Doña Ana County takes steps to terminate Camino Real Regional Utility Authority
EL PASO, Texas (KTSM) — The Doña Ana County Board of County Commissioners unanimously voted to take steps to end the agreement that created the Camino Real Regional Utility Authority.
The Board of County Commissioners took the vote at its meeting on Tuesday, May 13.
The County said it is giving the City of Sunland Park immediate notice of its intent to terminate the joint powers agreement (JPA) that created CRRUA.
CRRUA conducts 'cost of service' survey to look at rates
Board of County Commissioners Chair Christopher Schaljo-Hernandez said it was 'for mutual benefit to all parties.'
The County said it 'quickly notified' the City of Sunland Park after the Commission's vote and will follow up with a formal, written notice.
The most recent version of the JPA was amended in 2024 and the agreement's termination provisions require parties to notify each other, if they wish to terminate the agreement, the County said.
County staff will work with the City of Sunland Park to develop a plan for a transition and for dividing assets and debt of the utility, the County said.
Until that process is completed, CRRUA will continue to operate the water and wastewater services in the southern area of the County and within the City of Sunland Park, the County said.
'It is difficult to estimate how long this process will take to stand down CRRUA. The County intends to assess CRRUA's system assets to determine needs and priorities,' the County said.
'We are committed to being transparent in this process and keeping utility customers informed. We will also explore ways in which we can provide short-term assistance to residents,' County Manager Scott Andrews said. 'We will share more details as soon as we can and move forward in community (meetings), working with our state stakeholders, including the Governor's Office, the New Mexico Border Authority and others, as needed.'
We have reached out to CRRUA for comment.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
9th Circuit deals blow to qualified immunity, revives lawsuit against LAPD officer
A federal appeals court has reversed a ruling that shielded a Los Angeles police officer from liability in a fatal shooting, a decision that experts say could have broad implications for future cases in which law enforcement officials attempt to claim protection from civil lawsuits under the doctrine known as qualified immunity. The ruling Monday by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals was the latest twist in a lawsuit against LAPD officer Toni McBride over an on-duty shooting that occurred in April 2020. McBride, who was granted medical retirement from the police department late last year, killed Daniel Hernandez after he was in a car accident in South L.A. The shooting occurred as Hernandez, 38, walked toward McBride and her police partner while holding a box cutter, ignoring commands to drop the blade. Video footage showed McBride fire three two-bullet volleys over six seconds. The final two shots were fired while Hernandez was rolling on the ground, which attorneys for the Hernandez family argued in a lawsuit was a violation of his 4th Amendment rights. Read more: Reversal clears LAPD officer faulted for firing two extra bullets in fatal 2020 shooting The shooting was ultimately found to be "in policy" under the police department's standards. Last March, a three-judge panel from the 9th Circuit ruled that even though a jury could have reasonably found McBride used excessive force, she could not be sued in federal court due to qualified immunity, a controversial legal principle that protects officers from liability over some on-duty actions. The Hernandez family challenged the decision, leading to the reversal Monday on a 6-5 vote by the larger en banc panel of the appellate court. The judges cited a 2017 case in Orange County as precedent, writing that 'continuing to shoot a suspect who appears to be incapacitated and no longer poses an immediate threat violates the Fourth Amendment.' The case will now go to trial in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles. Narine Mkrtchyan, a lawyer for Hernandez's 18-year-old daughter, Melanie Hernandez, said the decision meant "justice has been served." "Not just for this family but also for the future of shooting cases,' Mkrtchyan said. 'Officers cannot keep shooting when someone is down on the ground, period.' McBride's father, Jamie McBride, is one of nine directors of the Los Angeles Police Protective League, the union that represents rank-and-file LAPD officers. He said Monday afternoon that his daughter did not have a statement on the latest development. 