Ukraine says it has hit over 40 Russian strategic bombers in mass drone attack
Videos widely shared on social media show what appears to be a row of heavy bomber aircraft on fire at an undisclosed location.
According to the Ukrainian media outlets which reported the strikes, the operation, dubbed "Spiderweb" (Pavutyna), which took a year and a half to prepare, targeted four airfields: Dyagilevo in Riazan region, Ivanovo in Ivanovo region, Belaya air base in Russia's Irkutsk region, which is located in south-eastern Siberia over 4,000km east of the frontline, and Olenya air base in Russia's Murmansk region, around 2,000km away from Ukraine's border.
Apparently, the operation included the clandestine smuggling of drones deep into Russian territory, hiding them and finally launching them remotely.
In March, Ukraine announced it had developed a new type of drone that can reach a range of up to 3,000 kilometres, but gave no details about its type or the size of its warhead.
Recent satellite images show various Russian strategic bombers at the four bases that were allegedly hit during the operation, including Tu-95, Tu-22M3, Tu-160 and A-50.
Tu-95, Tu-22 and Tu-160 are Russian heavy bombers regularly used by Moscow to launch missiles at Ukraine.
The Tu-22M3 is capable of carrying Kh-22 and Kh-32 cruise missiles, travelling at a speed of 4,000 km/h, exceeding Mach 4.
Tu-95 - the oldest among them - it is a Soviet-era plane, originally used to carry nuclear bombs but since modified to launch cruise missiles.
A-50 is radar detection aircraft, which can detect air defense systems, guided missiles, and coordinate targets for Russian fighter jets.
Volodymyr Zelenskyy earlier said he was meeting with the Ministries of Defence and Foreign Affairs, as well as the General Staff and SBU.
"We are doing everything to protect our independence, our state, and our people," Zelenskyy said, adding that would be outlining "tasks for the near term" and "define our positions ahead of the meeting in Istanbul on Monday."
Ukrainian and Russian officials are schedule to meet in Istanbul on Monday 2 June for the second round of talks between the two sides.
Zelenskyy said Kyiv's utmost priority is unconditional ceasefire, followed by the release of prisoners and the return of Ukrainian children that were forcefully deported by Russia.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
30 minutes ago
- The Hill
The news media has lost control
It has been said that journalists provide the conversation of democracy. That old adage is losing steam in this era, however, as the news agenda for the nation's rhetorical sphere is increasingly being framed by many and varied new voices. For decades, the journalism establishment exercised great power in deciding the topics and issues that Americans reflected over at the kitchen table or water cooler, and eventually at the voting booth. 'The news' was what primary gatekeepers such as The Associated Press, The New York Times and CBS said was news. Americans assumed that journalists brought particular and professional expertise to the agenda-setting function. Citizens also believed these reporters were representative of the nation's population, and therefore committed to creating a sensible, fair and wide-ranging news marketplace. News consumers respected journalists and trusted that the news industry was trying to serve a greater societal purpose. Long-time and legendary CBS news anchor Walter Cronkite was once widely considered the most trusted person in the nation. But the media establishment has largely squandered this lofty role and lost the confidence of news consumers. The news agenda has become infected with activism, hyperpartisanship and, at times, superficiality. The AllSides Media Bias Chart tracks the ideological leanings of a wide range of news outlets. Precious few achieve a centrist rating. Some receive a 'leans right' label, but most establishment news outlets receive a 'leans left.' Credibility ratings for the journalism industry have suffered as a result, and news consumers are looking elsewhere for information. Perhaps even worse, some citizens are just becoming news bystanders who no longer care about being informed. This void is being increasingly filled by all kinds of other voices, including podcasters, bloggers, social media provocateurs and even fringe, bombastic miscreants. On one level, this could actually be considered a good development. It is certainly the American way that everybody gets to have their say. The constitutional framers, indeed, intended that free press and free speech rights applied broadly to the wise and even the less than wise. The marketplace of news content need not be left any more to the machinations of a handful of elite, detached editors and producers in corporate media towers. The warping of the news agenda by supposedly professional journalists no doubt opened the door for the other players to emerge. And the old-time media have not yet figured out that squeezing the agenda won't work in the wide-open marketplace of the internet. The major broadcast networks provided minimal coverage last month of Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's press briefing about a possible role of the Obama administration in the Trump-Russia collusion hoax. CNN dumped out of its coverage with a correspondent questioning whether the story deserved any time at all. Gabbard's comments deserved to be scrutinized, of course, but a DNI's pointed remarks are news. However, there are risks associated with having the nation's news agenda set by the rough and