logo
Apex Wants To Bring Henry Ford-Style Mass Production To Satellites

Apex Wants To Bring Henry Ford-Style Mass Production To Satellites

Forbesa day ago
At Apex Technology's new, brightly lit factory in Los Angeles, a monitor shows the vital signs and location of its first satellite as it orbits the Earth every 90 minutes.
The stresses it's undergoing as it passes from blazing sunlight to the cold of night illustrate why making satellites is so hard – and expensive, said Apex's CEO and cofounder, Ian Cinnamon. 'Imagine your phone has to stay on for five years, and every 45 minutes you're going to put it in the oven and then the freezer,' said the fast-talking 33-year-old, with a toothy grin.
The satellite, named Aries after Cinnamon's dog, a brown and white Havanese, was launched last year less than 12 months after Apex started work on it, in what they claim is a record time for a small satellite designed to be mass produced. It's a first step toward their goal of bringing Henry Ford-style mass production to the satellite industry.
Past the monitor, in a clean room on the other side of a clear vinyl curtain, hairnet-wearing technicians work on another Aries satellite, which sits on a wheeled dolly at one of six stations on Apex's assembly line.
Cinnamon says it's the wave of the future in the satellite industry, where factories have historically built a single spacecraft at a time. With cofounder and CTO Max Benassi, a former lead engineer at SpaceX, he plans to produce a dozen satellites a month at the factory.
Satellite manufacturing has long been a bespoke business, with each spacecraft customized for their mission, like taking pictures of the Earth or beaming down TV signals. Elevated costs and delays have come with the territory.
With more and more small satellites being launched into low-Earth orbit, Apex is trying to convince constellation developers that it would be faster and more affordable to use a standardized spacecraft instead. Apex is offering three different types of "buses," meaning the main body of the satellite, including power and control systems — customers just have to add their own sensors and other payloads. Like, say, weapons to shoot down intercontinental ballistic missiles, as envisioned for President Trump's Golden Dome.
Similar to automakers, Apex offers different trim levels of its satellites, with options like more power, a fancier communications system and a choice between electrical or chemical propulsion. Otherwise Apex isn't changing a thing.
'You either take it or you leave it,' Cinnamon said.
He thinks that reducing the complexity will be a winning formula for buyers of small satellites, like defense contractors and telecom companies. Cinnamon and Benassi see a lot of runway: Before they started Apex in 2022, the duo canvassed such buyers and said they heard universal dissatisfaction over delays, cost creep and poor quality. 'We want to be the first satellite bus manufacturer that people do not hate. That's our differentiator,' Cinnamon told Forbes .
Apex's basic premise makes sense, said Caleb Henry, director of research at the space consultancy Quilty Analytics: Satellite operators have long recognized that buying standardized spacecraft would be advantageous. But the urge to seek more expensive custom solutions is powerful. 'They become their own worst enemy,' Henry said.
Apex's executive team reviews blueprints of their first factory. From left, mission services chief Nirav Mehta, sales lead Andrew Berg, CEO Ian Cinnamon, CTO Max Benassi and manufacturing head Alex Verrelli. Ethan Pines for Forbes
Satellite manufacturers booked $20 billion in revenue worldwide last year, according to the Satellite Industry Association. Apex hopes to contend for a big share of a growing pie as the U.S. military expands in space. Golden Dome alone could cost more than $800 billion, according to the Congressional Budget Office.
Apex has a long way to go: the company only produced three satellites in 2024. It's aiming for 10 this year.
Still, strong sales boosted its revenue last year to $60 million, Forbes estimates, mostly from predelivery payments for its Aries bus, which can carry up to 330 pounds of payload, and Nova, named after Benassi's bernadoodle, which can hold twice as much. (A third bus is in the works that can carry 1,000 pounds, called Comet, after a dog that an early employee flirted with adopting.) Cinnamon says that orders have topped $100 million from roughly a dozen customers, with defense accounting for about two-thirds. Apex is close-mouthed about who they are and what it's doing for them, citing government restrictions, but they include the British aerospace conglomerate BAE and defense tech startup Anduril, which has ordered at least one satellite as it seeks to expand into space.
One commercial customer is Aetherflux, which plans to build a network of satellites in space to harvest solar power. Apex is set to deliver the bus for their first demo satellite Friday. Aetherflux's founder, the billionaire Robinhood cofounder Baiju Bhatt, was impressed enough by Apex to become an investor as well, praising Benassi's technical chops and Cinnamon's drive in an interview with Forbes . 'Those guys are hardworking, they're scrappy,' he said.
Cinnamon says demand is so strong that they're exploring ways to accelerate their production ramp, which currently is slated to reach a rate of 144 satellites a year in 2028.
The company raised $200 million in April to build out the ability to produce more of its own parts, increasing its total funding to $322 million in equity and debt. Backers include 8VC, Andreessen Horowitz, Point72 Ventures and XYZ Capital. The company's rapid progress has gained it a spot on this year's Next Billion-Dollar Startups list of 25 venture-backed companies Forbes thinks are most likely to reach a $1 billion valuation.
Commercial activity in low-Earth orbit has exploded in recent years, but Apex may have muted prospects in the biggest market: telecommunications. The two companies building the largest constellations to provide broadband internet from space, SpaceX and Amazon, are making their own spacecraft in-house.
Defense is its biggest opportunity. The Defense Department is keen to expand its satellite supplier base, and Apex's performance has been impressive so far, a Space Force officer told Forbes on the condition of anonymity since he wasn't authorized to speak publicly. 'The DOD is tired of spending a ton of money to either not get a capability delivered on time or to their expectations.'
