Chicken Soup Recalls That Affected Millions
Across the U.S., people love chicken soup for many reasons. It's comforting, tasty, and guaranteed to warm you up on a cold, winter's day or when you're sick with a cold or the flu. Research suggests that chicken noodle soup, in particular, is an American favorite, closely followed by flavors like chicken and mushroom and cream of chicken. While it may feel nourishing and cozy, chicken soup is not always the safest choice. And that's because, on rare occasions, manufacturers release soup products onto the market that are mislabeled and contain undeclared allergens, like milk, egg, and pork.
Undeclared allergens is not the only issue that has faced the soup market. Once, products contained bits of glove (yes, seriously). On other occasions, soups have been sold without being inspected by the necessary authorities beforehand. But don't panic: When these issues happen, manufacturers, government authorities, and soup brands are often quick to act by issuing urgent recalls. Below, we've listed some of the biggest recalls in chicken soup history. From small brands to the big names (like The Campbell Soup Company and Progresso), it seems no one is immune from a mix-up or an accident in the soup factory.
Read more: Olive Garden Soups Ranked From Worst To Best
In 2023, New Jersey producer Aunt Kitty's Foods recalled more than 15,700 pounds of chicken pot pie soup cans, sold under the Hanover brand, because they contained soy that had not been declared on the label. Soy is an allergen that primarily affects children, although it can affect adults, too. If consumed by an individual with an allergy, the chicken soup could result in mild to severe allergic reactions, and even life-threatening anaphylaxis.
Undeclared allergens are one of the leading causes of food recalls in the U.S. Soy, specifically, has been the cause of nummerous food recalls over the years. In 2021, for example, protein powder was pulled from the shelves of Whole Foods amid fears it contained soy that was not declared on the label. In the same year, Nestlé recalled more than 27,000 pounds of pepperoni pizzas sold through its subsidiary DiGiorno for the same reason.
Also in 2021, around 4,550 bags of Quaker Oats' Quaker's Rice Crisps were recalled because, once again, they contained soy that had not been appropriately declared. At the time of the recall, cans of Aunt Kitty's chicken pot pie soup had already been sent to retailers in five states: Texas, Virginia, Maryland, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. Luckily, there were no reports of allergic reactions to the soup.
Also in 2023, Canadian food company BCI Foods was forced to recall more than 13,500 pounds of chicken noodle soup. This time, it was not due to undeclared allergens or any form of contamination, but because the products had not been reinspected by the U.S. authorities before they were shipped to California, Michigan, Minnesota, and Tennessee.
The Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) — part of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) — must inspect any imported products containing either meat, poultry, or eggs. This ensures that the products meet all the U.S. requirements for animal disease risk and labeling. The FSIS was informed that BCI Foods had not presented the soup for inspection by an import broker — a company or individual who works with brands to ensure that their products meet federal guidelines.
Anyone who had already purchased the chicken noodle soup, which was sold under the Tasty Kitchen label, was urged to either dispose of it or return it to the store they bought it from. BCI Foods isn't alone. In 2021, more than 2,200 pounds of Avanza Pasta products, including ravioli and tortellini, were recalled because they contained meat and poultry that had not been inspected by the FSIS.
In 2022, Texas food manufacturer MSI Express recalled more than 16,400 pounds of chicken and rice soup as they contained milk that had not been declared on the packaging. The soup products were manufactured for the soup brand Knorr, that is owned by the global food giant, Unilever.
The undeclared milk in the Knorr soup was found when MSI Express conducted allergen testing. There were no reports of illness associated with the recall. This was lucky, because like soy, milk is a common allergen in children. In fact, it is the most common food allergy in babies and young children, affecting about 2.5 percent of those aged under three. However, milk allergies affect older humans, too. Research suggests that up to 1.9% of American adults suffer from a milk allergy.
Again, symptoms of a milk allergy vary in severity. For some, they will be mild but still unpleasant (an itchy mouth, stomach cramps, or a runny nose, for example), but for others, they are very serious and could even be life-threatening (we're talking anaphylaxis, of course). This isn't the only time a Unilever brand has had to recall products over allergens. In 2019, Ben & Jerry's issued a voluntary recall of several ice cream products amid fears they had been contaminated nuts, another allergen that can lead to serious reactions in some individuals.
