Trump Rages at Claim War on Harvard Is Revenge for Rejection
Donald Trump blew up on Truth Social over a claim from author Michael Wolff that his crusade against Harvard is personal.
Wolff, author of several books about the president, claimed on The Daily Beast Podcast last week that Trump 'didn't get into Harvard' and suggested he's now targeting the university in part because he holds a 'grudge.'
'He needs an enemy,' Wolff said earlier in the podcast. 'That's what makes the show great. The Trump show. He picks fantastic enemies, actually. And Harvard, for all it represents, fits right into the Trump show,' he said.
'Going after Harvard has proved to be an incredibly reliable headline,' he added. 'So he's on the money. So he's done what he set out to do. Dominate headlines.'
Trump has gone after the university with gusto, freezing its federal funding, threatening its tax-exempt status and moving to block it from enrolling international students.
The president claimed Wolff's story is 'totally FALSE' and insisted he never applied to the Ivy League school.
'Michael Wolff, a Third Rate Reporter, who is laughed at even by the scoundrels of the Fake News, recently stated that the only reason I'm 'beating up' on Harvard, is because I applied there, and didn't get in,' Trump raged on his social media platform Monday.
'That story is totally FALSE, I never applied to Harvard,' Trump continued. 'I graduated from the Wharton School of Finance at the University of Pennsylvania. He is upset because his book about me was a total 'BOMB.' Nobody wanted it, because his 'reporting' and reputation is so bad!'
Trump's education has been colored by claims from family members that he was a 'brat' and that his sister 'did his homework for him.'
His higher education began at Fordham University in 1964. He studied for two years at the Bronx Catholic private school before transferring to the Wharton School of Finance and Commerce at Penn. He graduated from the Ivy League university with a bachelor's degree in economics in 1968.
His late sister, Maryanne Trump Barry, told her niece Mary Trump that she 'drove him around New York City to try to get him into college.'
She said he attended Fordham briefly 'and then he got into University of Pennsylvania because he had somebody take his exams.' Those claims were denied by the widow of Joe Shapiro, the man who was said to have taken the test for Trump.
The president's father and brother also helped him to get into the school through a connection, The Washington Post reported in 2019.
Trump has long boasted of his time at the Wharton school, claiming it was one of the 'hardest school to get into' and that he graduated top of his class, a claim that the evidence suggests is dubious at best.
Trump has had a long-running beef with Wolff, who wrote Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House and Siege: Trump Under Fire, among other titles.
In February, Trump called Wolff's latest book, All or Nothing: How Trump Recaptured America, a 'total FAKE JOB, just like the other JUNK he wrote.'
'He called me many times trying to set up a meeting, but I never called him back because I didn't want to give him the credibility of an interview,' Trump wrote on Truth Social at the time.
Even before Wolff floated the claim that the president was snubbed by Harvard, speculation ran rampant over the reason for his vendetta.
A White House spokesperson shot down the idea that Trump was rejected from the school, telling USA Today last week, the president 'didn't need to apply to an overrated, corrupt institution like Harvard to become a successful businessman and the most transformative President in history.'
Trump has accused Harvard of liberal bias and antisemitism, using those claims to justify his offensive.
According to Wolff, a running joke in White House circles held that Trump's war on the prestigious school stemmed from the rejection of another Trump: his youngest son, Barron.
The narrative apparently made its way to first lady Melania Trump, whose spokesperson issued a statement last Tuesday calling the claim that Barron applied to Harvard 'completely false.'
The 19-year-old recently finished his freshman year at New York University, where he studied at its Stern School of Business.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
8 minutes ago
Critical US-Iran nuclear talks on shaky ground
The future of high-stakes negotiations over Iran's nuclear program remains shrouded in uncertainty as the U.S. and Iran publicly clash over the terms of an interim agreement proposed by the Trump administration that is intended to pave the way for a longer-lasting deal. Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, slammed that proposal during an address on Wednesday, saying it "contradicts our principle of power by 100%" and vowing that Iran would not agree to stop enriching uranium on its own soil, calling it "a key tool in the nuclear program." The Iranian foreign minister, Seyed Abbas Araghchi, succinctly underscored Iran's terms in a post on X shortly after the Ayatollah's speech, writing "no enrichment, no deal." Iran's stance contrasts sharply with that of President Donald Trump, which he emphasized on his social media platform on Monday. "Under our potential Agreement -- WE WILL NOT ALLOW ANY ENRICHMENT OF URANIUM!" Trump wrote on Truth Social. While the president and his Cabinet officials have repeatedly said Iran would be required to end enrichment activities under the terms of a deal, U.S. officials say that the initial interim proposal -- which is only intended to be a stepping stone to a broader agreement -- did not prohibit Iran from enriching uranium at low levels while a long-term solution to fuel Iran's civilian nuclear energy program could be established. Trump's post appeared to contradict the position staked out by his negotiators, and although Iran has not yet formally responded to the interim proposal, it remained unclear on Wednesday whether the U.S. would stand by all the terms in its initial offer. Whether delegations from Iran and the U.S. would meet for a sixth round of nuclear negotiations also remained unclear, although a U.S. official said a possible meeting in the coming days was under discussion. After holding a phone call with Russian leader Vladimir Putin on Wednesday, Trump signaled that he would look to Moscow to play a greater role in negotiations with Iran. "President Putin suggested that he will participate in the discussions with Iran and that he could, perhaps, be helpful in getting this brought to a rapid conclusion," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "It is my opinion that Iran has been slowwalking their decision on this very important matter, and we will need a definitive answer in a very short period of time!" But optimism among both U.S. and Iranian officials appears to have cooled in recent days. An Iranian official, who spoke with ABC News on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive negotiations, said that the U.S.' proposed terms are "unreasonable, greedy and unconventional." "The U.S. constantly changes its positions, which has led to a growing accumulation of mistrust regarding its intentions and heightened uncertainty about its will and seriousness to fulfil commitments, assuming any agreement is even to be formed," they told ABC News. "This document is not even open to be reviewed or responded to," the official added. Iran is pushing for relief from sanctions that have badly damaged the national economy. This week, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei said Tehran needs guarantees regarding the "real end of the sanctions." That would include details on "how and through what mechanism" they would be lifted, Baghaei said, in remarks carried by the official IRNA news agency. Araghchi and Khamenei were downbeat on the U.S. proposal in comments this week. The document has "many ambiguities and questions," the Iranian foreign minister said in a Telegram post on Tuesday. "Many issues in this proposal are not clear," he added.
