Coroner criticises French probe of cycling crash that killed wine firm boss
The 59-year-old, from Old Basing, near Basingstoke, Hampshire, who helped found Hatch Mansfield premium wine merchants, was on the last day of the week-long trip riding with his son Felix and his son's friend Tom Caine.
The hearing at Winchester Coroner's Court on Monday was told that the two younger cyclists were riding ahead down the descent into the village of Bouilland when they avoided being hit by the BMW which went on to collide with Mr Tuck, who was riding at a distance behind them.
In a statement read to the hearing, Felix said: 'We were just going on a relaxed ride, Dad was happy and enjoying the ride.
'The descent to Bouilland is on a quiet country road, wide enough for two cars, it isn't particularly technical or steep.
'Tom and I had dropped Dad on the descent as he slowed down and was more cautious with his no-risk mindset.'
Felix said when they realised Mr Tuck had got behind, they turned around and rode back up the hill to find people attempting to help his father with his 'smashed up' Pinarello bike at the side of the road.
Coroner Simon Burge said attempts were made to save Mr Tuck's life by the driver and other members of the public before police and ambulance arrived, but the cyclist was pronounced dead at the scene.
The coroner said the driver of the BMW, a French man with his daughter in the rear seat, had stopped at the scene and told police that the first two riders had cut across to the wrong side of the road on the bend.
The driver claimed that the collision happened when he was unable to avoid hitting Mr Tuck who had taken the same approach to the bend.
Mr Burge added that the police determined that the crash was an accident and that the driver would not be prosecuted.
Mr Tuck's widow, Kate, told the hearing that she was concerned that the driver had provided 'inconsistent' statements about the incident, particularly by giving varying estimates of his speed from 50kph (31mph) to 70kph (43mph) in the 80kph (50mph) zone.
She added that photographs of the scene suggested the accident happened before the bend, contradicting the driver's account.
Mrs Tuck said: 'It was a ghastly accident however we look at it and nothing will bring him back, but it's hugely disappointing if I feel the record states that my husband was riding on the wrong side of the road and there is no independent evidence to corroborate.'
Mr Burge said: 'I do not reach any conclusion that Philip, Felix or Tom were riding recklessly.
'I find that all three of you having enjoyed a cycling holiday in France, you were out for a good time, riding at a leisurely pace.'
Criticising the French police investigation, the coroner, who recorded a conclusion of accidental death, said: 'Sadly the investigation carried out locally by the gendarmerie was inadequate in my view and leaves many unanswered questions.'
In a tribute to Mr Tuck released after his death, Ascot-based Hatch Mansfield said: 'Philip was an immensely kind, loyal and considerate man.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leader Live
13 hours ago
- Leader Live
Court to decide whether former dictator Assad can be stripped of immunity
If the judges at the Cour de Cassation lift Assad's immunity, it could pave the way for his trial in absentia over the use of chemical weapons in Ghouta in 2013 and Douma in 2018, and set a precedent to allow the prosecution of other government leaders linked to atrocities, human rights activists and lawyers say. Assad has retained no lawyers for these charges and has denied he was behind the chemical attacks. A ruling against Assad would be 'a huge victory for the victims', said Mazen Darwish, president of the Syrian Centre for Media which collected evidence of war crimes. 'It's not only about Syrians, this will open the door for the victims from any country and this will be the first time that a domestic investigative judge has the right to issue an arrest warrant for a president during his rule.' He said the ruling could enable his group to legally go after regime members, like launching a money laundering case against former Syrian central bank governor and minister of economy, Adib Mayaleh, whose lawyers have argued he had immunity under international law. For over 50 years, Syria was ruled by Hafez Assad and then his son, Bashar. During the Arab Spring, rebellion broke out against their tyrannical rule in 2011 across the country of 23 million, igniting a brutal 13-year civil war that killed more than half a million people, according to the Syrian Observatory of Human Rights. Millions more fled to Lebanon, Jordan, Turkey and Europe. The Assad dynasty manipulated sectarian tensions to stay in power, a legacy driving renewed violence in Syria against minority groups despite promises that the country's new leaders will carve out a political future for Syria that includes and represents all its communities. The ruling stripping Assad's immunity could set a 'significant precedent' that 'could really set the stage for potentially for other cases in national jurisdictions that strike down immunities,' said Mariana Pena, a human rights lawyer at the Open Society Justice Initiative, which helped bring the case to court. As the International Criminal Court has issued arrests warrants for leaders accused of atrocities — like Vladimir Putin in Ukraine, Benjamin Netanyahu in Gaza, and Rodrigo Duterte in the Philippines — the French judges' ruling could empower the legal framework to prosecute not just deposed and exiled leaders but those currently in power. The Syrian government denied in 2013 that it was behind the Ghouta attack, an accusation the opposition rejected as Assad's forces were the only side in the brutal civil war to possess sarin. The United States subsequently threatened military retaliation, but Washington settled for a deal with Moscow for Assad to give up his chemical weapons' stockpile.
