Mother Engaging Maid No Ground To Deny Child Custody, Says Bombay High Court
Last Updated:
The court underscored that such arrangements are common in households with infants and do not, by themselves, suggest neglect or incapacity on the part of the mother.
The Bombay High Court recently observed that the mere act of a mother engaging a maid to assist in caring for a young child cannot be used to deny her custody rights.
Dismissing a father's objection in a child custody battle, the court underscored that such arrangements are common in households with infants and do not, by themselves, suggest neglect or incapacity on the part of the mother.
The case stemmed from a dispute between a married couple over the custody of their infant son, born in June 2023. After leaving the matrimonial home, the mother filed a petition under the Guardians and Wards Act before the family court seeking permanent custody of the child. She also sought interim custody, which was granted on January 30, 2024.
The father challenged this interim order before the Bombay High Court's Aurangabad bench, arguing that the mother was not personally attending to the child and had instead delegated care to a maid. He submitted that this, combined with her alleged postnatal mental health issues, warranted the reversal of the custody decision.
However, the bench of Justice RM Joshi rejected the argument, noting that engaging domestic help is a normal and practical decision for many mothers managing infant care, especially in urban households. The court observed:
'Even if it is accepted that a maid servant is engaged by respondent, it is not uncommon for a maid servant to be engaged where there is small child in the house. In such circumstances, the said fact even if it is accepted to be true will not become a ground to cause interference in the impugned order."
Furthermore, the bench emphasised that the father had failed to bring any substantive material to show that the child's custody with the mother was harmful or against the child's welfare.
The bench observed that anxiety and depression after childbirth are not uncommon and do not by themselves prove the mother is incapable of nurturing her child. The court cited the family court's finding that the respondent appeared well-functioning, held a valid driving licence, moved around independently in Pune, and exhibited no signs of harmful behaviour. It noted that the medical certificate furnished by the respondent affirmed her ability to care for the baby.
Strengthening the mother's case, the court noted that the child had been in her custody for around eight months, and no concerns about the child's health, safety, or development had been raised during that period.
In fact, medical records indicated that the child was in normal physical and mental health.
The father had also argued that the family court, by granting custody at the interim stage, had effectively given final relief. The high court, however, clarified that the custody order was provisional and made pending a final decision on the mother's primary petition for permanent custody. It found no procedural irregularity in the family court's approach.
In conclusion, the high court found no merit in the father's plea and upheld the family court's order granting interim custody to the mother.
First Published:
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
RannSamar Foundation extends financial support to families affected by manual scavenging
MUMBAI: RannSamar Foundation, a Mumbai-based all-India NGO, on Saturday organized a fund distribution program for families who have lost loved ones to manual scavenging—lives lost while cleaning septic tanks. Between 2018 and 2023, over 400 lives were lost while cleaning septic tanks and sewers across India. The year-wise figures are alarming: 76 deaths in 2018, 133 in 2019, 35 in 2020, 66 in 2021, 84 in 2022, and 49 in 2023. "These stark numbers underscore the systemic failure to eliminate the practice of manual scavenging despite legal prohibitions and repeated court interventions," said advocate and social activist Abha Singh, who founded the NGO. The Foundation provides legal aid and financial assistance to families awaiting compensation or support. The program follows a Bombay High Court judgment from September 2021 in the case of Vimla Govind Charotiya & Others vs State of Maharashtra, argued by IPS officer and advocate Isha Singh on behalf of the petitioners. The court directed the state to compensate three petitioners with ₹10 lakh each for the loss of their husbands to manual scavenging while cleaning septic tanks. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 인터넷 지원금 아직도 모르세요?! 놓치면 3년마다 최대 220만원 손해! 인싸통 더 알아보기 Undo According to a press note, the RannSamar Foundation on Saturday distributed ₹30,000 each to three families: Vimla Govind Charotiya, Bani Bishwajit Debnath, and Neeta Kaleskar, whose husbands died while working under hazardous conditions on the premises of Morya SRA CHS Ltd in Mumbai—without oxygen masks, helmets, or other safety equipment. The Foundation also extended financial support to the family of Prakash Soma Parmar, who died in a similar manual scavenging incident in Ahmedabad, and the family of Nagnesh Ghumalvad from Nanded.