tumble atmosphere of social media, podcasters, influencers and zany characters. These actors are often more interested in buzz and vibe than deliberation and rational thinking. And now, in turn, traditional media cruise the internet looking for 'news,' trying to capitalize on the buzz of alternative agenda setters. There is little other way to explain the Coldplay concert couple or Sydney Sweeney's advertisement. And who would have figured a time when a key factor in a presidential election was which candidate did or did not go on Joe Rogan's podcast? Establishment journalism being influenced by the grassroots surely indicates a surrender by the news industry of its long-established responsibility to set an agenda of substance. Perhaps G.K. Chesterton had it right a hundred years ago when he mused, 'I am a journalist and so am vastly ignorant of many things, but because I am a journalist, I write and talk about them all.' But there should still be a key role for professional agenda-setters even in today's cluttered public sphere. Democracy and rational decision-making need an agenda based on deliberate and measured judgement, rather than chasing buzz and vibe. Professional editors and producers owe the nation a national dialogue based on relevance, high impact and perspective. A nation distracted by a shrill and superficial news agenda is unable to effectively address the serious challenges the nation faces.
Time Magazine
31 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
Trump Admin Revokes Security Clearances of These Officials
The Trump Administration has revoked the security clearances of 37 current and former U.S. government officials. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard publicly shared a memo confirming the revocation and the reasoning behind it, stating that it was carried out under the direction of President Donald Trump. According to Gabbard, the officials in question are 'intelligence professionals who have abused the public trust by politicizing and manipulating intelligence, leaking classified intelligence without authorization, and/or committing intentional egregious violations of tradecraft standards.' She did not provide evidence pertaining to this, nor did the memo. 'All personnel are reminded that holding a clearance is a privilege, not a right, and this privilege is contingent upon continued adherence to the principles and responsibilities of our profession,' read the memo. The officials, listed in the memo, will no longer have access to 'classified systems, facilities, materials, and information.' Furthermore, any 'contracts or employment' between the individuals and the U.S. government have been terminated. Some of the officials were involved in gathering information and making assessments on Russia's efforts to interfere in the 2016 U.S. election. Meanwhile, others had signed a public letter during Trump's first term, supporting calls for an impeachment inquiry into the President. Read More: Breaking Down Trump's Public Rebuke of Tulsi Gabbard's Statement on Iran There has been much conversation about purging staffers who are not deemed to be loyal to Trump. Far-right political activist and Trump ally Laura Loomer recently set up a 'tip line' whereby she asked her followers to contact her if they 'know an Obama-Biden holdover inside the Trump Admin who needs to be exposed for their misdeeds.' 'Laura Loomer is a great patriot. She's a very strong person,' Trump told reporters in April, amid questions as to the influence she may have after National Security Council staffers were fired after Loomer met with the President. 'She makes recommendations on things and people, and sometimes I listen to those recommendations, like I do with everybody. I listen to everybody, and then I make a decision.' Meanwhile, in an interview with Fox News on Tuesday, Gabbard claimed she had unclassified 'hundreds of pages' of documents detailing the 'creation of Russia-gate, this manufactured intelligence assessment that essentially had the intent of undermining the voices and votes of the American people who elected Donald Trump.' Vinh X. Nguyen, the National Security Agency's chief responsible AI officer, was among those to have his clearance revoked. The NSA official previously worked as the national intelligence officer for cyber issues during investigations into allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. Mark Zaid, a lawyer who often represents former and current government intelligence officials, has responded publicly to the Gabbard memo.'The vast majority of these individuals are not household names and are dedicated public servants who have worked across multiple presidential Administrations,' he said. 'Pure politicization of security clearance process. These are unlawful decisions that deviate from decades of precedent.' Gabbard announced in July that she was turning over evidence of an 'Obama Administration conspiracy to subvert Trump's 2016 victory and presidency' to the Department of Justice 'for criminal referral.' 