
R.I. Senate votes to ban sale, purchase of assault-style weapons
Edward Fitzpatrick
Senators Louis P. DiPalma, the Middletown Democrat who sponsored the Senate version of the bill, noted that assault weapons bills have been introduced for a dozen years without becoming law. 'We need to get this done,' he said. 'We need to get this done today.'
Advertisement
DiPalma noted that a union
Get Rhode Map
A weekday briefing from veteran Rhode Island reporters, focused on the things that matter most in the Ocean State.
Enter Email
Sign Up
He said the state of Washington has enacted a similar law banning the sale, purchase and manufacture of assault-style weapons. And he said that if the bill becomes law in Rhode Island, 'the proliferation of assault style weapons will go down precipitously.'
Senator Pamela J. Lauria, a Barrington Democrat, attempted to amend the bill to reflect the House-passed version of the legislation. She said it is crucial to pass a bill that bans possession — and not just sale — of assault weapons, especially now that President Trump's administration is scaling back the federal government's ability to enforce gun laws.
Advertisement
Lauria noted that Rhode Island Attorney General Peter F. Neronha had backed the House version of the bill, saying he could defend it in court. And she urged senators to 'pass the best possible bill,' including a ban on sale and possession of those guns.
But DiPalma objected to Lauria's amendment, saying it sought to circumvent the committee process that had resulted in the House bill being held for further study in the Senate Judiciary Committee.
New Senate President Valarie J. Lawson, an East Providence Democrat and teachers union president, upheld DiPalma's objection. Lauria challenged Lawson's ruling, and the Senate then voted 25 to 12 to back Lawson's ruling, thereby killing Lauria's amendment.
Senate Minority Leader Jessica de la Cruz, a North Smithfield Republican, and other Republicans proposed several amendments, including a proposal to delay implementation until July 1, 2027, rather than July 1, 2026.
De la Cruz said the banned weapons make up to 70 percent of the stock of some gun shops, and they need time to adjust. She noted the legislature had delayed implementation of new laws on casino smoking and payday loans, and she said those law don't involve the 'fundamental rights of the Second Amendment.'
Senator Andrew R. Dimitri, a Johnston Democrat, voted against the bill, saying, 'This bill still punishes good people, and does nothing to stop crime.'
But Senator Meghan E. Kallman, a Pawtucket Democrat, voted for the bill, citing mass shootings ranging from Columbine High School in 1999 to the Tree of Life synagogue in 2018.
'I am appealing to this chamber's sense of urgency. I do not want to have it happen here,' Kallman said. But she said she was voting for the bill 'over deep disappointment because we had the opportunity to do something better, stronger, and with much more moral clarity.'
Advertisement
In the leadup to Friday's vote,
Edward Fitzpatrick can be reached at
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
a few seconds ago
- CNN
‘We've had enough': Texas Democrat who slept on state House floor speaks out
Rep. Nicole Collier (D-TX) spent the night on the Texas House floor in protest after refusing a Republican demand to be placed under the watch of the state Department of Public Safety. CNN's Arlette Saenz reports.


CNN
a few seconds ago
- CNN
‘We've had enough': Texas Democrat who slept on state House floor speaks out
Rep. Nicole Collier (D-TX) spent the night on the Texas House floor in protest after refusing a Republican demand to be placed under the watch of the state Department of Public Safety. CNN's Arlette Saenz reports.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Newsom's proposed redistricting would split Simi Valley from the rest of Ventura County
If California voters approve the new congressional maps that appear headed for the November ballot, Simi Valley will get a new U.S. House representative next year. Simi Valley's representation in Washington, D.C. is not top of mind for Gov. Gavin Newsom and other Sacramento Democrats. Their goal is to add a few seats to the 43-9 advantage Democrats already hold in the California House delegation, countering the Republican-led redistricting in Texas and giving Democrats a better chance of controlling the House next year. To that end, the proposed district maps introduced in the State Assembly on Aug. 18 carve up some currently safe Republican districts and tweak some Democratic ones to make them safer. The two districts that cover most of Ventura County are considered fairly safe for Democrats, and both would remain largely unchanged. The 24th District, currently held by Santa Barbara Democrat Salud Carbajal, stays the same under the map that Newsom wants to put on the ballot. It includes the city of Ventura and the Ojai Valley, along with all of Santa Barbara County and some of San Luis Obispo County. Julia Brownley, a Democrat from Westlake Village, represents the rest of Ventura County in the 26th District. Under the proposed redistricting, most of that district would stay the same, but the city of Simi Valley would be cut from its southeastern edge. Instead, Brownley's district would extend northeast into the high desert, all the way to the outskirts of Lancaster and Palmdale. Simi Valley would be added to the 32nd District, which is now represented by Brad Sherman, a Democrat from the San Fernando Valley. In addition to Simi Valley, the district would include part of the San Fernando Valley and all of Malibu and Pacific Palisades. A statewide election is necessary to draw new maps because in 2010, California voters approved a constitutional amendment that gave redistricting authority to an independent, nonpartisan commission. Newsom's plan is to ask voters to set aside the commission's maps until for the next three congressional elections, then go back to the commission to draw maps after the 2030 census. Herb Gooch, a professor emeritus of political science at California Lutheran University in Thousand Oaks, said he doesn't think the new district map would change much for Simi Valley residents. They are represented by a Democrat now, and in all likelihood, they will be represented by a different Democrat if voters approve the governor's redistricting plan. "I don't know that it fundamentally changes the dynamics," Gooch said. "Julia's district is pretty safe, but Brad's is even safer. You're probably pretty much used to it if you're in Simi Valley." Simi Valley is the only city in Ventura County with more Republicans than Democrats. But for more than a decade — ever since Republican Elton Gallegly retired from Congress in 2012 — Simi Valley has either been represented by a Democrat, or it's been separated from the rest of Ventura County to fall into a district represented by a far-off Republican. "I don't know why, but it seems like Simi Valley is the area that always gets stuck in the middle," said Barbra Williamson, a Republican who served on the Simi Valley City Council from 1992 to 2012. "We get carved out every single time," said Leanna Brand, a Democrat and the leader of the liberal group Indivisible Simi Valley. "We know it. We expect it." Brand said she doesn't think Simi Valley was well served from before 2023, when it was part of a district that included Santa Clarita and Palmdale. Mike Garcia, a Republican who represented the district from 2020 to 2022, was focused on the Santa Clarita Valley and "did absolutely nothing for us," she said. Brand said it seems "a little less logical" to put Simi Valley in a district with Malibu, Topanga Canyon, Pacific Palisades and the more upscale parts of the San Fernando Valley, but she doesn't think it will change much about the city's representation. The only exception, she said, might be if Sherman is laser-focused on helping Pacific Palisades rebuild from the fire and doesn't pay much attention to the new part of his district. Williamson said she thinks Newsom's redistricting plan is "a terrible idea," while Brand sees it as a necessary move to counter Republican gerrymandering in other states. "We've got to play hardball at this point," Brand said. "But it's temporary." The question, Gooch said, is whether California voters will see it that way. The ballot measure to let the independent commission draw congressional districts passed with more than 60% of the vote, and the concept still polls well. "It might be harder to pull off than the governor thinks," Gooch said. "We've spent a lot of time educating people about having a neutral commission, and a lot of people are pretty proud about what's been done." Tony Biasotti is an investigative and watchdog reporter for the Ventura County Star. Reach him at tbiasotti@ This story was made possible by a grant from the Ventura County Community Foundation's Fund to Support Local Journalism. This article originally appeared on Ventura County Star: Newsom's redistricting plan would move Simi Valley to new district Solve the daily Crossword