News18
26-05-2025
- News18
Mother Engaging Maid No Ground To Deny Child Custody, Says Bombay High Court
Last Updated: The court underscored that such arrangements are common in households with infants and do not, by themselves, suggest neglect or incapacity on the part of the mother. The Bombay High Court recently observed that the mere act of a mother engaging a maid to assist in caring for a young child cannot be used to deny her custody rights. Dismissing a father's objection in a child custody battle, the court underscored that such arrangements are common in households with infants and do not, by themselves, suggest neglect or incapacity on the part of the mother. The case stemmed from a dispute between a married couple over the custody of their infant son, born in June 2023. After leaving the matrimonial home, the mother filed a petition under the Guardians and Wards Act before the family court seeking permanent custody of the child. She also sought interim custody, which was granted on January 30, 2024. The father challenged this interim order before the Bombay High Court's Aurangabad bench, arguing that the mother was not personally attending to the child and had instead delegated care to a maid. He submitted that this, combined with her alleged postnatal mental health issues, warranted the reversal of the custody decision. However, the bench of Justice RM Joshi rejected the argument, noting that engaging domestic help is a normal and practical decision for many mothers managing infant care, especially in urban households. The court observed: 'Even if it is accepted that a maid servant is engaged by respondent, it is not uncommon for a maid servant to be engaged where there is small child in the house. In such circumstances, the said fact even if it is accepted to be true will not become a ground to cause interference in the impugned order." Furthermore, the bench emphasised that the father had failed to bring any substantive material to show that the child's custody with the mother was harmful or against the child's welfare. The bench observed that anxiety and depression after childbirth are not uncommon and do not by themselves prove the mother is incapable of nurturing her child. The court cited the family court's finding that the respondent appeared well-functioning, held a valid driving licence, moved around independently in Pune, and exhibited no signs of harmful behaviour. It noted that the medical certificate furnished by the respondent affirmed her ability to care for the baby. Strengthening the mother's case, the court noted that the child had been in her custody for around eight months, and no concerns about the child's health, safety, or development had been raised during that period. In fact, medical records indicated that the child was in normal physical and mental health. The father had also argued that the family court, by granting custody at the interim stage, had effectively given final relief. The high court, however, clarified that the custody order was provisional and made pending a final decision on the mother's primary petition for permanent custody. It found no procedural irregularity in the family court's approach. In conclusion, the high court found no merit in the father's plea and upheld the family court's order granting interim custody to the mother. First Published:
NDTV
22-05-2025
- NDTV
"Can't Be Mute Spectators": Court Appoints Daughters As Guardians Of Bedridden Man
Mumbai: The Bombay High Court has appointed two daughters as guardians of their 73-year-old bedridden father, who suffered a brain injury during a cardiac arrest, noting that he was unable to take care of himself or his property. A bench of Justice Abhay Ahuja, in its order of May 8, a copy of which was made available on Wednesday, said courts cannot remain a mute spectator to such situations. The high court, while appointing the two daughters as guardians of their father, noted that the man was suffering from mental illness and was a "person in a state of lunacy who is incapable of taking care of himself or managing his property". "The higher courts of our country exercise the 'parens patriae' jurisdiction (legal protector of citizens unable to protect themselves) as they cannot be mute spectators to a real life situation of the nature before this Court," Justice Ahuja said. As per the plea, the senior citizen suffered a brain injury in 2024, resulting in deprivation of oxygen and blood supply, during a cardiac arrest. As a consequence, he has been in a semi-conscious and incapacitated state and is bedridden till date. The petition sought HC to appoint the two daughters as guardians of their father, as he is incapable of communication and is not even able to take care of his basic personal needs. The petition was initially filed under the Guardian and Wards Act, by which a guardian can be appointed for the welfare of a minor alone. The plea was later amended and sought for the daughters to be appointed as guardians of the senior citizen under Clause XVII of the Letters Patent. Under Clause XVII of the Letters Patent, the high court has the power and authority with regard to the person and estate of "infants, idiots and lunatics". A Letters Patent is a specific law under which an HC derives its subordinate piece of legislation and is a special law which prevails over the general law. The high court said under the Mental Healthcare Act, mental illness means a substantial disorder of thinking, orientation that grossly impairs judgment and the ability to meet with the ordinary demands of life. The court in its order noted that the man was unable to understand or take informed decisions, and that he requires constant care and attention. The bench noted that this was definitely not a case of mental retardation. "However, it can be said that this is a case of mental illness although the same may have arisen as a result of a cardiac arrest," HC said. "Lunacy refers to unsoundness of mind sufficient to incapacitate a person from civil transactions. It can also refer to a mental disorder as described in the definition of mental illness," Justice Ahuja said. Such mental illness where the person is incapable of taking care of himself or managing his assets, can be said to be a "state of lunacy" and hence under the Letters Patent, the high court would have authority and jurisdiction with respect to the person and the estate of such a "lunatic", HC said.
