Joel Kotkin: The West's immigration reckoning is here
Article content
Many leading countries for immigrants, notably in the Middle East, may have higher percentages of international migrants, but many are only there temporarily. But in Canada, Australia, and the U.S. — where the foreign born represent between 15 and 30 per cent of the total population — most come to stay, with sometimes problematic results.
Article content
Article content
Article content
President Joe Biden changed immigration policies, allowing millions, some barely vetted, to enter at ever increasing rates, causing the number of undocumented immigrants to soar past 11 million. Until recently, former Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeau followed a similar liberalization that allowed large numbers of migrants, some coming as refugees, into the country
Article content
Article content
In both countries, the mass migration has deepened already serious class divides as many new migrants remain poor. In Canada, one in five recent immigrants now lives in poverty, with most suffering from 'deep poverty' — an income below 75 per cent of the poverty line — compared to only five per cent of the whole population.
Article content
Such complexities are rarely part of the public discussion of immigration. In the U.S. legacy media spin on the crackdown focuses on the abuses and often ham handed approach used by the Trump administration in working class Latino communities. Stories of individual cases of respectable and upright families targeted by the crackdown predominate, stirring up ever more fear of a racist, even 'fascist' crackdown on minorities.
Article content
Article content
In contrast, the MAGA view focuses on criminal migrants and radical demonstrators, some of whom have engaged in violence. The images of young protesters waving Mexican flags is offensive to many American citizens, even in California. For MAGA, the crackdown represents both a return to legality as well as a defence from hostile elements.
Article content
Article content
Both views largely ignore a more complex, and often contradictory reality. Historically, as immigrant advocates rightly claim, the migration of peoples have been critical to the economic health, and cultural dynamism, of countries such as the United States, Canada, Australia, the United Kingdom, and France.
Article content
Guest workers, for example, played a critical role in the revival of Europe's economies, and steady immigration sparked growth in Canada, the U.S. and Australia. Yet as immigration levels have soared, the economic payoffs seem to be increasingly dubious, particularly when we put into account the changing structure of the labour market.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
37 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
U.S. judge briefly blocks immigrants' deportation to South Sudan
A U.S. federal judge on Friday briefly halted deportations of eight immigrants to war-torn South Sudan, sending the case to another judge, in Boston, the day after the Supreme Court greenlighted their removal. District Judge Randolph Moss sent the case north from Washington after an extraordinary Fourth of July hearing on Friday afternoon. He concluded that the judge best equipped to deal with the issues was Brian Murphy, the one whose rulings led to the initial halt of the Trump administration's effort to begin deportations to the eastern African country. He extended his order halting the deportation until 4:30 p.m. Eastern time, but it was unclear whether Murphy would act on the federal holiday to further limit the removal. Moss said new claims by the immigrants' lawyers deserved a hearing. The administration has been trying to deport the immigrants for weeks. None are from South Sudan, which is enmeshed in civil war and where the U.S government advises no one should travel before making their own funeral arrangements. The government flew them to the U.S. Naval Base at Djibouti but couldn't move them further because Murphy had ruled no immigrant could be sent to a new country without a chance to have a court hearing. The Supreme Court vacated that decision last month, then Thursday night issued a new order clarifying that that meant the immigrants could be moved to South Sudan. Lawyers for the immigrants, who hail from Laos, Mexico, Myanmar, Vietnam and other countries, filed an emergency request to halt their removal later that night. The case was assigned to Moss, who briefly barred the administration from moving the immigrants from Djibouti to South Sudan until his afternoon hearing concluded. He slightly extended that bar after he sent the case to Murphy. The administration has said it expected to fly the immigrants to South Sudan sometime Friday. The temporary stay was first reported by legal journalist Chris Geidner.
