Escaping homelessness is nearly impossible without systemic change
Summit County, with an estimated population of 535,733 as of 2023, has seen a slight population decline since 2008. Housing insecurity has become a growing concern, with fair market rent for a two-bedroom apartment rising 26% since 2018.
Extreme housing cost burdens, which occur when households spend more than half of their monthly income on housing, highlight persistent affordability issues. Surprisingly, the current local zip code with the highest number of evictions is 44313, supplanting the 44306 zip code, according to a recent report shared in the local Eviction Task Force facilitated by the local Fair Housing Contact Service.
The annual HUD Point-in-Time (PIT) Count, which was conducted Jan. 28, estimates the number of sheltered and unsheltered individuals experiencing homelessness on a single night. In Summit County this effort, mandated by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and organized by the Summit County Continuum of Care, helps track trends, allocate federal funding and guide local strategies to address homelessness. While invaluable, the count's single-night methodology underscores the need for sustained attention and resources.
The living conditions for many unsheltered individuals are unsafe and dehumanizing. Exposure to harsh weather, unsanitary environments and lack of access to basic needs like food and health care further exacerbate their struggles. Barriers such as unaffordable housing, limited mental health support, and insufficient job opportunities make escaping homelessness nearly impossible without systemic change.
We must take a multifaceted approach to address this crisis by investing in affordable housing, expanding mental health and addiction services, and creating sustainable job opportunities. Preventative measures like rental assistance, landlord mitigation and prevention are also critical. Above all, we must foster a sense of community responsibility and empathy to reduce the stigma of homelessness.
Homelessness is a societal failure, not an individual one. I urge community leaders and citizens to act with urgency and humanity to ensure everyone has access to safe and stable shelter. Let us not ignore those who need our help the most.
Shana Miller is the interim executive director of the Summit County Continuum of Care and co-chair of the PIT Count. Leesa Bruback is the manager of central intake at United Way of Summit and Medina Counties and co-chair of the PIT Count.
This article originally appeared on Akron Beacon Journal: Solutions for homelessness include housing, mental health | Opinion
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Atlantic
3 days ago
- Atlantic
The Birth of the Attention Economy
This is an edition of Time-Travel Thursdays, a journey through The Atlantic 's archives to contextualize the present. Sign up here. Early in the Civil War, Oliver Wendell Holmes Sr. announced in The Atlantic that the necessities of life had been reduced to two things: bread and the newspaper. Trying to keep up with what Holmes called the 'excitements of the time,' civilians lived their days newspaper to newspaper, hanging on the latest reports. Reading anything else felt beside the point. The newspaper was an inescapable force, Holmes wrote; it ruled by 'divine right of its telegraphic dispatches.' Holmes didn't think he was describing some permanent modern condition—information dependency as a way of life. The newspaper's reign would end with the war, he thought. And when it did, he and others could return to more high-minded literary pursuits—such as the book by an 'illustrious author' that he'd put down when hostilities broke out. Nearly 40 years after Holmes wrote those words, newspapers were still on the march. Writing in 1900, Arthur Reed Kimball warned in The Atlantic of an ' Invasion of Journalism,' as newspapers' volume and influence grew only more intense. Their readers' intellect, Kimball argued, had been diminished. Coarse language was corrupting speech and writing, and miscellaneous news was making miscellaneous minds. The newspaper-ification of the American mind was complete. The rise of the cheap, daily newspaper in the 19th century created the first true attention economy—an endless churn of spectacle and sensation that remade how Americans engaged with the world. Although bound by the physical limits of print, early newspaper readers' habits were our habits: People craved novelty, skimmed for the latest, let their attention dart from story to story. And with the onset of this new way of being came its first critics. In our current moment, when readers need to be persuaded to read an article before they post about it online, 19th-century harrumphs over the risks of newspaper reading seem quaint. Each new technology since the newspaper—film, radio, television, computers, the internet, search engines, social media, artificial intelligence—has sparked the same