'Rembrandt to Vermeer' exhibition marks Amsterdam's 750th anniversary
The "From Rembrandt to Vermeer, Masterpieces from The Leiden Collection" is on show from Wednesday to August 24 at the H'ART Museum in the city centre.
The museum describes the exhibition as "a unique and intimate glimpse into the 17th-century Netherlands through the eyes of the great Dutch Masters."
Other artists include Frans Hals, Jan Steen, Ferdinand Bol, Gerard Dou and Frans van Mieris.
The exhibition includes the only Vermeer still in private hands - "A Young woman Seated at the Virginals."
The exhibition sketches many facets of Amsterdam life, highlighting everything from food, drink, reading and music to aging, parenting and the art of portraiture and self-portraiture.
It includes character studies of people from various backgrounds, at the market, in the pub or in their homes.
The focus is formed by 17 paintings and one drawing by Rembrandt, who moved to Amsterdam from Leiden in 1630.
The US-French art collector Thomas Kaplan has been fascinated by Rembrandt since childhood and has assembled "The Leiden Collection"in the artist's honour.
The H'ART website notes that the exhibition depicts many women, from wealthy matrons to goddesses to ordinary citizens.
"Particularly noteworthy is the inclusion of a painting by Maria Schalcken, one of the few women in her time known to be working as a painter," it adds. —dpa
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Observer
20-07-2025
- Observer
France museum-goer eats million-dollar banana taped to wall
A visitor to a French museum bit into a fresh banana worth millions of dollars taped to a wall last week, exhibitors said on Friday, in the latest such consumption of the conceptual artwork. Italian artist Maurizio Cattelan -- whose provocative creation entitled "Comedian" was bought for $6.2 million in New York last year -- said he was disappointed the person did not also eat the skin and the tape. After the hungry visitor struck on Saturday last week, "security staff rapidly and calmly intervened," the Pompidou-Metz museum in eastern France said. The work was "reinstalled within minutes", it added. "As the fruit is perishable, it is regularly replaced according to instructions from the artist." Cattelan noted the banana-eater had "confused the fruit for the work of art". "Instead of eating the banana with its skin and duct tape, the visitor just consumed the fruit," he said. Cattelan's edible creation has sparked controversy ever since it made its debut at the 2019 Art Basel show in Miami Beach. He has explained the banana work as a commentary on the art market, which he has criticised in the past for being speculative and failing to help artists. The New York Post said the asking price of $120,000 for "Comedian" in 2019 was evidence that the market was "bananas" and the art world had "gone mad". It has been eaten before. Performance artist David Datuna ate "Comedian" in 2019, saying he felt "hungry" while inspecting it at the Miami show. Chinese-born crypto founder Justin Sun last year forked out $6.2 million for the work, then ate it in front of cameras. As well as his banana work, Cattelan is also known for producing an 18-carat, fully functioning gold toilet called "America" that was offered to Donald Trump during his first term in the White House. A British court in March found two men guilty of stealing it during an exhibition in 2020 in the United Kingdom, from an 18th-century stately home that was the birthplace of wartime prime minister Winston Churchill. It was split up into parts and none of the gold was ever recovered. —AFP
Muscat Daily
16-07-2025
- Muscat Daily
Oman hosts film contest dedicated to Palestine
Muscat – A short film competition dedicated to amplifying the Palestinian narrative concluded in Muscat on Tuesday with entries from Gaza taking the top honours. Titled 'Lens on Palestine', the competition was launched in October 2024 as a first-of-its-kind initiative in the sultanate. Organised by Al Istiqama TV in partnership with Oman Film Society, the event drew over 100 entries from across the region, with 37 shortlisted films from 11 countries making it to the final round. The contest aimed to offer filmmakers a platform to present visual accounts of Palestinian history, daily life, cultural identity and political realities. Each film ranged between four and ten minutes, offering a compact but powerful expression of the Palestinian cause. The jury comprised filmmakers and cultural figures from Oman, Jordan, Palestine and Egypt. Representing Oman was Jamil bin Saeed al Yaqoobi, a veteran director and co-founder of Oman Film Society, known for celebrated works like Khalf al Kawalis, Nuz and the documentary Madrasat al Islah . Speaking at the event on Tuesday, Yaqoobi said the competition was in response to 'the urgent need to convey the Palestinian narrative to global audiences' and 'shed light on the daily human suffering under continuous violations and the ongoing Israeli war in Gaza'. The top three awards were won by Palestinian entries. Void by director Hussam Hamdi Abu Dan claimed the first prize of US$18,000. In a Moment by director Aseel al Waddiya took second place, earning US$13,000, while Palestine's Lens by director Hamdi Khalil al Hussein received the third and US$7,500. Individual awards also reflected the competence of entries from Palestine. Ziad Jarr won for Best Screenplay and Best Editing, while Hussam Hamdi received the Best Actor award. Clara al Banati was named Best Director. Twenty additional films were each awarded US$500 in recognition of their originality and contribution to the competition's goals. Prior to the closing ceremony, a two-day workshop was held for participants, covering the basics of scripting, direction and editing led by filmmaking professionals. Al Istiqama TV confirmed that a second edition of the competition is planned, dates of which will be announced later this year. Organisers said the strong response from the region reaffirmed the importance of cinema as a tool for advocacy and cultural expression.
