logo
Property tax row: GMC officials delay meeting minutes, councillors protest

Property tax row: GMC officials delay meeting minutes, councillors protest

Time of India26-07-2025
Ghaziabad: Ghaziabad Municipal Corporation (GMC) officials have deferred submitting the minutes of the June 30 board meeting, drawing sharp criticism from councillors protesting the recent property tax hike.
The minutes, which document the repeal of the proposed property tax hike, were to be shared publicly.
Officials blamed a basement fire at the GMC office on Friday for the delay, but councillors have alleged deliberate delay and foul play. A group of councillors had earlier staged a sit-in protest at GMC's headquarters in Navyug Market, demanding the immediate release of the meeting minutes.
"We called off the protest after officials, including municipal commissioner Vikramaditya Singh Malik, assured us that the minutes would be provided at 10am on July 25, after the kanwar yatra," said Himanshu Sharma, councillor of Ward 75.
You Can Also Check:
Noida AQI
|
Weather in Noida
|
Bank Holidays in Noida
|
Public Holidays in Noida
"The officials missed the deadline, and mysteriously, the same afternoon, the basement of the GMC office was gutted in a fire. Now officials are saying that no work could be carried out at the office because the fire disrupted operations, preventing them from sharing the minutes on the assured date. This is a very uncanny coincidence," added Sharma.
Meanwhile, Mayor Sunita Dayal said, "I was told that officials would share the minutes with my office at 10 am on Friday, but I have not received them.
I ensured that the hike in property tax proposal was annulled, and it is for the officials now to answer anything related to the matter."
In response, commissioner Malik has formed a committee led by additional municipal commissioner Jung Bahadur to ascertain the cause of the fire. "Minutes of the meeting could not be provided on the scheduled date because of the fire, and to rule out any foul play, the commissioner has formed a committee to probe the incident.
Instructions have been issued to normalise working at GMC as soon as possible. The minutes of the meeting will be provided after that," said a GMC official.
On the issue of property tax, a case was filed in the Allahabad High Court against GMC's decision to impose a hike, and the court is due to hear the matter on July 30. The hike in property taxes took effect on April 1. The property tax rates before April 1 were between Rs 0.32/sq foot on properties with less than 12m of road width, Rs 0.48 to Rs 2 for roads 12–24 metres wide, and Rs 0.65 to Rs 2.41 for wider roads. The revised rate is between Rs 0.75/sq foot to Rs 4/sq foot.
In March this year, the board passed the proposal to link tax with the DM circle rate. GMC calculates tax based on the annual rental value (ARV) of a property.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Supreme Court Questions Rahul Gandhi's Patriotism Over China Territory Claims, Stays Defamation Case
Supreme Court Questions Rahul Gandhi's Patriotism Over China Territory Claims, Stays Defamation Case

Hans India

time8 minutes ago

  • Hans India

Supreme Court Questions Rahul Gandhi's Patriotism Over China Territory Claims, Stays Defamation Case

The Supreme Court delivered sharp criticism to Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on Monday regarding his assertions that China had seized over 2,000 square kilometers of Indian territory. The justices questioned whether a genuine patriot would make such statements, though they simultaneously halted defamation legal proceedings against the Leader of Opposition. The controversy stems from Gandhi's statements during his 2022 Bharat Jodo Yatra, where he alleged that Chinese forces had occupied significant portions of Indian land and were physically attacking Indian military personnel in Arunachal Pradesh. The Supreme Court bench, comprising Justices Dipankar Datta and Augustine George Masih, expressed skepticism about the source of Gandhi's information regarding the territorial claims. The justices questioned Gandhi's approach as the Leader of Opposition, suggesting that such concerns should be raised within Parliament rather than through public statements. They emphasized that his position carries significant responsibility and questioned why he would make such assertions publicly instead of utilizing proper parliamentary channels. Gandhi had approached the Supreme Court after the Allahabad High Court rejected his petition in May, which challenged both the summoning order and the criminal complaint filed against him. The High Court had previously ruled that freedom of speech does not provide protection for statements that defame the military forces. The original complaint was filed by Udai Shanker Srivastava, who accused Gandhi of making disparaging comments about the Indian Army during his political campaign. The complainant alleged that Gandhi's remarks were made in the context of ongoing border tensions with China and were detrimental to the armed forces' reputation. During a 2022 press conference in Rajasthan, Gandhi had criticized the ruling party for allegedly ignoring China's territorial advances and military aggression. He claimed that while media attention focused on internal political matters, insufficient attention was given to what he described as China's capture of Indian territory and violence against Indian soldiers. Gandhi reiterated similar claims in January 2023 while in Jammu and Kashmir, stating that former military officials had corroborated his assertions about territorial loss. He mentioned meeting with retired army personnel and a delegation from Ladakh who allegedly confirmed that Chinese forces had taken control of significant Indian territory. The Congress leader also claimed that former military personnel informed him that numerous patrolling points previously under Indian control had been permanently occupied by Chinese forces. These statements formed the basis of the defamation case filed in Uttar Pradesh, which led to a trial court issuing summons against Gandhi. After receiving the summons, Gandhi approached the Allahabad High Court seeking to have both the proceedings and the summons dismissed. However, the High Court rejected his petition, leading to his appeal to the Supreme Court. The case highlights the delicate balance between political criticism and statements that may be perceived as harmful to national interests or military morale. While the Supreme Court has stayed the defamation proceedings, the justices' comments reflect concerns about the appropriateness of Gandhi's public statements regarding sensitive border issues. The matter underscores ongoing political tensions regarding India's border management and the role of opposition leaders in addressing national security concerns. The Supreme Court's intervention suggests that while legal proceedings have been paused, questions remain about the proper channels for raising such sensitive issues in India's democratic framework.