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Brown student accuses school of waste at Congressional hearing
WASHINGTON (WPRI) — Speaking before a U.S. House Judiciary subcommittee, Brown University student Alex Shieh testified about his experience challenging his school as Republican lawmakers consider whether Ivy Leagues are violating antitrust laws. 'This committee has a responsibility not just to investigate Ivy League antitrust violations, but to reclaim the American Dream from those who have twisted it into a racket,' Shieh said. Shieh made national headlines when Brown launched a disciplinary investigation after he sent more than 3,000 emails to university staff, asking them to explain their jobs. He said the emails were for a Brown Spectator story investigating wasteful spending. During Wednesday's hearing, Republican Congressman Jim Jordan of Ohio asked Shieh what the school accused him of doing wrong. 'First, it was emotional, psychological harm, invasion of privacy and misrepresentation,' Shieh said. 'Asking someone how they spend your money is emotional harm?' Jordan asked. Shieh said the school dropped its charges after a disciplinary hearing last month. LOCAL COVERAGE: Brown student won't face discipline for DOGE-like email to administrators In a two-page email to 12 News, a spokesperson for Brown disputed several claims Republican lawmakers made about the school's finances during the hearing. The school also pushed back on Shieh's comments. 'We've continued to see inaccuracies reported publicly by the student testifying today about a related disciplinary process,' spokesperson Brian Clark wrote regarding Shieh. In an interview with 12 News after the hearing, Shieh said this issue is now much larger than him, and that he hopes lawmakers will get universities to cut down on wasteful spending. 'I'm glad that Congressman Jordan invited me to testify today,' he said. 'And I guess I'm grateful for all lawmakers there, both parties, who seem to be taking this issue of Ivy League antitrust violations very seriously.' But some Democrats on the subcommittee warn that the issue of college costs is being used by Republicans to go after universities. 'All institutions of higher learning are under attack?' Rep. Hank Johnson, D-Ga., asked Julie Margetta Morgan, a higher education expert invited to testify in front of the committee. 'That's right,' Margetta Morgan said. Download the and apps to get breaking news and weather alerts. Watch or with the new . Follow us on social media: Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump signs proclamation to ban travel from 12 countries
President Donald Trump signed a proclamation Wednesday evening to ban travel from several countries to the US, citing security risks. The ban will fully restrict entry of nationals from 12 countries: Afghanistan; Myanmar, also known as Burma; Chad; Republic of the Congo; Equatorial Guinea; Eritrea; Haiti; Iran; Libya; Somalia; Sudan; and Yemen. People from seven countries will have partial restriction: Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. The proclamation includes exceptions for lawful permanent residents, existing visa holders, certain visa categories and individuals whose entry serves US national interests. The president made the final call on signing this proclamation after the antisemitic attack in Boulder, Colorado, according to a White House official. He was considering it beforehand, but Sunday's assault put it into motion faster. The White House is touting the new president's travel ban as 'fulfilling' a campaign promise to 'protect Americans from dangerous foreign actors that want to come to our country and cause us harm.' 'President Trump is fulfilling his promise to protect Americans from dangerous foreign actors that want to come to our country and cause us harm. These commonsense restrictions are country-specific and include places that lack proper vetting, exhibit high visa overstay rates, or fail to share identity and threat information,' White House deputy press secretary Abigail Jackson wrote on X. Trump said in a video posted Wednesday that new countries could be added to the travel ban as 'threats emerge around the world.' 'The list is subject to revision based on whether material improvements are made. And likewise new countries can be added as threats emerge around the world, but we will not allow people to enter our country who wish to do us harm and nothing will stop us from keeping America safe,' the president said. The proclamation takes effect at 12:01 AM on June 9, according to the White House. Wednesday's proclamation comes less than five months after the president was inaugurated into office for his second term. On his first day in office, he issued an executive order directing cabinet members, including the secretary of state, to compile a list of countries 'for which vetting and screening information is so deficient as to warrant a partial or full suspension on the admission of nationals from those countries.' In his first term, Trump barred travelers from seven majority-Muslim nations from coming to the US, a policy that saw court challenges before President Joe Biden repealed it when he took office in 2021. The barring of nationals from Afghanistan could impact Afghans who worked alongside the US during its two decades of war there. Tens of thousands of Afghans have already been caught in limbo due to other Trump administration executive orders suspending the US refugee admissions program and the suspension of foreign aid funding for flights of Afghan Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) holders. This story and headline have been updated with additional information.