Apex has successfully worked through a series of the sort of small R&D contracts that the Pentagon uses to test out new companies, and in February it won a $46 million contract from the Space Force for an unspecified number of Aries satellites. (York Space Systems has filed a lawsuit alleging it was awarded without a proper competition.)
Sitting at a desk in his office in front of a painting of his dog Aries in a space suit, Cinnamon said he's already convinced a couple of companies that have produced their own buses to try out Apex – and he's gunning for more. 'My dream would be every single major prime that's competing in Golden Dome [uses] the Apex satellite bus platforms.'
The company's aim to dominate the satellite industry is underlined in its conference rooms, all named after apex predators: caiman, orca, hawk. The sign outside Cinnamon's office bears the name of the deadliest predator of all — human. Dangerous Mind
Cinnamon grew up in Los Angeles, a son of sitcom writers. He showed a precocious ability for programming – and commerce. He sold video games online in elementary school and wrote a textbook for teens called Programming Video Games for the Evil Genius at age 15. (He later wrote another book in the Evil Genius series, on building drones.) Cinnamon fell in love with space, too, starting rocketry clubs at his middle and high school. He went to MIT to study aerospace engineering, but shifted tracks after deciding the program was a conveyor belt to a straitjacketed job at a giant defense contractor or with the government. 'I'd be fired within a few hours,' he laughs. 'Bureaucracy and I are not going to get along.'
Technicians work on Aries satellite buses on Apex's assembly line. Courtesy of Apex Technology
After earning a degree in brain science, he went to work for billionaire Mark Pincus at a startup incubator. On the side, Cinnamon cofounded a nonprofit that tried to use machine learning to make an HIV vaccine, an effort that won him a place in the 2015 Forbes 30 Under 30.
In 2016, Cinnamon started a company called Synapse that developed an AI system to automatically detect weapons in the images captured by scanners at airport security checkpoints. The company struggled to clinch many customers, but he sold it in 2020 to Palantir, where he worked with satellite companies to apply his technology to classifying what was in the images they were capturing on Earth — and came to believe there was room for a better spacecraft maker.
In the previous decade, the market began to shift from large, billion-dollar satellites in geosynchronous orbits to constellations of dozens to hundreds of smaller ones closer to Earth. Some companies had decided to build their own small satellites, like Earth observation pioneers Planet and Spire, and of course SpaceX. A flock of new startups had come on the scene to build smallsats for others, including the military, like Terran Orbital and York Space Systems.
Cinnamon's customers at Palantir, and others he spoke to, weren't satisfied with them, he said. 'There was no satellite manufacturer who was able to keep up with that demand.' Apex's competitors, like the European aerospace giant Airbus and Terran, which was acquired in 2024 by Lockheed Martin, say they offer standardized platforms that they can produce at volume; Cinnamon argues that in reality their satellite models are just a starting point for customization.
Fixing the product allows for faster manufacturing and more rapid delivery – as well as firm pricing, which Apex, in an industry first, is making public on its website, with a menu to run through the various options.
The base version of Aries starts at $3.5 million and can be delivered in six months, the company says; fully loaded, the LEO version is $9.5 million and takes 12 months. Nova starts at $6 million.
That's likely more than the cost to SpaceX of its narrowly tailored Starlink satellites, which the consultancy Quilty estimates have run up to a million apiece. But it's less than the prices the U.S. military's Space Development Agency has paid for the constellation it's building, ranging from an average of $15 million for communications satellites to $40 million to $45 million for missile tracking spacecraft.
Apex has also designed its satellites to be easier to put together, allowing the startup to widen its hiring to lower-paid mechanics with auto experience.
It aims to increase the share of components custom built in-house or by contractors to 90% from 50% now, on the conviction that suppliers won't be able to support its production expansion.
Apex investor and board member Ross Fubini, founder of the venture capital firm XYZ, who previously backed Cinnamon at Synapse, said he's been impressed by the young entrepreneur's deft triangulation of a complicated market.
'A lot of the tension in this part of the business is you have to not do everything your customer wants,' he said.
In the case of Golden Dome, the customer has yet to even define what it wants. But a host of other companies hungry for the opportunity have acquired startups making small satellites to stay relevant as the market for larger ones stagnated, including Lockheed (Terran), Raytheon (Blue Canyon) and Boeing (Millennium Systems). SpaceX, which has built over 9,000 satellites for its Starlink network, also could be a compelling option for the government – though seemingly less so following founder Elon Musk's falling out with Trump.
Apex could be at a disadvantage unless it strikes a strong partnership with a prime contractor, said Micah Walter-Range, an industry consultant and former director of research at the Space Foundation. And Apex's drive to bring its supply chain in house to boost production brings a host of additional risks.
'It's possible to do all the things that they say they're going to do, but it comes down to the execution.' More from Forbes Forbes Starlink's Numbers Could Bring SpaceX's Valuation Crashing Down By Jeremy Bogaisky Forbes This Billionaire Immigrant Is Racing Elon Musk To Connect Your Phone From Space By Alex Knapp Forbes Robinhood's Billionaire Cofounder Wants To Set Up Hundreds Of Solar Panels In Space By Alex Knapp
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Apple (AAPL) Upgrading Siri with AI-Powered Apple Intent
Apple (AAPL) Upgrading Siri with AI-Powered Apple Intent

