logo
Indy council Democrats booted Jesse Brown because he's a terrible co-worker

Indy council Democrats booted Jesse Brown because he's a terrible co-worker

Yahoo13-02-2025

Mayor Joe Hogsett's budget address to the City-County Council last year was one of the most dramatic government meetings I've covered.
Lauren Roberts and Caroline Ellert, who said they had been subject to sexual harassment under the mayor's employ, attended the meeting. Their presence prompted Hogsett to publicly apologize for his failures to keep employees safe and promise change. The emotionally charged moment illustrated the power of speaking up and telling your story.
Briggs: Vop Osili is raising money like he's running for Indy mayor
And then there were members of the audience co-opting that story by holding signs linking sexual harassment in Indianapolis to the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza. The protesters, who were calling for the city to pass a special resolution demanding a ceasefire in Gaza, would later disrupt the meeting and force a recess while law enforcement cleared them from the council chamber.
Council Democrat Jesse Brown might not have directed the protesters' actions during that Aug. 12 meeting. But they were his people, acting out on his Gaza fixation, which would go on for weeks to divide council Democrats and cause more disruptions over an issue that had nothing to do with city government. The council in November removed Brown's proposed ceasefire resolution from an agenda after councilors couldn't agree on the language — a move that prompted more outbursts from protesters.
This is an example of why Brown is no longer part of the council's Democratic caucus. He is a terrible co-worker who constantly makes other Democrats' jobs harder for no good reason.
Brown is an east-side Democrat who identifies as a democratic socialist and is a prolific poster on social media. He joined the council by defeating former Vice President Zach Adamson in 2023, a truly impressive primary win in a safe Democratic district.
Democrats considered booting Brown from their caucus almost immediately after he took office last year, but finally expelled him this month. Brown's exit from the caucus means he can't attend Democrats-only meetings where they collaborate on strategy and policy. He can otherwise continue to fully participate as a council member.
Brown says council Democrats didn't give him a reason for the expulsion. That might be because there are too many reasons to name.
Since joining the council, Brown has gone into business for himself. He went on a political crusade last year against state Sen. Aaron Freeman, R-Indianapolis, during sensitive negotiations to save the Blue Line. Then he cast aspersions on a compromise that preserved the bus rapid transit line, suggesting Democrats gave too much ground to Republicans (they didn't).
Brown called for Hogsett to resign as mayor over the sexual harassment scandal, putting himself out on a limb where he remains alone several months later.
He has attacked others, too, most recently going after "so-called Democrats," as he put it in a recent newsletter, for supporting charter schools as the Indiana General Assembly considers multiple bills to either weaken or dismantle Indianapolis Public Schools. Most other council Democrats (but not all) see a need to accommodate charter schools in Indianapolis and are trying to reach a compromise that causes minimal damage to IPS. Some view Brown's anti-charter barrage as counterproductive to saving IPS.
As you can see, Brown takes far-left positions. But his problem isn't political views. It's that he constantly chooses to operate on an island without regard for how his words or actions affect others — while also positioning himself as a lone truth-teller in a political party full of corrupt establishment cronies.
Council Democrats finally gave Brown what he seemed to want: a one-person caucus of his own. Yet, suddenly, Brown professes to want to be part of the team. He's urging supporters to "resist this disenfranchisement of the people of District 13" and plans to participate in a March 3 "march on city hall" to protest being kicked out of caucus meetings.
Brown repeatedly acted alone and now he's complaining about being marginalized. He can't have it both ways.
Brown is the classic colleague who thinks he's always right and everyone else is always wrong. No one likes working with that person.
Brown wrote a column last year for IndyStar arguing that "Democrats need to welcome outsiders to the table warmly and gratefully rather than keeping them at arms' length." Brown's actions suggest he takes that to mean the Democratic Party must bend to his outsider's approach while he attacks peers who favor different policies or strategies.
Brown is not the only free-thinking Democrat in Indianapolis. Jared Evans, a west-side council Democrat, has repeatedly infuriated council colleagues and the mayor's office with his own independent streak. Yet, he has remained a Democrat in good standing for his entire nine years on the council.
What's different with Brown?
Brown pursued a path of maximum hostility toward friend and foe alike. He has neither fit in with the establishment nor done the hard work of persuading Democrats to move toward him. He has caused constant distractions and headaches for Democrats, while giving legislative Republicans an easy left-wing target.
Politics aside, Brown's relationship with other Democrats amounted to a simple workplace drama that had run its course. The council's Democratic caucus did what organizations do every day: identified a self-absorbed teammate who didn't want to work with others and wished him well in future endeavors.
Now, council Democrats don't have to deal with Brown in caucus meetings and he's getting a march in his honor, the kind of dopamine-driven reward he seems to crave. This workplace conflict is ending with a win-win resolution.
Contact James Briggs at 317-444-4732 or james.briggs@indystar.com. Follow him on X and Threads at @JamesEBriggs.
This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star: Jesse Brown's exit from council caucus is a workplace drama | Opinion

