logo
At Black Colleges, a Stubborn Gender Enrollment Gap Keeps Growing

At Black Colleges, a Stubborn Gender Enrollment Gap Keeps Growing

New York Times30-03-2025

Before stepping foot on Howard University's campus, Skylar Wilson knew she would see more women there than men. But just how many more stunned her: Howard, one of the most elite historically Black colleges and universities in the nation, is only 25 percent men — 19 percent Black men.
'I was like, 'Wow,'' said Ms. Wilson, a 20-year-old junior. 'How is that possible?'
Howard is not unique. The number of Black men attending four-year colleges has plummeted across the board. And nowhere is this deficit more pronounced than at historically Black colleges and universities, or H.B.C.U.s. Black men account for 26 percent of the students at H.B.C.U.s, down from an already low 38 percent in 1976, according to the American Institute for Boys and Men. There are now about as many non-Black students attending H.B.C.U.s as there are Black men.
The decline has profound implications for economic mobility, family formation and wealth generation. Raj Chetty, a Harvard economist who uses large data sets to study economic opportunity, has found that the income gap between America's Black and white populations is entirely driven by differences in men's economic circumstances, not women's.
The causes are many. Higher college costs, the immediate financial needs of Black families, high suspension rates in high school and a barrage of negative messages about academic potential all play roles in the decline of Black male enrollment and college completion. Howard estimates that its cost of attendance for undergraduates easily exceeds $50,000 a year.
'If we are serious about reducing race gaps in economic opportunity, household wealth, et cetera, then our attention should be squarely focused on economic outcomes for Black boys and men — period. Full stop,' said Richard Reeves, president of the American Institute for Boys and Men.
But now programs designed to nurture Black academic achievement may be dismantled by the Trump administration, which deems them 'racist' diversity, equity and inclusion efforts. Cultural centers, mentorship programs, work force recruitment activities and scholarship programs are all threatened by the White House's promise to cut funding to universities that do not eliminate what it calls racial preferences.
On Wednesday, Mr. Trump asked the Supreme Court to allow him to terminate more than $600 million in teacher training grants, which would decimate two of the Education Department's largest professional development programs. Both were designed to place teachers in underserved schools and diversify the educational work force.
'It's a perpetuating cycle,' said Dr. Cheryl Holcomb-McCoy, chief executive of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. 'If you don't see other Black male educators, then it's hard for you to see yourself in that position.'
On Thursday, the Department of Health and Human Services targeted California medical schools for maintaining what Trump administration officials called 'discriminatory race-based admissions,' though bolstering the number of Black doctors has long been a goal of the medical establishment.
'Put simply, educational institutions may neither separate or segregate students based on race, nor distribute benefits or burdens based on race,' Craig Trainor, the Education Department's acting assistant secretary for civil rights, wrote in a memo to universities in February.
Black educators say burdens are already distributed unfairly. Society undermines Black men's belief in their own potential, starting from early education and continuing through professional development, said Dr. Derrick Brooms, executive director of the Black Men's Research Institute at Morehouse College, an elite, all-male H.B.C.U. in Atlanta.
Colleges like Howard may be the starkest of manifestations. Payton Garcia, a Howard sophomore, recalled being one of three men in his introduction to philosophy class, which has about 30 students.
'We did a Cuba trip,' he recalled. 'I was the only male that was in the class.'
Recent shifts in higher education, driven in part by conservative policies in Washington, have wrought large changes in predominantly Black colleges, positive and negative. The Supreme Court's ban on race-based college admissions drove up interest in some H.B.C.U.s and strengthened the application pool overall, Dr. Brooms said. But he's still concerned about the long-term trend.
Dr. Brooms said at this point, Morehouse may have to re-evaluate its recruitment strategy, including looking abroad: 'Perhaps there may be some Black men in Canada who may want to attend.'
On campuses like Howard's, the gender disparity is understood. Women run the place.
'Everybody knows that the women dominate this campus,' said Tamarus Darby Jr., a 20-year-old sophomore at Howard.
'You see predominantly women out here running for positions, and then you see their friends, young women, showing up for them and supporting them,' he said. 'It's different for the men.'
According to students and faculty at Howard, Black male students can have a difficult time finding both themselves and a community.
One night last October, young men gathered in small groups on the Howard yard and wrote down what they were most afraid of — 'I have a fear of failure,' said Joshua Hughes, a senior who led the 'burning of the fears' that night. 'I have a fear of letting my family down. I have a fear of not living up to my full potential.'
Some read their fears aloud before tossing their writings into a giant firepit as a drum line banged African djembes.
In 2019, Calvin Hadley, then a senior adviser to Howard's president, was asked how Howard could better engage men on campus. He put together a survey of students, faculty and staff, and then hosted several barbershop listening sessions. Something clicked.
'We had these very detailed, emotional conversations around manhood, around masculinity, around relationships,' said Mr. Hadley, now Howard's assistant provost for academic partnerships and student engagement.
Male fears can work against college attendance, students said. Fears of failure may deter Black men from higher education, even as fears of letting their families down drive them prematurely into the work force, before their earning potential can be reached.
Mr. Darby said many of his friends didn't have parents or family who attended college, or they thought the costs were prohibitive. 'So they were trying to find those other avenues to make money and to be successful, not thinking that college was the number one thing that was going to get you there,' he said.
As a middle schooler, Jerrain Holmes, a 20-year-old sophomore, recalled thinking: 'College? What is college?' He added, 'I knew I just wanted a job.'
But in his Detroit-area high school, he enrolled in a college readiness program, and it made all the difference.
'As a general proposition, young men are arriving on college campuses less skilled academically than women,' Mr. Reeves said. 'That's even more true of men of color, Black men.'
That leads to problems of completion, which are at least as significant as declining enrollment.
The first year of college is crucial for male retention, and a lack of services can lead young men to feel isolated or that they don't belong, Dr. Brooms said.
'If you can show you can keep people, that folks can persist to graduation, that becomes a recruitment tool itself,' said Dr. Brooms.
On a recent warm, breezy spring day on campus, Howard students laid on blankets, chatting. Some set up tables to sell merchandise, displaying the famed entrepreneurial 'Howard hustle.' Others campaigned for student senate or royal court. The gender disparity was on the minds of the students.
Christian Bernard, a 22-year-old senior from affluent Potomac, Md., is a third-generation legacy student. He was on the yard selling items from his clothing brand, emblazoned with the slogan 'Worth It.' He started the brand amid the turmoil and grief of June 2020, after the murder of George Floyd by a Minneapolis police officer and the swell of Black Lives Matter demonstrations.
He chose Howard for its soccer program and his family ties. Before injuries derailed his athletic career, he made strong friendships with his teammates.
'There's a lot of male camaraderie here at Howard,' he said.
Those studying the challenges that young Black men face are careful to avoid a battle of the sexes. Women have faced historical challenges of their own. Some people perceive female gains as a threat to men in a zero-sum battle for resources and power.
Mr. Reeves said that is a mistake, particularly when it comes to family formation.
Asking the young men on campus how the gender gap affects dating will draw a sheepish grin. They understand their advantage.
Young women are thinking about it too. 'Those ratios,' said Nevaeh Fincher, a sophomore, can be 'rough.'
'A lot of the boys feel like they've got options,' Ms. Fincher said, 'which, if we're being honest, they do.'
The lack of college-educated Black men could change family structures and bread winning patterns, placing more financial burdens on Black women. College-educated Black women already have higher lifetime earnings than college-educated white women because they work more years over the course of their lives, despite lower annual earnings, according to the Kansas City Federal Reserve.
For young women who care about the future of Black America, in general, all of this is alarming.
'We see a lot of school programs and districts that are giving up on students and giving up on Black men before they even give them a chance,' said Ms. Wilson. She's seen it in the male students she mentors, who say their teachers don't offer much encouragement.
'They expect them to be bad,' she said. 'They expect them to be problems.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says US will keep supporting Israeli air strikes
Trump says US will keep supporting Israeli air strikes

