appealable error by the High Court. The appeal is therefore dismissed with costs of RM10,000," Justice Azizah said.
The other judges on the bench are Justices Datuk Azizul Azmi Adnan and Datuk Ahmad Fairuz Zainol Abidin.
Mabel was represented by counsel Datuk David Gurupatham and R.Venothani while lawyer Guok Ngek Seong and Phyllia Lim acted for Rewcastle-Brown.
On May 2, 2024, Judge Datuk Raja Ahmad Mohzanuddin Shah Raja Mohzan rejected the suit with costs of RM15,000, after finding that the plaintiff failed to translate the allegedly defamatory articles into the Malay language.
He pointed out that the requirement for complete pleadings in the Malay language is tritely attributed to the language's supremacy as a national language.
Raja Ahmad Mohzanuddin said the relevant provisions are enshrined in Article 152 of the Federal Constitution as well as Section 8 of the National Language Act 1963/67 and Order 92 Rule 1 of the Rules of Court 2012.
Mabel filed the suit against Rewcastle-Brown in 2019 over articles linking her to alleged text messages sent to the family of Morais, who was murdered in September 2015.
She denied the allegations in the article and initiated the lawsuit to seek damages from Rewcastle-Brown, as well as a court order for the article to be removed from the Sarawak Report website. - BERNAMA
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
13 of 29 MA63 demands resolved, says Fadillah
KUALA LUMPUR: Some 13 out of the 29 demands under the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) have been resolved, says Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Fadillah Yusof. He said nine of the 13 were finalised during the Madani administration, while four were carried out through previous administrations. 'Efforts towards achieving the remaining 16 demands are ongoing. 'This includes education, health, petroleum and oil royalties,' sais the Energy Transition and Water Transformation Ministry when winding up debates for his ministry in the Dewan Rakyat on Monday (Aug 18). Stressing the government's commitment to resolving all matter under MA63, he said the time frame also depends on the legal proceedings involved. 'We respect the special position of Sabah and Sarawak as indicated in the Federal Constitution,' he added. He also said the federal government is always ready to resolve the demands in efforts to recognise the spirit of MA63.


The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Process to separate powers of AG and public prosecutor at final stage, says Azalina
KUALA LUMPUR: The process to separate the powers of the Attorney General and the Public Prosecutor is in its final stages, says Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said. The Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) said that a complete study and proposed model on the separation of powers would be brought to Cabinet soon. "The initiative to separate the roles of the AG and the Public Prosecutor is now in its final phase. "The findings, along with a proposed separation model, will be brought to the Cabinet for consideration in the near future," said Azalina during her winding-up speech on the 13th Malaysian Plan (13MP) in the Dewan Rakyat on Monday (August 18). Azalina also said that Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim had said during Question Time that the Cabinet is expected to make a policy decision on the matter by the end of August, Azalina said the Parliamentary Services Act and the commitment to separate the powers of the AG and the Public Prosecutor represent the government's most significant reform to date. She said this would involve amendments to the Federal Constitution, requiring a two-thirds majority in Parliament. Meanwhile, to ensure all Malaysians have access to justice, the government is set to introduce mobile court services in rural areas under the "Justice on Wheels" initiative. She said the initiative had been implemented in Sabah and Sarawak but not in the peninsula. "This is an inclusive step to ensure that justice is not just in urban areas but also in rural areas and the interior," said Azalina. She said newly appointed Chief Justice Datuk Wan Ahmad Farid Wan Salleh had also expressed support for the initiative. "We hope to have one mobile unit for each state. Mobile legal access will not just solve small cases but also assist in registering documents," she said.


Sinar Daily
4 hours ago
- Sinar Daily
Singaporean sentenced to 72 years, 24 strokes for ghastly murder of wife, stepson
In his oral judgment, the judge described the accused's actions as cruel, including placing his wife's head on the ceiling of their house. 18 Aug 2025 04:08pm A Singaporean man was today sentenced to 72 years in prison and 24 strokes of the cane by the Melaka High Court after being found guilty of murdering his wife and stepson, whose dismembered remains were discovered in a bushy area six years ago. Photo for illustrative purposes only - 123RF MELAKA - A Singaporean man was today sentenced to 72 years in prison and 24 strokes of the cane by the Melaka High Court after being found guilty of murdering his wife and stepson, whose dismembered remains were discovered in a bushy area six years ago. Judge Datuk Anselm Charles Fernandis handed down the sentence on Shahrul Nizam Zuraimy, 36, at the end of the defence case. The court ordered him to serve 36 years' imprisonment and 12 strokes for each charge, with the sentences running consecutively, starting from the date of arrest on Oct 11, 2019. In his oral judgment, Anselm described the accused's actions as cruel, including placing his wife's head on the ceiling of their house, with no reasonable justification, apparently to conceal the crime and the victims' identities. A Singaporean man was today sentenced to 72 years in prison and 24 strokes of the cane by the Melaka High Court after being found guilty of murdering his wife and stepson, whose dismembered remains were discovered in a bushy area six years ago. Photo illustrated by Sinar Daily "The court considered the concept of life for life, as well as the emotions of the victims' family members. However, it must also look at the case as a whole and the wider public interest. "The court also took into account the defence's submissions, aggravating factors presented by the prosecution, and the victims' impact statements from the mother and sister of the deceased, who testified to suffering emotional trauma and health problems; besides the victim's surviving children also growing up without a mother's love,' he said. Shahrul Nizam was charged with two counts of murder for causing the deaths of his wife, Norfazera Bidin, 27, and her son, Muhammad Iman Ashraf Abdullah, 11, at a house in Taman Merdeka Jaya, Batu Berendam, Melaka Tengah, between 6pm on Oct 6 and 7.30am on Oct 7, 2019. The charges, framed under Section 302 of the Penal Code, carry the death penalty or a maximum 40-year prison sentence. If the death penalty is not imposed, whipping of no fewer than 12 strokes is mandatory. Earlier, Norfazera's mother and sister, in their impact statements, urged the court to impose a commensurate sentence, including the death penalty, citing the trauma endured by the family and the brutality of the killings. Deputy Public Prosecutors Mohd Asri Abd Rahman Sidik and Nur Syazwanie Marizan also sought either the death penalty or consecutive prison sentences, stressing that the accused had betrayed his role as protector of the victims. "The accused was supposed to protect the victims, but instead killed them, including a child who was his stepson. The court must balance public interest with the severity of the cruelty committed,' they argued. The prosecution also noted that the factor of regret raised by the defence should be weighed carefully, as although the accused eventually surrendered, he initially misled the victims' family about their whereabouts and fled to Singapore after the crime. Defence lawyers Andrew Lourdes and Chua Yong Yi pleaded for leniency, arguing that their client had repented and regretted his actions, and should be given a second chance. - BERNAMA