
The liberals' license: How the left finds release in an age of rage
Those words from author Elie Mystal, a regular commentator on MSNBC, are hardly surprising from someone who previously called the Constitution 'trash' and urged not just the abolition of the U.S. Senate but also of 'all voter registration laws.'
But Mystal's radical rhetoric is becoming mainstream on the left, as shown by his best-selling books and popular media appearances.
There is a counter-constitutional movement building in law schools and across the country. And although Mystal has not advocated violence, some on the left are turning to political violence and criminal acts. It is part of the 'righteous rage' that many of them see as absolving them from the basic demands not only of civility but of legality.
They are part of a rising class of American Jacobins — bourgeois revolutionaries increasingly prepared to trash everything, from cars to the Constitution.
The Jacobins were a radical group in France that propelled that country into the worst excesses of the French Revolution. They were largely affluent citizens, including journalists, professors, lawyers, and others who shredded existing laws and destroyed property. It would ultimately lead not only to the blood-soaked 'Reign of Terror' but also to the demise of the Jacobins themselves as more radical groups turned against them.
Of course, it is not revolution on the minds of most of these individuals. It is rage.
Rage is the ultimate drug. It offers a release from longstanding social norms — a license to do those things long repressed by individuals who viewed themselves as decent, law-abiding citizens.
Across the country, liberals are destroying Tesla cars, torching dealerships and charging stations, and even allegedly hitting political dissenters with their cars.
Last week, affluent liberal shoppers admitted that they are shoplifting from Whole Foods to strike back at Jeff Bezos for working with the Trump administration and moving the Washington Post back to the political center. They are also enraged at Mark Zuckerberg for restoring free speech protections at Meta.
One '20-something communications professional' in Washington explained 'If a billionaire can steal from me, I can scrape a little off the top, too.' These affluent shoplifters portrayed themselves as Robin Hoods.
Of course, that is assuming Robin Hood was stealing organic fruit from the rich and giving it to himself.
On college campuses, affluent students and even professors are engaging in political violence.
Just this week, University of Wisconsin Professor José Felipe Alvergue, head of the English Department, turned over the table of College Republicans supporting a conservative for the Wisconsin Supreme Court. He reportedly declared, 'The time for this is over!'
Likewise, a mob this week attacked a conservative display and tent on the campus of the University of California-Davis as campus police passively watched. The Antifa protesters, carrying a large banner with the slogan 'ACAB' or 'all cops are bastards,' trashed the tent and carried it off.
Antifa is a violent and vehemently anti-free speech group that thrives on U.S. college campuses. In his book ' Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook,' Mark Bray explains that 'most Americans in Antifa have been anarchists or antiauthoritarian communists. … From that standpoint, 'free speech' as such is merely a bourgeois fantasy unworthy of consideration.'
Of course, many of the American Jacobins are themselves bourgeois or even affluent figures. And they are finding a host of enablers telling them that the Constitution itself is a threat and that the legal system has been corrupted by oligarchs, white supremacists, or reactionaries.
This includes leading academics and commentators who are denouncing the Constitution and core American values. Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the UC Berkeley Law School, is the author of 'No Democracy Lasts Forever: How the Constitution Threatens the United States.'
In a New York Times op-ed, 'The Constitution Is Broken and Should Not Be Reclaimed,' law professors Ryan D. Doerfler of Harvard and Samuel Moyn of Yale called for the nation to 'reclaim America from constitutionalism.'
Commentator Jennifer Szalai has scoffed at what she called 'Constitution worship.' 'Americans have long assumed that the Constitution could save us,' she wrote. 'A growing chorus now wonders whether we need to be saved from it.'
As intellectuals knock down our laws and Constitution, radicals are pouring into the breach. Political violence and rage rhetoric are becoming more common. Some liberals embraced groups like Antifa, while others shrugged off property damage and violent threats against political opponents. It is the very type of incitement or rage rhetoric that Democrats once accused Trump of fostering in groups like the Proud Boys.
Members of Congress such as Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) have called for Tesla CEO Elon Musk to be ' taken down ' and said that Democrats have to be ' OK with punching.'