'In the end, when it goes to the Supreme Court or state court, I think that common sense will prevail and I think they'll agree that she acted in self-defense and she was totally justified in the force that she used," the elder McBride said. "She made the community safer by taking care of the threat that was coming at her. A spokesperson for the LAPD did not immediately return a call seeking comment Tuesday afternoon. While the shooting case has slowly made its way through the courts, a separate case centered on McBride's social media activity has also generated controversy. With more than 100,000 followers on Instagram, McBride built an audience by sharing pro-gun videos and content and highlighting her position and experience as an LAPD officer. McBride alleged in a civil lawsuit that her free speech rights were violated and she was subjected to gender discrimination when she was retaliated against for her social media postings. Read more: LAPD officer who moonlights as gun influencer loses lawsuit over social media accounts McBride's online success made her into a 'gun influencer' who earned money for sponsored social media posts that showed her shooting firearms at training ranges and competitions, Aneta Freeman, an assistant L.A. city attorney, alleged last year during the civil trial over her online activity. McBride received free items, Freeman said, including a ballistic vest, ammo and hair extensions. She sought $100,000 damages, claiming that she suffered 'emotional distress' as a result of the workplace dispute over her social media. McBride dropped the gender discrimination claims, and in April 2024, she lost her free speech lawsuit when a jury ruled that she had not been treated unfairly. McBride's attorney, Greg Smith, said Tuesday that while she lost on the free speech claim, she preserved her right to refile a retaliation action alleging that she was discriminated against because of her gender. Whether she will refile remains to be seen. 'That's completely up in the air right now; there's no lawsuit right now,' Smith said. Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
18-year-old charged in Oakland chase that killed math teacher insists car wasn't stolen: attorney
The Brief Eric Scott Hernandez-Garcia insisted through his attorney that he did not steal the Infiniti that the CHP was chasing. Charging documents do not allege the car was stolen, though it didn't have any plates. Hernandez-Garcia, who is charged with the death of a Castlemont math teacher, delayed entering a plea until June 20. OAKLAND, Calif. - The attorney of an 18-year-old charged with felony vehicular manslaughter after the CHP pursued him and which led to the death of an innocent Castlemont math teacher in Oakland told KTVU a different version of events ahead of his Monday court hearing. Attorney Roseann Torres said that Eric Scott Hernandez-Garcia, who is "deathly afraid of police" was out on May 28 getting snacks at the store in his mother's Infiniti G35 when a California Highway Patrol officer started pursuing him. Authorities originally stated that the car was stolen. But Hernandez-Garcia, through his attorney, insists it was not; he said his mother owns the car. Video at the scene showed the Infiniti had no rear plates, something that Torres was not immediately able to explain. However, the teen's claims appear to have validity. On Monday, Alameda County Sheriff's Sgt. Roberto Morales told KTVU that deputies spotted an Infiniti G35 driving recklessly on May 5 and issued a "seizure warrant" for the car. Morales acknowledged that deputies did not know who was driving at the time and said at that point, the car had rear plates and did not come back as stolen. It was this car that the CHP spotted on May 28, leaving the parking lot near the intersection of 102nd Avenue and International Bouelvard, when the driver took off. Hernandez-Garcia was driving the car that day. It's unclear if the Infiniti had plates on May 28, and if it didn't, how the CHP was alerted to the fact that the car was wanted. Torres also emphasized that Hernandez-Garcia had no weapons or drugs on him at the time, and that police had tried to stop him before, but he doesn't know why. She described Hernandez-Garcia as a scared teen, and is very traumatized by police. Torres asked, and was granted, her client's plea to be delayed until June 20. "All the police reports, the witnesses, Ring cameras, and things that are mentioned that we'll be obtaining," she said outside court. "We have to get the full extent of the evidence before we start the case, so today is too soon after the incident happened." Hernandez-Garcia was supposed to graduate Aspire High School this Saturday. On Friday, the Alameda County District Attorney's Office charged Hernandez-Garcia with seven felonies following the death of Marvin Boomer, a beloved Castlemont High teacher. Boomer was walking with his girlfriend at 7:45 p.m. at East 21st Street and Park Boulevard. At the same moment, California Highway Patrol officers were in pursuit of Hernandez-Garcia because they recognized his "wanted" Infiniti. Hernandez-Garcia ended up striking a minivan with two people inside, and then, five blocks later, a parked car, a tree and a fire hydrant, which ended up getting knocked off its base and flying into Boomer, killing him. According to a statement from Michelle D. Bernard, president and CEO of the Bernard Center for Women, Politics & Public Policy, who described herself as the official spokesperson for the Boomer family and his girlfriend, Boomer's family is "grief-stricken over the devastating and senseless loss." Bernard said that Boomer pushed his girlfriend out of the way, as the Infiniti was barreling toward them, saving her life. "It is clear that Marvin's actions spared her from also being killed," Bernard said in a statement. Boomer's sister and girlfriend, who did not identify herself by name, also issued statements on Monday, asking for privacy. "Marvin gave his life to save mine," his girlfriend wrote. "I'm still here because of him. But I lost the love of my life. I am living with unimaginable pain—physical and emotional. Let Marvin's legacy be honored with truth, dignity, and care." Click to open this PDF in a new window.
