
Connellsville Area School District to eliminate class rank
The school board voted in 2023 to remove class rank and replace it with a new honor system for academic achievements. The change will take effect this school year.
"We're going to fight for what we see as right for our school district and for the future classes of Connellsville Area High School," high school senior Morgan Nicholson said.
Nicholson and other students said they were never informed of the change until recently.
"I had no idea this decision was made, and it wasn't very publicly sent out," said Benjamin Metzgar, a Connellsville graduate.
Metzgar graduated last year, but said he still has concerns about how the removal of class rank may affect current and future students at the district.
"I'm worried that them taking away the class rank, them doing this, will take away motivation and the strive for people that are academically striving and driven like I am," Metzgar said.
Class ranks are used to compare students' academic performance to their classmates.
"At the last graduation, the valedictorian of the class of 2025 said that he would be the last one. So, that's when it all became very real to me," senior high school student Emma Hull said.
Hull helped create a petition this year in hopes that the school board will consider reversing their decision.
"We've been emailing them, showing them the petition, talking to them," high school senior Natalie Mangus said.
So far, more than 1,000 people have signed the petition. In addition, several students and parents have been attending board meetings, including one this week, where they spoke during public comment to voice their concerns.
"These kids are trying to put their mark in society and the future, and you're taking away what they're trying to earn," a parent said during the board meeting.
In a statement to KDKA from the district, it said, in part, "The decision to remove class rank was made in 2023 as a result of a culmination of research and discussion spanning over a year's time. The research and debate included the former superintendent, school board, high school principals, guidance counselors, and various student groups. Because the students in 10th and 11th grade at that point had already scheduled their classes under the old system, the decision was made to eliminate class rank effective with the class of 2026. At that time the group took a look at what other area high schools were doing as well as what impact class rank had on college admissions, awards, and scholarships. In the end, it was found that eliminating class rank would not have an adverse effect on those things. Many colleges and universities expressed pursuing a student who was well-rounded, was involved in service groups, extracurriculars, etc. over the number of honors or AP classes someone had on their transcript."
The district went on to say, "Further, it was found that in some cases students were feeling forced to load their classes with weighted, honors, or advanced-placement courses instead of taking classes that may be a passion for them or make them more well-rounded such as band, chorus, art, technology, and other elective courses. Some students were requesting to skip their lunch period in order to schedule an additional weighted course."
Incoming seniors said they disagree with the decision.
"I feel like this will stop students from taking AP classes because they won't feel the need to strive for first place," Nicholson said. "I don't think it's right to not be proud of students who do well in school. I think they should be honored to be doing so well in academics."
Hull said that without a class rank, it could put students at a disadvantage when applying for colleges.
"There's local schools that a lot of us will be applying to, like Penn State and Pitt, and since a lot of us are applying to those areas, if we had class rank, then they'd be able to see how we compare amongst each other, which we don't have," Hull said.
A board meeting is scheduled for Wednesday night. Students and parents told KDKA they plan to attend.
"The board's supposed to be the people that support the students and do what's best for them, but we don't feel supported when we heard that it was getting taken away," high school senior Julian Smith said.
KDKA asked the superintendent if there was a possibility that the board would reconsider and reverse the decision to eliminate class rank.
"That is hard to say, only because hearing of some dissension regarding this issue was brought to light so recently," Superintendent Richard Evans said. "Over the two years since the decision was made, I don't believe anyone within the district was aware of any opposition regarding the elimination of class rank until now. So, it comes at a bit of a surprise. Having said that, the board and administration is always going to hear, consider, and take serious any concern that is brought forth by our students, families, and/or community."
As of now, the district said a new honor system will replace class rank.
"A new system of honor was put into place that enabled the district to celebrate many more students for their academic achievements. "Cum Laude" - any student with a GPA of 3.80 or higher. "Magna Cum Laude" - any student with a GPA of 4.00 or higher along with the completion of two or more Advanced Placement classes. "Summa Cum Laude" - any student with a GPA of 4.15 or higher along with the completion of four or more Advanced Placement classes. This past year, the district was able to honor 76 students who fell into this category, rather than the traditional top ten based on class rank," the district said in a statement.
In a response to the change.org petition, board member Bob Renzi said, "If our board would decide to reinstate class rankings, it could only begin with this incoming freshman class, and we wouldn't have another valedictorian until 2029."