Observer
08-07-2025
- Observer
Jonathan Anderson Sets a New Dressing Agenda at Dior
A photo of Christian Dior's original salon stretched the width of the Invalides, the gold-domed palace where Napoleon is buried, offering a fish-eye view of the past to the throngs shrieking outside — and a sign of just where Dior believes it belongs in the pantheon of French power. Inside, dove-gray velvet lined the walls of a temporary event space and displayed two rare 18th-century oils by Jean Siméon Chardin on loan from the National Galleries of Scotland and the Louvre. Robert Pattinson gossiped with Josh O'Connor. Donatella Versace schmoozed with Roger Federer. A pregnant Rihanna arrived with A$AP Rocky a mere 45 minutes after the official start time. That's how much anticipation there was for the Dior men's show. Filmmaker Luca Guadagnino was even trailing around to document the moment. It was Jonathan Anderson's debut as the creative director/savior of the house, the first designer to be put in charge of both menswear and womenswear. And under all the buzz, a giant question mark hovered: Could the former Loewe wunderkind reignite excitement not just in the brand but in fashion? Anderson made it look easy. Literally. Beginning with his take on the Bar jacket, the most famous Dior womenswear shape — the one that prompted Harper's Bazaar editor Carmel Snow to jump out of her seat shrieking, 'It's a New Look!' in 1947. It was reimagined in a Donegal tweed with a flat back and a whiff of the hourglass at the front, as if it retained a vague memory of what it once was. With it, he paired not a shirt but a stiff white stock collar and a pair of oversize white cotton cargo shorts, each side sporting elaborate folds to create the plumped out silhouette of a goose, or a 1948 couture dress called the Delft. Go on, shake your tail feathers. If little Lord Fauntleroy had spent a year at the University of Southern California and then returned for a pickup game of basketball at Versailles, this is how he might dress. It was not a capital N New Look. It wasn't that radical, or shocking. But it was an awfully charming newish one. And it was situated smack in the middle of the tension between formality and informality, menswear and womenswear, commerce and creativity (Anderson's own work at Loewe and Uniqlo and what he inherited at Dior), which seems to define this particular moment. Jonathan Andersons take on the Bar jacket, Diors most famous womens wear shape, is paired with cargo shorts at the Dior spring 2026 fashion show in Milan in June 2025. (Simbarashe Cha/The New York Times) No one is all one thing or another. Neither are their clothes. Neither are the totems of wealth. What Anderson proposed was a clear and convincing argument that contradictions can gracefully coexist. Most of all, he put forward the belief that fashion and wearability are not irreconcilable ideas — that you either have to look bizarro or look boring. For every highfalutin garment there was an equal and opposite this-old-thing, usually worn together. Velvet frock coats were paired with faded jeans in Japanese denim. Olive green puffer coats and down vests were cut with trapeze backs. The exact pattern of another classic Dior dress, the Caprice, with its elaborately swathed peplum skirt, was applied to a pair of loose khakis, giving one leg the fillip of a drape. An 18th-century frock coat was exactingly reproduced — in moleskin. There were shamrocks on tennis shoes and high-tops with driving shoe soles; cable knits under elaborate waist coats. There was a lot of neck action. Book totes borrowed, again, from the women's line, with actual book titles on them from Baudelaire and Françoise Sagan. Anderson had clearly done his homework. Easter eggs to early Dior were everywhere. Even the labels inside the clothes were in the designer's preferred silk faille. He was never going to toss everything out the window and start again. He couldn't. Dior is a multibillion-dollar business, after all, and some of his predecessors (Raf Simons, Hedi Slimane, John Galliano) were his idols. Once upon a time, a designer might have had the arrogance to wipe the slate clean, but this is a new age. The industry is in crisis, and the creative tectonic plates are shifting. It is why Anderson invited seemingly every other designer in Paris to join him at the show. It is also why he picked the Chardin oils and why he seeded his Instagram with Warhol Polaroids of Lee Radziwill and Jean-Michel Basquiat. Chardin, he said in a preview, 'kind of loosened up the still life'; Warhol made pop culture high art. Both crystallized an inflection point in culture. Anderson clearly wants his Dior to do the same. His show invitation came borne on a china plate with three china eggs on top, as if a reminder that the menswear was just the beginning (and maybe to acknowledge that some shells may get broken along the way). Fair enough. The result may not knock you sideways, but it's likely to make you sit up and buy. Not to mention whetting the appetite for his first womenswear collection, come September.
