Organizations push back on new charging pilot program in letter to State's Attorney Burke
The 136 signers of the letter, which include the ACLU of Illinois, Chicago Appleseed Center for Fair Courts and the Rainbow PUSH Coalition, as well as Chicago Police district councilors, professors and academics and other individuals, ask Burke to halt the policy and reinstate felony review for all gun cases.
'It undermines fundamental principles of equal justice and due process, erodes public trust, and poses serious risks to communities who are already overpoliced,' the letter said, arguing the pilot program disproportionately impacts Black neighborhoods.
In Cook County, local police submit many felony cases to assistant state's attorneys who decide whether to approve charges. The office's Felony Review Unit is nearly unique, with few other similar models nationwide, though not all felony charges go through that process. Most felony narcotics cases are directly filed by police.
Matt McGrath, spokesman for the state's attorney's office, said in a statement that all 54 cases that have gone before a judge or grand jury have 'withstood scrutiny and advanced.' Another 12 cases are still pending. The office plans to continuing expanding the program, he said.
'The felony review bypass program is a collaborative effort between the State's Attorney's office and CPD designed to get police officers back on the beat sooner while allowing prosecutors to focus time and resources on violent and victim-centric crimes,' McGrath said. 'It's important to note felony review bypass is not prosecutorial review bypass, and the pilot is working due to extensive training of district personnel by CCSAO felony review supervisors and clearly defined evidence requirements, among other factors.'
The state's attorney's office launched the pilot program in January in the department's Englewood District on the South Side and later expanded to the Far South Side's Calumet District while the office reviews data with an eye on continuing to grow the program. Officials have said the effort frees up police and prosecutors for higher level work by allowing police to directly file charges in matters where felony review prosecutors were already approving charges in around 90% of cases and generally handling them by phone.
Still, the move was criticized by Cook County Public Defender Sharone Mitchell Jr. and some aldermen and community members, who pointed out that the stakes can be high for an individual if police get charges wrong, as people can be detained until the case goes before a judge. But the program got a nod of support from Mayor Brandon Johnson who told WTTW last month that the effort would 'give us an opportunity to see if we can expedite the process that one, solves crime, but it doesn't impede officers from returning back to the people.'
Friday's letter marked an effort to push back on a larger scale, and it argued that prosecutors, rather than police, have the legal training to assess the legitimacy of criminal charges. It contended that the districts chosen for the pilot program are majority Black and have a history of abuse at the hands of police, including torture and excessive force.
Among other objections, the letter also said the move was made without community input and could put a strain on court resources.
'Lack of independent review at this stage increases the risk of unconstitutional arrests being taken to court and shaky legal cases proceeding to prosecution, and it undermines accountability and trust within the legal system,' the letter said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas Democrat Spends Night on House Floor to Protest Map She Says Erodes Black and Latino Voting Power
The redistricting battle in Texas has taken a turn. After state House Democrats returned from their walkout, they were informed on Monday that they would need a police escort when they leave the chamber floor in order to prevent them from fleeing the state again before the House reconvenes on Wednesday. State Rep. Nicole Collier, however, refused to sign what Democrats are calling 'permission slips,' and she spent the night on the chamber floor in protest. 'My constituents sent me to Austin to protect their voices and rights,' she said. 'I refuse to sign away my dignity as a duly elected representative just so Republicans can control my movements and monitor me with police escorts.' Collier added that her community, which is majority-minority, expects her to fight for fair representation. 'When I press that button to vote, I know these maps will harm my constituents — I won't just go along quietly with their intimidation or their discrimination,' she said. Dozens of Texas House Democrats fled to Illinois, New York, and Massachusetts on Aug. 3. They hoped that their absence would deny the chamber the quorum it needs to conduct business and, as a result, block the proposed congressional map, which is designed to aggressively favor the Republican Party in the 2026 midterm later said they were prepared to return once their Republican colleagues adjourn the special legislative session and California releases a retaliatory map of its own. Advocates have criticized the Texas map, unveiled just days before the 60th anniversary of the Voting Rights Act, for potentially chipping away at the political power of Texans of color. Texas state Rep. Jolanda Jones is one of the Democrats who left the state. 'The districts that are targeted overwhelmingly are Black districts [that are represented by Democrats],' Jones said at a press conference earlier this month. 