GoPro Inc (GPRO) Q4 2024 Earnings Call Highlights: Navigating Challenges with Strategic Growth ...
Revenue: $201 million for Q4 2024, in line with guidance.
GAAP Net Loss Per Share: $0.24 for Q4 2024.
Non-GAAP Net Loss Per Share: $0.09 for Q4 2024, exceeded guidance.
Subscription and Service Revenue Growth: 9% year over year for Q4 2024.
Aggregate Retention Rate: Reached a record 59% in Q4 2024.
Camera Units Sold: Approximately 775,000 units in Q4 2024.
Subscribers: Grew 1% year over year to 2.52 million in Q4 2024.
Subscription Attach Rate: 34% in Q4 2024, up from 29% in Q4 2023.
Average Selling Price (ASP): $346 in Q4 2024, compared to $330 in Q4 2023.
Retail Revenue: $601 million for 2024, 75% of total revenue, down 15% year over year.
GoPro.com Product Revenue: $94 million for 2024, 12% of total revenue, down 54% year over year.
Operating Loss: $80 million for 2024, compared to $34 million in 2023.
Sell-through Units: 2.5 million units for 2024, down 13% year over year.
Gross Margin Improvement Expectation: More than 100 basis points in 2025 over 2024.
Operating Expenses Reduction: Expected to be nearly 30% lower in 2025 compared to 2024.
Cash Position: Expected to be approximately $80 million at the end of Q1 2025.
Warning! GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Signs with GPRO.
Release Date: February 06, 2025
For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript.
GoPro Inc (NASDAQ:GPRO) reported Q4 results that were largely in line or slightly better than guidance.
The company has successfully diversified its manufacturing and sourcing, mitigating the impact of US tariffs.
Subscription and service revenue grew 9% year over year, with an 8% increase in ARPU.
GoPro Inc (NASDAQ:GPRO) introduced new products, including the HERO13 Black and a tiny 4K camera, expanding its product portfolio.
The company is focused on operational efficiencies, expecting to improve gross margin by more than 100 basis points in 2025.
GoPro Inc (NASDAQ:GPRO) expects units and revenue to be lower in 2025 compared to 2024 due to macroeconomic headwinds and competition.
The company reported a GAAP net loss per share of $0.24 for Q4 2024.
Retail revenue was down 15% year over year, and GoPro.com product revenue decreased by 54%.
Operating loss for the year was $80 million, compared to a $34 million loss in 2023.
The delay of the new MAX 2 360 camera has impacted the company's revenue and unit sales projections.
Q: Can you explain the expected decline in subscribers for 2025 despite strong renewal rates? A: Brian McGee, CFO and COO, explained that while units are expected to be down, the aggregate retention rate is improving, which results in better ARPU. This helps counterbalance the reduction in units, leading to an expected $105 million in revenue and approximately 2.4 million subscribers, down about 120,000 from the previous year.
Q: Can you provide more concrete guidance on 2025 revenue expectations? A: Brian McGee stated that they will guide quarter to quarter due to various headwinds like consumer competition and FX impacts. While they expect revenue to be down, they are focusing on maintaining a good margin and cost reductions. They are not providing a precise top-line number for 2025 at this time.
Q: Why reintroduce the MAX 1 camera, and will it be margin accretive? A: Nicholas Woodman, CEO, explained that the MAX 1 was reintroduced due to a delay in the MAX 2 launch and identified market demand. The refreshed product, along with enhanced software, will serve as an entry-level 360 product. Brian McGee added that it is margin accretive, contributing positively to their financial model.
Q: Will the GP3-enabled camera be released this year? A: Nicholas Woodman stated that due to competitive reasons, they cannot disclose specific details about upcoming product releases, including the GP3-enabled camera.
Q: What are the long-term growth prospects for GoPro's subscription service? A: Nicholas Woodman mentioned that while historically tied to hardware, they are exploring new software experiences to boost engagement and conversion rates. Brian McGee added that improving retention rates and ARPU are key drivers, and they expect subscription growth to resume in 2026 with new product launches.
For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript.