The Hill

time31 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump says US will keep supporting Israeli air strikes

President Trump on Sunday said the United States will keep supporting Israel's air strikes on Iran amid escalating conflict between the two countries. The president was asked as he left for the Group of Seven (G-7) summit in Canada if the U.S. would continue to support Israel's defenses and replied, 'We do.' He added that he 'wouldn't say that' when asked if he had called on Israel to pause airstrikes into Iran. Additionally, when asked about how he plans to de-escalate the situation between Iran and Israel, Trump responded, 'it's time for a deal.' 'Sometimes they have to fight it out,' he added. 'We'll see what happens.' The president praised his relationship with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The two leaders spoke on Friday. 'We get along very well and I think we have great respect for each other,' Trump said. The president had told ABC News earlier on Sunday that 'it's possible' the U.S. becomes involved in the current conflict between Iran and Israel. 'We're not involved in it. It's possible we could get involved. But we are not at this moment involved,' Trump told the outlet. Israel and Iran exchanged strikes for their third day on Sunday. Iran has been facing Israeli airstrikes while some of Iran's missiles have hit buildings in Israel, making it past air defenses. Israel bombarded Iran early on Friday morning, moving forward with its largest-ever military operation against its common Middle East rival and upending a push from Trump for a nuclear deal with Iran. The U.S. attempted to quickly distance itself from the strikes, which killed some of Iran's top military leaders.

