logo
A week dominated by health care points to a looming showdown in Yukon politics

A week dominated by health care points to a looming showdown in Yukon politics

CBC22-03-2025
Yukon Party Leader Currie Dixon largely sidestepped an opportunity to defend his health critic on Thursday after the premier launched an attack on Brad Cathers's record leading the file.
Speaking with reporters for the first time during the sitting, Premier Ranj Pillai fired back at the opposition, putting the spotlight on Cathers, who was the health and social services minister from 2006 to 2008.
"It's hard for us to be in there, understanding the track record of Brad Cathers when it comes to being a health minister. All I could say is he turned that hospital into an absolute mess … it was a dumpster fire," Pillai said. "So when you hear 'this is the change we need,' we know that it would be more of the same with folks."
The matter Pillai referred to involved the resignation of the Whitehorse hospital's board chair, Marny Ryder, in November 2006. Ryder would later speak out about strained communication between the board and the minister, capacity issues, funding and conflicts between doctors and the hospital's CEO.
Following Ryder's comments, a group of doctors called for CEO Michael Aerberhardt to resign. The board of the Yukon Hospital Corporation supported Aeberhardt before eventually firing him in August 2007.
When asked to comment on Cathers's legacy, Dixon said he was in university at the time.
"It was over 20 years ago so I don't really recall his time as health minister, if I'm perfectly honest," he said. "But Brad has a long history in the legislature in a variety of portfolios and he's been a great colleague to work with."
Pillai also invoked memories of the Dennis Fentie government following a week in the legislature that was dominated by discussions about healthcare, a key ballot box issue in this year's election, which must take place no later than Nov. 3.
His Liberal government faced a barrage of questions from the Yukon Party about whether it would carry out the Official Opposition's proposals to headhunt U.S. doctors and form a task force aimed at reducing the administrative burden for family doctors.
In both cases, the government countered that it was already working to recruit from abroad and has a joint committee with doctors to discuss cutting red tape.
Pillai said his government has been focused on confronting challenges like the doctor shortage, building infrastructure and integrating First Nations governance into the education system.
He challenged the Yukon Party to do more than criticize and present some policy alternatives.
"What I see is a group of individuals in the opposition that have collectively sat in those seats for 103 years, that all seem like they're going to continue to be part of that caucus, and they're selling change," Pillai said.
"So we'll wait and see. The 'everything's broken' narrative, I think Yukoners are tired of and that's what I've been hearing time and time again from the opposition."
Dixon rejected Pillai's characterization, saying it's health professionals themselves who have said that the healthcare system is in crisis.
He also trumpeted two Yukon Party motions that were passed unanimously by MLAs on opposition Wednesday, expressing hope that the government will act on them. While the wordings of both motions were amended on the floor, they still reflected the proposals presented by the Yukon Party this week.
But on his party's criticism of the government, Dixon made no apologies, citing the opposition's job.
"From time to time, we'll ask questions on behalf of constituents. From time to time, we will criticize government policy and from time to time, we'll raise our own plans or express our vision of what should be done instead," he said.
"But naturally, the best time really for Yukoners to see two competing visions is an election. And that's when we release a platform."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EDITORIAL: Stick a fork in ‘Elbows Up'
EDITORIAL: Stick a fork in ‘Elbows Up'

Toronto Sun

timean hour ago

  • Toronto Sun

EDITORIAL: Stick a fork in ‘Elbows Up'

Prime Minister Mark Carney has promised about $1.2 billion in loan guarantees, grants and contributions for Canadian sawmills. Photo by Darren Makowichuk / DARREN MAKOWICHUK/Postmedia 'Elbows Up' hasn't been Prime Minister Mark Carney's approach to dealing with U.S. President Donald Trump on tariffs ever since he won the April election and it's time to consign the phrase to the dustbin of history. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account While Carney advocated dollar-for-dollar tariffs against the U.S. during the Liberal leadership race, he quickly jettisoned the idea on becoming prime minister. That was logical given that Canada would lose a dollar-for-dollar trade war because the U.S. economy is ten times the size of ours. A Leger/Postmedia poll released last week found public support for the 'Elbows Up' approach to trade relations with the U.S. — that the Liberals originally promoted — has plummeted. Six months ago, it was at 73%. Now it's down to 45%, close to a statistical tie with 41% who say Canadian negotiators should take a more measured approach and focus on getting a deal with Trump, even if it means some tariffs on Canadian goods remain. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. That's similar to Carney's path on the issue — posing initially as a trade warrior who would meet Trump dollar-for-dollar on the field of battle and get a deal eliminating all the Trump tariffs. That was always a double-edged sword because Canadian counter-tariffs on imported U.S. goods are paid by Canadians in higher consumer prices. Carney's position has changed significantly since then. First, his government removed counter-tariffs it had initially imposed on many imported American goods that Canadian companies needed to continue operating. He scrapped the Liberals' digital services tax within days of Trump demanding it. Then he lowered expectations, saying a deal with Trump could include some U.S. tariffs. Carney also put out the word that Canada's position was that no deal with the U.S. was better than a bad deal. What it all means is that some of the tariffs Trump has already imposed on us could become permanent, leading up to renegotiating the entire Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade that comes up for renewal next year. Trump agreed to that deal during his first term, praising it at the time as 'the fairest, most balanced, and beneficial trade agreement we have ever signed into law … the best agreement we've ever made.' Crime Toronto & GTA Toronto Blue Jays Canada Sunshine Girls