'They're pitting [U.S. Rep.] Jasmine Crockett against [U.S. Rep.] Marc Veasey. And they're pitting [U.S. Rep] Al Green against [the vacant] CD18, where there was a Black representative.' For instance, in Green's current district, which includes a portion of the Greater Houston area, the Black voting-age population would drop from 39% to 11%. Similarly, the Black voting-age population of Veasey's Fort Worth-based district, currently 25%, would also drop. On Aug. 14, California Gov. Gavin Newsom formally called on state lawmakers to approve a Nov. 4 ballot measure that would temporarily allow California to redraw its map without having to go through its independent commission. Here's more information about the latest developments in the Lone Star State — and beyond. Why did Texas House Democrats flee the state? For months, President Donald Trump has been pushing his allies in Texas to redraw district lines. Doing so could give the Republican Party five additional seats in the U.S. House in next year's midterm elections. Historically, midterm elections haven't been kind to the party of the sitting president. Trump is attempting to build on Republicans' 219-212 majority in the House, where four seats are vacant. It wasn't until after Trump called Abbott this summer that the Texas governor put redistricting on the agenda for a special legislative session, according to The Texas Tribune. The 30-day session began on July 21. Its agenda included 18 items, from national disaster preparation and property taxes to redistricting. Texas House Democrats slammed Abbott for putting items related to this summer's deadly flooding on an agenda that they say was filled with partisan priorities. The lawmakers hoped to run out the clock on the session by leaving the state, though Abbott has already called another session. Yet the battle over map-drawing is expected to have ramifications across the U.S. And some say that it could possibly trigger a redistricting arms race. Democratic leaders in a number of other states — including California, Illinois, Maryland, New Jersey, and New York — have vowed to retaliate if Texas House Republicans continue with the unusual move to redistrict in the middle of the decade instead of after the next census in 2030. And according to some legal scholars, the U.S. Supreme Court likely won't provide a way out of the crisis. 'The court determined in 2019's Rucho v. Common Cause that partisan gerrymandering presented a non-justiciable political question, so federal courts couldn't intervene and hear those cases,' Melissa Murray, a law professor at New York University, told Capital B. 'The only avenues for relief would be state courts or redistricting commissions.' What are politicians saying about the Texas map? Crockett, a vocal Democratic critic of the Trump administration, blasted state Republicans on Aug. 3, but said that the issue is 'bigger than Texas.' 'This isn't just about the five seats in Texas,' Crockett told MSNBC. 'This is about a power grab. It's about basically setting the tone for what Donald Trump will try to do throughout the country so that he can suppress the voices of Black and brown folk just so that he can stay in power.' Texas state Rep. Ron Reynolds, one of the Democrats who left the state, echoed some of these thoughts, saying that he and his colleagues won't 'relent to an authoritarian president that wants to steal and racially gerrymander our Black and Brown districts.' Trump has also pressured Republican state lawmakers in Florida, Indiana, Missouri, New Hampshire, and Ohio to redraw their maps. Some Democratic leaders have vowed to use every tactic at their disposal to prevent any mid-cycle redistricting. 'Everything is on the table,' Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, who has met with the Texas Democrats, said on July 30. 'We've got to preserve democracy.' Maryland House Majority Leader David Moon, also a Democrat, went even further. He told The Associated Press on Aug. 1 that he would introduce a bill permitting mid-cycle redistricting if Texas continues down its current path because 'we can't have one state, especially a very large state, constantly trying to one-up and alter the course of congressional control while the other states sit idly by.' Former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, who runs the Democratic Party's redistricting efforts and has traditionally pushed for a nonpartisan approach, seemed to give the green light — at least for now — to Democrats exploring map-drawing outside the census period. 'We have to understand that the nature of the threat that has been put upon the country through what they're trying to do in Texas has really increased the danger to our democracy,' he told ABC News on Aug. 3. 'As a result of that, we've got to do things that, perhaps in the past, I would not have supported.' 'I think that responsible Democrats in other states have to take into account the threat to our democracy, the need to preserve our democracy, so that we can ultimately try to heal it,' he added. 'And I would hope that they will take steps that are, again, as I said, temporary but responsible.' What does the walkout say about the Voting Rights Act? To many advocates, the redistricting battle illustrates the precarious state of voting rights. On Aug. 13, Texas House Minority Leader Gene Wu, one of the Democrats who left the state, called the Texas map a 'racist and unconstitutional gerrymandering effort.' He also said that it was an attempt to 'stifle Americans who have had enough.' This latest controversy erupted on the eve of the 60th anniversary of the Voting Rights Act, which some legal scholars say is standing on its last leg. Over the past decade, the Voting Rights Act has been scaled back through various legal challenges. In 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court gutted a section of the act that required jurisdictions with histories of discrimination against Black voters to secure federal approval before changing its election laws. 'If we don't know our history, we don't know nothing,' Khadidah Stone, who was a plaintiff in a major 2023 Supreme Court case, recently told Capital B. 'Especially if you aren't a white man, you need to be putting yourself on the line fighting for voting rights just as much as anybody else.' What's the next move for Democrats? Though many Democratic leaders are exploring retaliatory measures, not all of them can move as quickly as Texas House Republicans. That's because different states have different procedures for redrawing maps. In Texas and a number of other Republican-controlled states, state legislatures handle redistricting. This means that in these states the task of redrawing maps is simpler and faster and that the party in power can almost guarantee that its lawmakers will be reelected. Meanwhile, in many Democratic-controlled states, including California and New York, redistricting is done through an independent commission. This is meant to minimize partisan influence and maximize competitiveness, though reliance on this model also slows down the speed with which maps can be redrawn. It remains to be seen how Democratic leaders' countermoves will play out. This story has been updated. The post Texas Democrat Spends Night on House Floor to Protest Map She Says Erodes Black and Latino Voting Power appeared first on Capital B News.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