South Wales Argus
17 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Concern over enforcement of Severn Bridge weight limit
The grainy image appears to show a French-registered lorry approaching the bridge from the Chepstow side, despite restrictions that have been in place since May 2025 to protect the bridge's ageing suspension cables. But the photo is just one piece of a much larger puzzle. Since the weight limit was introduced, enforcement has been plagued by confusion, delays, and a lack of transparency. Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) cameras, promised by National Highways, were not in place at the start of the weight restrictions in May and there's still no clear confirmation they are operational. Councillor Catrin Maby said enforcement is now handled through Avon and Somerset Police, but there's no public data on summonses, and no clarity on which democratic body oversees the bridge's monitoring group. Adding to the chaos, old signage displaying the previous 44-tonne limit remained in place after he restrictions, potentially misleading foreign drivers relying on outdated satellite navigation. Enforcement is split between two police forces, and local hauliers gossip has it that foreign drivers are using the bridge, seemingly without penalty. Monmouthshire County Council has compared the economic impact to the potential closure of Scunthorpe steelworks, warning that more than 2,500 jobs at Newhouse Farm industrial estate are at risk. Councillors have called for a 'who, what, when, where, why and how' approach to enforcement, demanding clear signage, functioning cameras, and accountability. Councillor Watts has said : 'Until then, the bridge remains a symbol of muddled management, where rules exist, but clarity does not.' The farce continued this week as Gwent Police confirmed that a 27-year-old man from Bristol was issued with a traffic offence report after being escorted off the M48 Severn Bridge on Wednesday, July 16—while driving a horse and carriage. National Highways has not been asked to comment on whether the horse and carriage exceeded the 7.5-tonne weight limit.
North Wales Chronicle
19 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Court to decide whether former dictator Assad can be stripped of immunity
If the judges at the Cour de Cassation lift Assad's immunity, it could pave the way for his trial in absentia over the use of chemical weapons in Ghouta in 2013 and Douma in 2018, and set a precedent to allow the prosecution of other government leaders linked to atrocities, human rights activists and lawyers say. Assad has retained no lawyers for these charges and has denied he was behind the chemical attacks. A ruling against Assad would be 'a huge victory for the victims', said Mazen Darwish, president of the Syrian Centre for Media which collected evidence of war crimes. 'It's not only about Syrians, this will open the door for the victims from any country and this will be the first time that a domestic investigative judge has the right to issue an arrest warrant for a president during his rule.' He said the ruling could enable his group to legally go after regime members, like launching a money laundering case against former Syrian central bank governor and minister of economy, Adib Mayaleh, whose lawyers have argued he had immunity under international law. For over 50 years, Syria was ruled by Hafez Assad and then his son, Bashar. During the Arab Spring, rebellion broke out against their tyrannical rule in 2011 across the country of 23 million, igniting a brutal 13-year civil war that killed more than half a million people, according to the Syrian Observatory of Human Rights. Millions more fled to Lebanon, Jordan, Turkey and Europe. The Assad dynasty manipulated sectarian tensions to stay in power, a legacy driving renewed violence in Syria against minority groups despite promises that the country's new leaders will carve out a political future for Syria that includes and represents all its communities. The ruling stripping Assad's immunity could set a 'significant precedent' that 'could really set the stage for potentially for other cases in national jurisdictions that strike down immunities,' said Mariana Pena, a human rights lawyer at the Open Society Justice Initiative, which helped bring the case to court. As the International Criminal Court has issued arrests warrants for leaders accused of atrocities — like Vladimir Putin in Ukraine, Benjamin Netanyahu in Gaza, and Rodrigo Duterte in the Philippines — the French judges' ruling could empower the legal framework to prosecute not just deposed and exiled leaders but those currently in power. The Syrian government denied in 2013 that it was behind the Ghouta attack, an accusation the opposition rejected as Assad's forces were the only side in the brutal civil war to possess sarin. The United States subsequently threatened military retaliation, but Washington settled for a deal with Moscow for Assad to give up his chemical weapons' stockpile.