Shankaracharya seeks cows' entry into Parliament: If there is a delay...
Shankaracharya seeks cows' entry into Parliament: If there is a delay...

India Today

time29 minutes ago

  • India Today

Shankaracharya seeks cows' entry into Parliament: If there is a delay...

Shankaracharya Avimukteshwaranand has said that a cow should have been taken into the new Parliament building at Central Vista during its inauguration."If a statue of a cow can enter Parliament, why can't a living cow be taken inside?" he asked reporters on seer said the Sengol held by Prime Minister Narendra Modi while entering the new Parliament building showed a cow engraved on the "A real cow should have also been taken into the building to bestow blessings. If there is a delay, we will take cows from all over the country and bring them to Parliament," he said, adding this would ensure the PM and the building receive the blessings of a real Sengol is installed in the Lower House of the also demanded that the Maharashtra government immediately frame a protocol on cow felicitation."The state has not yet declared how to honour the cow. It should finalise a protocol so that people can follow it, and also fix penalties for its violation," he Shankaracharya demanded that every assembly constituency in India have a "Ramadham" — a cow shelter accommodating 100 cows."A total of 4,123 Ramadhams will be built across the country. The shelters will focus on daily cow service, protection, and promoting indigenous breeds," he following the protocol while caring for cows would be financially rewarded."A person taking care of 100 cows will receive Rs 2 lakh per month," he Hindu pontiff further said that the Dharma Sansad has passed a congratulatory resolution in support of Hoshangabad MP Darshan Singh Chowdhary, who has demanded that the cow be declared as Rashtramata (Mother of the Nation).Shankaracharya said people should support only those candidates who protect cows and work for legislation in their interest."The present regime has not yet satisfied us. Cow slaughter must be completely stopped in India," he the language controversy, he said, "Hindi was first recognised for administrative use. The Marathi-speaking state was formed in 1960, and Marathi was recognised later. Hindi represents several dialects — the same applies to Marathi, which has borrowed from its dialects."The seer said any violence should be treated as a criminal demanded justice in the Malegaon blast case, stating that the real culprits must be punished."It is ridiculous that the government is celebrating Amrit Kaal while cows who provide us with milk are being slaughtered. Those in government cannot be called our brothers unless they stand in support of cows," he said.- EndsMust Watch

Russia's RS-28 Sarmat: The Missile That Can Strike Over The Poles, Outrange US And China
Russia's RS-28 Sarmat: The Missile That Can Strike Over The Poles, Outrange US And China

News18

time32 minutes ago

  • News18

Russia's RS-28 Sarmat: The Missile That Can Strike Over The Poles, Outrange US And China

The RS-28 Sarmat, or 'Satan 2,' is a Russian ICBM with an 18,000 km range, capable of carrying multiple nuclear warheads, designed to outmatch US and Chinese missile systems As tensions escalate between the United States and Russia, the spotlight is back on one of the deadliest weapons in Russia's nuclear arsenal, the RS-28 Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM), dubbed 'Satan 2' by NATO. The missile, a cornerstone of Russian President Vladimir Putin's strategic deterrence doctrine, is designed to outmatch US and Chinese missile systems in both range and payload capacity. The resurfaced interest follows reports that the US has deployed two nuclear submarines near Russian waters, prompting Moscow to flex its own strategic capabilities. Russian officials have repeatedly touted the Sarmat as a weapon that renders Western defence systems obsolete. What Makes RS-28 Sarmat So Dangerous? The Sarmat is a super-heavy, liquid-fueled ICBM developed by Russia's Makeyev Rocket Design Bureau. Intended to replace the Soviet-era R-36M (SS-18 Satan), it took shape as a project in the early 2000s, with its first successful test conducted on April 20, 2022. One of the most formidable aspects of this missile is its range, estimated at up to 18,000 kms, which allows it to strike virtually any point on Earth, including targets across the North and South Poles. This unique capability has led to concerns in Western military circles about the difficulty of intercepting such a trajectory. In terms of physical dimensions, the RS-28 weighs 208 tonnes and measures 35 metres in length. But what truly sets it apart is its payload capacity. The missile can carry 10 to 15 nuclear warheads through its Multiple Independently Targetable Reentry Vehicle (MIRV) system. Some variants are expected to be equipped with Avangard hypersonic glide vehicles, capable of maneuvering mid-flight to evade missile defence shields. Its speed is estimated at over Mach 20, placing it well within the hypersonic category, which further complicates detection and interception efforts by traditional radar and satellite-based early warning systems. Strategic Implications Russia's deployment of the RS-28 Sarmat is widely interpreted as a direct challenge to US and NATO missile capabilities. It significantly outperforms the American LGM-30G Minuteman III (with a range of around 13,000 km) and China's DF-41 (range: 12,000–15,000 km), particularly in terms of both distance and payload. The missile is designed with a primary focus on deterrence against the US and NATO, but analysts believe it also represents a threat to countries such as Ukraine, Japan, and Australia, given its role within Russia's broader nuclear doctrine. Strengths vs Weaknesses Strengths Weaknesses While Russia projects the RS-28 Sarmat as a 'game-changer" in global strategic balance, its deployment also signals a renewed arms race in long-range nuclear missile technology. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! view comments Location : Russia First Published: August 04, 2025, 13:03 IST News world Russia's RS-28 Sarmat: The Missile That Can Strike Over The Poles, Outrange US And China Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store