Southwest jet narrowly avoids colliding with business jet at Chicago airport
Flight 2504 was landing at Chicago's Midway airport on Tuesday morning, however it had to perform a "precautionary" go-around to avoid a conflict with another aircraft, the airline said.
https://t.co/fXni6Zq5TJ pic.twitter.com/cg2lY4aSa3
— ABC 7 Chicago (@ABC7Chicago) February 25, 2025
Around 8:50 a.m. CT, Southwest Flight 2504, a Boeing 737-800 arriving from Omaha, Nebraska, abruptly pulled up and flew over a FlexJet Challenger on the runway. The Southwest plane performed a go-around, a maneuver in which it circled and reapproached the landing.
A dramatic video posted on social media showed the Southwest jet nearing touchdown then ascending sharply. The FAA and National Transportation Safety Board are investigating.
Southwest said the crew 'followed safety procedures and the flight landed without incident.' According to Southwest's website, its Boeing 737-800 aircraft can carry 175 passengers.
The business jet, which Flexjet says can carry up to nine passengers, had been taxiing on runway 31C before departing for Knoxville, Tennessee.
The Southwest jet had descended to an altitude of 50 feet when it abandoned its landing only about 2,050 feet away from the business jet, according to tracking service Flightradar 24.
As it abruptly rose, the Southwest plane had only reached an altitude of 250 feet when it passed over the smaller aircraft, the service said.
Over the last two years, a series of troubling near-miss incidents has raised concerns about US aviation safety and the strain on understaffed air traffic control operations. There was no indication of air traffic control error in Tuesday's incident.
In October, the FAA said it was opening an audit into runway incursion risks at the 45 busiest US airports.
Democrats in Congress seized on the fact that the Trump administration recently fired 352 FAA workers, including some involved in safety operations.
'Maybe not the best time to fire hundreds of FAA workers, tell the remaining workers you want to 'put them in trauma',' Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut said on Tuesday, citing a comment from a Trump administration official.
Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy has said firings did not include any 'safety-critical positions' or air traffic controllers. Duffy did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The FAA, which has aging technology and facilities and needs billions of dollars to modernize, is about 3,500 air traffic controllers short of targeted staffing, prompting the aviation industry and lawmakers to call for action.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Saudi Gazette
2 hours ago
- Saudi Gazette
Trump set to meet Putin in push for Ukraine peace
WASHINGTON – US and Russian officials will converge on the state of Alaska ahead of a highly anticipated Friday meeting between Presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin. The pair will meet for the first time in six years, as Trump tries to enact a key campaign pledge to end Russia's war in Ukraine. The US president, who has portrayed himself as a global peacemaker, hopes to leverage his personal relationship with Putin to achieve a ceasefire breakthrough where others have failed. On Thursday he assessed there was a "25% chance" the meeting would not be successful. Ukraine's leader Volodymyr Zelensky has been excluded from the talks, and warned that any resolutions made in his absence will be meaningless. In Anchorage there are few signs of the impending high-stakes meeting, except for the international media that have descended on the are rubbing elbows with holidaymakers from the "lower 48" states on visits to the Alaskan wilderness during the height of the tourist meeting between the two leaders will take place entirely on a nearby US military base – a reflection of security concerns and the relative brevity of the planned sit-down, currently scheduled to last just a few summit comes exactly one week after Trump's deadline for Russia to reach a ceasefire or face tough new was always highly unlikely that Kyiv and Moscow – who have been locked in a bloody war since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 – would reach an agreement to end hostilities before that was scepticism about whether Trump would stand by his threat of imposing sanctions on countries that do business with Russia, which would have resulted in a blistering trade war with China. He has, however, gone as far as to say he will impose secondary tariffs on India later this month over its purchases of Russian week's announcement that Trump and Putin would meet had the effect of tacitly pausing the sanctions countdown – and awarding both sides more time to think about their next the week, the American approach to the aims and hopes for the summit has been varied – shifting from the positive, to the cautious, to the the latter extreme, Trump has threatened "very severe