ICE Barbie Speechwriter Said J6ers ‘Did Absolutely Nothing Wrong'
A devout supporter of President Donald Trump hired as a speechwriter for the Department of Homeland Security has a long record of praising the Jan. 6 attack and espousing extremist and racist rhetoric online. Eric Lendrum, who writes speeches for DHS Secretary Kristi Noem—dubbed 'ICE Barbie' for her love of highly stylized cosplaying in a variety of uniformed roles—has repeatedly defended Trump supporters who stormed the Capitol, according to posts reviewed by NOTUS and the Daily Beast. According to his LinkedIn profile, Lendrum was hired as a speechwriter by DHS. 'The J6'ers did nothing wrong. Absolutely no violence was committed by Trump supporters on that day. Fact. Period,' Lendrum wrote in August 2023. In a December 2021 blog post, he falsely described the Capitol riot as 'peaceful' and compared the treatment of conservatives to the persecution of Jews during the Holocaust and the enslavement of Black people. 'It has been said that the most surefire way to create an authoritarian regime is to completely dehumanize a significant portion of the population, so that their subsequent enslavement by the state will not face any larger resistance,' Lendrum wrote on the American Greatness blog. 'It was true during slavery, it was true during the Holocaust, and it is true now.' Despite insisting Jan. 6 was 'peaceful,' Lendrum mocked lawmakers who hid from Trump supporters—which included members of far-right groups found guilty of seditious conspiracy, those who attacked police officers, and people carrying zip ties—on his Right Take podcast just weeks after it took place. 'There's something so gratifying about seeing the images of these members of Congress—especially the Democrats—crouching under their chairs, putting on those stupid, like, bubble masks, those anti-gas bubble masks, and then taking selfies,' he said. Lendrum further said the Great Replacement Theory—a white supremacist conspiracy that minorities and immigrants are replacing white Americans through immigration and demographic growth—was 'real' on another episode of his podcast in October 2022. NOTUS and the Daily Beast also uncovered multiple hateful posts from an X account belonging to Lendrum. In November 2023, he advocated for drivers to plow through pro-Palestinian protesters blocking traffic. 'Cars are bigger and heavier than any one of these freaks. All it takes is one brave driver to do what needs to be done, then others will follow,' he wrote. The same account, which follows several DHS and White House staffers, repeatedly attacked members of the LGBTQ+ community, calling them 'freaks." He referred to trans people as 'child molesters,' using a slur, and on multiple posts on the American Greatness dismissed transgender identity as a 'mental illness.' In response, a DHS spokesperson emailed the Daily Beast a link to the First Amendment of the Constitution, which protects freedom of speech.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Spike Lee Says Trump Should ‘Think Twice' if He Considers a Federal Takeover of New York: ‘The Boogie-Down? Harlem?'
"This is a scary time," the "Do the Right Thing" director tells the Rev. Al Sharpton on MSNBC Spike Lee's characters say 'Wake up!' in 'Do the Right Thing,' 'School Daze' and 'Malcolm X' – and now the director has put the signature line in his weekend MSNBC appearance, too. Speaking with 'Politics Nation' host Rev. Al Sharpton on Saturday to promote the Denzel Washington film 'Highest 2 Lowest,' Lee said the Trump administration's federal law-enforcement takeover in Washington, D.C., wouldn't go quite the same if the president tried it in New York City. More from TheWrap Sabrina Carpenter, Busta Rhymes, Ricky Martin, J Balvin and More Set to Perform at 2025 VMAs John Oliver Marvels at Trump-Putin Meeting Going 'So Badly' Even Fox News Couldn't Spin It 'Drag Race' EP Explains How Pop Culture and RuPaul Himself Inspire the Show's Challenges 'Fallout' Debuts First-Look Images for Season 2, Teasing New Vegas 'This country right now is … it's bananas, and this and this guy trying to take over D.C. and just weaponize these things,' Lee said. 'And I mean, he's going to think twice [if he tries] to do that in New York though. The Boogie Down? Harlem?' Sharpton agreed, saying that it would 'be a different kind of reaction.' Chuckling with glee, Lee responded: 'Oh yeah. It's gonna be very different.' Sharpton asked Lee what he thought about Trump mobilizing federal agents and National Guard troops 'in heavily Black and brown cities with Black mayors,' given how Lee has portrayed authoritarian law enforcement throughout his films. 'They're weaponizing these other agencies of the United States government,' Lee said more gravely. 'And this is — this is a scary time. The last word in 'School Daze' … my brother … Lawrence Fishburne saying, 'Wake up!' And the first line in 'Do the Right Thing' you know — Samuel Jackson saying, 'Wake up.' So we need to wake up. We need to wake up. You know, it's some serious times and we gotta be on point and just be in the moment and see this three-card-monte game — watch the black, watch the black, watch the black! … you can't win.' 'Highest 2 Lowest' is in theaters now. Watch the entire exchange in the video above. The post Spike Lee Says Trump Should 'Think Twice' if He Considers a Federal Takeover of New York: 'The Boogie-Down? Harlem?' | Video appeared first on TheWrap.