New York Post
8 hours ago
- New York Post
California needs to stop tying itself in knots over trans athletes and admit — men shouldn't compete against women
Instead of simply following President Trump's executive order that bans biological men from participating in women's sports, California came up with a more reductive policy. They said girls could share the podium with trans athlete AB Hernandez who, by the way, had a pretty successful Saturday at the state championships. Because Hernandez, a junior at Jurupa Valley High School, is a dude competing against chicks. As controversy swirled around Hernandez's dominant performance in high school track and field and Trump's threats to withhold federal funding, the California Interscholastic Federation tweaked its rules on Tuesday to mandate that any biological females who lost to a trans-athlete would not lose their place. Advertisement Hernandez took first in two events and second in another. For the high jump, Hernandez cleared 5 feet 7 inches with no failed attempts while his two, I guess we can call them 'co-winners,' Jillene Wetteland and Lelani Laruelle cleared the same threshold with a fail each. The three shared the first-place podium. 4 Thanks to California Interscholastic Foundation's new rule AB Hernandez shares the first platform with two female track and field athletes. AP In the triple jump, the trans athlete won while Kira Gant Hatcher, who trailed by over a half-meter, stood atop the first-place platform, again alongside Hernandez. Advertisement And yet the fact that they had to change the rules of a simple straight forward competition —whoever jumps the highest or the longest wins — to accommodate Hernandez was an admission from officials that this all was inherently ridiculous. And yes, utterly confusing. Hey, you technically lost to a biological male but here's your first-place trophy anyways because we feel bad that we are letting this dude in. Girls, like their male counterparts, are cutthroat and competitive. They want and deserve a level playing field and the chance to win fair-and-square. They shouldn't have to be told to be a good girl and make room for the person who everyone has agreed — by making the rule change — does not belong there. Why not simply comply with the ban? Instead, the governing body is twisting itself into a pretzel to accommodate trans athletes. Advertisement 4 AB Hernandez, a transgender student at Jurupa Valley High School, competes in the long jump at the California high school track-and-field championships. AP It's 2025. After years of being told that we had to remake our society and erase the female side of the gender binary in sports, jails and yes, locker rooms, or be called a transphobe, we have returned to consensus of sanity. Or at least people are finally unafraid of being canceled to simply state the obvious: biological men have a physical advantage over them. This is such a settled issue that the most recent polling shows close to 80 percent of Americans believe men do not belong in women's sports. There's also been another change. Advertisement After what I can only call a chilling absence of male voices from the sports world, we're starting to see more high-profile athletes finally speak out. Maybe because it's no longer verboten. But better late than never. Last month Aaron Rodgers told Joe Rogan that, 'the trans-woman movement is actually anti-woman…when it comes to sports. 4 Charles Barkley has spoken out against biological males in women's sports. Getty Images 'You're not seeing trans men dominating anything. It's because there's a biological difference.' Meanwhile, Sir Charles Barkley told Outkick's Dan Dakitch that he was 'gonna make this very simple for you, Dan. Men should not play sports against women. 'I don't even think that's controversial… I don't wanna hear you try to explain it to me. No, no, no, I don't wanna hear it. I'm not gonna argue with you. Men shouldn't play sports against women. I'm done,' he said. Even cuckoo progressive California Gov. Gavin Newsom — who is trying to rebrand himself as a common sense Dem — admitted it was 'deeply unfair.' Then he backed this sudden rule change. Advertisement 4 Back in February, Donald Trump signed an executive order banning trans women athletes from women's sports. AP And yet, there are many pockets of the media who are still choosing their twisted version of compassion for boys over reality. During a Friday interview with Julie Hamill, President of the California Justice Center, CNN host Brianna Keilar repeatedly called Hernandez 'her' and used the cockamamie phase, 'assigned female at birth.' A visibly annoyed Hamill corrected Keilar, noting that Hernandez is a he. Because when you strip all the pronoun charades and the fluffy terms of 'gender affirming care' we can see clearly what this issue is about: biological truth and fairness.