consequences" if his Russian counterpart does not agree to end the war. What seemed to harden his approach was a group call on Wednesday with European leaders including the other hand, Kyiv will have been alarmed when Trump mooted the "swapping of territories" and the White House indicated that the president would take a passive approach by treating the meeting as a "listening exercise".All the while, the Russians have remained mostly silent – refusing to engage with speculation and rumours of frozen frontlines, territorial exchanges or minerals deals between Moscow and is consistency in that silence. Whenever Kremlin officials have spoken this week, it has been to reiterate Putin's seemingly intractable position on the have restated that the war will only end once Russia gains full sovereignty over the Ukrainian regions it partially occupies – Donetsk and Luhansk, known as the Donbas, as well as Kherson and Zaporizhzhia – and a pledge that Kyiv will demilitarise and not join Nato, the military alliance of Western Trump seems convinced that the usually convivial relationship he has cultivated with Putin could help him unlock a deal to end the conflict and further his image as a global issue has become central to the question of what Trump has delivered on the world stage since returning to the US presidency. He has a domestic audience to keep happy, and many of his supporters backed him for his pledge to swiftly end the war and disentangle America from expensive foreign conflicts more of the summit – his first meeting with Putin for six years – the American hopes that his negotiating style will pay dividends where other efforts to end the war have top officials have stressed the importance of him meeting Putin in person, and Trump himself has talked up his business-like instincts, saying he may know "in the first two minutes... exactly whether or not a deal can be made".Europe finds itself in the unenviable position of being caught between the two sides and excluded from Friday's their last-minute call with Trump on Wednesday, European leaders emerged tentatively optimistic that once in Alaska the US president would fight their Ukraine itself, they have endured several turbulent months, during which Trump had a memorable White House bust-up with Zelensky and later temporarily paused military supplies for Kyiv – a markedly different stance to his predecessor Joe has been sidelined ahead of Friday, protests by the Ukrainian leader that any agreement struck by Trump and Putin without input from Kyiv would amount to "dead decisions", it became increasingly clear as the week progressed that the US-Russia meeting would remain a bilateral he was careful to keep Trump onside, Zelensky felt he had to intervene after the US president's throwaway comments about the need to see "some swapping, changes in land" between Russia and Ukraine."We will not withdraw from the Donbas. We cannot do that," the Ukrainian president said, with a hint of exasperation, as speculation over potential territorial concessions reached a height on Tuesday."Everyone forgets the first part: our territories are illegally occupied. For the Russians, the Donbas is a bridgehead for a future new offensive," he said, arguing that he would "pave the way" for further conflict on its soil if he gave up the many of his compatriots, Zelensky is convinced that Putin wants to destroy Ukraine's sovereignty and people, and believes any concession to Russia would result in renewed and perhaps fatal aggression in the near is why he has consistently pushed to be invited into the room with Trump and this will not be the case during Friday's summit, the US president has pledged to update Zelensky soon afterwards – and has indicated he is angling for a "quick" three-way meeting in the near Putin would have to gain from such a meeting is unclear. The Kremlin has always said Putin and Zelensky have no reason to meet until much further down the negotiating that could still be far off. Ultimately, Putin's "central objective lies in obtaining... the geopolitical 'neutralisation' of Ukraine," according to analyst Tatyana Stanovaya."It is extremely difficult to convey what is truly at stake... as people often simply cannot accept that Putin might want so much – and be serious about it. Unfortunately, he can."The frenzied lead-up to the Alaska summit has revealed that if Trump's position on a potential resolution of the conflict is still subject to change, Putin's is will offer them a meeting place; common ground at the negotiating table may be harder to find. – BBC
Al Arabiya
2 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Trump weighs taking stake in intel: Report