This article first appeared on GuruFocus.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Associated Press
17 minutes ago
- Associated Press
INVESTOR DEADLINE APPROACHING: Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Investigates Claims on Behalf of Investors of Zenas BioPharma
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses Exceeding $75,000 In Zenas To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options If you purchased or otherwise acquired stock of Zenas pursuant and/or traceable to Zenas' registration statement for the initial public offering held on or about September 13, 2024 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310). [You may also click here for additional information] New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - June 8, 2025) - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against Zenas BioPharma, Inc. ('Zenas' or the 'Company') (NASDAQ: ZBIO) and reminds investors of the June 16, 2025 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company. [ This image cannot be displayed. Please visit the source: ] Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that: (1) Zenas BioPharma materially overstated the amount of time it would be able to fund its operations using existing cash and expected net proceeds from the IPO; and (2) as a result, defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times and negligently prepared. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages. The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not. Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding Zenas' conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others. To learn more about the Zenas BioPharma class action, go to or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310). Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook. Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP ( ). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner. To view the source version of this press release, please visit
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
1 Stock Down 34% This Year to Buy and Hold
Investors are withdrawing their money from stocks like Viking Therapeutics due to the current uncertainty. However, the biotech has a duo of mid-stage candidates that look incredibly promising. Though it carries above-average risk, Viking has significant upside potential. 10 stocks we like better than Viking Therapeutics › Shares of Viking Therapeutics (NASDAQ: VKTX), a mid-cap biotech, are down by 34% this year. This poor performance may suggest that recent company-specific developments have rendered the stock less attractive or that it is being affected by broader market issues. The latter is true, at least to some extent, but Viking Therapeutics' thesis has not changed significantly this year. The drugmaker remains attractive compared to most of its similarly sized peers. Here is why. Viking Therapeutics is a clinical-stage biotech. That means the company has no product on the market, generates no revenue, and is consistently unprofitable. Investors aren't too keen on buying shares of companies that fit this profile when broader equities are experiencing significant volatility due to potential macroeconomic issues. In fairness, that makes sense. Clinical-stage biotechs carry above-average risk. Their products may never see the light of day outside the clinic, and even when they do, many do not generate substantial revenue. However, Viking Therapeutics is a bit different. The company is developing medicines across several areas with high unmet needs. First, there is the drugmaker's work in the weight management space. The anti-obesity drug market has experienced significant growth in recent years. Yet, analysts continue to predict that the best is yet to come. Viking Therapeutics' leading candidate in this area, VK2735, is a dual GLP-1/GIP agonist. The only approved medicine of this kind on the market is Eli Lilly's Zepbound, an undisputed leader. Being in the same class as Zepbound doesn't guarantee VK2735's success, but it's still worth pointing out that a similar mechanism of action that led to Zepbound's breakthrough and efficacy could also prove successful for Viking Therapeutics' crown jewel. And more importantly, the investigational medicine has produced better results than almost any other mid-stage candidate in weight management, outside of those being developed by Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk. That's impressive for a mid-cap biotech, considering significantly larger drugmakers with far more resources are trying to dominate this market. Viking Therapeutics' other mid-stage program, VK2809, performed well in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), a disease with obesity as one of the main risk factors and whose prevalence is on the rise. However, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved just the first MASH medicine last year, although that will likely change soon. The point, though, is that VK2809 could join a relatively young market in a few years and generate massive sales down the road. These two candidates set Viking Therapeutics apart from other clinical-stage biotech companies. It's also worth noting that Viking Therapeutics recently signed a multiyear manufacturing agreement with privately held CordenPharma for VK2735. Per the terms of the deal, CordenPharma will manufacture more than a billion oral formulations of the medicine annually, as well as over 100 million autoinjectors and another 100 million syringes per year. Viking Therapeutics will make payments to CordenPharma, totaling $150 million through 2028. This deal highlights that Viking Therapeutics is already planning some post-commercial activity for its leading candidate. That's a great sign for investors. Viking Therapeutics is developing other candidates, including another weight management product that is still in preclinical studies. Following a similar blueprint, this product is a dual agonist that mimics the action of not just one but two gut hormones: amylin, which helps regulate blood sugar, and calcitonin, which regulates calcium levels. There is slow progress on that front, but Viking Therapeutics' commitment to innovation is impressive for such a small biotech. Now, Viking Therapeutics' most advanced programs could fail in phase 3 studies. If that happens, especially with VK2735, the stock price is likely to plummet. That's a significant risk to consider. That's why the stock is probably not suitable for risk-averse investors. However, those who are comfortable with volatility should strongly consider initiating a small position in the stock. If the business goes under, which isn't that rare for smaller biotech companies, your losses will be relatively small so long as the company makes a tiny portion of your overall portfolio. But there is significant upside potential that those who invest in Viking Therapeutics today could enjoy over the long run. Before you buy stock in Viking Therapeutics, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Viking Therapeutics wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $669,517!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $868,615!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 792% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 171% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Prosper Junior Bakiny has positions in Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, and Viking Therapeutics. The Motley Fool recommends Novo Nordisk and Viking Therapeutics. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 1 Stock Down 34% This Year to Buy and Hold was originally published by The Motley Fool