'Obama himself manufactured the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax. Crooked Hillary [Clinton], Sleepy Joe [Biden], and numerous others participated in this, the crime of the century!. Irrefutable evidence.,' Trump claimed via Truth Social in the days after Gabbard's announcement. Attorney General Pam Bondi then directed the Department of Justice on Aug. 5 to probe into the origins of the investigations into Russian interference in favor of Trump during both the 2016 and 2020 elections. Read More: Trump Revokes Security Clearances for Biden, Harris, and More. Here's the Full List and What That Means In March, Trump revoked security clearances for former President Joe Biden, as well as members of the Biden family. Other high-profile Democrats, including former presidential candidate Kamala Harris, Hillary Clinton, former Secretary of State Antony Blinken, former National Security Advisor Jacob Sullivan, and former Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco also had their privileges rescinded. The President said it was 'no longer in the national interest' for these individuals to have security clearances. 'I hereby direct every executive department and agency head to take all additional action as necessary and consistent with existing law to revoke any active security clearances held by the aforementioned individuals and to immediately rescind their access to classified information,' he said in his directive.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump Hands Travel-Loving Vance Ultimate Poisoned Chalice
Donald Trump has given Vice President J.D. Vance an expanded role in coordinating a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine, in what could end up being a crucial litmus test ahead of the 2028 election. In the wake of the historic summits in Alaska and Washington, Trump announced that Vance would work with Secretary of State Marco Rubio and the president's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, to help resolve the bloody conflict in Europe. The move is believed to be the first time Vance and Rubio, who are often touted as future Republican contenders for the White House, have been brought into such a major foreign policy challenge together. But some question whether it could end up being a poisoned chalice depending on success or failure, particularly as doubts remain over Putin's desire to stop the carnage. 'At least it's a better assignment than Biden gave Kamala Harris with immigration,' said veteran political analyst Larry Sabato, referencing the former vice president's early role in trying to tackle the U.S. border crisis. Vance has been an energetic world traveler, often combining his trips with vacations. Most recently, he and Second Lady Usha Vance went to the U.K. where they met the country's foreign secretary before heading for the celebrity hotspot of the Cotswolds region of south-west England, then traveled north to Scotland where Vance played at Trump's Turnberry golf course. Other foreign trips have included Italy, the Vatican—where he was the last person to meet the late Pope Francis—and India, where his family posed in local clothes and he and his wife went to the Taj Mahal. Trump announced Vance's latest role in a Truth Social post on Monday night, after the historic meeting with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky and the leaders of France, UK, Germany, Italy, NATO and the European Commission. The Washington summit was a major breakthrough in a war that began in February 2022 and saw few signs of abating until recently. It was also a boon for Zelensky and the Europeans, whose combination of flattery and pushback staved off Trump from demanding immediate territorial concessions that Putin wanted in exchange for his cooperation. The Ukrainian president was also met with a much warmer reception than his last meeting in the Oval Office in February, which resulted in Vance berating Zelensky for not being grateful enough for America's military aid. This time, the vice president was notably silent, much to the relief of Zelensky's supporters in Europe and across social media. 'What a difference it makes when Trump is hemmed in by the adults in the room and J.D. Vance is sitting at the kids' table instead of trying to ambush Zelensky,' Democratic influencer Majid Padellan posted on X. Another pro-Trump pundit agreed, writing: 'I think they super-glued Vance's mouth shut. But overall that went better than I expected.' After the meeting, the president called Putin 'and began the arrangements for a meeting, at a location to be determined.' 'After that meeting takes place, we will have a Trilat, which would be the two Presidents, plus myself,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. 'Again, this was a very good, early step for a War that has been going on for almost four years. Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Special Envoy Steve Witkoff, are coordinating with Russia and Ukraine. Thank you for your attention to this matter!' But questions remain about Russia's willingness to negotiate an end to the war, given its foreign minister, Sergey Lavrov, played down the prospect of a direct meeting on Tuesday. It is also unclear what role America and European countries will have in protecting Ukraine through security guarantees. Trump on Tuesday ruled out putting U.S. troops in Ukraine as part of any future peace-keeping mission, but the White House remains open to providing air support to Kyiv. The issue is likely to be a balancing act for Vance, who has previously opposed further U.S. military assistance to Ukraine. The vice president has been notably quiet since Monday's summit and his office declined to comment when asked about his coordination efforts and what he hoped to achieve. He did, however, retweet Trump's Truth Social Post on Monday night and put out a post on Tuesday praising White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt for rebuking the media for its coverage about Trump's meetings. 'Karoline Leavitt lighting the American media up for lying about our negotiations with Russia and Ukraine,' he said.