GOLDSTEIN: Canada's targets for cutting greenhouse gases fit the definition of insanity
GOLDSTEIN: Canada's targets for cutting greenhouse gases fit the definition of insanity

Toronto Sun

time3 hours ago

  • Toronto Sun

GOLDSTEIN: Canada's targets for cutting greenhouse gases fit the definition of insanity

Liberal and Conservative governments have been setting and failing to meet emission reduction targets since 1988. Photo by iStock / GETTY IMAGES After almost four decades of Canadian governments setting and failing to hit eight consecutive targets for reducing Canada's industrial greenhouse gas emissions, surely it's time to admit the targets are meaningless. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Far from being 'aspirational' as supporters claim, they in fact deceive Canadians about the effectiveness of federal spending of more than $200 billion of taxpayers' money on climate change (as of 2023) on 149 federal programs administered by 13 government departments, since the Liberal government came to power in 2015. In fact, Liberal and Conservative governments have been setting and failing to meet emission reduction targets since 1988. Given 37 years of ongoing failures, these targets now fit the definition of insanity — doing the same thing over and over again, expecting different results. Here's where things stand given the latest available federal government emissions data that comes from 2023. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Canada's current emission reduction target was set by then prime minister Justin Trudeau in 2021 — a goal of reducing Canada's emissions to at least 40% (and, ideally, up to 45%) below 2005 levels in 2030. According to the federal government, which retroactively changes the historical data every year based, it says, on improved data-gathering methods, Canada emitted 759 million tonnes of these gases in 2005. That means the government's target is to cut Canada's emissions to 455 million tonnes (40% below 2005 levels) and, ideally, to 417 million tonnes (45% below 2005 levels) in 2030. Canada's emissions in 2023 were 694 million tonnes which is 8.5% below 2005 levels. To meet the minimum federal target of reducing emissions to 455 million tonnes in 2030 would require cutting 2023 emissions by 239 million tonnes. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. That would mean the equivalent of shutting down Canada's entire old and gas sector (208 million tonnes of annual emissions in 2023) in 2030 and still coming up short. To reach the government's interim target of reducing emissions to 20% below 2005 levels in 2026 (meaning 607 million tonnes) would require a cut of 87 million tonnes of emissions by next year, more than all emissions from Canada's buildings sector in 2023 (82.7 million tonnes). Earlier this year, the government announced another unrealistic target of reducing emissions to 45%-50% of 2005 levels by 2035. A report by federal environment commissioner Jerry DeMarco following an audit of the Liberals' Net Zero Emissions Accountability Act last year said it was still possible for the government to achieve its 2030 target, 'but now the task is much harder because there are only six years left to do essentially 20 or 30 years worth of reductions.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. His findings, however, provided few grounds for optimism. DeMarco said the government's lack of transparency made it impossible for the average citizen to understand, much less believe, its emission reduction targets. It claims current policies will achieve a 36.2% reduction in emissions compared to 2005 in 2030, close to its minimum target of 40%. But when DeMarco's auditors examined a sampling of 20 of the government's 149 measures to cut emissions, they found only nine were on track to achieve their goals. Of 32 additional measures the government claimed would help boost reductions from 36.2% to at least 40% in 2030, only seven were new. The audit found cases where two different programs were funding the same projects and reporting the same expected emission reductions, raising the possibility of double-counting. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. It also reported the computer modelling used to estimate the emission cuts of various government programs wasn't updated in 2023 compared to 2022 and that some of the initial calculations were overly optimistic. In addition, 'recent decreases to projected 2030 emissions were not due to climate action taken by governments, but were instead because of revisions to the data used in modelling.' Given all this, if the Liberals under Prime Minister Mark Carney won't abandon unrealistic climate targets then they should at least come clean with Canadians about where things really stand. Read More This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. This as opposed to their current practice of insisting they're on track to meet their targets when the federal government's own data tell a very different story. It's the same problem with the Liberals' policy to mandate that 20% of all new car sales must be battery-electric, plug-in hybrid or hydrogen fuel cell starting next year, rising to 60% in 2030 and 100% in 2035. The auto sector has warned that given lagging EV sales in Canada, the only way to achieve the 2026 target would be to pull a million new gas-powered vehicles off the market, limiting consumer choice, increasing delivery times and driving up costs for consumers at a time when our auto sector is under siege from Donald Trump's tariffs. RECOMMENDED VIDEO Canada Crime Toronto & GTA Toronto Blue Jays Toronto Blue Jays

