Kerala to seek sterilisation of Bonnet macaque near forests
The Kerala Forest Department will shortly approach the Union Ministry of Environment, Forests, and Climate Change seeking permission to carry out sterilisation of the species endemic to South India.
Farmers and people living in forest fringes have complained about crop loss caused by the troops of monkeys. The animals, according to farmers, damage a wide variety of crops, including coconuts and agricultural crops. The presence of the species has been reported in almost all the eco-tourism centres of the State.
The department had drawn up a 'Mission Bonnet macaque' as part of a 10-point programme to reduce instances of human-wildlife conflicts. The sterilisation programme, along with other initiatives, is part of the mission, said Pramod G. Krishnan, Chief Wildlife Warden (CWW), Kerala.
After wild pigs, the Bonnet macaque is the second species for which population-control measures are being proposed. Though wild pigs are being culled, there are no plans to cull the monkeys. The proposal is to sterilise the troops in specific locations and release them back into their territories. The sterilised animals will be sheltered for some time for the healing of their wounds. The State had earlier made some isolated attempts to sterilise the monkeys, said Mr. Krishnan.
The project requires the permission of the Union Ministry since the species is included in Schedule I of the Wildlife Protection Act. The species is included in Schedule 1, considering the fall in their overall population. Besides sterilisation, the department plans to implement waste management programmes in eco-tourism centres where these animals feed on leftover food. The practice of visitors feeding the animals will be thoroughly discouraged, he said.
The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) has included the species in the 'vulnerable' category considering its declining population. Studies indicate that the species faces serious population decline, even up to 65%, in some parts of its distribution range. Hunting, persecution, removal of native avenue trees, feeding by humans, and displacement by Rhesus macaques in the northern parts of the range are believed to have contributed to the decline. The presence of the species has been recorded in Andhra Pradesh, Goa, Karnataka, Kerala, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu and Gujarat, according to the IUCN assessment.
Incidentally, the Ministry had earlier shot down the proposal of the State government to classify wild pigs as vermin.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
7 hours ago
- The Hindu
Govt. urged to lay 400 kVA Padubidri-Kasaragod power transmission line underground
The Society for Forest, Environment, and Climate Change, Mangaluru, urged the government to lay the 115-km-long 400 kVA power transmission line from Padubidri in Udupi district to Kasaragod in Kerala underground using latest technology in order to save trees and protect environment. Addressing reporters here on Saturday, Benedict C. Fernandes, the society's secretary, said that such a transmission line has been laid underground in Chennai using the latest technology. If the line is installed overhead, about 1.78 lakh trees, which are in private properties, will have to be felled. In addition, about 3,000 trees on the government land will have to be cut down, he said, adding that the axing of trees will affect the environment of Dakshina Kannada and Udupi districts, he said. Mr. Fernandes said that in January, the Forest Department in Dakshina Kannada gave permission for the project proponent to fell trees on the government land. When the society challenged it before the National Green Tribunal (NGT), it stayed the move on August 1. He claimed that the project proponent has obtained only 'in-principle approval' or stage I clearance from the Union Ministry of Environment, Forest, and Climate Change. 'Final approval or stage II clearance by the Ministry is required before commencing any work on the ground,' Mr. Fernandes said. The secretary claimed that the project proponent has already erected 35 transmission towers even before obtaining stage II clearance. 'No work can commence just by obtaining stage I clearance on the Parivesh portal for projects that require forest clearance. The stage I clearance signifies that the proposal has been accepted only in principle,' he claimed. Mr. Fernandes said that if stage II clearance is obtained, the project proponent has to identify farmers who will lose their land to the project and pay them compensation, as per supplementary guidelines issued by the Union Ministry of Power on March 21, 2025. As per the guidelines, the compensation amount to be fixed should be the market value of the land, and this has to be decided by a five-member committee headed by the chairman, which, in this case, will be Deputy Commissioner. 'So far no such committee has been formed,' Mr. Fernandes said. He expressed concern that the radiation that will be emitted by the proposed transmission line would create health issues among people living in the vicinity.
