Rachel Reeves threatens to sue Roman Abramovich over Chelsea FC sale proceeds
The chancellor and foreign secretary are threatening to take Roman Abramovich to court to seize the proceeds of his Chelsea FC sale.
The Russian oligarch, who is sanctioned by the UK government over his alleged links to Vladimir Putin, for £2.5bn to an American consortium in 2022, after Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
Those funds remain in a frozen UK bank account but are meant to be used for humanitarian causes linked to the Ukraine war.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves and Foreign Secretary David Lammy have now said they are "deeply frustrated" an agreement cannot be reached with the oligarch and will take him to court if it cannot be dealt with soon.
In a joint statement, they said: "The government is determined to see the proceeds from the sale of Chelsea Football Club reach humanitarian causes in Ukraine, following Russia's illegal full-scale invasion.
"We are deeply frustrated that it has not been possible to reach agreement on this with Mr Abramovich so far.
"While the door for negotiations will remain open, we are fully prepared to pursue this through the courts if required, to ensure people suffering in Ukraine can benefit from these proceeds as soon as possible."
Read more:
Abramovich was forced to sell Chelsea - which he bought for a reported £140m - after 19 years of ownership, after being over his alleged close ties to the Russian president - something he denies.
The sale was made under the supervision of the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation, under the proviso the proceeds go to humanitarian aid in Ukraine.
They cannot be moved or used without a licence from the office.
In March, the Foreign Office said officials were in talks with Abramovich's representatives, but multiple sources told the BBC there had been no meetings between any Labour ministers and members of the foundation set up to oversee the funds since last July's general election.
They said there was a deadlock and a political decision by a minister is needed to negotiate and sign off an agreement.
It is not known if there has been meetings in the three months since then.
The £2.5bn - and interest accrued - would make up for some of the reduction in the aid budget, announced in February.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
28 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Zelenskyy dismisses Russian demands, proposes direct Putin talks
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said that Russia's maximalist demands mean there's no point in continuing with lower-level talks aimed at brokering an end to the war. Calling Russia's conditions for peace an "ultimatum," Zelenskyy said that he remains willing to meet directly with President Vladimir Putin. But low level talks such as those that took place in Istanbul on Monday make no sense unless they lead to a meeting of the two leaders, he said. "To continue diplomatic meetings in Istanbul at a level that does not resolve anything further is, in my opinion, meaningless," Zelenskyy told reporters in Kyiv on Wednesday. Zelenskyy is upping the pressure on Putin after a pair of audacious attacks against Russian targets in recent days that represented an embarrassing setback for the Kremlin. U.S. special envoy for Ukraine Keith Kellogg said yesterday that additional sanctions on Russian are "ready to drop," based on his conversation with Republican Senator Lindsey Graham. Another prisoner exchange with Russia involving around 500 people is possible over the coming weekend, according to Zelenskyy, who said that Russia was motivated by a desire to avoid further western sanctions. Prisoner exchanges "are going on and should go on, but the Russians are not ready for a ceasefire; at least the delegation level is not ready to resolve this and they believe that this is a matter for the leaders, they told us so themselves," he said. Zelenskyy proposed a ceasefire until a leaders' meeting in a place "of Russia's choice," citing Istanbul, the Vatican, or Switzerland. "If we see that we can continue the dialogue and are ready to take steps towards de-escalation, we will continue the ceasefire with American monitoring and American guarantees of mediation," he said. However, he said a meeting with Putin would also be possible "tomorrow" without such a ceasefire agreement in place. Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
Miami Herald
28 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Ukraine delegation visits Washington as Senate mulls Russia sanctions
June 4 (UPI) -- Ukrainian officials were set to update U.S. senators on Wednesday on the war and discuss arms purchases and efforts to pressure Russia to negotiate a peace deal, including a tough new bipartisan sanctions bill due to come to the floor of the upper chamber next week. The delegation, which included Deputy Prime Minister and Economy Minister Yuliia Svyrydenko, Deputy Defense Minister Serhii Boyev and Presidential Office head Andriy Yermak, arrived Tuesday, a day after a second round of Ukraine-Russia peace talks in Turkey broke up without a breakthrough. Yermak said in a social media post that the delegation was bringing a "comprehensive agenda" of issues that were important to Ukraine to actively promote to members of both parties and President Donald Trump's team. "We plan to talk about defense support and the situation on the battlefield, strengthening sanctions against Russia, including Senator [Lindsey] Graham's bill. We will also discuss the Agreement on the Establishment of the Reconstruction Investment Fund, which we signed earlier," wrote Yermak. He said the delegation would also raise the issue of getting back Ukrainian children deported by Russia and support for the process. The bill that Sen. Graham, R-S.C., plans to introduce in the Senate aims to ratchet up economic pressure on Russia, targeting its trade partners by slapping 500% tariffs on imports from countries that continue to purchase Russian products, including gas, oil and uranium. China and India are the two biggest markets for Russian energy exports. Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., told Politico that he and Graham would host a closed-door meeting with the Ukrainians on Capitol Hill to which all Senators had been invited. He said support for the sanctions bill was gaining very strong momentum with 82 members of the Senate split down the middle of the aisle agreeing to co-sponsor it. Blumenthal said the secondary sanctions could be a "game changer." "It's a pivotal moment in Ukraine -- and crunch time for the Senate on this bill." He also pushed back on what he said was a growing but false belief that Ukraine was losing the war, saying recent offensive assaults deep into Russian territory, such as Sunday's so-called "Operation Spiderweb," in which Ukrainian drones destroyed 41 strategic Russian bomber aircraft, proved otherwise. Blumenthal argued that such feats could help shift the dial among the administration's foreign policy team, helping persuade them to bolster military and other assistance for Ukraine and to support the sanctions bill. That in turn would help overcome the reservations of some lawmakers, he said. "Events will move the White House -- and maybe some of the president's friends here [Capitol Hill]. Congress can move ahead. [Trump] doesn't have to support it." Current U.S. flows of arms and equipment to Ukraine are all under drawdowns on assistance packages approved under former President Joe Biden, with no fresh approvals since as the Trump administration shifts to a more mercantile approach under which Ukraine will buy the weapons rather than receiving them as aid. Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘He failed in his fiduciary duty': My brother liquidated our mother's 401(k) for her nursing home. He claimed the rest.