CTV News
39 minutes ago
- CTV News
Trump signs his tax and spending cut bill at the White House July 4 picnic
U.S. President Donald Trump arrives to speak at a rally at the Iowa State Fairgrounds, Thursday, July 3, 2025, in Des Moines, Iowa. (AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall) WASHINGTON — U.S. President Donald Trump signed his package of tax breaks and spending cuts into law Friday after his cajoling produced almost unanimous Republican support in Congress for the domestic priority that could cement his second-term legacy. Flanked by Republican legislators and members of his Cabinet, Trump signed the multitrillion-dollar legislation outside the White House, and then banged down the gavel that House Speaker Mike Johnson gifted him that was used during the bill's final passage Thursday. Against odds that at times seemed improbable, Trump achieved his goal of celebrating a historic - and divisive - legislative victory in time for the nation's birthday. Fighter jets and a stealth bomber streaked through the sky over the annual White House Fourth of July picnic as Trump and first lady Melania Trump stepped out onto the White House balcony. 'America's winning, winning, winning like never before,' Trump said, noting last month's bombing campaign against Iran's nuclear program, which he said the flyover was meant to honor. 'Promises made, promises kept and we've kept them.' The White House was hung with red, white and blue bunting for the regular Fourth of July festivities. The United States Marine Band played patriotic marches - and, in a typical Trumpian touch, tunes by 1980s pop icons Chaka Khan and Huey Lewis. The two separate flyovers bookended Trump's appearance and the band playing the national anthem. Democrats assailed the package as a giveaway to the rich that will rob millions more lower-income people of their health insurance, food assistance and financial stability. 'I never thought that I'd be on the House floor saying that this is a crime scene,' Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York said during a record-breaking speech that delayed the bill's passage by eight-plus hours. 'It's a crime scene, going after the health, and the safety, and the well-being of the American people.' The legislation extends Trump's 2017 multitrillion-dollar tax cuts and cuts Medicaid and food stamps by US$1.2 trillion. It provides for a massive increase in immigration enforcement. Congress' nonpartisan scorekeeper projects that nearly 12 million more people will lose health insurance under the law. The legislation passed the House on a largely party-line vote Thursday, culminating a monthslong push by the GOP to cram most of its legislative priorities into a single budget bill that could be enacted without Senate Democrats being able to block it indefinitely by filibustering. It passed by a single vote in the Senate, where North Carolina Republican Thom Tillis announced he would not run for reelection after incurring Trump's wrath in opposing it. Vice President JD Vance had to cast the tie-breaking vote. In the House, where two Republicans voted against it, one, conservative maverick Tom Massie of Kentucky, has also become a target of Trump's well-funded political operation. The legislation amounts to a repudiation of the agendas of the past two Democratic presidents, Barack Obama and Joe Biden, in rolling back Obama's Medicaid expansion under his signature health law and Biden's tax credits for renewable energy. The Congressional Budget Office estimates the package will add $3.3 trillion to the deficit over the decade and 11.8 million more people will go without health coverage. Trump exulted in his political victory Thursday night in Iowa, where he attended a kickoff of events celebrating the country's 250th birthday next year. 'I want to thank Republican congressmen and women, because what they did is incredible,' he said. The president complained that Democrats voted against the bill because 'they hate Trump -- but I hate them, too.' The package is certain to be a flashpoint in next year's midterm elections, and Democrats are making ambitious plans for rallies, voter registration drives, attack ads, bus tours and even a multiday vigil, all intended to highlight the most controversial elements. Upon his return to Washington early Friday, Trump described the package as 'very popular,' though polling suggests that public opinion is mixed at best. For example, a Washington Post/Ipsos poll found that majorities of U.S. adults support increasing the annual child tax credit and eliminating taxes on earnings from tips, and about half support work requirements for some adults who receive Medicaid. But the poll found majorities oppose reducing federal funding for food assistance to low-income families and spending about $45 billion to build and maintain migrant detention centers. About 60 per cent said it was 'unacceptable' that the bill is expected to increase the $36 trillion U.S. debt by more than $3 trillion over the next decade. By Darlene Superville And Nicholas Riccardi.
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Global economy on edge ahead of Trump's trade deal deadline
After U.S. President Donald Trump imposed hefty tariffs on dozens of countries in April, then announced a three-month pause, one of his top advisers made a bold prediction. 'We're going to run 90 deals in 90 days,' Peter Navarro, the president's trade adviser, told Fox Business Network. Trade partners would trip over one another to offer concessions to the U.S. in order to avoid the threatened 'reciprocal' tariffs. With the July 9 deadline only days away, the Trump administration has come up short. It has signed only three deals – two barebone trade pacts with Britain and Vietnam and a partial and temporary tariff truce with China. On Thursday, a frustrated Mr. Trump said he would start sending letters to countries that had failed to reach an agreement with the White House, dictating tariffs as high as 70 per cent that would come into force in August. The situation is combustible. If Mr. Trump proceeds with the unilateral imposition of punishing tariffs, major trading partners that have held off retaliation will likely hit back with their own counter-tariffs. That could escalate quickly, convulsing supply chains and disrupting the calm that has prevailed in financial markets since April. Mr. Trump has threatened to send tariff letters before without following through. And more deals could emerge before the July 9 deadline. Trade officials from the European Union, Japan, South Korea and other countries, including Canada, have all been in Washington looking for a breakthrough. Analysis: As some Asian countries strike deals with Trump, others brace for tariffs Still, the fact that Mr. Trump – who fancies himself the ultimate deal-maker – has had such trouble closing, highlights the limits of America's ability to force its protectionist vision on the rest of the world. Access to the world's largest consumer market is potent leverage in any trade discussion. But other countries have diverse interests and complex domestic politics that make large trade concessions difficult. And they have an incentive to rag the puck, hoping Mr. Trump backs down in the face of renewed market turmoil, domestic opposition or court challenges. 