anxieties about how our minds and souls will be changed. Mostly, we've endured. But these anxieties have always hinted at the possibility that one day, we'll reach the endgame—the point at which words and the work of the mind will have become redundant. Worries over journalism's invasive qualities are as old as the modern daily newspaper. In New York, where the American variant first took shape in the 1830s, enterprising editors found a formula for success; they covered fires, murders, swindles, scandals, steamboat explosions, and other acts in the city's daily circus. As James Gordon Bennett Sr., the editor of the New York Herald and the great pioneer of the cheap daily, said, the mission was 'to startle or amuse.' Small in size and packed with tiny type, the papers themselves didn't look particularly amusing, but the newsboys selling them in the street were startling enough. Even if you didn't buy a paper, a boy in rags was going to yell its contents at you. These cheap newspapers had relatively modest urban circulations, but they suggested a new mode of living, an acceleration of time rooted in an expectation of constant novelty. Henry David Thoreau and other contrarians saw the implications and counseled the careful conservation of attention. 'We should treat our minds,' Thoreau wrote in an essay posthumously published in The Atlantic, 'that is, ourselves, as innocent and ingenuous children, whose guardians we are, and be careful what objects and what subjects we thrust on their attention.' This included newspapers. 'Read not the Times,' he urged. 'Read the Eternities.' But the problem was only getting worse. The Eternities were steadily losing ground to the Times—and to the Posts, the Standards, the Gazettes, the Worlds, and the Examiners. In the last third of the 19th century, the volume of printed publications grew exponentially. Even as more 'serious' newspapers such as the New-York Tribune entered the marketplace, the cheap daily continued to sell thousands of copies each day. Newspapers, aided by faster methods of typesetting and by cheaper printing, became twice-daily behemoths, with Sunday editions that could be biblical in length. A British observer marveled at the turn of the century that Americans, 'the busiest people in the world,' had so much time to read each day. American commentators of high and furrowed brow worried less that newspapers were being left unread and more that they were actually being devoured. The evidence was everywhere—in snappier sermons on Sundays, in direct and terse orations at colleges, in colloquial expressions in everyday usage, in the declining influence of certain journals and magazines (including The Atlantic). If I may apply what Kimball deplored as 'newspaper directness,' people seemed to be getting dumber. Those who were reared on slop and swill wanted ever more slop and swill—and the newspapers were all too ready to administer twice-daily feedings. Writing in The Atlantic in 1891 on the subject of ' Journalism and Literature,' William James Stillman saw a broad and 'devastating influence of the daily paper' on Americans' 'mental development.' No less grave were the political implications of a populace marinating in half-truths, seeking the general confirmation of what it already believed. In such a market, journalists and their papers had an incentive to perpetuate falsehoods. Was all of this hand-wringing a little too much? Has not one generation predicted the doom of the next with each successive innovation? Socrates warned that writing would weaken thought and give only the appearance of wisdom. Eighteenth-century novels occasioned panic as critics worried that their readers would waste their days on vulgar fictions. And as for newspapers, didn't Ernest Hemingway famously take 'newspaper directness' and make it the basis for perhaps the most influential literary style of the 20th century? Each innovation, even those that risk dimming our broader mental capacity, can stimulate innovations of its own. But at the risk of sounding like those 19th-century critics, this time really does seem different. When machines can so agreeably perform all of our intellectual labors and even fulfill our emotional needs, we should wonder what will become of our minds. No one has to spend much time imagining what we might like to read or pretend to read; algorithms already know. Chatbots, meanwhile, can as readily make our emails sound like Hemingway as they can instruct us on how to perform devil worship and self-mutilation. Thoreau may have never divined the possibility of artificial intelligence, but he did fear minds smoothed out by triviality and ease. He imagined the intellect as a road being paved over—' macadamized,' in 19th-century parlance—'its foundation broken into fragments for the wheels of travel to roll over.' 'If I am to be a thoroughfare,' Thoreau wrote, 'I prefer that it be of the mountain-brooks, the Parnassian streams, and not the town-sewers.'
