Harvard University Settles Jewish Student's Lawsuit Alleging Anti-Semitism
The legal challenge was brought by Alexander Kestenbaum, also known as Shabbos, and the nonprofit group Students Against Antisemitism in January 2024.
Kestenbaum and Harvard jointly agreed to end the case, according to a dismissal notice filed in Boston federal court.
The student's claims were dismissed with prejudice, meaning the case cannot be bought back into court.
The terms of the settlement remain confidential.
'Harvard and Mr. Kestenbaum acknowledge each other's steadfast and important efforts to combat antisemitism at Harvard and elsewhere,' the university said in an emailed statement to The Epoch Times. 'Harvard and Mr. Kestenbaum are pleased to have resolved the litigation.'
Related Stories
5/15/2025
5/15/2025
Kestenbaum graduated from Harvard Divinity School last year, and has become a growing voice in a Republican-led campaign aimed at rooting out alleged antisemitism at major American universities.
In a separate
'By filing our lawsuit, Harvard began efforts to reform, and with President Trump's efforts it will continue to face a stark choice—enforce its policies and uphold its federal obligations or lose out on taxpayer funding and continue to destroy the University's reputation,' he continued.
Kestenbaum said he would continue to the Trump administration in 'pursuing much-needed change' at Harvard and other colleges and universities across the country.
Lawsuit Alleges 'Jewish Hatred' Rampant at Harvard
Kestenbaum's lawsuit alleged Harvard had become 'a bastion of rampant anti Jewish hatred and harassment,' in the wake of the Oct. 7, 2023 Hamas incursion into Israel.
The terrorist group killed 1,200 people and took around 250 hostages during the attack. Since then more than 52,800 Palestinians, many of them women and children, have been killed in the war in Gaza,
The lawsuit cited protests on campus in support of Palestine that it alleged were antisemitic, and claimed Jewish students at the school have been attacked on social media.
It further alleged that Harvard faculty members have 'promulgated antisemitism in their courses and dismissed and intimidated students who object.'
The suit accused the Cambridge, Massachusetts-based school of violating Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which
It said the school should be compelled to implement 'institutional, far-reaching, and concrete remedial measures,' including terminating employees who are allegedly responsible for 'antisemitic discrimination and abuse,' and suspending students who engaged in such conduct.
Harvard
'We have enhanced training and education on antisemitism across our campus and introduced measures to support our Jewish community and ensure student safety and security,' it said in a statement.
'We have launched programs to promote civil dialogue and respectful disagreement inside and outside the classroom.'
The school added that it has also adopted many other reforms, and will 'continue to combat antisemitism and to foster a campus culture that includes and supports every member of our community.'
Harvard
Kestenbaum did not settle at the time and instead pursued his case against the school under an amended complaint, which was settled on Thursday.
The Epoch Times has contacted a spokesperson for Harvard for further comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
5 minutes ago
- New York Times
Is the A.I. Sell-off the Start of Something Bigger?
Andrew here. The Trump administration is reportedly considering taking stakes in semiconductor companies — beyond Intel — that were granted money as part of the CHIPS and Science Act, in a major shift toward industrial policy. Cabinet members have said that U.S. taxpayers should have received shares in exchange for funding chipmakers. But there's some important missing context: At the time, companies like TSMC probably wouldn't have taken CHIPS Act money if they had to give up equity. The law was meant to persuade such companies to do something that they believed wasn't economical, namely building factories in the U.S. But the landscape has changed amid President Trump's tariffs, which has made producing chips abroad much more expensive — and made CHIPS Act money more valuable. It appears that the administration's approach has been more stick than carrot. What are the implications? Will U.S. companies take government money in the future? And will this approach get the right results? Tell us what you think. Is the A.I. pendulum swinging again? For years now, investors have clambered to get a piece of the action in artificial intelligence. That's pushed up valuations to nosebleed-inducing levels, even as some market observers (and Sam Altman) warn that things are getting out of hand. For now, private-market investors still appear to be eager to bid up the value of A.I. start-ups. But on Tuesday's market moves suggest that public investors are getting more jittery, raising at least some questions about the future of the tech boom. Things still look bubbly for privately held start-ups — including OpenAI, which is in talks to let current and former employees sell about $6 billion worth of stock at an astonishing roughly $500 billion valuation. That's nearly twice the market capitalization of Salesforce. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
USA Today
7 minutes ago
- USA Today
Texas Republicans set to approve Trump-backed new congressional map after lengthy fight