'Countries don't view these talks entirely as a math equation,' said Brian Clow, who was deputy chief of staff to former prime minister Justin Trudeau and who helped oversee Canada-U.S. relations. 'It's also about pride and sovereignty, and so countries are only willing to bend so much to this president.' Mr. Trump's wholesale attempt to re-engineer the global trading system kicked into high gear on April 2, which he dubbed 'Liberation Day.' Using executive powers outlined in the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, Mr. Trump imposed a baseline tariff of 10 per cent on all trading partners – excluding Canada, Mexico and China, which had already been hit with IEEPA tariffs, ostensibly to punish them for shortcomings on border security. He also unveiled 'reciprocal' tariffs on some 50 trading partners, ranging from 10 per cent on the United Kingdom to 49 per cent on Cambodia. (These tariffs are separate from the sectoral tariffs Mr. Trump has placed on steel, aluminum and automobiles using Sec. 232 of the Trade Expansion Act). The verdict on 'Liberation Day' was swift and damning. Stock markets plunged and the U.S. dollar tumbled. There was a sharp sell-off in U.S. Treasuries alongside worrying signs of dysfunction in the world's most important bond market. After a week, Mr. Trump relented and announced the three-month pause, citing the 'yippy' bond market as a reason he reversed course. That set in motion the three-month sprint to get deals done. Britain reached an agreement first, which lowered levies on British car exports under a 100,000-vehicle quota and established duty-free quotas for beef, but left a 10 per cent baseline tariff in place. That was followed by an agreement with China that walked back the triple-digit tariffs both countries had placed one another in a mutually destructive show of brinksmanship. The truce is only six-months long and leaves the U.S. effective tariff rate on Chinese goods above 30 per cent. Then this week, the White House announced an agreement with Vietnam, that puts a 20 per cent tariff on Vietnamese goods (which is lower than the 40 per cent Mr. Trump had threatened), as well as a 40 per cent tariff on products that are deemed to have originated in China and been shipped to the U.S. via Vietnam. The booming Southeast is Trump's secret trade-war weapon Other deals are in the works. Negotiators from Japan, South Korea and the European Union have been meeting with Mr. Trump's trade team, led by Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. But leaders in Tokyo, Seoul and Brussels have all indicated in recent days that the negotiating teams remain far apart and deals by July 9 are unlikely. 'The bottom line is that the Trump administration wants a fundamentally unbalanced deal,' said Jacob Funk Kirkegaard, a senior fellow at the Brussels-based think tank Bruegel. 'They want something like what they got with the U.K., what they appear to have gotten with Vietnam. But that doesn't work with, an economy that is roughly the size of the U.S. itself,' he said, referring to the EU. Ottawa is also trying to secure a deal with Washington but is working toward a self-imposed July 21 deadline. Canada wasn't hit with 'reciprocal' tariffs, but is facing sectoral tariffs on steel, aluminum and automobiles as well as levies on goods that don't comply with continental free trade agreement's rules of origin. While many countries appear to be earnestly engaging with the U.S., there are reasons to slow-walk negotiations. In May, the United States Court of International Trade ruled that Mr. Trump's use of IEEPA to impose tariffs was illegal, calling into question the basis of Mr. Trump's 'reciprocal' tariff plan. That ruling has been stayed until an appeal can be heard by a higher court, but it may be giving trade negotiators from other countries pause. There are also already more U.S. sectoral tariffs in the pipeline, with investigations currently under way into pharmaceuticals, lumber, semiconductors and copper that could result in Sec. 232 tariffs like those on steel, aluminum and automobiles. That means foreign negotiators don't have a clear picture of what other tariffs they may ultimately face when they're offering concessions. 'This type of exercise or negotiation is facilitated when both sides are putting chips on the table,' said Jeffrey Schott, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics and a former U.S. trade negotiator. 'But in many respects the United States is just making demands and saying we will limit the protection we impose against you if meet our demands. That's a tough negotiating position.' So far, financial markets have taken this trade uncertainty in stride. Equity markets have rebounded from the post-'Liberation Day' slump and hit record highs in recent days. Volatility remains low in bond and currency markets. Robin Brooks, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and a former chief FX strategist at Goldman Sachs, said that markets are responding positively to the trade détente between the U.S. and China, as well as the better-than-expected U.S. economic data that suggests earlier recession calls were overly pessimistic. As long as China and the U.S. don't resume their hot trade war, markets may shrug off a breakdown in trade discussions between the U.S. and the EU or Japan, Mr. Brooks said. But they likely won't be so sanguine if the failure to hit the July 9 deadline causes another round of erratic flip-flops from Mr. Trump. 'The dollar didn't fall because of tariffs. It fell because of this back-and-forth which in markets created a perception of chaos,' Mr. Brooks said of the market meltdown in April. 'If you're trying to put a finger on what could cause markets to fall out of bed, then it's more stuff like that, more back and forth.'