Time Business News
3 days ago
- Time Business News
'Gaza Is Starving': A Cry for Help the World Can No Longer Ignore
Imagine your child crying from hunger for days… your home reduced to rubble… your hospital out of power and hope. This isn't a movie or a history lesson. It's Gaza—right now. What's unfolding is not just a conflict—it's a humanitarian catastrophe. Over 58,573 Palestinians are dead, including nearly 18,000 children. More than 139,000 are wounded. Entire neighborhoods have vanished, families sleep on streets, and famine is sweeping through the land. Yet, the world scrolls on. This blog isn't just an update—it's a call to action. Since hostilities began in October 2023, at least 58,573 Palestinians have been killed and 139,607 injured, as reported by Gaza's Ministry of Health Among them, approximately 17,921 were children, 9,497 women, 26,655 men, and 4,307 elderly individuals From March to mid-July 2025, over 737,000 Palestinians were forced to flee their homes following Israeli-issued displacement orders covering 81% of the Gaza Strip UNRWA+ Many now live in makeshift shelters, overcrowded schools, or on open streets—often with no protection against the elements According to IPC and U.N. assessments, famine conditions are now unfolding in significant areas of Gaza, with 100% of the population facing acute food insecurity and over half a million people at risk of death TIME+ in significant areas of Gaza, with and over TIME+ Up to 39% of Gazans now go days without eating , and most families survive on just one low-quality meal per day , and most families survive on just one low-quality meal per day Among screened children under five, acute malnutrition rose from 2.4% in February to 8.8% in July, and severe acute malnutrition increased from 1% to 1.5% 'One in three people in Gaza hasn't eaten for days.' Tom Fletcher, UN Emergency Relief Coordinator, July 2025 Outbreaks of meningitis , bloody diarrhea , and jaundice syndrome surged in June at crowded displacement sites , , and surged in June at crowded displacement sites Hospitals like Nasser Hospital in the south risk collapse due to power and resource shortages in the south risk collapse due to power and resource shortages Gender-based violence is rising, driven by displacement, lack of resources, and the breakdown of protective community structures UN Emergency Relief Coordinator Tom Fletcher proclaimed: 'One in three people in Gaza hasn't eaten for days'—a 'devastating' humanitarian reality proclaimed: 'One in three people in Gaza hasn't eaten for days'—a 'devastating' humanitarian reality The UK government and leading international agencies have demanded an immediate ceasefire, open aid access, and a plan to end the suffering, including recognition of Palestinian statehood if conditions don't improve UNRWA : Provides food, shelter, education, and medical care. : Provides food, shelter, education, and medical care. International Rescue Committee (IRC) : Delivers hygiene kits, nutrition, cash support, and sanitation services : Delivers hygiene kits, nutrition, cash support, and sanitation services Save the Children, Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), and local NGOs also offer critical support. Voices worldwide are calling for an immediate ceasefire, unrestricted humanitarian access, and increased pressure on governments to force systemic change and open borders. Distribute verified updates across social media, use hashtags like #StandWithGaza or #SaveGaza, and promote petitions or campaigns urging global leaders and the U.N. to take action. Even small donations help—food, fuel, medical kits, and clean water save lives. Funding is currently covering only a fraction of needs with 88% dedicated to Gaza needs and persistent gaps remain Crisis Aspect Key Data & Facts Casualties ~58,600 killed, ~139,600 injured Displacement 737,000+ newly displaced Malnutrition Severe across age groups; child malnutrition up to 8.8% Food Crisis Nearly half a million at risk; famine unfolding Aid Access Under 200 trucks/day entering Gaza Fuel Shortages WASH and hospitals crippled, public health failing Q1: How many people are displaced in Gaza right now? A1: Over 737,000 Palestinians have been newly displaced since March 2025, according to OCHA Q2: Is famine officially declared? A2: While no formal famine has been declared due to data constraints, famine thresholds have been met in large parts of Gaza according to IPC and UN reporting TIME. Q3: What is causing so many deaths at aid sites? A3: Violent crowding, militarized aid distribution, and interceptions at crossings have caused over 1,000 deaths among those seeking food since May Q4: How many children are malnourished? A4: Among children screened, 16% in Gaza City suffered acute malnutrition in July, with severe acute malnutrition rates rising sharply Q5: Are aid deliveries increasing? A5: Aid deliveries rose to around 70–220 trucks per day, but still fall far short of the 500–600 trucks UN estimates are necessary for basic needs Q6: How can people best help now? A6: Support trusted humanitarian agencies, advocate publicly and politically, raise awareness, and donate funds to ensure food, water, shelter, and medical care reach those in immediate need. The people of Gaza are enduring a crisis of catastrophic proportions. Families lack food, shelter, clean water, and healthcare. Children are starving, hospitals are collapsing, and no safe place exists. The international community must act now: Demand an immediate ceasefire Open humanitarian access across all crossings across all crossings Increase funding and aid delivery Support reliable NGOs and U.N. organizations Please consider donating, sharing verified information, and urging your government and international bodies to put pressure on all parties for lasting relief and justice. Every voice and action matters. Together, we can help hold the world accountable—and bring urgently needed aid to the people of Gaza. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Newsweek
3 days ago
- Newsweek
Man Floored by What In-N-Out Employees Do in Drive-Thru Line: 'Really Weird'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A man visiting an In-N-Out Burger drive-thru got more than he bargained for when an employee prayed for him and was told by another that "Jesus loves [him]". The original poster (OP) recounted her husband's story on Reddit, explaining that one of the employees at the restaurant in Carmel Mountain Ranch, California, had taken his order—and then prayed for him. Confused, he then went to the next window to pay and was asked by a different employee, "Did anyone tell you yet today that Jesus loves you?" An aerial view of an In-N-Out Burger restaurant on July 21, 2025 in Daly City, California. An aerial view of an In-N-Out Burger restaurant on July 21, 2025 in Daly City, California. Photo by"I realize In-N-Out is a Christian-owned company with Bible verses on their stuff, but in all my years of being alive, I have NEVER seen that, or heard of that happening before," the OP noted. "No hate to Christians or people just trying to do something nice, but... wtf?" She continued, "I'm sure this is just the actions of the individual employees and not mandated by In-N-Out. I'm just saying it's weird." Reddit Reacts More than 3,100 Reddit users took to the comments to weigh in, and many were as puzzled as the OP. One wrote, "That's really weird. I've never experienced that in my 35 years. I wonder if it's new?" Another added, "With how long the wait time is in the drive-thru, that's ridiculous." "There are a few at the Carmel Mtn location that do that," one Redditor pointed out. "Even if you're a religious person, it's awkward and inappropriate to do to people in a drive-thru line." 'Cringey and awkward' In a message to Newsweek, the OP said she didn't mean to stir up controversy or "put religion down". "I was simply curious if anyone else had ever experienced something like that there," she explained. "I know In-N-Out is a Christian company and they include Bible verses on their packaging, which has never bothered me. "What surprised me was how much attention the post got. A lot of people agreed with me, but I also got a lot of trolling for even mentioning anything." She added that her husband described the moment as "cringey and awkward, even if it was well-intentioned". A polite man, her husband allowed the employee to pray for him because "he didn't want to make it awkward." 'This really isn't about religion' "What's gotten lost in the conversation is that this really isn't about religion—it's about boundaries," the OP told Newsweek. "Prayer, like anything personal, should be consensual. "It's not the content of the message that's the issue; it's that the setting didn't exactly allow for a comfortable 'no', even to a nice, well-intentioned worker. That's what rubbed us the wrong way." The OP noted she and her husband are natives of San Diego and don't plan to stop going to In-N-Out. Other Burger Coverage Burgers aren't as popular as they once were, especially among members of Gen Z. Experts told Newsweek that this reflects a growing focus on sustainability and health. Still, companies are making an effort to keep the burgers coming. McDonald's recently added a new burger to the Value Menu—the Daily Double burger, which comes with two beef patties, American cheese, shredded lettuce, slivered onions, mayo and tomato. Newsweek's "What Should I Do?" offers expert advice to readers. If you have a personal dilemma, let us know via life@ We can ask experts for advice on relationships, family, friends, money and work, and your story could be featured on WSID at Newsweek. To read how Newsweek uses AI as a newsroom tool, click here.