LA Mayor hits back at Trump Marine deployments saying 'we don't want them here'
LA Mayor hits back at Trump Marine deployments saying 'we don't want them here'

Fox News

time35 minutes ago

  • Fox News

LA Mayor hits back at Trump Marine deployments saying 'we don't want them here'

Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass hit back at President Donald Trump's Marine and National Guard deployments in her city, telling CNN's Dana Bash "we don't want them here." "I do want to dispel the notion that the military is here. We don't want them here, they don't need to be here. Our local law enforcement has complete control of the situation," Bass said on "State of the Union" Sunday. Trump deployed an initial round of 2,000 federalized National Guard troops to the City of Angels after chaotic anti-I.C.E. protests – in which demonstrators threw rocks at federal vehicles, brandished Mexican flags, and set Waymo cars on fire – on Saturday, June 7 and subsequently deployed an additional round of 2,000 National Guard troops and 700 U.S. Marines. The Marines detained a former Army veteran, Marcos Leao, 27, who became a U.S. citizen after serving in the military, after he wandered into a restricted area on his way to the Veterans Administration office. Leao told Reuters that the Marines treated him "very fairly." "They treated me very fairly, understand, this is a whole stressful situation for everybody, and we all have a job," Leao said. Protests continued in Los Angeles over the following week, culminating in a large demonstration as part of the nationwide "No Kings" protest on Saturday. Bass downplayed the unrest in her city, saying that recent protests took place in a "small sliver of our town" and put the blame for any unrest squarely on Trump's deportation raids. Bass called Saturday's protests "overwhelmingly peaceful" and said that there were sectors of Los Angeles' economy that couldn't survive without illegal immigrant labor. "There were a lot of people out, about 30,000. Out of that big crowd five people were arrested, about 30 were given citations and there were injuries on both sides. Officers were injured and so were people that were there," Bass said. "If the raids hadn't happened, then that protest would have been a 'No Kings' protest, we know that was planned months in advance. But the disruption and the fear that has been caused by the outrage by the raids has really had a devastating effect and has been a body blow to our economy." I.C.E has made several high-profile raids in Los Angeles and across the country as part of the president's campaign promise to deliver mass-deportations. Trump promised to prioritize criminal illegal aliens, but critics allege the administration is separating families and targeting non-criminal workers. "I don't think the president understands that we have entire sectors of our economy that cannot function without immigrant labor," Bass said. The Trump administration called for a halt on deportation raids on agricultural sites, hotels and restaurants, and not to arrest "noncriminal collaterals" the New York Times reported. The move came out of fears that the sweeping raids were hurting key industries in the U.S. "Our great Farmers and people in the Hotel and Leisure business have been stating that our very aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good, long-time workers away from them, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace," Trump posted on Truth Social Thursday.

Insiders own 28% of Pinnacle Investment Management Group Limited (ASX:PNI) shares but retail investors control 50% of the company
Insiders own 28% of Pinnacle Investment Management Group Limited (ASX:PNI) shares but retail investors control 50% of the company

Yahoo

time41 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Insiders own 28% of Pinnacle Investment Management Group Limited (ASX:PNI) shares but retail investors control 50% of the company

Pinnacle Investment Management Group's significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 49% ownership Insider ownership in Pinnacle Investment Management Group is 28% Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. A look at the shareholders of Pinnacle Investment Management Group Limited (ASX:PNI) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are retail investors with 50% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk). Individual insiders, on the other hand, account for 28% of the company's stockholders. Institutions will often hold stock in bigger companies, and we expect to see insiders owning a noticeable percentage of the smaller ones. In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Pinnacle Investment Management Group. View our latest analysis for Pinnacle Investment Management Group Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index. As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Pinnacle Investment Management Group. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Pinnacle Investment Management Group's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Pinnacle Investment Management Group. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Stephen R. Wilson with 10% of shares outstanding. Ian Macoun is the second largest shareholder owning 8.3% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 5.1% of the company stock. Ian Macoun, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer. A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority. While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily. The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO. Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances. Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Pinnacle Investment Management Group Limited. Insiders own AU$1.3b worth of shares in the AU$4.4b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders. The general public-- including retail investors -- own 50% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders. I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Pinnacle Investment Management Group has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of. But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store