The Trump administration is in talks with Intel to have the US government potentially take a stake in the struggling chipmaker, Bloomberg News reported on Thursday, citing people familiar with the plan. Such a move would mark another intervention by US President Donald Trump in industries seen as vital to national security. Trump has pushed for multibillion-dollar government tie-ups in semiconductors and rare earths - for instance, a pay-for-play deal with Nvidia and an arrangement with rare-earth producer MP Materials to secure critical minerals. Intel declined to comment on the report but said it was deeply committed to supporting Trump's efforts to strengthen US technology and manufacturing leadership. White House spokesman Kush Desai said: 'Discussion about hypothetical deals should be regarded as speculation unless officially announced by the administration.' Intel's shares surged over 7 percent in regular trading and then another 2.6 percent after the bell. The discussions follow a meeting this week between Trump and Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan. That meeting came days after Trump publicly demanded that Tan resign over his investments in Chinese tech companies, some linked to the Chinese military. Details of the stake and price are still being discussed, Bloomberg said. Ryuta Makino, an analyst at Intel investor Gabelli Funds, said it was likely that the US government would take a stake in Intel because Trump wants the chipmaker to expand domestic manufacturing and to create more jobs. Intel warned last month that it may have to get out of the chip manufacturing business if it does not land external customers to make chips in its factories. It planned to slow construction work on new factories in Ohio. Tan, who took the top job just over six months back, has been tasked to undo years of missteps that left Intel struggling to make inroads in the booming AI chip industry dominated by Nvidia, while investment-heavy contract manufacturing ambitions led to heavy losses. 'I think any deal that involves the US, as well as third-party investors (PE) likely has to come with tariffs that strongly encourage customers like Nvidia, AMD, Apple to use Intel Foundry,' said Ben Bajarin, CEO of market analysis firm Creative Strategies. It is not unusual for the US government to take a stake in a company, but those have usually needed financial help. Though Intel's stock market value has tumbled in recent years and it has lost its industry leadership, its revenue remains stable at over $50 billion a year, and it was not clear to some investors that the chipmaker needs such direct government assistance.
Saudi Gazette
14 hours ago
- Saudi Gazette
US warns of additional tariffs on India if Trump-Putin peace talks fail
MUMBAI — US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has warned that Washington could increase secondary tariffs on India. He said the decision would depend on the outcome of President Donald Trump's meeting with Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday. "We've put secondary tariffs on Indians for buying Russian oil. And I could see, If things don't go well, then sanctions or secondary tariffs could go up," Bessent said in an interview to Bloomberg TV on Wednesday. Earlier this month, Trump imposed a 25% penalty on India in addition to 25% tariffs for buying oil and weapons from Russia. The US has been trying to mediate a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine, and on Wednesday, Trump warned of "severe consequences" if Moscow did not agree to a peace deal. Trump and Putin are set to meet in Anchorage on Friday to discuss how to end the war in Ukraine."President Trump is meeting with President Putin, and the Europeans are in the wings carping about how he should do it, what he should do. The Europeans need to join us in these sanctions. The Europeans need to be willing to put on these secondary sanctions," Bessent increased imports of cheap Russian crude since the Ukraine war have strained India-US relations and disrupted ongoing trade talks with oil made up 35% to 40% of India's oil imports in 2024 - up from 3% in has defended its purchases of Russian oil, arguing that as a major energy importer, it must buy the cheapest available crude to protect millions of poor Indians from rising comments come after he called India a "bit recalcitrant" on trade negotiations in an interview with Fox Business on says his tariffs are part of his administration's plan to boost the US' economy and make global trade has repeatedly called India a tariff abuser and is keen to trim a $45bn (£33bn) trade deficit with Asia's third largest negotiations between Delhi and Washington have been under way for several months, and are set to renew with US negotiators expected to arrive in India on 25 experts say India's refusal to reduce duties on agriculture and dairy products has been a major thorn in the new 50% tariff rate on India is set to come into effect on 27 August, which some experts have said is akin to an embargo on trade between the two makes India the most heavily taxed US trading partner in Asia and is expected to severely hamper its exports focused industries like textiles and jewellery, and could drag India's growth down by as much as half a percent. — BBC