Some take such words as a justification to violently attack a system supposedly advancing the white supremacy or fascism. Fortunately, such violence has been confined so far to a minority of radicalized individuals, but there is an undeniable increase in such violent, threatening speech and in actual violence.
The one thing the American Jacobins will not admit is that they like the rage and the release that it brings them. From shoplifting to arson to attempted assassination, the rejection of our legal system brings them freedom to act outside of morality and to take whatever they want.
Democratic leaders see these 'protests' as needed popularism to combat Trump — to make followers ' strike ready ' and 'to stand up and fight back.'
For a politician, a mob can become irresistible if you can steer it against your opponents. The problem is controlling the mob once it has broken free of the bounds of legal and personal accountability.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

USA Today
28 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump's pick for New Jersey prosecutor, Alina Habba, is serving unlawfully, judge rules
The Aug. 21 ruling escalates the Trump administration's battle with the judiciary over Habba's appointment. President Donald Trump's pick to lead the federal prosecutor's office in New Jersey, Alina Habba, has been serving unlawfully for nearly two months, a judge ruled on Aug. 21. Trump selected Habba, his former personal lawyer, as the interim U.S. attorney for New Jersey in March. But keeping Habba in that role has proven a challenging task. On July 22, a panel of judges declined to appoint Habba to the role. Attorney General Pam Bondi responded by removing the official who was set to replace Habba. "This Department of Justice does not tolerate rogue judges – especially when they threaten the President's core Article II powers," Bondi wrote in a July 22 post on X. Article II of the Constitution spells out the powers of the presidency. Federal Judge Matthew W. Brann's Aug. 21 ruling that Habba's interim appointment ended on July 1 escalates the administration's battle with the judiciary. Brann wrote that courts can declare Habba's actions since July 1 void. "And because she is not currently qualified to exercise the functions and duties of the office in an acting capacity, she must be disqualified from participating in any ongoing cases," Brann added. Brann is the chief federal judge for a trial court in Pennsylvania. However, he was assigned to handle cases challenging Habba's ongoing role in New Jersey federal prosecutions by the court that deals with federal appeals for both Pennsylvania and New Jersey. The Justice Department, which includes the New Jersey U.S. attorney's office, didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. Brann halted his own ruling from going into effect until after the Trump administration had a chance to appeal and see what the higher courts say. Before March, Habba had never worked as a prosecutor. She represented Trump in multiple civil cases in recent years when he was out of office.


New York Post
28 minutes ago
- New York Post
Jasmine Crockett calls Trump and MAGA voters the ‘most unpatriotic people'
Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas, sharply criticized President Donald Trump and his supporters on Wednesday, calling them unpatriotic during an interview on California Gov. Gavin Newsom's podcast. Crockett said during the interview that Trump tried to use Congress, his administration and the courts to his advantage any time he disagreed with something. 'Whether we're talking about those in his administration or whether we're talking about the courts or whether we're talking about the Congress, that is one of the reasons he is so desperate to make sure that he can win in the midterms, because he knows that Democrats, it's not even about partisanship. It's about doing what's right. It's about doing the American thing,' Crockett said. 'And to be clear, you can wave all the flags you want to, but I am telling you right now that the most unpatriotic people that we have in this country are MAGA and this president. We are the real patriots. And it is time for us to take our flag back and show people what America is about,' the Texas lawmaker added. 3 Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas, sharply criticized President Donald Trump and his supporters on Wednesday, calling them unpatriotic during an interview on California Gov. Gavin Newsom's podcast. AP She accused the president of 'decimating' the Constitution and taking freedoms away. 'You can't say that you love the Constitution while decimating it with every single stroke of a pen for an executive order while you are disrespecting our troops who have signed up to protect our freedoms, not just here but abroad, and then taking people's freedoms away using those exact same troops. I just don't understand,' she told Newsom. 'President Trump is the leader of the greatest and most patriotic political movement in history,' White House assistant press secretary Liz Huston told Fox News Digital in a statement. 