In 2021, more than 6,300 pounds of chicken tortilla soup — produced by the Texas company Blount Fine Foods for restaurant chain Panera Bread's grocery store range — were recalled amid concerns they could contain pieces of glove. Yep, Blount Fine Foods feared pieces of gray nitrile gloves, often worn in manufacturing plants, somehow made their way into the food supply. But the company itself didn't find the issue—it was alerted to the problem when consumers began informing the FSIS they had discovered glove pieces in their food.
This is far from the first time that a foreign object has spurred a food recall. Although, it's important to state that finding gloves in a food product is uncommon. Usually, the foreign objects are pieces of metal from machinery (in January 2025, for example, Aldi recalled more than 24,000 pounds of frozen taquitos amid concerns they contained pieces of metal). Rocks and insects are also common causes of foreign object recalls.
All foreign objects in food — including gloves, metal, and rocks — present a choking or internal injury hazard. Anyone who had purchased the Panera Bread chicken tortilla soup was urged to either throw it away or return it to the store they bought it from for a refund.
Popular soup brand Progresso, owned by the multinational food corporation General Mills, has endured a few controversies over the years. Some have been more lighthearted (see: The recent launch of its Soup Drops, a suckable form of chicken soup), while others have been more serious. In 2020, for example, Faribault Foods, a Minnesota manufacturer, recalled more than 15,100 pounds of Progresso chicken noodle soup as it contained not one, but four allergens that had not been declared on the label.
At the time of the recall, the cans of soup had already been shipped across the U.S. It was consumers, who were discovering meatballs in their cans of soup instead of chicken, who first alerted the FSIS to the mixup. The packaging error meant that the product contained both undeclared milk and soy as well as undeclared beef and pork.
Meat allergies aren't common, but they do happen and cases are rising. This has been attributed to bites from lone star ticks, which are human-biting ticks that carry a molecule that can lead to alpha-gal syndrome (meat allergies). Research suggests that 450,000 Americans could currently have alpha-gal syndrome as a result of tick bites. Luckily, there were no reports of allergic reactions associated with the Progresso soup mix-up. Once again, consumers who had purchased the soup were urged to not consume it.
In 2019, BCI Foods was once again caught out for importing a number of products, including chicken soup, into the U.S. without re-inspection from the FSIS. As a result, it had to issue a recall for more than 3,300 pounds of soup that it had already shipped to Aldi locations in New York and Pennsylvania. There were no reports of illness associated with the recall.
This is not the first time Aldi stores have had to recall products. As mentioned above, it had to pull thousands of pounds of frozen taquitos from the shelves. And that's not all. In 2017, for example, recalled 2,000 packages of frozen peas over concerns they contained Listeria. In 2019, it was implicated in a giant Tyson Foods recall of more than 11.8 million pounds of chicken strips due to metal contamination.
Without a doubt, the Campbell Soup Company is one of the most popular soup brands in the U.S. In 2020, for example, research suggests that 1.8 million Americans ate five or more products from the company over the year. But this popularity doesn't make it immune from recalls. In 2017, for example, the company recalled more than 4,100 pounds of Healthy Request chicken soup from stores in Florida because it contained milk that had not been declared on the label.
The problem was discovered by consumers, who, as with the later Progresso recall, found meatball soup inside the cans instead of chicken. As mentioned above, milk is a common allergen and can result in mild to severe reactions. There were no reports of illness caused by the mislabeled soup.
However, this isn't the first time The Campbell Soup Company has been in hot water over undeclared allergens. In 2002, 15 years prior to the chicken soup mixup, the soup company recalled more than 19,700 cases of tomato soup as they contained undeclared milk and soy. Allergens aren't the only reason it has issued recalls. In 2015, it recalled 355,000 cans of its SpaghettiOs over fears they could contain plastic. And way back in 1971, the company recalled chicken vegetable soup cans after bacteria linked with botulism was discovered in its factory.
The Campbell Soup Company wasn't alone in 2017. In January of that year, Kettle Cuisine — which manufactured products for Whole Foods Markets — recalled more than 3,000 pounds of chicken soup as once again, they didn't contain chicken soup, but Italian wedding soup with meatballs. At the time of the recall, the products had already been sent to Whole Foods Markets in five states: Connecticut, Maine, New Jersey, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island.