Yahoo

time2 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Apple (AAPL) Upgrading Siri with AI-Powered Apple Intent

Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) is one of the tech stocks with strong return on equity. On August 10, it was announced that the company is working on a significant upgrade to its AI voice control, which will change how people use iPhones. Reports indicate that the company is working on an upgraded version of App Intents that will make Siri the true hands-free controller for devices. App Intents will enable people to use their voice to instruct Siri to perform complex operations, such as finding a specific photo, editing it, and sending it off. Thanks to artificial intelligence integration, the digital assistant can comment on an Instagram photo or scroll through a shopping app and add items to a cart. With the new upgrades, Apple is exploring ways to make its voice control operate with precision inside interfaces. The upgrades would mark an important milestone and fulfillment of a promise that Siri made 15 years ago. It will also be a significant upgrade to the company's hardware. Without App Intents, Apple's products would be less compelling than those offered by Amazon and Google. Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) is a technology company that designs, manufactures, and markets smartphones, personal computers, tablets, wearables, and accessories. It also sells a variety of related services, including software, digital content, and subscription-based services. The stock boasts of a high return on equity of 149.81%, affirming its ability to convert shareholder equity to profit. While we acknowledge the potential of AAPL as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 13 Best NYSE Penny Stocks to Invest in Now and 10 Best 52-Week High Stocks to Buy According to Analysts. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. 擷取數據時發生錯誤 登入存取你的投資組合 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤

It's Time Investors Give Qualcomm Stock a Little 'Respect'
It's Time Investors Give Qualcomm Stock a Little 'Respect'

Yahoo

time2 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

It's Time Investors Give Qualcomm Stock a Little 'Respect'