3 Rep. Jasmine Crockett accused President Trump of 'decimating' the Constitution and taking freedoms away. REUTERS Crockett and Trump have traded barbs in recent months, with the Democratic lawmaker even calling the president a 'piece of s—.' Trump in turn has said Crockett is a 'low-IQ person.' Crockett said anyone who supported Trump is 'sick' during a podcast interview with Katie Couric in June. 3 Crockett and Trump have traded barbs in recent months, with the Democratic lawmaker even calling the president 'a piece of s—.' Trump in turn referred to Crockett as a 'low-IQ person.' Getty Images The Texas congresswoman claimed that no matter what political affiliations Americans identify with, they 'should be against Trump.' When asked by Couric what she thinks of Trump deploying National Guardsmen and Marines to Los Angeles to quell the anti-ICE protests, Crockett slammed Trump for seeking 'retribution' and having his own 'special little army' to carry it out. 'It is sick. It is really sick, and anybody that supports it is also sick,' she told Couric. 'We've got a mental health crisis in this country because everyone, no matter how you affiliate yourself, should be against Trump. Period.' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt responded to these remarks during a press conference in June. 'The last time I checked, Jasmine Crockett couldn't dream of winning such a majority of the public as President Trump did,' she said.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Nvidia and AMD get 'thanks, but no thanks' from China
Nvidia and AMD get 'thanks, but no thanks' from China originally appeared on TheStreet. Nvidia and AMD recently made a deal with the U.S. government to get restrictions on selling their less advanced artificial intelligence chips to China removed. The companies agreed to pay the government 15% of their revenues from chip sales to China. It's quite likely that this deal is "beautiful," but I'm not sure it is entirely legal. The U.S. Constitution forbids export taxes, Article I, Section 9, Clause 5: "No Tax or Duty shall be laid on Articles exported from any State." The likely loophole for this deal is that since the chips are made in Taiwan, they are technically not exported from the U.S. What an unexpected turnaround, from banning chips to prevent China from winning the AI war — pardon, race — to these chips no longer being a problem for national security because they'll bring lots of money to the exports of less advanced AI chips don't pose a national security problem and shouldn't be taxed, or they pose a security problem and shouldn't be allowed. The "pay us the cut of your sales" middle ground the U.S. government is taking makes the whole thing look suspiciously like racketeering. Or is this just signaling that national security is for sale? Whatever this deal is, China is looking to make it less attractive. China recommends local companies steer clear of Nvidia AI chips Chinese authorities have warned local companies against using foreign AI chips, with a special focus on Nvidia's () H20 chips. The guidance concentrated on national security-related work by state enterprises or private companies, reported Bloomberg. There are two reasons for China doing this. The first is that it fears Nvidia chips could have backdoors/spyware. Of course, Nvidia denied this. Another reason is that China is trying to protect its own tech companies, with a little bit of tit for tat. The U.S. has banned Huawei since 2019 because of security concerns. The latest ban it has imposed is on Huawei's Ascend 910C chips, which are considered competitors to Nvidia's Nvidia and AMD () sell as many chips as they can would hurt Huawei. China isn't implementing a complete ban. It is just sending warnings to specific organizations because Huawei can't produce enough chips to fulfill the demand, so this partial approach is trying to achieve the best possible result. Considering that tariffs and bans are changing as quickly as the weather, who knows what will really happen or whether restrictions imposed by China will have any effect whatsoever. Who cares about AI chip restrictions when there is a black market? On August 5, the U.S. Justice Department announced that Chinese nationals were arrested and charged with illegally exporting tens of millions of dollars' worth of AI chips to China. The two individuals smuggled advanced Nvidia H100 chips and other technology to China from October 2022 through July 2025, reported CNN. This is one instance where law enforcement caught the offenders, but a report by Financial Times estimated that at least $1 billion worth of smuggled high-end Nvidia AI processors have ended up on the Chinese black market. More Nvidia:Nvidia stated that making data centers from smuggled products isn't a sound idea from both a technical and an economic perspective. "Datacenters require service and support, which we provide only to authorized NVIDIA products," Nvidia told CNBC. According to an investigative journalist's report, smugglers describe Nvidia's attitude as: "Open one eye, close one eye." PC hardware reviews YouTube channel Gamers Nexus investigated the GPU black market in China over several months, and its documentary about what it discovered will be out on August and AMD get 'thanks, but no thanks' from China first appeared on TheStreet on Aug 12, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Aug 12, 2025, where it first appeared. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data