UPS to pay nearly $2 million to settle lawsuit over hazardous waste sent to local landfills
The lawsuit, filed in San Joaquin County Superior Court on July 23, came after a years-long investigation into 140 UPS locations in California, according to a statement from the office. The matter was investigated by the district attorney's offices in Riverside, Yolo, San Joaquin and San Bernadino counties, among others.
The suit alleged that UPS irresponsibly disposed of hazardous and medical waste in 'regular trashbins,' which contained corrosive, ignitable and toxic materials. The trash was then sent to landfills not meant to receive it, officials said.
It was unclear how the waste mentioned in the lawsuit was produced, or where it came from. UPS is a multinational delivery company that operates trucks, airplanes and trains, which can all produce waste through standard shipping practices. UPS did not specify how much waste the company produced in its 2024 Global Reporting Initiative sustainability report.
The Riverside County district attorney's office said UPS was cooperative and quick to improve upon the practices discussed in the suit. UPS said that, in advance of the settlement, it implemented new waste management systems and training programs that teach employees how to deal with hazardous waste at all California facilities.
'The safety of our employees and communities, and care for our environment, are the highest priorities at UPS,' the shipping company said in a statement to The Times. 'We immediately investigated and took corrective actions to address the allegations made by the counties. UPS fully cooperated with the counties' investigation, including conducting audits of its waste handling practices under the oversight of the DA's.'
UPS will pay $1.4 million in civil penalties, $140,000 in cost reimbursement and $205,000 that will go toward supplemental environmental projects, officials said.
'UPS, like all California businesses, is required to properly dispose of hazardous waste and medical waste in labeled and segregated containers to ensure that incompatible waste does not mix and cause dangerous chemical reactions or harm to the environment,' the statement said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Lucid (LCID) Stock Trades Down, Here Is Why
What Happened? Shares of luxury electric car manufacturer Lucid (NASDAQ:LCID) fell 9.7% in the afternoon session after the company reported second-quarter results that missed analyst expectations and lowered its full-year production forecast. The company posted revenue of $259.4 million, which fell roughly in line with analyst estimates. Lucid also cut its 2025 production outlook to a range of 18,000 to 20,000 vehicles, down from a previous target of 20,000. The report revealed a negative gross margin, a figure that included a $54 million hit from tariffs and signaled significant cost pressures. The stock market overreacts to news, and big price drops can present good opportunities to buy high-quality stocks. Is now the time to buy Lucid? Access our full analysis report here, it's free. What Is The Market Telling Us Lucid's shares are extremely volatile and have had 55 moves greater than 5% over the last year. In that context, today's move indicates the market considers this news meaningful but not something that would fundamentally change its perception of the business. The previous big move we wrote about was 8 days ago when the stock dropped 7.7% on the news that bellwether United Parcel Service (UPS) reported weak earnings and withheld its full-year guidance, citing 'macro-economic uncertainty' and low consumer sentiment. The logistics giant reported a decline in revenue and missed profit estimates, sending a chill through the entire logistics chain. UPS pointed to a challenging economic environment and near-historic lows in U.S. consumer confidence as key factors for its performance. By withholding its full-year forecast, the company signaled significant uncertainty ahead, confirming fears of a broader economic slowdown that could impact demand for shipping and freight services. This news weighed on other ground and rail transportation stocks, as investors worried that the headwinds affecting UPS could be a sign of wider issues across the industry. Lucid is down 27.2% since the beginning of the year, and at $2.21 per share, it is trading 48.2% below its 52-week high of $4.26 from August 2024. Investors who bought $1,000 worth of Lucid's shares at the IPO in September 2020 would now be looking at an investment worth $222.95. Unless you've been living under a rock, it should be obvious by now that generative AI is going to have a huge impact on how large corporations do business. While Nvidia and AMD are trading close to all-time highs, we prefer a lesser-known (but still profitable) semiconductor stock benefiting from the rise of AI. Click here to access our free report on our favorite semiconductor growth story. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
UPS Fined $1.7 Million After Statewide Investigation into Hazardous Waste Disposal
UPS Fined $1.7 Million After Statewide Investigation into Hazardous Waste Disposal originally appeared on L.A. Mag. United Parcel Service (UPS) must pay $1.745 million in penalties and related costs after an environmental investigation found that the company mishandled hazardous and medical waste at more than 140 facilities across settlement, announced this week, resolves a civil lawsuit filed in San Joaquin County Superior Court and brought by a coalition of 45 District Attorney's Offices from across the state. The prosecution alleges that UPS and its subsidiaries, UPS Supply Chain Solutions and UPS General Services, routinely disposed of toxic, corrosive and flammable materials in regular trash bins, sending them to landfills not equipped to handle such discarded items reportedly included ignitable and reactive substances as well as over-the-counter medications containing regulated ingredients, in violation of California environmental laws.'This settlement holds UPS accountable for its past handling of hazardous materials and helps ensure better protection of public health and the environment,' said Mike Hestrin, Riverside County District Attorney, whose office played a leading role in the multi-agency