Hindustan Times
2 days ago
- Hindustan Times
Wild card entries: Check out 5 species saved by the CITES agreement
There are tens of thousands of species on the CITES list — from snails and flowers to snakes, sharks, mammals, insects and trees. The list helps governments and NGOs organise their efforts, work across borders and crack down on illegal trade in wildlife products. Overfishing had nearly wiped out the humphead wrasse, in the oceans of the Indo-Pacific. (A single fish can still fetch ₹ 75,000.) (Wikimedia) And so it is that CITES (the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora) quietly works in the background to help protect… a forgotten dragonfly, a fruit bat in Madagascar, a giant butterfly that lives in only one 100-sq-km section of coastal rainforest. Take a look. , * The world's largest butterfly (Wikimedia) The Queen Alexandra's birdwing, with a wingspan of 10 to 11 inches, is found in only one 100-sq-km section of coastal rainforest, near Popondetta in Papua New Guinea. By the 1980s, it had been driven to the brink of extinction by habitat loss and by illicit trade (a single butterfly can sell for as much as $10,000, or ₹8.7 lakh, with the most avid buyers being preserved-specimen collectors, and researchers looking to study rare species). Cited as endangered on the IUCN Red List, it was included in CITES's Appendix 1 in 1987, with the result that all international commercial trade was immediately banned. In a headline-making case, a smuggler in the US was sentenced to 21 months and a fine of over $31,000 in 2007, for possession of this and other endangered insects. In 2001, a Canadian researcher was fined CA $50,000 for possession of the Queen Alexandra. The newest threat the butterfly faces is oil palm plantations. There is no known estimate of how many are left in the wild. . * The largest flying parrot (Wikimedia) The hyacinth macaw, a bright blue bird and the world's largest flying parrot, faced near-extinction in the 1980s, due to habitat loss and heavy trapping for the exotic pet trade. CITES listed the species in Appendix 1 in 1987, banning international commercial trade. This reduced global demand. Meanwhile, Brazil, Bolivia and Paraguay strengthened enforcement and habitat protection. Conservation efforts, including nest protection and ecotourism, further supported recovery. As a result, the population has more than doubled since the 1990s. There are now over 6,500 hyacinth macaws in the wild. As the rate of decline slowed, IUCN in 2014 downgraded the hyacinth macaw's threat level from endangered to vulnerable. . * King of the coral reefs The humphead wrasse, called the king of the coral reefs, is found in the oceans of the Indo-Pacific and can grow to up to 6.5 ft and weigh as much as 180 kg. Amid habitat loss, overfishing and destructive fishing techniques, the bulbous-headed blue-grey creature was cited as endangered by IUCN in 2004. Studies showed that its population had fallen by 75% in areas where commercial humphead wrasse fishing was rampant. In the ocean around Sabah, Borneo, despite local bans, populations had declined by an estimated 99% due to overfishing for export and, sadly, the fish's own low rates of reproduction. CITES declared it an Appendix 2 species in 2004, with trade to be controlled. Species numbers have risen since. The fish remains on the endangered list. A single fish can still sell for up to $850 ( ₹75,000). . * By the skin of its teeth (Wikimedia) Listed as endangered in 1967, the American alligator was hunted nearly to extinction for its skin. It would take a CITES ban on all trade in 1979, and extensive campaigning, to get people to stop wearing it on their feet and wrapping their bags in it. Population numbers have since rebounded. Protected under the Endangered Species Act in the US, its overall threat level was downgraded in 1987. It is now listed in the Least Concern category on the IUCN Red List. . * No woolly mammoth (Wikimedia) The vicuna, a South American member of the camel family and a close relative of the llama and alpaca, saw its numbers decline to about 6,000 by the late-1960s, as the animal was hunted for its valuable wool. The IUCN Red List declared it endangered. Alongside dedicated conservation efforts, CITES put it on the Appendix 1 list in 1975, and all trade in vicuna products was banned. The governments of Bolivia and Peru signed a treaty to help restore its numbers, and the governments of Chile, Ecuador and Argentina later signed on too. Specially trained rangers were deployed to protect the vicuna from poachers. By 1987, its risk level had been downgraded by IUCN from endangered to vulnerable, and licensed trade was permitted again under CITES Appendix 2 conditions. By 2012, numbers had soared past 200,000. Current estimates place the population at about 500,000. Since 2018, it has been in the Least Concern category on the IUCN Red List.