The mixup meant that multiple common allergens were not declared, including milk, wheat, and eggs. The latter is one of the most common allergens in children. While most reactions are mild, they can cause life-threatening anaphylaxis. There were no reports of allergic reactions associated with the Campbell Soup packaging error, which was discovered by a Whole Foods Market employee.
Whole Foods has been caught up in multiple recalls over the years. In 2024, for example, baby carrots were pulled from its shelves over concerns they could contain E.coli, a harmful bacteria that can lead to serious illness. Also in 2024, its cheeses sold under its 365 label were recalled amid fears that they could contain Listeria, another harmful strain of foodborne bacteria.
In 2015, Canadian brand Victory Kitchens had to recall more than 4,600 pounds of chicken noodle soup because they contained chicken from an ineligible country. This means that the chicken supplier was based in a country the FSIS does not deem eligible to ship chicken to the U.S. In this case, that country was Thailand. The chicken noodle soup was not distributed across the U.S. but was instead sent to the United Arab Emirates.
Victory Kitchens isn't alone. Nearly a decade after this incident, in 2024, California brand Yumei Foods had to recall more than 9,300 pounds of products containing catfish as they were imported from China, which is not eligible to supply this particular fish to the U.S.
In 2023, North Carolina importer Capitology recalled more than 4,600 pounds of pork chicharrones because they were imported from Honduras, which again, is not listed as an eligible country by the USDA. Today, Thailand is eligible to export catfish to the U.S., but it is still not eligible to export chicken products. FSIS currently allows processed chicken to be exported from Canada, Chile, China, Israel, Mexico, Poland, and Korea.
In 2015, Los Angeles brand Rustico Foods recalled more than 2,600 pounds of packaged soup — including chicken matzo ball soup and chicken vegetable soup — because they were produced and shipped to southern California without federal inspection. The recall was issued after the FSIS was alerted to products it did not know had been produced in the first place.
Whether they are carried out on domestic or internationally-produced products, inspections are important. They help to keep the food system safe from many different threats, including foodborne illnesses. This is because the food supply is especially vulnerable to bacteria like Salmonella, Listeria, and E.coli, all of which can cause life-threatening diseases if left unchecked.
In some cases, even harmful parasites can enter into the food supply via contaminated products. In this instance, there were no reports of any foodborne illnesses or any other issues associated with the recall from Rustico Foods. Any individual who had already purchased the products was urged to throw them away or return them instead of eating them.
Conagra Brands, which owns several brands, including Gardein, Reddi-Whip, Birds Eye, and Healthy Choice, has been through more than one recall over the years. One of the worst scandals occurred in 2007, when peanut butter produced through its Peter Pan label was contaminated with Salmonella. In 2024, more than 2.5 million pounds of its canned meat products had to be recalled due to a potentially dangerous packaging defect.
In 2014, Conagra Brands had problems with one of its soup brands: Healthy Choice. The company issued another recall for more than 54,000 pounds of chicken noodle soup that had been shipped nationwide and to the Caribbean. Once again, consumers found a problem in the soup's packaging label. The two common allergens, wheat and egg, were not declared on the labelling.
Wheat is not just an allergen, it is also a trigger for celiac disease, which is an autoimmune condition with a number of different symptoms that affects around 1% of the U.S. population. There were no reports of illness associated with the packaging error. However, consumers who were concerned about potential reactions were urged to contact their healthcare providers.
For more food and drink goodness, join The Takeout's newsletter. Get taste tests, food & drink news, deals from your favorite chains, recipes, cooking tips, and more!