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hamas threats to aid staff reason for halted food distribution, GHF says
Hamas threats to aid staff reason for halted food distribution, GHF says

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Hamas threats to aid staff reason for halted food distribution, GHF says

The organization claimed "Hamas wants to return to a broken system it once controlled and exploited—diverting aid, manipulating distribution, and putting its own agenda." The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation announced on Saturday that the reason for temporarily pausing operations was due to threats against the organization and its staff by Hamas. "Hamas is the reason hundreds of thousands of hungry Gazans were not fed today. The group issued direct threats against GHF operations. These threats made it impossible to proceed today without putting innocent lives at risk," the statement read. "Hamas wants to return to a broken system it once controlled and exploited—diverting aid, manipulating distribution, and putting its own agenda ahead of the Palestinian people's basic needs. However, GHF will not be deterred. "We remain committed to safe, secure, and independent aid delivery. We are actively adapting our operations to overcome these threats and fully intend to resume distributions without delay." Aid distribution in Gaza was halted on Friday after the US and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation said overcrowding had made it unsafe to continue operations, in the latest disruption to its troubled relief effort. In a day of confusing messaging, the GHF first announced its distribution sites in southern Gaza were closed, then it revealed that it had actually handed out food, before saying that it had had to close its gates as a precautionary measure. "The distribution was conducted peacefully and without incident; however, it was paused due to excessive crowding that made it unsafe to proceed," it said in a statement.

3 ways Trump's policy bill hurts Tesla
3 ways Trump's policy bill hurts Tesla

Yahoo

time38 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

3 ways Trump's policy bill hurts Tesla

Elon Musk has been feuding with President Trump over a bill the president is championing that, among other things, cuts incentives for electric vehicles and solar energy that benefit Musk's company Tesla. Trump said Musk's vocal opposition to Republicans' 'big, beautiful bill' is based on its elimination of incentives for electric vehicles (EVs). 'Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here. … He had no problem with it,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. 'All of a sudden he had a problem, and he only developed the problem when he found out that we're going to have to cut the EV mandate, because that's billions and billions of dollars,' he added. While the bill may not be all bad for Musk – including preserving Trump's 2017 income tax cuts – it contains significant provisions that impact Musk's flagship company. It also rolls back green-tax incentives. Since he's stepped away of the Trump administration, the entrepreneur has been a vocal critic of the legislation, including lamenting that 'there is no change to tax incentives for oil & gas, just EV/solar.' While the House narrowly passed its version of the bill in late May, it is facing hurdles in the Senate, where it is so far losing some momentum. Here's a look at the provisions that may be particularly impactful for the company – as well as other electric vehicle and climate-friendly energy companies: One major way in which the 'big, beautiful bill' harms Tesla is by making its cars more expensive. The Democrats' 2022 Inflation Reduction Act lifted a cap allowing manufacturers that had already sold more than 200,000 electric vehicles to once again be eligible for the $7,500 consumer tax credit. It also extended eligibility for the credit through 2032 The bill effectively made the cars $7,500 cheaper for consumers. But, the credits are cut in the GOP's bill. Without that credit, Tesla and other EV makers may make fewer sales. One major hurdle facing the adoption of electric vehicles is that they are oftentimes more expensive than gas-powered cars. However, Musk has contended when he was supporting Trump that he does not need the tax credit. Tesla Energy sells both rooftop solar energy and grid scale solar power – both of which are hampered by the Republican bill. The legislation axes tax credits for rooftop solar after this year. It also eliminates tax credits for any grid scale project that begins construction more than 60 days after the bill is enacted. Projects also need to begin producing energy by the end of 2028 to become eligible. These utility scale cuts are controversial even within the GOP and could face changes in the Senate. The legislation would eliminate a Biden-era regulation that forces the electric vehicle market to shift toward EVs. While Tesla is already all-electric, doing so could still impact its bottom line, as the way the regulations are set up, automakers either have to make their vehicles greener or purchase credits from automakers like Tesla that already outperform the regulations. If the regulation is weakened, traditional car manufacturers may not have to buy as many credits from EV-makers like Tesla. However, it's not clear whether this provision will make it into what's ultimately passed because it will first need to be approved by the Senate parliamentarian, which sets the rules for what types of provisions are eligible in legislation passed through a procedure that requires just 50 votes. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