investigation. The civil judgment requires UPS to pay $1.4 million in civil penalties, $140,000 in cost reimbursements and $205,000 toward Supplemental Environmental Projects to fund environmental education and enforcement efforts. Riverside County alone will receive $230,000 in penalties and an additional $25,000 for cost prosecutors emphasized the severity of UPS's actions, they also praised their cooperation with the investigation and their willingness to take steps to improve its waste disposal company has implemented new employee training programs, updated internal waste management policies and introduced stricter procedures for labeling, sorting and disposing hazardous materials in compliance with California businesses in the state are required to manage hazardous materials and medical waste under a complex framework of environmental regulations designed to prevent pollution, chemical reactions and risks to human full list of impacted UPS facilities has not been made public, though authorities say violations occurred throughout the state, including at locations in Southern California. This story was originally reported by L.A. Mag on Aug 5, 2025, where it first appeared. Solve the daily Crossword
Los Angeles Times
a day ago
- Los Angeles Times
Justin Baldoni heats up ‘It Ends With Us' legal battle, bringing movie's insurers to court
Justin Baldoni's name is not going to be out of the courtroom anytime soon. The actor and director, who has been embroiled in legal drama related to his 2024 film 'It Ends With Us' for months, is suing insurers of the film for refusing to cover the costs of litigation stemming from the film. In a lawsuit filed July 30 in Los Angeles Superior Court, Baldoni and his production company, Wayfarer Studios, accuse three insurance companies of breach of contract for denying coverage of costs for a December lawsuit filed by Baldoni's co-star, Blake Lively. The case marks the latest wrinkle in an already messy dispute, bringing in new parties to try to sort out who's footing the mounting legal bills. The insurance companies named in the suit — New York Marine, QBE Insurance Group Limited and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's — sold policies to Wayfarer, 'promising to defend and indemnify' the company and its officers against, among other things, lawsuits like the one Lively filed, which outlines claims of sexual harassment, retaliation and several other charges. Wayfarer Studios' executives Steve Sarowitz and Jamey Heath joined Baldoni and the company in filing the lawsuit against the insurers. They were also named defendants in Lively's suit. The sprawling legal saga surrounding 'It Ends With Us' erupted late last year after a contentious press tour and swirling rumors about a rift between Baldoni and Lively. Lively accused Baldoni and his team of orchestrating a smear campaign against her after she reported on-set sexual harassment in the original lawsuit she filed. Baldoni filed a $400 million countersuit alleging that Lively's accusations are baseless and have caused serious harm to his career, reputation and personal life, further escalating the high-interest legal brawl. A judge dismissed the countersuit in June, saying it didn't meet legal standards, marking a setback for Baldoni's camp. But the case remains one of the most closely-watched Hollywood courtroom battles in recent memory. The new lawsuit from Baldoni and his team comes after another insurer of the film, Harco National Insurance, recently tried to sever itself from the sticky legal feud. Harco filed a lawsuit in New York federal court in July seeking a court order expressly stating that it has no duty to pay legal fees for the production company or its officers. Harco says in the lawsuit that the sexual harassment Lively accuses Baldoni of on set allegedly occurred before the effective dates of its policy, and that Wayfarer didn't disclose possible issues that could have led to claims ahead of time. The policies from the three insurers named in the new suit collectively carry at least $8 million in insurance, and the complaint alleges that the policies should have covered the costs incurred in the legal fight. Each insurer sent letters to Wayfarer denying coverage, and Baldoni and his associates claim the insurers either did not conduct 'any meaningful investigation' into the claim before denying it, or that they cited various inapplicable exclusions to the policy. Representatives for all parties of the lawsuit did not respond to requests for comment, except for Lloyd's, which said it cannot discuss individual policies or policyholders, nor can it comment on matters in litigation. The latest development in the months-long dispute could color how Wayfarer and Baldoni move forward as legal fees continue to rack up. Greg Doll, an entertainment litigator and partner at the Los Angeles firm Doll Amir & Eley, said while the vast majority of similar civil cases are settled before trial, the Lively lawsuit could be an exception. 'What happens in an outlier case is it gets intensely personal, and there's public embarrassment, there's public accusations, and then it becomes about standing on principle,' Doll said. Baldoni's side has deep pockets. Wayfarer Studios has been footing the legal bills in the Lively suit, according to the most recent complaint filed. Sarowitz, Wayfarer's co-founder, co-chairman and leading financier who is also the billionaire founder of Paylocity, once allegedly said he was prepared to spend '$100 million to ruin' Lively and her family, according to Lively's complaint. 'Other companies, you could say they're going to live and die by the insurance coverage because they don't have any assets of their own. They're going to be scared,' Doll said. 'This doesn't appear to be that situation.' But as legal bills mount and the case only becomes more tangled, sorting out what coverage Baldoni's side could get from its insurers makes sense, Doll said, even despite the ample funding they have. Without coverage, it's a 'much more complex negotiation,' he added. 'That becomes a different sort of calculus [for them] about how much of our own money are we willing to spend in settlement, or how much we're willing to roll the dice and fight knowing that our own money might be at stake,' Doll said.