Read the original article on The Takeout.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hamilton Spectator
28 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Nina Kuscsik, pioneer in long-distance running and first woman to win the Boston Marathon, has died
BOSTON (AP) — Nina Kuscsik, who campaigned for women's inclusion in long-distance running and then won the Boston Marathon the first year that they were officially allowed to enter into the race, has died. She was 86. An obituary for the A.L. Jacobsen Funeral Home in Huntington Station, New York, said Kuscsik died June 8 of respiratory failure after a long battle with Alzheimer's disease. 'Nina was more than a pioneer, determined women's running advocate, and celebrated icon within the sport. To us, she was a friend who will always be remembered for her kindness, joyful laugh and smile,' the Boston Athletic Association said on Instagram. 'Nina held the distinct honor of winning the 1972 Boston Marathon , and recognized the platform that came with that triumphant moment, inspiring thousands of women to reach their own goals and finish lines in the decades since. The BAA extends heartfelt condolences to Nina's family, friends, and all in the running community who were touched by her grace.' According to the obituary, Kuscsik graduated from high school at 16, studied nursing for two years and received her license at 18 after petitioning to change a New York law that required nurses to be 21. She won state championships in speed skating, roller skating and cycling – all in the same year — before turning to running when her bicycle broke. She ran the Boston Marathon four times from 1968-71 — before women were officially welcomed, a period retroactively recognized as the Pioneer Era — and then won the first official women's race in 1972. She was also the first woman to enter the New York race, in 1970, and was one of the 'Six who Sat' – six women who refused to start the '72 New York City Marathon for 10 minutes to protest an Amateur Athletic Union rule that the women's race had to be separate from the men's. She won that year and the next year as well. She later served on AAU and USA Track and Field committees drafting rules for women's running. Kathrine Switzer, who entered the 1971 Boston Marathon using her initials and became the first woman to official compete, called Kuscsik 'one of our greatest leaders.' 'Nina was not only a champion runner, but was instrumental in the official acceptance of women and distance running because she did years of tough work of changing rules, regulations and submitting medical evidence to prove women's capability,' said Switzer, who started alongside Kuscsik and six other women who met the qualifying time for the the 1972 Boston race. 'Eight of us registered, eight of us showed up, and all eight of us finished,' she said. 'It was a stunning moment — and a blistering hot day — but appropriately enough, Nina won.' In addition to the more than 80 marathons she ran over her lifetime, Kuscsik set the American record for the 50-mile run in 1977 and won the Empire State Building Run-Up three straight years from 1979–81. She was inducted into the Long Distance Running Hall of Fame in 1999. ___ AP sports:

Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Hershey creates new guilt-free candy that's a dream combo
Many of us may think we have self-control, but once we take a bite of that delicious chocolate bar we've been thinking about for the last few hours, it's almost impossible to stop at just one piece. Before realizing it, the entire chocolate bar is gone. A few minutes later, our stomachs begin to hurt, and with it comes a creeping sense of guilt that makes us swear we will never do it again. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter The reality is that most of us tend to forget a few days later, turning this unhealthy habit into an ongoing vicious cycle. Related: Hershey creates new candy that's a dream combo Food companies know the guilty pleasure that unhealthy snacks and sweets evoke in millions of consumers worldwide. However, trends are evolving, with older and younger generations prioritizing low-calorie content and clean ingredients like never before. When healthier options are available, this becomes more feasible. Image source: Getty Images To avoid getting destroyed by the competition, many food companies have recently invested in developing healthier alternatives to these indulgent treats. Last year, PepsiCo (PEP) acquired the Mexican-American food brand Siete Food, and Flowers Foods (FLO) bought the healthy snack brand Simple Mills for $795 million in January. Prebiotic alternative soda brands like Poppi and Olipop have taken over the better-for-you beverage market, growing astronomically in only a few years. Related: Hershey combines two beloved products to make dream snack The global healthy snack market was estimated to be worth nearly $96 billion in 2023 and is expected to reach around $145 billion by 2030, with an annual growth rate of 6.1%, according to a study by Grand View Research. Hershey has also expanded its portfolio by investing in the better-for-you snack sector. In April, it made a major business move by acquiring the organic snack brand LesserEvil. However, it's taking the health kick to the next level. Hershey (HSY) has teamed up with the protein bar brand ONE to launch a new collaboration that makes eating chocolate healthier than ever. The result is a chocolate bar you can enjoy guilt-free. Although