My mother recently passed away; she had blood cancer, which was diagnosed 2023. I was to receive half of all her assets. My brother, the executor of her will, coerced her during her illness to give him power of attorney. My mother and brother liquidated her significant 401(k) account into a fund to help with home/nursing care. My brother is now stating that the balance, which was not consumed by nursing-home costs, is lawfully his. I have requested a copy of the power-of-attorney document. I have, in-hand, all wills by my father and mother where it clearly states all assets are to be divided equally, including stocks in her 401(k). I also have texts stating that the funds were liquidated for this purpose. 'He failed in his fiduciary duty': My brother liquidated our mother's 401(k) for her nursing home. He claimed the rest. My daughter's boyfriend, a guest in my home, offered to powerwash part of my house — then demanded money 'It was a contract sabotage': My new husband told me to 'sign here.' I refused — it was the best decision of my life What on Earth is going on with the American consumer? He spotted weight-loss drugs and AI before they became hot. Here's this investor's next big idea. My understanding is that he failed in his fiduciary duty as the POA was void at death. What can I do? The Sister Related: 'My mother-in-law has done some shady stuff': She wants to sell air rights to her home and cheated her grandchildren out of their inheritance It may or may not have been a good idea, at the time, to liquidate your mother's 401(k) to pay for her nursing home, but desperate times sometimes call for creative measures. To do it all at once raises questions about tax implications and your brother's motivations for creating such a pile of cash. Given that he now lays claim to it, the answer seems to paint him in a bad light. The only way he could access this money — as you say, his POA duties were null and void upon your mother's death — is if he deposited this money in a bank account with his name on it. Either that, or he added his name to an existing account in your mother's name. It's an old trick: telling an elderly parent you're a co-signer while making yourself a co-owner. Larceny, the theft of someone's property, is a felony in most states, depending on the amount stolen. She is likely betting on your legal inexperience and good nature to get away with it. There is a statute of limitations on elder financial abuse in most states, and you should treat this as such. The Securities Industries and Financial Markets Association, or Simfa, has a checklist for financial abuse, including 'numerous withdrawals of smaller amounts' and 'changing power of attorney or the beneficiaries on insurance or investment accounts.' Simfa recommends people in your position to contact an Eldercare Locator information specialist toll-free on 800-677-1116 weekdays, 9:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Eastern time. It has both English- and Spanish-speaking specialists. But now you are faced with a dilemma: Can you prove that your brother committed fraud and/or elder financial abuse by helping himself to her substantial 401(k)? If he had, for instance, taken a reverse mortgage on your mother's house to pay for the home, the remaining equity would have remained in your mother's estate and, as such, would have gone through probate. The sooner you consult a lawyer and contact your late mother's bank, the better. Executors and power of attorneys, as you suggest, don't have unfettered power. They have a legal responsibility to act in their client's best interest, and they can face civil and criminal penalties for failing in those duties. Self-dealing is obviously a no-no. Your attorney will likely advise you to file a petition and remove your brother as executor and, hopefully, freeze any bank accounts that he has access to. Executors can be removed for enriching themselves at the expense of the estate through incompetence or financial malfeasance. You're being hoodwinked and gaslighted by your brother. Related: I bought a home with my elderly parents. They reneged on their promise to sell their house and repay me. What now? 'He was recently taken to the hospital': My elderly neighbor gave me power of attorney. Can his estranged daughter object? 'Punishing myself would not help': My credit card was stolen — the thief revealed lots of nasty surprises about my finances 'We've had our ups and downs': My late in-laws left their estate to me, my husband and our son. Do we need to hire an attorney? 'I'm not wildly wealthy, but I've done well': I'm 79 and have $3 million in assets. Should I set up 529 plans for my grandkids? My father-in-law has dementia and is moving in with us. Can we invoice him for a caregiver? 'I am getting very frustrated': My mother's adviser has not returned my calls. He manages $1 million. Is this normal? 20 stocks primed for rapid growth while trading at half of Nvidia's valuation My life partner is 18 years my senior. He wants to leave his $4.5 million fortune to me — not his two kids. Do we tell them? Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