Associated Press
35 minutes ago
- Associated Press
INVESTOR DEADLINE APPROACHING: Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Investigates Claims on Behalf of Investors of Red Cat Holdings
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses Exceeding $50,000 In Red Cat To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options If you suffered losses exceeding $50,000 in Red Cat between March 18, 2022 and January 15, 2025 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310). [You may also click here for additional information] New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - June 8, 2025) - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against Red Cat Holdings, Inc. ('Red Cat' or the 'Company') (NASDAQ: RCAT) and reminds investors of the July 21, 2025 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company. [ This image cannot be displayed. Please visit the source: ] Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that: (1) the Salt Lake City Facility's production capacity, and Defendants' progress in developing the same, was overstated; (2) the overall value of the SRR Contract was overstated; and (3) as a result, Defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. In March 2022, Red Cat announced that Teal had been selected by the U.S. Department of Defense's Defense Innovation Unit and the U.S. Army to compete in Tranche 2 of the U.S. Army's Short Range Reconnaissance Program of Record (the 'SRR Program'). The SRR Program is a U.S. Army initiative to provide a small, rucksack-portable sUAS to U.S. Army platoons. At all relevant times, Defendants suggested or otherwise asserted that the SRR Program's Tranche 2 contract (the 'SRR Contract') was worth potentially hundreds of millions to over a billion dollars in contract revenues. In March 2023, Company management confirmed that "[t]he Salt Lake City factory is complete and ready to go' and "[w]e now have the capacity to produce thousands of drones per month.' The complaint alleges that, throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company's business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) the Salt Lake City Facility's production capacity, and Defendants' progress in developing the same, was overstated; (ii) the overall value of the SRR Contract was overstated; and (iii) as a result, Defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. On July 27, 2023, Red Cat hosted a conference call with investors and analysts to discuss its financial and operating results for its fiscal year 2023. During the call, Defendants revealed that the Salt Lake City Facility could only currently produce 100 drones per month, and that the facility was still being built, refined, and expanded. Red Cat filed an annual report on Form 10-K with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission the same day, which likewise reported that construction of the facility was only 'substantially completed' and potentially could reach a production capacity of one thousand drones per month over the next 2 to 3 years, but only with additional capital investments and manufacturing efficiencies realized. Following these disclosures, Red Cat's stock price fell $0.10 per share, or 8.93%, to close at $1.02 per share on July 28, 2023. On September 23, 2024, Red Cat issued a press release announcing its financial and operating results for the first quarter of its fiscal year 2025. Among other results, the Company reported losses per share of $0.17, missing consensus estimates by $0.09, and revenue of $2.8 million, missing consensus estimates by $1.07 million. On a subsequent conference call that Red Cat hosted with investors and analysts the same day to discuss these results, Company management disclosed that Red Cat had spent 'the past four months . . . retooling [the Salt Lake City Facility] and preparing for high volume production[,]' while admitting that a 'pause in manufacturing of Teal 2 and building our Army prototypes impacted Teal 2 sales' because, inter alia, Red Cat 'couldn't produce and sell Teal 2 units[] while retooling [its] factory.' On this news, Red Cat's stock price fell $0.80 per share, or 25.32%, over the following two trading sessions, to close at $2.36 per share on September 25, 2024. On November 19, 2024, Red Cat issued a press release announcing that it had won the SRR Contract. On a subsequent conference call that Red Cat hosted with investors and analysts the same day to discuss the contract win, Defendants continued to assert that the SRR Contract was worth potentially hundreds of millions of dollars, while expressing their confidence that Red Cat could realize up to $50 million to $79.5 million in revenue from the SRR Contract during it fiscal year 2025 alone. Then, on January 16, 2025, Kerrisdale Capital ('Kerrisdale') published a report (the 'Kerrisdale Report') alleging, inter alia, that Defendants had overstated the value of the SRR Contract, which Kerrisdale found was only worth approximately $20 million to $25 million based on U.S. Army budget documents. The Kerrisdale Report also alleged that Defendants had been misleading investors about the Salt Lake City Facility's production capacity for years, while also raising concerns about the timing of executive departures and insider transactions that took place shortly after Red Cat announced it had won the SRR Contract. On this news, Red Cat's stock price fell $2.35 per share, or 21.54%, over the following two trading sessions, to close at $8.56 per share on January 17, 2025. The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not. Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding Red Cat's conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others. To learn more about the Red Cat class action, go to or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310). Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook. Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP ( ). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner. To view the source version of this press release, please visit