it might sound impossible, the ONE x Hershey's Double Chocolate protein bar contains 18 grams of protein and one gram of sugar. To promote this new creation, Hershey and ONE are maximizing the celebrity marketing trend and partnering with pro golfer Bryson DeChambeau, who has become the face of the new launch. More Retail News: McDonald's menu adds new happy meal fans will loveStarbucks brings back fan-favorite menu item after 2-year hiatusChick-fil-A quietly launches unexpected new menu items However, that's not all. If DeChambeau makes a hole-in-one from June 12 to 15, fans can try the new chocolate protein bar for free. Those who want to receive a free ONE x Hershey's Double Chocolate protein bar can sign up beginning on June 16 at 12 p.m. via the Double or ONEthing Challenge website while supplies last. The ONE x Hershey's Double Chocolate protein bar can be purchased on Amazon and at select retailers, but it will soon be available nationwide. Related: Veteran fund manager unveils eye-popping S&P 500 forecast The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Judge rules some NIH grant cuts illegal, saying he's never seen such discrimination in 40 years
WASHINGTON — A federal judge ruled Monday it was illegal for the Trump administration to cancel several hundred research grants, adding that the cuts raise serious questions about racial discrimination. U.S. District Judge William Young in Massachusetts said the administration's process was 'arbitrary and capricious' and that it did not follow long-held government rules and standards when it abruptly canceled grants deemed to focus on gender identity or diversity, equity and inclusion. In a hearing Monday on two cases calling for the grants to be restored, the judge pushed government lawyers to offer a formal definition of DEI, questioning how grants could be canceled for that reason when some were designed to study health disparities as Congress had directed. Young, an appointee of Republican President Ronald Reagan, went on to address what he called 'a darker aspect' to the cases, calling it 'palpably clear' that what was behind the government actions was 'racial discrimination and discrimination against America's LGBTQ community.' After 40 years on the bench, 'I've never seen government racial discrimination like this,' Young added. He ended Monday's hearing saying, 'Have we no shame.' During his remarks ending the hearing, the judge said he would issue his written order soon. Young's decision addresses only a fraction of the hundreds of NIH research projects the Trump administration has cut — those specifically addressed in two lawsuits filed separately this spring by 16 attorneys general from Democratic states, public health advocacy groups and some affected scientists. A full count wasn't immediately available. In the California lawsuit, filed in April with the other Democratic states, Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta said the UC system had received more than $2 billion in NIH awards in 2024 and that CSU had spent more than $90 million on NIH-funded research the same year. At the time of filing, Bonta wrote that the UC system's five health centers were awaiting action on grant proposals totaling $563 million. While Young said the funding must be restored, Monday's action was an interim step as the ruling could be appealed. The Trump administration is 'exploring all legal options' including asking the judge to stay the ruling or appealing, said Andrew Nixon, a spokesman for NIH's parent agency, the Department of Health and Human Services. 'HHS stands by its decision to end funding for research that prioritized ideological agendas over scientific rigor and meaningful outcomes for the American people,' he said in an email. While the original lawsuits didn't specifically claim racial discrimination, they said the new NIH policies prohibited 'research into certain politically disfavored subjects.' In a filing this month after the lawsuits were consolidated, lawyers said the NIH did not highlight genuine concerns with the hundreds of canceled research projects studies, but instead sent 'boilerplate termination letters' to universities. The topics of research ranged widely, including cardiovascular health, sexually transmitted infections, depression, Alzheimer's and alcohol abuse in minors, among other things. Attorneys cited projects such as one tracking how medicines may work differently in people of ancestrally diverse backgrounds, and said the cuts affected more than scientists — such as potential harm to patients in a closed study of suicide treatment. Lawyers for the federal government said in a court filing earlier this month that NIH grant terminations for DEI studies were 'sufficiently reasoned,' adding later that 'plaintiffs may disagree with NIH's basis, but that does not make the basis arbitrary and capricious.' The NIH, lawyers argued, has 'broad discretion' to decide on and provide grants 'in alignment with its priorities' — which includes ending grants. Monday, Justice Department lawyer Thomas Ports Jr. pointed to 13 examples of grants related to minority health that NIH either hadn't cut or had renewed in the same time period — and said some of the cancellations were justified by the agency's judgement that the research wasn't scientifically valuable. The NIH has long been the world's largest public funder of biomedical research. Neergaard writes for the Associated Press. Times staff writer Jaweed Kaleem contributed to this story.