Qualcomm (QCOM) stock ticked lower yesterday after the bell despite delivering a solid fiscal third-quarter earnings beat. Despite since bouncing back today, this dip highlights what analysts say is a persistent lack of "respect" for the semiconductor giant that investors should reconsider. The wireless technology leader reported fiscal third-quarter revenue of $10.4 billion, topping analyst estimates of $10.34 billion with a 10% year-over-year increase. Non-GAAP earnings per share of $2.77 exceeded forecasts by 2.2%, yet the market's lukewarm response underscores ongoing skepticism about the company's prospects. More News from Barchart Warren Buffett Warns Investing At 'Too-High Purchase Price' Even for 'an Excellent Company' Can Undo a Decade of Smart Investing Why Archer Aviation's (ACHR) Post-Earnings Tailspin Looks Like a Favorably Mispriced Opportunity BitMine Immersion Now Holds 1.15 Million Ethereum Tokens. Should You Buy BMNR Stock Here? Our exclusive Barchart Brief newsletter is your FREE midday guide to what's moving stocks, sectors, and investor sentiment - delivered right when you need the info most. Subscribe today! What investors may be missing is Qualcomm's successful pivot beyond smartphones. While handset chip revenue grew a modest 7% to $6.3 billion, the company's diversification strategy is gaining serious traction. Automotive revenue surged 21% to $984 million, hitting a quarterly record, while Internet of Things (IoT) revenue jumped 24% to $1.7 billion. The company's expansion into artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure and PC processors, with its Snapdragon X platform, is expected to power over 100 PC models by 2026. The recent $2.4 billion acquisition of Alphawave Semi strengthens its data center capabilities as AI demand continues to surge. Qualcomm returned $3.8 billion to shareholders through dividends and buybacks while maintaining healthy margins. In fiscal 2025 (ending in September), Qualcomm is forecast to pay an annual dividend of $3.59 per share, up from $3.51 per share in fiscal 2024. Moreover, these payouts are forecast to increase to $3.91 per share in fiscal 2028. Is Qualcomm Stock a Good Buy Right Now? Qualcomm recently unveiled an ambitious road map to reach $22 billion in combined automotive and IoT revenues by fiscal 2029. Nakul Duggal, GM of Auto, IoT, and Cloud, highlighted Qualcomm's decade-long transformation of automotive architecture through its Snapdragon Digital Chassis platform. Qualcomm's safety-certified Advanced Driver-Assistance System (ADAS) stack will debut globally with BMW's Neue Klasse vehicles, marking a key milestone in autonomous driving technology. With 20 OEMs programmed for Autopilot solutions launching within 18 months, Qualcomm is positioned to capitalize on the growing demand for ADAS. The automotive segment's $45 billion design win pipeline includes substantial ADAS opportunities, with management noting that one-third of this backlog represents the next major growth driver beyond traditional infotainment systems. CEO Cristiano Amon also revealed advanced discussions with a leading hyperscaler for custom ARM-based solutions, targeting fiscal 2028 revenue generation. The $2.4 billion Alphawave IP acquisition provides critical connectivity IP to complement Qualcomm's Oryon CPU and Hexagon NPU processors. Management emphasized their focus on inference optimization, targeting efficiency metrics like tokens per dollar and tokens per watt as AI workloads scale. Moreover, the multi-year Xiaomi agreement ensures Snapdragon 8 Series platforms will power flagship devices with increasing volumes annually across China and global markets. This partnership will help Qualcomm strengthen its position in China, where the company has operated successfully for three decades. Qualcomm's diversification strategy appears well-positioned for sustained growth across multiple high-value markets. What is the Target Price for QCOM Stock? Analysts tracking QCOM stock expect sales to rise from $39 billion in fiscal 2024 to $47 billion in fiscal 2028. In this period, adjusted earnings are forecast to expand from $10.2 per share to $13.3 per share. QCOM stock trades at a forward price to earnings multiple of 13x, below its 10-year historical average of 15.4x. If the chip stock is priced at 14x forward earnings, it should trade around $187 in August 2027, indicating an upside potential of 20%. If we adjust for dividend reinvestments, cumulative returns could be over 25%. Out of the 32 analysts covering Qualcomm stock, 15 recommend 'Strong Buy', one recommends 'Moderate Buy', 15 recommend 'Hold', and one recommends 'Strong Sell'. The average QCOM stock price target is $179, above the current price of $154. With a fourth-quarter revenue guidance of $10.3 billion to $11.1 billion and the company trading at attractive valuations, despite its diversification progress, it is hard to see why QCOM stock dipped at all. Analysts may have a point that Qualcomm deserves more investor "respect" for its execution and growth potential beyond traditional mobile markets. On the date of publication, Aditya Raghunath did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Errore nel recupero dei dati Effettua l'accesso per consultare il tuo portafoglio Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati

Trump debanking order will have limited impact on crypto, experts say
Trump debanking order will have limited impact on crypto, experts say