Despite going into her senior year without class rankings, Hull said she still plans to push herself to the limit academically.
"I want to still get the highest GPA that I can. It's just unfortunate that I'll no longer be recognized for it at graduation," Hull said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Whitehorse immigration consultant denies wrongdoing in lawsuit from former client
Immigration consultant Maggie Ozen has filed her statement of defence to the Yukon Supreme Court in a lawsuit from former client Franklin Lee. As Gabrielle Plonka reports, Ozen denies doing anything wrong.
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Oil Steady With Focus on India-Russia Trade Before Tariff Boost
(Bloomberg) -- Oil was steady as the market weighed the outlook for Russian crude flows to India after a Trump administration official ramped up his criticism over the trade ahead of an expected tariff increase. Brent held below $68 a barrel, on track for the biggest weekly gain since early July, while West Texas Intermediate was near $63. White House trade adviser Peter Navarro blasted India again for continuing to buy Russian oil and said he sees US import levies on the nation doubling as planned on Aug. 27. Why New York City Has a Fleet of New EVs From a Dead Carmaker Trump Takes Second Swing at Cutting Housing Assistance for Immigrants Neom's Desert Ski Resort Strains Saudi Prince's $1.5 Trillion Plan Chicago Schools Seeks $1 Billion of Short-Term Debt as Cash Gone We Need a Reality Check on Crime, Safety and Transit 'India doesn't appear to want to recognize its role in the bloodshed,' he said. 'They don't need the oil. It's a refining profit sharing scheme.' President Donald Trump has threatened to raise the duties on Indian imports to the US to 50%, half of which would be due to purchases of Russian crude. Still, oil refiners in the South Asian nation have returned to buying after a brief pause, while an official from Moscow expects flows to be maintained. Earlier this week, Navarro claimed that the surge in Russian imports since the war in Ukraine was driven by 'profiteering by India's Big Oil lobby' and not domestic needs. Oil is still lower for the year as OPEC+ ramps up production and Trump's trade policies spark concerns over demand. Foreigners Are Buying US Homes Again While Americans Get Sidelined Volkswagen EVs Outsell Tesla in Europe a Decade After Dieselgate What Declining Cardboard Box Sales Tell Us About the US Economy Survived Bankruptcy. Next Up: Cultural Relevance? Women's Earnings Never Really Recover After They Have Children ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


CBS News
7 minutes ago
- CBS News
Judge blocks Trump administration from expanding Florida's "Alligator Alcatraz" over environmental concerns
A federal judge on Thursday ordered an indefinite halt to new construction at an immigration detention facility that Florida officials have dubbed "Alligator Alcatraz," and barred any new detainees from being brought to the site, siding with environmental groups who said the facility is endangering the Everglades and its wildlife. The decision is a setback for Florida's Republican-led state government and its aggressive efforts to aid the Trump administration's hardline immigration agenda, including by deputizing thousands of state police as federal immigration officers. The order by U.S. District Court Judge Kathleen Williams did not require Florida officials to completely cease operations at Alligator Alcatraz, allowing the state to continue using existing structures there to detain immigrants suspected of being in the U.S. illegally. But Williams barred any more detainees from being transferred to the site — dashing plans to expand the detention center. The makeshift detention facility — located in what was largely an abandoned airfield — is one of several locations and prisons that Republican-led states have offered the Trump administration so they can be converted into immigration detention centers. Officials in Indiana and Nebraska have also allowed facilities in their states to hold immigrants facing deportation. Thursday's ruling stems from a lawsuit filed by the Miccosukee tribe and environmental activists who challenged operations at Alligator Alcatraz on environmental grounds. They've argued environmental reviews mandated in federal law should have been completed before the site was set up. Florida officials have argued Alligator Alcatraz is not subject to those federal environmental requirements because the facility is run by the state. The Trump administration has said it will reimburse Florida for the effort using federal funds. Williams had paused further construction at Alligator Alcatraz earlier this month, but only for two weeks. A separate lawsuit over the legal rights of those held at the Everglades facility is also playing out. That case was partially dismissed by the U.S. District Court Judge Rodolfo Ruiz earlier this week, since the Trump administration had designated an immigration court to hear the claims of those detained at Alligator Alcatraz, one of the main concerns raised by the lawsuit. But Ruiz allowed another part of the case centered on detainees' right to in-person and confidential legal consultations to proceed, transferring the lawsuit to another federal judge.