Hindustan Times
4 days ago
- Hindustan Times
Nod to denotification of 1500 ha of forest land in Telangana to relocate villages from tiger reserve
New Delhi, The environment ministry's advisory committee has recommended 'in-principle' approval to a Telangana government proposal for de-notification of 1,501.88 hectares of reserve forest land to relocate five villages from the core area of the Amrabad Tiger Reserve in Nagarkurnool district. Nod to denotification of 1500 ha of forest land in Telangana to relocate villages from tiger reserve The state government has said the relocation is voluntary and aims to consolidate wildlife habitat, reduce human-wildlife conflict and improve ecosystem protection. A total of 1,54,977 trees of 27 species will be felled for the exercise, according to the proposal. According to the agenda note considered by the committee in its meeting on July 30, the proposal sought diversion of forest land in compartments 465, 466, 467, 468, 469, 470, 471, 472 and 473 of the Bacharam Reserved Forest of Achampet Division for relocation of Kollampenta, Thatigundal Penta, Sarlapally, Kudichinthala Bailu and Vatvarlapally villages from the core area of the reserve. The proposal involves relocation in two phases. In phase I, 417 families from Sarlapally , Kudichinthala Bailu, Kollampenta and Thatigundal Penta will be shifted, requiring 546 hectares. At ₹15 lakh per family, the budget for phase I is ₹62.55 crore, according to the DFO Nagarkurnool. In phase II, 836 families from Vatvarlapally and Sarlapally will be relocated, requiring 955.88 hectares. The budget for phase II is ₹125.4 crore. The DFO informed that approvals from gram sabhas, the district level committee, the state level committee and the National Tiger Conservation Authority have been obtained. The five villages are located in the core area of the reserve notified under Section 38 of the Wildlife Act, 1972, and need to be relocated to make the core inviolate. A tiger reserve consists of two zones: the core and the buffer . According to the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, core areas must remain "inviolate for the purpose of tiger conservation". The buffer areas, in contrast, permit sustainable human activities alongside wildlife conservation. According to the minutes of the Advisory Committee meeting, the district collector and magistrate, Nagarkurnool, has certified that there is no government revenue land available in the district for relocation. The proposed site is about eight km from the core area and is outside the reserve boundary. About 207 hectares in the relocation area have plantations under schemes such as CAMPA-NFM, the state afforestation programme and the Forest Development Agency, with species including eucalyptus, pongamia, ficus and miscellaneous varieties. The NTCA approved the village relocation plans for phase I on September 13, 2024, and for phase II on July 14, 2025. The committee noted that the relocation proposal originated when the central government, in its April 21, 1994 clearance for the Srisailam Left Bank Canal tunnel project through the reserve, required that ₹16 crore from the user agency or the state government be provided to the forest department, part of which was to be used for rehabilitation of villages in the core area and part for tiger conservation. Land vacated after relocation will be brought under the protected area network by initiating notifications under the Wildlife Act, 1972, after extinguishing all rights, the proposal says. The relocation is exempt from payment of net present value and compensatory afforestation under the Van Rules, 2023. The advisory committee has recommended the proposal subject to conditions, including that the state provide alternative degraded forest land for 20 hectares of compensatory afforestation taken up under the Palamuru-Rangareddy Lift Irrigation Scheme, furnish details of schemes where funds have been allocated for relocation and give the present legal status of the five villages. The committee's recommendation comes amid criticism from environment and tribal rights organisations, which in July wrote to the environment ministry seeking withdrawal of a September 13, 2024 NTCA directive to states to expedite relocation of villages from tiger reserve cores. They said such orders could lead to coerced relocations. The NTCA maintains the process is voluntary and essential to make core areas inviolate, reduce conflict and improve habitat. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