Yahoo

time2 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump debanking order will have limited impact on crypto, experts say

Last week, US President Donald Trump issued an executive order directing bank regulators to rescind guidance that could lead to 'politicised or unlawful debanking.' Crypto businesses, and even some prominent conservatives — including the president himself — have alleged they were denied or lost access to bank accounts at the behest of politically-motivated, Biden-era regulators. But last week's executive order, entitled, 'Guaranteeing Fair Banking for All Americans,' won't do much for crypto businesses that fear they've been locked out of the traditional financial system, according to experts who spoke to DL News. That's because the order does little to root out 'reputation risk.' The term refers to regulators' ability to dissuade banks from engaging supposedly controversial customers, such as pornographers, firearms manufacturers, payday lenders, and crypto companies. Critics of the practice say that banks should only consider objective criteria, such as a customer's financial risk, when deciding whether to offer someone a checking account. Guidance documents and manuals 'This is going to make people happy who have been asking for it, but it's not clear how much good it's going to do them,' Dru Stevenson, a professor at South Texas College of Law Houston, told DL News. The executive order directs bank regulators to remove the use of reputation risk 'or equivalent concepts' that could result in 'politicized or unlawful debanking' from their 'guidance documents, manuals, and other materials.' But it isn't clear that examples of debanking were motivated by politics, according to Stevenson. 'It's not clear to me that they couldn't still allow for reputational risk that would apply to, say, an AI company, because that's not exactly a political issue or something that's unlawful,' he said. And reputation risk can have a downstream effect on banks' profits. 'If you have risk averse investors at one of the gigantic pension funds, or mutual funds, and they find out that Wachovia has gone gung ho about crypto, that might be a reason for them to switch to a more conservative bank,' Stevenson said. Moreover, banks were always free to ignore guidance documents and manuals according to Stevenson. As such, removing references to reputation risk from such documents will likely have little practical effect. 'If you're an agency, you can't go into court and say, 'This person violated our guidance document,'' he said. 'You have to show that they violated the statute or that they violated a codified regulation that went through notice and comment rulemaking.' Management reports Julie Hill, the dean of the University of Wyoming's law school, noted that Trump-appointed bank regulators have already said they will stop using reputation risk. While the regulators have new leadership, they are largely staffed by the same people who served under the Biden administration, Hill added. And reputation risk isn't the only tool regulators can use to pressure banks to reject certain customers. Anti-money laundering laws are one reason banks often reject customers, according to Hill. 'The vast, vast majority of suspicious activity reports don't lead to any sort of follow up, let alone any sort of enforcement,' she told DL News. Moreover, banks are not allowed to tell customers that their account was flagged for suspicious activity. 'We have a situation where banks had to file one or more SARs, and they decided it's just not worth it, we should debank, because we don't want our regulators upset with us, and it's getting expensive to file all these SARs.' Another tool at regulators' disposal: management reports. 'If a regulator suggests to a bank, 'We think this is risky, maybe you want to stop doing it' [but] it's not really that risky, banks might do it anyway,' Hill said, 'because their management rating will get downgraded and then that impacts all sorts of things, including their capital requirements.' Those ratings are also secret, according to Hill. 'Anytime you see a really broad authority with very little limit, and then also a lot of secrecy or lack of transparency about how regulators or banks implement that, you're likely to set up claims for debanking,' she said. Banks' responsibility The executive order also directs the regulators to identify financial institutions that had any 'past or current, formal or informal, policies or practices that require, encourage, or otherwise influence … politicized or unlawful debanking.' Finding examples of politically-motivated debanking could be straightforward if the orders came from federal regulators, according to Hill. 'It's a much harder thing if what you think happened is the banks, for whatever reason, just decided to debank people for political reasons, unconnected with risk or profit or whatever,' she said. 'There's a real question about how we think regulators are going to figure that out and whether we think there's any duty on the bank to voluntarily disclose it.' Whatever the effect of the executive order, both professors agreed that a new administration could reinstate the use of reputation risk unilaterally. 'It kind of highlights how unsticky changes made by the executive branch are when it comes to discretionary enforcement,' Hill said. 'This is one of those things that can change from administration to administration.' Stevenson agreed. 'If we ever get to have other presidents, the next president can just do another executive order and put it all back, like, overnight,' Stevenson said. Aleks Gilbert is DL News' New York-based DeFi correspondent. You can contact him at aleks@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store