IDF recovers body of Thai hostage
IDF recovers body of Thai hostage

Yahoo

time38 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

IDF recovers body of Thai hostage

The Israeli military has recovered the body of a Thai national who was held hostage in the Gaza Strip. The remains of Nattapong Pinta were recovered in a special operation conducted by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) in Gaza. Mr Pinta was kidnapped by Hamas terrorists during the Oct 7 2023 attack on Israel, and he was killed in captivity shortly after being taken, the IDF said. He had been working as a farm labourer on the Nir Oz kibbutz in southern Israel, just a few miles east of Gaza's border, when he was abducted. The Thai national is the most recent hostage whose body has been found. On Thursday, the Israeli military recovered the bodies of US-Israeli dual citizens Judith Weinstein Haggai, 70, and Gad Haggai, 72, who were both residents of the same kibbutz where Mr Pinta worked. Israeli authorities have said they believe all three of the recently found hostages were murdered by the terrorists who kidnapped them. The attack that Hamas launched on Oct 7 surprised and devastated Israel, with the terrorist group killing more than 1,000 people, including hundreds of security personnel, and taking over 200 hostages. About 30 Thais were abducted that day. Roughly two-thirds of those kidnapped on Oct 7 were subsequently released as part of deals between Israel and Hamas. Forty-six Thais have been killed during the conflict, the Thai foreign affairs ministry has said. The war between Israel and Hamas, sparked by the Oct 7 attack, continues to rage on in Gaza. Attempts to broker a ceasefire and peace deal have repeatedly hit roadblocks. Hamas has rejected proposed deals that do not guarantee a full Israeli withdrawal from the Strip and an end to the war. Mr Pinta, 36, who is survived by a young son and wife, was among those taken after he'd migrated to Israel as an agricultural labourer in 2022. At the time of the Oct 7 attack, there were about 30,000 Thai migrant workers in Israel. Many of them returned home primarily via government evacuation flights, and some vowed never to return, given the risks they faced due to the ongoing Israel-Palestine conflict. Since then, however, the Thai government has continued to grant permissions for its citizens to work in Israel. Thais remain the largest group of foreign farm workers in Israel, with about 38,000 in the country, according to Thai officials. There are 55 hostages remaining in Gaza, though only about 20 of them are believed to still be alive, according to Israeli authorities. Israel said its expanded offensive in the Strip, named Operation Gideon's Chariot, will increase the chances of returning the missing. However, many of the hostages' families have expressed alarm at the new tactic of seizing and holding territory, which follows heavy bombardment, and are urging Benjamin Netanyahu to make a deal with Hamas. The Thai Embassy has been notified about Mr Pinta, according to the prime minister's office. 'We express our deep gratitude and appreciation to our brave commanders and soldiers for this important and successful operation,' said a statement from Netanyahu's office. 'We will not rest and we will not be silent until all our hostages are brought home – both the living and the deceased.' 'We stand with Nattapong's family today and share in their grief,' an Israeli hostage support group said in a statement. 'While the pain is immense, his family will finally have certainty after 20 terrible and agonising months of devastating uncertainty,' the statement said. 'Every family deserves such certainty to begin their personal healing journey.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store