This Day in History, 1947: 'Bellicose and irrepressible' mayor Gerry McGeer dies in office
This Day in History, 1947: 'Bellicose and irrepressible' mayor Gerry McGeer dies in office

Vancouver Sun

time7 hours ago

  • Vancouver Sun

This Day in History, 1947: 'Bellicose and irrepressible' mayor Gerry McGeer dies in office

At about 10:15 p.m. on Aug. 10, 1947 Vancouver Mayor Gerry McGeer finished up some work in his study and laid down on a couch. At 10 a.m. the following morning, his driver came to pick up McGeer to go to city hall, but he was dead. McGeer had had a fatal heart attack in his sleep. He was 59. McGeer had previously had some health problems — he was bedridden with appendicitis and peritonitis (inflammation of the belly) during the 1946 campaign for mayor. 'He underwent an emergency operation Dec. 2 and spent the rest of the campaign period in hospital,' the Province noted on Aug. 11. Discover the best of B.C.'s recipes, restaurants and wine. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of West Coast Table will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. 'He fought the same hard campaign he always fought, in spite of his illness, fighting for votes in radio speeches from his hospital bed.' He won in a landslide. The city was shocked at his sudden death eight months later — there had been speculation he was going to make a run for prime minister if Mackenzie King stepped down. Gerald Gratton McGeer was born in Winnipeg on Jan. 6, 1888, one of 13 children. The family moved to Vancouver two years later, where his Irish father Jim McGeer became well-known for his eloquence and political bent. He passed both traits on to his son. Gerry McGeer was an impatient youth: the Province said he quit high school at 14 because he thought the education system 'medieval.' So his father got him as job as an iron moulder. 'He was a cocky little squirt, but the hardest working little guy you ever saw,' one of his co-workers said years later. 'The description was prophetic of McGeer the politician and reformer,' said the Province. 'Bellicose and irrepressible, fond of his own eloquence, at times showy and bombastic, but with a fact-filled memory and a cool, calculating brain underlying all his fireworks.' In his political career he was a fierce opponent of the left. But the Province said in his iron moulder days he became a union official, and 'took a leading role in organizing several Vancouver strikes.' He attended Dalhousie Law School in Halifax and was admitted to the B.C. bar in 1915. A year later he successfully ran for the B.C. legislature in Richmond as a Liberal. After a stint in the army in the First World War, he ran for the federal Liberals in Vancouver Centre in 1920, but lost. He then thrived as a lawyer, being named a King's Counsel in 1921. But politics was his true calling. He became a Liberal MLA again in 1933 and in 1934 entered the civic arena, winning a landslide victory over Vancouver's longest-serving mayor L.D. Taylor. People had been arguing over whether to build a new city hall for decades but McGeer finally got it done, opening the city's current art deco city hall in 1935. But his term as mayor was stormy: he read the riot act at Victory Square after unemployed men occupied the Hudson's Bay store on April 23, 1935. He then moved the proposed city hall out of downtown to 12th and Cambie, which was heavily criticized. He was elected as a reformer, and in his first week in office fired the police chief and two magistrates. He declared war on vice and had the cops confiscate 1,000 slot machines. He was so ubiquitous in Vancouver, newspaper headlines often referred to him as simply 'Gerry.' He left both civic and provincial politics after he won Vancouver Burrard in the federal election in 1935. But he became obsessed with currency reform and what the Sun called 'monetary theories of his own devising,' and was never named to a federal cabinet. Still he was well-known across Canada because of his speeches. A wag once said McGeer suffered from 'inflammation of the vowels.' 'Ebullient, controversial, hard-hitting, voluble, and at times flamboyant, he never failed to capture the imagination of a public, which time after time gave him resounding, record-smashing majorities at the polls,' said the Sun after his death. He was re-elected as MP in 1940 and was named to the Senate in 1945. But he called it 'a mausoleum' and successfully ran for Vancouver mayor again in 1946. His nephew Pat McGeer kept the family name alive in the provincial legislature as a Liberal and Social Credit MLA and cabinet minister from 1962 to 1996. jmackie@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store