Aug 20 (Reuters) - Texas Republicans on Wednesday will take up a new state congressional map intended to flip five Democratic-held U.S. House seats in next year's midterm elections, after dozens of Democratic lawmakers ended a two-week walkout that had temporarily blocked its passage. Republican state legislators have undertaken a rare mid-decade redistricting at the behest of President Donald Trump, who is seeking to improve his party's odds of preserving its narrow U.S. House of Representatives majority despite political headwinds. The gambit has triggered a national redistricting war, with governors of both parties threatening to initiate similar efforts in other states. Democratic California Governor Gavin Newsom is advancing an effort to neutralize Texas' move by redrawing his state's map to flip five Republican seats, pitting the nation's most populous Democratic state against Texas, its most populous Republican one. The Texas map aims to flip five Democratic seats. Other Republican states including Ohio, Florida, Indiana and Missouri are moving forward with or considering their own redistricting efforts, as are Democratic states such as Maryland and Illinois. Redistricting typically occurs every 10 years after the U.S. Census to account for population changes, and mid-decade redistricting has historically been unusual. In many states, lawmakers manipulate the lines to favor their party over the opposition, a practice known as gerrymandering. Texas' new map was listed on Wednesday's schedule for the state House, though it was not clear how quickly Republicans could move to approve it. The bill is still subject to debate on the floor, and Democrats can also introduce amendments to be voted upon. Democrats fled the state earlier this month to deny the Texas House a quorum. In response, Republicans undertook extraordinary measures to try to force them home, including filing lawsuits to remove them from office and issuing arrest warrants. The walkout ended when Democrats voluntarily returned on Monday, saying they had accomplished their goals of blocking a vote during a first special legislative session and persuading Democrats in other states to take retaliatory steps. Republican House leadership assigned state law enforcement officers to monitor Democrats to ensure they would not leave the state again. One Democratic representative, Nicole Collier, slept in the Capitol building on Monday night rather than accept a police escort. Republicans, including Trump, have openly acknowledged that the new map is aimed at increasing their political power. The party currently controls 25 of the state's 38 districts under a Republican-drawn map that was passed four years ago. Democrats and civil rights groups have said the new map dilutes the voting power of racial minorities in violation of federal law and have vowed to sue. Nationally, Republicans captured the 435-seat House in 2024 by only three seats. The party of the president historically loses House seats in the first midterm election, and Trump's approval ratings have sagged since he took office in January. (Reporting by Joseph Ax; Editing by Daniel Wallis)
The Hill
7 minutes ago
- The Hill
Kinzinger: Trump claiming to be war hero ‘just nuts'
Former Republican Rep. Adam Kinzinger (Ill.) criticized President Trump for claiming to be a war hero in the wake of the Iran strikes, arguing it is offensive to those who have served in combat. 'Yeah. I mean, look, this is just nuts. This is nuts. And they're going to find — his people are going to find a way to justify this,' Kinzinger, a frequent Trump critic, told CNN's Erin Burnett on Tuesday. 'Listen, when they were putting out something honoring the Army's 250th anniversary, they put out a picture of Donald Trump in his military academy uniform, which has nothing to do with the military except they drill you.' Kinzinger, who retired from Congress in 2021 and is now a senior contributor on CNN, was asked to weigh in on Trump's recent remarks on 'The Mark Levin Show.' 'He's a war hero because we work together. He's a war hero,' Trump told conservative radio host Mark Levin, referring to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. 'I guess I am too.' 'Nobody cares, but I am too. I mean, I sent those planes,' he added, just months after the U.S. bombed three nuclear facilities near Tehran in defense of Israel. Kinzinger, who served in the Air Force and was deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan, pressed back against the rhetoric but added that he hopes the president is able to facilitate a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine. 'You can like what he's done. That's fine. I hope he gets a resolution in Ukraine,' he said. 'But to put himself on the same level of people that have actually gone out and served this country, not claimed bone spurs, is an offense to anybody who served.' 'And frankly, you just take somebody that served, calling themselves a war hero, even that would be inappropriate,' the former GOP lawmaker, who said recently that he feels closer to a Democrat nowadays, told CNN. 'For a guy that never served to say it, it's nuts.' Kinzinger added, 'But somebody, they'll defend it, they'll find a way.' The comments come as Trump is looking to facilitate a Russia-Ukraine peace deal after meeting with both leaders and seeking another ceasefire in the Middle East between Isreal and Hamas.
